DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>
To: "Shetty, Praveen" <praveen.shetty@intel.com>,
	"Doherty, Declan" <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
	"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	"Iremonger, Bernard" <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] examples/ipsec-secgw: support flow director	feature
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:51:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MN2PR18MB2877DF3BBC751ADA33BFA69DDFFA0@MN2PR18MB2877.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN7PR11MB253188BDEDBCDC29E4DF0C229DFA0@BN7PR11MB2531.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Praveen,

Please see inline.

Thanks,
Anoob

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shetty, Praveen <praveen.shetty@intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 12:36 PM
> To: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>; Doherty, Declan
> <declan.doherty@intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin
> <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; Iremonger, Bernard
> <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [EXT] RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] examples/ipsec-secgw: support flow
> director feature
> 
> External Email
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Hi Anoob,
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Please see my answers below.
> 
> Regards,
> Praveen
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2020 4:31 PM
> To: Shetty, Praveen <praveen.shetty@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Doherty,
> Declan <declan.doherty@intel.com>; Iremonger, Bernard
> <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin
> <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] examples/ipsec-secgw: support flow director
> feature
> 
> Hi Praveen,
> 
> I do have some review comments on the code. Before that, can you give a brief
> overview of what is being targeted? My understanding is that the primary
> objective is to use rte_flow (or flow director) to redirect a specific flow(/SA) to a
> specific queue. Can you confirm?
> 
> >>>> Yes, your understanding is correct, the main objective is to support load
> distribution in ipsec-secgw application.
> >>>> flow director and RSS features are used achieve the load distribution.
> >>>> flow director is used to redirect the specified inbound ipsec flow to a
> specified queue.

[Anoob] May be update the commit description with some more such details. And I think it's better to use 'rte_flow' rather than flow director. I see that i40e PMD talks about flow director, but overall the feature is usage of rte_flow.
 
> 
> Couple of questions,
> 1. I would assume the new option of "flow-direction" is optional and is
> determined per SA. In that case, can I assume that RSS would be active for the
> other flows (or SAs). Let's say, I just want to add a SA for which I would like to
> enable "flow-direction" but leave the rest as is. How is that handled?
> 
> [Praveen]
> 
> >>>> We are using fdir_flag to differentiate the mix of SA's(SA's with and
> without flow-direction).
> >>>> fdir_flag will be "set" for the SA which has configured with flow-direction
> option(SA rule syntax is extended to 	add new options  <action_type>
> <portid>  <queueid> ).
> >>>> flow creation is called only for the SA's with fdir_flag is set.

[Anoob] I've few questions on this. I'll send this along with my code review.
 
> 
> 2. I see that the changes are only applicable for LOOKASIDE_PROTOCOL. The
> same feature would be useful for other modes as well, right?
> 
> [Praveen]
> >>>>  We are adding this feature for i40e NIC and the  i40e NIC doesn't support
> either encryption or decryption, that's why we used only
> LOOKASIDE_PROTOCOL in this case.

[Anoob] I meant LOOKASIDE_NONE (LOOKASIDE_CRYPTO) case. I would assume that can be early supported.

