From: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>
To: Praveen Shetty <praveen.shetty@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"declan.doherty@intel.com" <declan.doherty@intel.com>
Cc: "bernard.iremonger@intel.com" <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>,
"konstantin.ananyev@intel.com" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH v3] examples/ipsec-secgw: support flow director feature
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 13:39:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MN2PR18MB287707598EB141F41332AE89DFC60@MN2PR18MB2877.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200331130211.24761-1-praveen.shetty@intel.com>
Hi Praveen,
I've few minor comments. Please see inline.
Thanks,
Anoob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Praveen Shetty <praveen.shetty@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 6:32 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; declan.doherty@intel.com; Anoob Joseph
> <anoobj@marvell.com>
> Cc: bernard.iremonger@intel.com; konstantin.ananyev@intel.com
> Subject: [EXT] [PATCH v3] examples/ipsec-secgw: support flow director feature
>
> External Email
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Support load distribution in security gateway application using NIC load
> distribution feature(Flow Director).
> Flow Director is used to redirect the specified inbound ipsec flow to a specified
> queue.This is achieved by extending the SA rule syntax to support specification
> by adding new action_type of <flow-direction> to a specified <port_id>
> <queue_id>.
>
> Signed-off-by: Praveen Shetty <praveen.shetty@intel.com>
> ---
> v3 changes:
> Incorporated Anoob review comments on v2.
>
> examples/ipsec-secgw/ep0.cfg | 11 +++++
> examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.h | 9 ++++
> examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 5 files changed, 211 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ep0.cfg b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ep0.cfg
> index dfd4aca7d..6f8d5aa53 100644
> --- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ep0.cfg
> +++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ep0.cfg
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ sp ipv4 in esp protect 111 pri 1 dst 192.168.186.0/24 sport
> 0:65535 dport 0:6553 sp ipv4 in esp protect 115 pri 1 dst 192.168.210.0/24 sport
> 0:65535 dport 0:65535 sp ipv4 in esp protect 116 pri 1 dst 192.168.211.0/24
> sport 0:65535 dport 0:65535 sp ipv4 in esp protect 115 pri 1 dst
> 192.168.210.0/24 sport 0:65535 dport 0:65535
> +sp ipv4 in esp protect 117 pri 1 dst 192.168.212.0/24 sport 0:65535
> +dport 0:65535
> sp ipv4 in esp protect 125 pri 1 dst 192.168.65.0/24 sport 0:65535 dport 0:65535
> sp ipv4 in esp protect 125 pri 1 dst 192.168.65.0/24 sport 0:65535 dport 0:65535
> sp ipv4 in esp protect 126 pri 1 dst 192.168.66.0/24 sport 0:65535 dport 0:65535
> @@ -61,6 +62,8 @@ sp ipv6 in esp protect 125 pri 1 dst
> ffff:0000:0000:0000:aaaa:aaaa:0000:0000/96
> sport 0:65535 dport 0:65535
> sp ipv6 in esp protect 126 pri 1 dst
> ffff:0000:0000:0000:bbbb:bbbb:0000:0000/96 \ sport 0:65535 dport 0:65535
> +sp ipv6 in esp protect 127 pri 1 dst
> +ffff:0000:0000:0000:cccc:dddd:0000:0000/96 \ sport 0:65535 dport
> +0:65535
>
> #SA rules
> sa out 5 cipher_algo aes-128-cbc cipher_key 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0 \
> @@ -118,6 +121,9 @@ dst 172.16.1.5
>
> sa in 116 cipher_algo null auth_algo null mode ipv4-tunnel src 172.16.2.6 dst
> 172.16.1.6
>
> +sa in 117 cipher_algo null auth_algo null mode ipv4-tunnel src
> +172.16.2.7 \ dst 172.16.1.7 flow-direction 0 2
> +
