From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A07BA0487 for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 05:35:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8821F28; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 05:35:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx0b-0016f401.pphosted.com (mx0b-0016f401.pphosted.com [67.231.156.173]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB9F1E20; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 05:35:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0045851.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-0016f401.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x643Z1E9013875; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 20:35:01 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=marvell.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=pfpt0818; bh=+Vadv+I3IixDm89i0B9liNBfYiwe+hrpr+Xw6U7Hq54=; b=g4G/YIJvpl2LJDjXfJJ1oZxi6N89jsWelX+q6WZLxsyD5/5PStBMNarsIkypd9C2FARy Nh3t7eP/kFv1dkyT4KI82nCOwAd+HHgH/ObudtxYTrAR4W0Wjh6kh/0GcUmIT53Xc04P TlGRQ5bKL0awipMPB24CA1QBFNGb8eNZhXq4pnJXNAJMqopJ6mutmewPXjPiHnKgWsBO md7IRfSocl0eXME2Ho62FKuJsUBQZUYpc5ny5tFo15RVokeW/XRjLYm4YG/fdJqMIIP6 z7HDeXRCLvAfMcjRzT4OUouTPjFcP0HzmZrl2jxy1kVo2oHtN1fC1mdA76c6EIoK3E1S Fg== Received: from sc-exch01.marvell.com ([199.233.58.181]) by mx0b-0016f401.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2tgtf73jm2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 03 Jul 2019 20:35:01 -0700 Received: from SC-EXCH04.marvell.com (10.93.176.84) by SC-EXCH01.marvell.com (10.93.176.81) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1367.3; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 20:34:59 -0700 Received: from NAM05-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.48.59) by SC-EXCH04.marvell.com (10.93.176.84) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1367.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 20:34:59 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=marvell.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-marvell-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=+Vadv+I3IixDm89i0B9liNBfYiwe+hrpr+Xw6U7Hq54=; b=GCM+s646qE+MdZ2hzkzUFideD+eIrthZVvpsEYql0bCcafXsjlzC3wDqNrw6zF6xy65+9FWr+Qjle/wyOYkgsBCwCUuUXMmiplQuMn74ss+Fcm+x7XYsiwd5S8NGvqH+aEJNWpUrkI5eOkL45Az4FTkBWKfx/4/ybkL5LV/Y/nU= Received: from MN2PR18MB2877.namprd18.prod.outlook.com (20.179.20.218) by MN2PR18MB2623.namprd18.prod.outlook.com (20.179.82.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2032.20; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 03:34:57 +0000 Received: from MN2PR18MB2877.namprd18.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::595e:3b6c:3d12:7285]) by MN2PR18MB2877.namprd18.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::595e:3b6c:3d12:7285%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2032.019; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 03:34:57 +0000 From: Anoob Joseph To: Thomas Monjalon CC: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mattias_R=F6nnblom?= , "Bruce Richardson" , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , "dev@dpdk.org" , Nikhil Rao , Erik Gabriel Carrillo , Abhinandan Gujjar , Pablo de Lara , Narayana Prasad Raju Athreya , Lukas Bartosik , "Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula" , Hemant Agrawal , Nipun Gupta , Harry van Haaren , Liang Ma , "techboard@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH 00/39] adding eventmode helper library Thread-Index: AQHVMODfJaWShYqkoEST+UIrk446laa3YooAgAAIhgCAAAcs8IAAJdsAgAB+fuCAAIClAIAABBeQgAB8MwCAALjgkA== Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 03:34:57 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1729509.9S1lrLiWIz@xps> <1566776.CC23m1cY86@xps> In-Reply-To: <1566776.CC23m1cY86@xps> Accept-Language: en-IN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [115.113.156.2] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 741ac0dd-b242-4b3d-a037-08d700309662 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(7168020)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:MN2PR18MB2623; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR18MB2623: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000; x-forefront-prvs: 0088C92887 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(39860400002)(346002)(366004)(396003)(136003)(376002)(13464003)(189003)(199004)(51444003)(5660300002)(66476007)(64756008)(66446008)(66556008)(55236004)(73956011)(66946007)(76116006)(3846002)(6116002)(6506007)(52536014)(71200400001)(71190400001)(6916009)(102836004)(476003)(486006)(99286004)(68736007)(76176011)(7696005)(446003)(478600001)(53546011)(26005)(25786009)(7416002)(4326008)(186003)(11346002)(256004)(8936002)(561944003)(81166006)(86362001)(6246003)(316002)(66066001)(81156014)(54906003)(2906002)(7736002)(305945005)(74316002)(33656002)(9686003)(55016002)(14454004)(53936002)(6436002)(8676002)(229853002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR18MB2623; H:MN2PR18MB2877.namprd18.