> 
> 3. I'm not sure "flow-direction" is the right wording for the option. This is just
> specifying the "rx-queue" per SA. @Akhil, Konstantin, comments?
> 
>  >>>> @Declan, @Konstantin ,  @Bernard, @Akhil  Could you please suggest a
> name on which we can all agree  upon?
> 
> Thanks,
> Anoob
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Praveen Shetty
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 8:25 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org; declan.doherty@intel.com;
> > bernard.iremonger@intel.com; konstantin.ananyev@intel.com
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] examples/ipsec-secgw: support flow
> > director feature
> >
> > Modified Secuirty gateway application to support configuration of flow
> > director rule to direct inbound IPsec SA to a specified queue.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Praveen Shetty <praveen.shetty@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  examples/ipsec-secgw/ep0.cfg       | 11 +++++
> >  examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c       | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.h       | 11 +++++
> >  examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c          | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  5 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ep0.cfg
> > b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ep0.cfg index dfd4aca7d..c9f80e81b 100644
> > --- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ep0.cfg
> > +++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ep0.cfg
> > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ sp ipv4 in esp protect 111 pri 1 dst
> > 192.168.186.0/24 sport
> > 0:65535 dport 0:6553  sp ipv4 in esp protect 115 pri 1 dst
> > 192.168.210.0/24 sport
> > 0:65535 dport 0:65535  sp ipv4 in esp protect 116 pri 1 dst
> > 192.168.211.0/24 sport 0:65535 dport 0:65535  sp ipv4 in esp protect
> > 115 pri 1 dst
> > 192.168.210.0/24 sport 0:65535 dport 0:65535
> > +sp ipv4 in esp protect 117 pri 1 dst 192.168.212.0/24 sport 0:65535
> > +dport 0:65535
> >  sp ipv4 in esp protect 125 pri 1 dst 192.168.65.0/24 sport 0:65535
> > dport 0:65535 sp ipv4 in esp protect 125 pri 1 dst 192.168.65.0/24
> > sport 0:65535 dport 0:65535 sp ipv4 in esp protect 126 pri 1 dst
> > 192.168.66.0/24 sport 0:65535 dport 0:65535 @@ -61,6 +62,8 @@ sp ipv6
> > in esp protect 125 pri 1 dst
> > ffff:0000:0000:0000:aaaa:aaaa:0000:0000/96
> >  sport 0:65535 dport 0:65535
> >  sp ipv6 in esp protect 126 pri 1 dst
> > ffff:0000:0000:0000:bbbb:bbbb:0000:0000/96 \  sport 0:65535 dport
> > 0:65535
> > +sp ipv6 in esp protect 127 pri 1 dst
> > +ffff:0000:0000:0000:cccc:dddd:0000:0000/96 \ sport 0:65535 dport
> > +0:65535
> >
> >  #SA rules
> >  sa out 5 cipher_algo aes-128-cbc cipher_key
> > 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0 \ @@ -118,6 +121,9 @@ dst 172.16.1.5
> >
> >  sa in 116 cipher_algo null auth_algo null mode ipv4-tunnel src
> > 172.16.2.6 dst
> > 172.16.1.6
> >
> > +sa in 117 cipher_algo null auth_algo null mode ipv4-tunnel src
> > +172.16.2.7 \ dst 172.16.1.7 flow-direction 0 2 port_id 0 type
> > +lookaside-protocol-offload
> > +
> >  sa in 125 cipher_algo aes-128-cbc cipher_key
> > c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:\
> >  c3:c3:c3:c3:c3 auth_algo sha1-hmac auth_key
> > c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:\
> >  c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3:c3 mode ipv6-tunnel \ @@ -130,6 +136,11 @@ sa
> > in
> > 126 cipher_algo aes-128-cbc cipher_key
> > 4d:4d:4d:4d:4d:4d:4d:4d:4d:4d:4d:\