> sa in 125 cipher_algo aes-128-cbc cipher_key c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:\
> c3:c3:c3:c3:c3 auth_algo sha1-hmac auth_key
> c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:\
> c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3 mode ipv6-tunnel \ @@ -130,6 +136,11 @@ sa in
> 126 cipher_algo aes-128-cbc cipher_key 4d:4d:4d:4d:4d:4d:4d:4d:4d:4d:4d:\
> src 2222:2222:2222:2222:2222:2222:2222:6666 \ dst
> 1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:6666
>
> +sa in 127 cipher_algo null auth_algo null mode ipv6-tunnel \ src
> +2222:2222:2222:2222:2222:2222:2222:7777 \ dst
> +1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:7777 \ flow-direction 0 3
> +
> #Routing rules
> rt ipv4 dst 172.16.2.5/32 port 0
> rt ipv4 dst 172.16.2.6/32 port 1
> diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c b/examples/ipsec-
> secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
> index ce36e6d9c..4400b075c 100644
> --- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
> +++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
> @@ -246,6 +246,30 @@ static struct rte_eth_conf port_conf = {
> .txmode = {
> .mq_mode = ETH_MQ_TX_NONE,
> },
> + .fdir_conf = {
> + .mode = RTE_FDIR_MODE_NONE,
> + .pballoc = RTE_FDIR_PBALLOC_64K,
> + .status = RTE_FDIR_REPORT_STATUS,
> + .mask = {
> + .vlan_tci_mask = 0xFFEF,
> + .ipv4_mask = {
> + .src_ip = 0xFFFFFFFF,
> + .dst_ip = 0xFFFFFFFF,
> + },
> + .ipv6_mask = {
> + .src_ip = {0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFF,
> + 0xFFFFFFFF},
> + .dst_ip = {0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFF,
> + 0xFFFFFFFF},
> + },
> + .src_port_mask = 0xFFFF,
> + .dst_port_mask = 0xFFFF,
> + .mac_addr_byte_mask = 0xFF,
> + .tunnel_type_mask = 1,
> + .tunnel_id_mask = 0xFFFFFFFF,
> + },
> + .drop_queue = 127,
> + }
> };
>
> struct socket_ctx socket_ctx[NB_SOCKETS]; @@ -1183,6 +1207,28 @@
> ipsec_poll_mode_worker(void)
> }
> }
>
> +int
> +check_flow_params(uint16_t fdir_portid, uint8_t fdir_qid) {
> + uint16_t i;
> + uint16_t portid;
> + uint8_t queueid;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < nb_lcore_params; ++i) {
> + portid = lcore_params_array[i].port_id;
> + if (portid == fdir_portid) {
> + queueid = lcore_params_array[i].queue_id;
> + if (queueid == fdir_qid)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (i == nb_lcore_params - 1)
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> static int32_t
> check_poll_mode_params(struct eh_conf *eh_conf) { @@ -2813,6 +2859,15
> @@ main(int32_t argc, char **argv)
>
> sa_check_offloads(portid, &req_rx_offloads[portid],
> &req_tx_offloads[portid]);
> + /* check if FDIR is configured on the port */
> + if (check_fdir_configured(portid)) {
> + /* Enable FDIR */
> + port_conf.fdir_conf.mode =
> RTE_FDIR_MODE_PERFECT;
> + /* Disable RSS */
> + port_conf.rxmode.mq_mode = ETH_MQ_RX_NONE;
> + port_conf.rx_adv_conf.rss_conf.rss_hf = 0;
> + port_conf.rx_adv_conf.rss_conf.rss_key = NULL;
> + }
> port_init(portid, req_rx_offloads[portid],
> req_tx_offloads[portid]);
> }
> diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c index
> d40657102..76ee9dbcf 100644
> --- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c
> +++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c
> @@ -418,6 +418,73 @@ create_inline_session(struct socket_ctx *skt_ctx,
> struct ipsec_sa *sa,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +int
> +create_ipsec_esp_flow(struct ipsec_sa *sa) {
> + int ret = 0;
> + struct rte_flow_error err;
> + if (sa->direction == RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_EGRESS)
> + return 0; /* No Flow director rules for Egress traffic */
[Anoob] Any reason why this is not relevant for Egress.