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: marvell.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: gsxoT/0929xGT4kF3X5L/ffrlNwqlZEj0n1BDz3U19n05CtJP8erRUMZSdAtZdzrm3hATeeS/E51ijM6toxT3BqO1Hon3HALt1aT/dy4n5oPlpNjz0cvyro4+zHwmAHftw4Ysj7zv99SM1gaXfCEC+kbE7SDg4Q2/qCl1/vmhfV9E0dPfkSoF3aTvg3DY5Bgu6ttD5KtJA1IpQkYEldAtZhkPmgWljyTKwAtx3Gc7YT7xlWddBxfbMd3RkKNnwbsbnxu9I8EAQ14skWaFXy3ccSQU/DojndiIlgv0xOOJdbM7D71bWVEotwmHD3gtpFNoYCCu6XXMnARIwUkogwP6Iz1N5quDflQPv5vRLondePCnDdfvznFhhVtGbxsh8kGhGMESrZWLlOExDwfA+9Zmg5cO458nRlQQbAhQMat5rM= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 741ac0dd-b242-4b3d-a037-08d700309662 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 Jul 2019 03:34:57.5961 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 70e1fb47-1155-421d-87fc-2e58f638b6e0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: anoobj@marvell.com X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR18MB2623 X-OriginatorOrg: marvell.com X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-07-04_02:, , signatures=0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH 00/39] adding eventmode helper library X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Thomas, > It was discussed in the techboard today. > Please read the summary below. >=20 > We want to keep l2fwd as simple as possible. > So we agree to have a fork of l2fwd for eventdev. >=20 > It was proposed to integrate eventdev in l2fwd, l3fwd and ipsec-secgw. > l2fwd will get eventdev integration in its fork l2fwd-event. > l3fwd will get eventdev integration in a separate file. > ipsec-secgw will get more complex eventdev integration. > We don't expect to have more examples impacted. > There will be no code shared for eventdev integration between the > examples. Thanks for taking this up in the techboard meeting. The above plan looks fi= ne to me. Will prepare v2 with the above mentioned changes. Thanks, Anoob > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2019 10:01 PM > To: Anoob Joseph > Cc: Mattias R=F6nnblom ; Bruce Richardson > ; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran > ; dev@dpdk.org; Nikhil Rao ; > Erik Gabriel Carrillo ; Abhinandan Gujjar > ; Pablo de Lara > ; Narayana Prasad Raju Athreya > ; Lukas Bartosik ; Pavan > Nikhilesh Bhagavatula ; Hemant Agrawal > ; Nipun Gupta ; Harry > van Haaren ; Liang Ma > ; techboard@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH 00/39] adding eventmode helper > library >=20 > 03/07/2019 11:37, Anoob Joseph: > > From: Thomas Monjalon > > > 03/07/2019 03:35, Anoob Joseph: > > > > [Anoob] Initially the target would be only DPDK applications. > > > > As I had mentioned earlier, I'm dropping the idea of making this a > > > > library/common code. My proposal is to have all the code in > > > > l2fwd-event application itself. > > > > In that case, would you have any problem? > > > > > > No I think that's fine to do whatever you want in this forked example= . > > > But remind that you won't be allowed to fork one more example until > > > things are settled down and approved by the technical board. > > > > [Anoob] Idea was never to fork any example. If we are in agreement with > going with just l2fwd-event (and all the code in one directory), I can st= art > working on v2 patches with the agreed changes. > > > > Also, what is your suggestion on when we can take up a more complicated > example (let's say ipsec-secgw)? When would you say things are settled > down? >=20 > It was discussed in the techboard today. > Please read the summary below. >=20 > We want to keep l2fwd as simple as possible. > So we agree to have a fork of l2fwd for eventdev. >=20 > It was proposed to integrate eventdev in l2fwd, l3fwd and ipsec-secgw. > l2fwd will get eventdev integration in its fork l2fwd-event. > l3fwd will get eventdev integration in a separate file. > ipsec-secgw will get more complex eventdev integration. > We don't expect to have more examples impacted. > There will be no code shared for eventdev integration between the > examples. >=20 > Hope it clarifies the situation. >=20