> >  src 2222:2222:2222:2222:2222:2222:2222:6666 \  dst
> > 1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:6666
> >
> > +sa in 127 cipher_algo null auth_algo null mode ipv6-tunnel \ src
> > +2222:2222:2222:2222:2222:2222:2222:7777 \ dst
> > +1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:7777 \ flow-direction 0 3 port_id
> > +0 type lookaside-protocol-offload
> > +
> >  #Routing rules
> >  rt ipv4 dst 172.16.2.5/32 port 0
> >  rt ipv4 dst 172.16.2.6/32 port 1
> > diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c b/examples/ipsec-
> > secgw/ipsec-secgw.c index 4799bc90c..132484422 100644
> > --- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
> > +++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
> > @@ -166,7 +166,6 @@ static const struct option lgopts[] = {
> >  	{CMD_LINE_OPT_FRAG_TTL, 1, 0, CMD_LINE_OPT_FRAG_TTL_NUM},
> >  	{NULL, 0, 0, 0}
> >  };
> > -
> >  /* mask of enabled ports */
> >  static uint32_t enabled_port_mask;
> >  static uint64_t enabled_cryptodev_mask = UINT64_MAX; @@ -259,6
> > +258,30 @@ static struct rte_eth_conf port_conf = {
> >  	.txmode = {
> >  		.mq_mode = ETH_MQ_TX_NONE,
> >  	},
> > +	.fdir_conf = {
> > +	.mode = RTE_FDIR_MODE_NONE,
> > +	.pballoc = RTE_FDIR_PBALLOC_64K,
> > +	.status = RTE_FDIR_REPORT_STATUS,
> > +	.mask = {
> > +		.vlan_tci_mask = 0xFFEF,
> > +		.ipv4_mask     = {
> > +			.src_ip = 0xFFFFFFFF,
> > +			.dst_ip = 0xFFFFFFFF,
> > +		},
> > +		.ipv6_mask     = {
> > +			.src_ip = {0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFF,
> > +						0xFFFFFFFF},
> > +			.dst_ip = {0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFF,
> > +						0xFFFFFFFF},
> > +		},
> > +		.src_port_mask = 0xFFFF,
> > +		.dst_port_mask = 0xFFFF,
> > +		.mac_addr_byte_mask = 0xFF,
> > +		.tunnel_type_mask = 1,
> > +		.tunnel_id_mask = 0xFFFFFFFF,
> > +	},
> > +	.drop_queue = 127,
> > +	}
> >  };
> >
> >  static struct socket_ctx socket_ctx[NB_SOCKETS]; @@ -1184,7 +1207,6
> > @@
> > main_loop(__attribute__((unused)) void *dummy)
> >
> >  			if (nb_rx > 0)
> >  				process_pkts(qconf, pkts, nb_rx, portid);
> > -
> >  			/* dequeue and process completed crypto-ops */
> >  			if (UNPROTECTED_PORT(portid))
> >  				drain_inbound_crypto_queues(qconf,
> > @@ -1196,6 +1218,27 @@ main_loop(__attribute__((unused)) void *dummy)
> >  	}
> >  }
> >
> > +int check_flow_params(uint16_t fdir_portid, uint8_t fdir_qid) {
> > +	uint16_t i;
> > +	uint16_t portid;
> > +	uint8_t queueid;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < nb_lcore_params; ++i) {
> > +		portid = lcore_params_array[i].port_id;
> > +		if (portid == fdir_portid) {
> > +			queueid = lcore_params_array[i].queue_id;
> > +			if (queueid == fdir_qid)
> > +				break;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		if (i == nb_lcore_params - 1)
> > +			return -1;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 1;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int32_t
> >  check_params(void)
> >  {
> > @@ -2503,6 +2546,15 @@ main(int32_t argc, char **argv)
> >  			continue;
> >
> >  		sa_check_offloads(portid, &req_rx_offloads,
> &req_tx_offloads);
> > +		/* check if FDIR is configured on the port */
> > +		if (check_fdir_configured(portid)) {
> > +			/* Enable FDIR */
> > +			port_conf.fdir_conf.mode =
> > RTE_FDIR_MODE_PERFECT;
> > +			/* Disable RSS */
> > +			port_conf.rxmode.mq_mode = ETH_MQ_RX_NONE;
> > +			port_conf.rx_adv_conf.rss_conf.rss_hf = 0;
> > +			port_conf.rx_adv_conf.rss_conf.rss_key = NULL;
> > +		}
> >  		port_init(portid, req_rx_offloads, req_tx_offloads);
> >  	}
> >
> > diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c