As for the code I would suggest something like,
/* No flow director rules for Egress traffic */
if (sa->direction == RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_EGRESS)
return 0;
...
> + if (sa->flags == TRANSPORT) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, IPSEC,
> + "No Flow director rule for transport mode:");
[Anoob] Is the ending : required in the line above? And do might need a \n?
Also, why is one case returning 0 (EGRESS) and another (TRANSPORT) is returning -1? One is treated as error and other is not?
> + return -1;
> + }
> + sa->action[0].type = RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_QUEUE;
> + sa->pattern[0].type = RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ETH;
> + sa->action[0].conf =
> + &(struct rte_flow_action_queue){
> + .index = sa->fdir_qid,
> + };
> + sa->attr.egress = 0;
> + sa->attr.ingress = 1;
> + if (IS_IP6(sa->flags)) {
> + sa->pattern[1].mask = &rte_flow_item_ipv6_mask;
> + sa->pattern[1].type = RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV6;
> + sa->pattern[1].spec = &sa->ipv6_spec;
> + memcpy(sa->ipv6_spec.hdr.dst_addr,
> + sa->dst.ip.ip6.ip6_b, sizeof(sa->dst.ip.ip6.ip6_b));
> + memcpy(sa->ipv6_spec.hdr.src_addr,
> + sa->src.ip.ip6.ip6_b, sizeof(sa->src.ip.ip6.ip6_b));
> + sa->pattern[2].type = RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ESP;
> + sa->pattern[2].spec = &sa->esp_spec;
> + sa->pattern[2].mask = &rte_flow_item_esp_mask;
> + sa->esp_spec.hdr.spi = rte_cpu_to_be_32(sa->spi);
> + sa->pattern[3].type = RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_END;
> + } else if (IS_IP4(sa->flags)) {
> + sa->pattern[1].mask = &rte_flow_item_ipv4_mask;
> + sa->pattern[1].type = RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV4;
> + sa->pattern[1].spec = &sa->ipv4_spec;
> + sa->ipv4_spec.hdr.dst_addr = sa->dst.ip.ip4;
> + sa->ipv4_spec.hdr.src_addr = sa->src.ip.ip4;
> + sa->pattern[2].type = RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ESP;
> + sa->pattern[2].spec = &sa->esp_spec;
> + sa->pattern[2].mask = &rte_flow_item_esp_mask;
> + sa->esp_spec.hdr.spi = rte_cpu_to_be_32(sa->spi);
> + sa->pattern[3].type = RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_END;
> + }
> + sa->action[1].type = RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END;
> +
> + ret = rte_flow_validate(sa->portid, &sa->attr,
> + sa->pattern, sa->action,
> + &err);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, IPSEC,
> + "Flow Validation failed\n");
[Anoob] The above should fit into one line. Also V should be small.
> + return ret;
> + }
> + sa->flow = rte_flow_create(sa->portid,
> + &sa->attr, sa->pattern, sa->action,
> + &err);
[Anoob] Start breaking into multiple lines when you exceed 80 char limits. In the earlier line, &sa->attr should fit into the line above.
Also, having a blank line above rte_flow_create() line would be good.
> + if (!sa->flow) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, IPSEC,
> + "Flow Creation failed\n");
[Anoob] Above should fit into one line. Also C should be small.
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * queue crypto-ops into PMD queue.
> */
> diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.h b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.h
> index f8f29f9b1..b0e9f45cb 100644
> --- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.h
> +++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.h
> @@ -144,6 +144,8 @@ struct ipsec_sa {
> };
> enum rte_security_ipsec_sa_direction direction;
> uint16_t portid;
> + uint8_t fdir_qid;
> + uint8_t fdir_flag;
>
> #define MAX_RTE_FLOW_PATTERN (4)
> #define MAX_RTE_FLOW_ACTIONS (3)
> @@ -408,5 +410,12 @@ create_lookaside_session(struct ipsec_ctx *ipsec_ctx,
> struct ipsec_sa *sa, int create_inline_session(struct socket_ctx *skt_ctx, struct
> ipsec_sa *sa,
> struct rte_ipsec_session *ips);
> +int
> +check_flow_params(uint16_t fdir_portid, uint8_t fdir_qid);
> +
> +int
> +create_ipsec_esp_flow(struct ipsec_sa *sa);
>
> +int
> +check_fdir_configured(uint16_t portid);
> #endif /* __IPSEC_H__ */
> diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c b/examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c index
> 0eb52d141..ddd275142 100644
> --- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c
> +++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c
> @@ -271,6 +271,7 @@ parse_sa_tokens(char **tokens, uint32_t n_tokens,
> uint32_t type_p = 0;
> uint32_t portid_p = 0;
> uint32_t fallback_p = 0;
> + int16_t status_p = 0;
>
> if (strcmp(tokens[0], "in") == 0) {
> ri = &nb_sa_in;
> @@ -295,6 +296,7 @@ parse_sa_tokens(char **tokens, uint32_t n_tokens,
> if (atoi(tokens[1]) == INVALID_SPI)
> return;
> rule->spi = atoi(tokens[1]);
> + rule->portid = UINT16_MAX;
> ips = ipsec_get_primary_session(rule);
>
> for (ti = 2; ti < n_tokens; ti++) {
> @@ -636,9 +638,14 @@ parse_sa_tokens(char **tokens, uint32_t n_tokens,
> INCREMENT_TOKEN_INDEX(ti, n_tokens, status);
> if (status->status < 0)
> return;
> - rule->portid = atoi(tokens[ti]);
> - if (status->status < 0)
> + if (rule->portid == UINT16_MAX)
> + rule->portid = atoi(tokens[ti]);
> + else if (rule->portid != atoi(tokens[ti])) {
> + APP_CHECK(0, status, "portid %s "
> + "not matching with already assigned portid
> %u",
> + tokens[ti], rule->portid);
> return;
[Anoob] Alignment for APP_CHECK's broken up parts are not following the convention.
> + }
> portid_p = 1;
> continue;
> }
> @@ -681,6 +688,43 @@ parse_sa_tokens(char **tokens, uint32_t n_tokens,
> fallback_p = 1;
> continue;
> }
> + if (strcmp(tokens[ti], "flow-direction") == 0) {
> + if (ips->type ==
> +
> RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_INLINE_PROTOCOL ||
> + ips->type ==
> +
> RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_LOOKASIDE_PROTOCOL ||
> + ips->type ==
> +
> RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_INLINE_CRYPTO) {
> + APP_CHECK(0, status, "Flow Director not "
> + "supported for security session "
> + "type:%d", ips->type);
> + return;
> + }
> + rule->fdir_flag = 1;
> + INCREMENT_TOKEN_INDEX(ti, n_tokens, status);
> + if (status->status < 0)
> + return;
> + if (rule->portid == UINT16_MAX)
> + rule->portid = atoi(tokens[ti]);
> + else if (rule->portid != atoi(tokens[ti])) {
> + APP_CHECK(0, status, "portid %s "
> + "not matching with already assigned portid
> %u",
> + tokens[ti], rule->portid);
> + return;
> + }
> + INCREMENT_TOKEN_INDEX(ti, n_tokens, status);
> + if (status->status < 0)
> + return;
> + rule->fdir_qid = atoi(tokens[ti]);
> + /* validating portid and queueid */
> + status_p = check_flow_params(rule->portid,
> + rule->fdir_qid);
> + if (status_p < 0) {
> + printf("port id %u / queue id %u is not valid\n",