> > b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c index 6e8120702..363809cfd 100644
> > --- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c
> > +++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c
> > @@ -415,6 +415,73 @@ create_inline_session(struct socket_ctx *skt_ctx,
> > struct ipsec_sa *sa,
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +int
> > +create_ipsec_esp_flow(struct ipsec_sa *sa) {
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +	struct rte_flow_error err;
> > +	if (sa->direction == RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_EGRESS)
> > +		return 0; /* No Flow director rules for Egress traffic */
> > +	if (sa->flags == TRANSPORT) {
> > +		RTE_LOG(ERR, IPSEC,
> > +			"No Flow director rule for transport mode:");
> > +			return -1;
> > +	}
> > +	sa->action[0].type = RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_QUEUE;
> > +	sa->pattern[0].type = RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ETH;
> > +	sa->action[0].conf =
> > +			&(struct rte_flow_action_queue){
> > +				.index = sa->fdir_qid,
> > +	};
> > +	sa->attr.egress = 0;
> > +	sa->attr.ingress = 1;
> > +	if (IS_IP6(sa->flags)) {
> > +		sa->pattern[1].mask = &rte_flow_item_ipv6_mask;
> > +		sa->pattern[1].type = RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV6;
> > +		sa->pattern[1].spec = &sa->ipv6_spec;
> > +		memcpy(sa->ipv6_spec.hdr.dst_addr,
> > +				sa->dst.ip.ip6.ip6_b, IPV6_ADDR_LEN);
> > +		memcpy(sa->ipv6_spec.hdr.src_addr,
> > +				sa->src.ip.ip6.ip6_b, IPV6_ADDR_LEN);
> > +		sa->pattern[2].type = RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ESP;
> > +		sa->pattern[2].spec = &sa->esp_spec;
> > +		sa->pattern[2].mask = &rte_flow_item_esp_mask;
> > +		sa->esp_spec.hdr.spi = rte_cpu_to_be_32(sa->spi);
> > +		sa->pattern[3].type = RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_END;
> > +	} else if (IS_IP4(sa->flags)) {
> > +		sa->pattern[1].mask = &rte_flow_item_ipv4_mask;
> > +		sa->pattern[1].type = RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV4;
> > +		sa->pattern[1].spec = &sa->ipv4_spec;
> > +		sa->ipv4_spec.hdr.dst_addr = sa->dst.ip.ip4;
> > +		sa->ipv4_spec.hdr.src_addr = sa->src.ip.ip4;
> > +		sa->pattern[2].type = RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ESP;
> > +		sa->pattern[2].spec = &sa->esp_spec;
> > +		sa->pattern[2].mask = &rte_flow_item_esp_mask;
> > +		sa->esp_spec.hdr.spi = rte_cpu_to_be_32(sa->spi);
> > +		sa->pattern[3].type = RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_END;
> > +	}
> > +	sa->action[1].type = RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END;
> > +
> > +	ret = rte_flow_validate(sa->fdir_portid, &sa->attr,
> > +				sa->pattern, sa->action,
> > +				&err);
> > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > +		RTE_LOG(ERR, IPSEC,
> > +			"Flow Validation failed\n");
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +	sa->flow = rte_flow_create(sa->fdir_portid,
> > +				&sa->attr, sa->pattern, sa->action,
> > +				&err);
> > +	if (!sa->flow) {
> > +		RTE_LOG(ERR, IPSEC,
> > +			"Flow Creation failed\n");
> > +		return -1;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * queue crypto-ops into PMD queue.
> >   */
> > diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.h
> > b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.h index 4f2fd6184..00147895a 100644
> > --- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.h
> > +++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.h
> > @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@
> >
> >  #define IP6_VERSION (6)
> >