> + rule->portid, rule->fdir_qid);
> + }
> + continue;
> + }
>
> /* unrecognizeable input */
> APP_CHECK(0, status, "unrecognized input \"%s\"", @@ -719,7
> +763,6 @@ parse_sa_tokens(char **tokens, uint32_t n_tokens,
> if (!type_p || (!portid_p && ips->type !=
> RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_CPU_CRYPTO)) {
> ips->type = RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_NONE;
> - rule->portid = -1;
> }
>
> *ri = *ri + 1;
> @@ -823,6 +866,9 @@ print_one_sa_rule(const struct ipsec_sa *sa, int
> inbound)
> break;
> }
> }
> + if (sa->fdir_flag == 1)
> + printf("flow-direction %d %d", sa->portid, sa->fdir_qid);
> +
> printf("\n");
> }
>
> @@ -1141,6 +1187,12 @@ sa_add_rules(struct sa_ctx *sa_ctx, const struct
> ipsec_sa entries[],
> }
> }
>
> + if (sa->fdir_flag && inbound) {
> + rc = create_ipsec_esp_flow(sa);
> + if (rc != 0)
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, IPSEC_ESP,
> + "create_ipsec_esp flow failed\n");
[Anoob] Instead of function name, can you give the description of what actually failed?
> + }
> print_one_sa_rule(sa, inbound);
> }
>
> @@ -1243,6 +1295,20 @@ fill_ipsec_session(struct rte_ipsec_session *ss, struct
> rte_ipsec_sa *sa)
> return rc;
> }
>
> +int
> +check_fdir_configured(uint16_t portid)
> +{
> + struct ipsec_sa *sa = NULL;
> + uint32_t idx_sa = 0;
> +
> + for (idx_sa = 0; idx_sa < nb_sa_in; idx_sa++) {
> + sa = &sa_in[idx_sa];
> + if (sa->portid == portid)
> + return sa->fdir_flag;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Initialise related rte_ipsec_sa object.
> */
> --
> 2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-02 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-11 14:55 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] " Praveen Shetty
2020-03-12 11:00 ` Anoob Joseph
[not found] ` <BN7PR11MB25310A9A6B9C3BE91A411AA29DFD0@BN7PR11MB2531.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
[not found] ` <BN7PR11MB2531E92F9B078563A947615F9DFD0@BN7PR11MB2531.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
[not found] ` <BN7PR11MB2531ABDDAE26D1FD3B216E259DFD0@BN7PR11MB2531.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2020-03-13 7:05 ` Shetty, Praveen
2020-03-13 10:51 ` Anoob Joseph
2020-03-13 12:21 ` Shetty, Praveen
2020-03-19 16:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Praveen Shetty
2020-03-20 8:15 ` Anoob Joseph
2020-03-23 11:24 ` Shetty, Praveen
2020-03-31 13:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Praveen Shetty
2020-04-01 13:19 ` Akhil Goyal
2020-04-01 13:26 ` Anoob Joseph
2020-04-01 13:53 ` Akhil Goyal
2020-04-02 11:15 ` Shetty, Praveen
2020-04-02 13:39 ` Anoob Joseph [this message]
2020-04-02 17:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Shetty, Praveen
2020-04-03 5:14 ` Anoob Joseph
2020-04-03 5:52 ` Akhil Goyal
2020-04-03 10:21 ` Shetty, Praveen
2020-04-03 10:28 ` Anoob Joseph
2020-04-08 14:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Praveen Shetty
2020-04-09 10:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Praveen Shetty
2020-04-14 7:33 ` Shetty, Praveen
2020-04-15 18:59 ` Akhil Goyal
2020-04-16 11:49 ` Shetty, Praveen
2020-04-16 16:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " Praveen Shetty
2020-04-17 20:58 ` Akhil Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MN2PR18MB287707598EB141F41332AE89DFC60@MN2PR18MB2877.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
--to=anoobj@marvell.com \
--cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=praveen.shetty@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).