> > +#define IPV6_ADDR_LEN   16
> > +
> >  struct rte_crypto_xform;
> >  struct ipsec_xform;
> >  struct rte_mbuf;
> > @@ -138,6 +140,9 @@ struct ipsec_sa {
> >  	};
> >  	enum rte_security_ipsec_sa_direction direction;
> >  	uint16_t portid;
> > +	uint16_t fdir_portid;
> > +	uint8_t fdir_qid;
> > +	uint8_t fdir_flag;
> >
> >  #define MAX_RTE_FLOW_PATTERN (4)
> >  #define MAX_RTE_FLOW_ACTIONS (3)
> > @@ -383,5 +388,11 @@ create_lookaside_session(struct ipsec_ctx
> > *ipsec_ctx, struct ipsec_sa *sa,  int  create_inline_session(struct
> > socket_ctx *skt_ctx, struct ipsec_sa *sa,
> >  		struct rte_ipsec_session *ips);
> > +int
> > +check_flow_params(uint16_t fdir_portid, uint8_t fdir_qid);
> > +
> > +int
> > +create_ipsec_esp_flow(struct ipsec_sa *sa);
> >
> > +int check_fdir_configured(uint16_t portid);
> >  #endif /* __IPSEC_H__ */
> > diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c b/examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c
> > index 4822d6bda..9955dfcbe 100644
> > --- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c
> > +++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c
> > @@ -20,6 +20,9 @@
> >  #include <rte_random.h>
> >  #include <rte_ethdev.h>
> >  #include <rte_malloc.h>
> > +#include <rte_common.h>
> > +#include <rte_string_fns.h>
> > +#include <rte_ethdev_driver.h>
> >
> >  #include "ipsec.h"
> >  #include "esp.h"
> > @@ -271,6 +274,7 @@ parse_sa_tokens(char **tokens, uint32_t n_tokens,
> >  	uint32_t type_p = 0;
> >  	uint32_t portid_p = 0;
> >  	uint32_t fallback_p = 0;
> > +	int16_t status_p = 0;
> >
> >  	if (strcmp(tokens[0], "in") == 0) {
> >  		ri = &nb_sa_in;
> > @@ -681,6 +685,25 @@ parse_sa_tokens(char **tokens, uint32_t n_tokens,
> >  			fallback_p = 1;
> >  			continue;
> >  		}
> > +		if (strcmp(tokens[ti], "flow-direction") == 0) {
> > +			rule->fdir_flag = 1;
> > +			INCREMENT_TOKEN_INDEX(ti, n_tokens, status);
> > +			if (status->status < 0)
> > +				return;
> > +			rule->fdir_portid = atoi(tokens[ti]);
> > +			INCREMENT_TOKEN_INDEX(ti, n_tokens, status);
> > +			if (status->status < 0)
> > +				return;
> > +			rule->fdir_qid = atoi(tokens[ti]);
> > +			/* validating portid and queueid */
> > +			status_p = check_flow_params(rule->fdir_portid,
> > +					rule->fdir_qid);
> > +			if (status_p < 0) {
> > +				printf("port id %u / queue id %u is not valid\n",
> > +					rule->fdir_portid, rule->fdir_qid);
> > +			}
> > +			continue;
> > +		}
> >
> >  		/* unrecognizeable input */
> >  		APP_CHECK(0, status, "unrecognized input \"%s\"", @@ -823,6
> > +846,9 @@ print_one_sa_rule(const struct ipsec_sa *sa, int inbound)
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > +	if (sa->fdir_flag == 1)
> > +		printf("flow-direction %d %d", sa->fdir_portid, sa->fdir_qid);
> > +
> >  	printf("\n");
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -1153,7 +1179,15 @@ sa_add_rules(struct sa_ctx *sa_ctx, const
> > struct ipsec_sa entries[],
> >  				return -EINVAL;
> >  			}
> >  		}
> > -
> > +		if (sa->fdir_flag &&
> > +			ips->type ==
> > +			RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_LOOKASIDE_PROTOCOL
> > &&
> > +			inbound) {
> > +			rc = create_ipsec_esp_flow(sa);
> > +			if (rc != 0)
> > +				RTE_LOG(ERR, IPSEC_ESP,
> > +					"create_ipsec_esp flow failed\n");
> > +			}
> >  		print_one_sa_rule(sa, inbound);
> >  	}
> >
> > @@ -1256,6 +1290,20 @@ fill_ipsec_session(struct rte_ipsec_session
> > *ss, struct rte_ipsec_sa *sa)
> >  	return rc;
> >  }
> >
> > +int
> > +check_fdir_configured(uint16_t portid) {
> > +	struct ipsec_sa *sa = NULL;
> > +	uint32_t idx_sa = 0;
> > +
> > +	for (idx_sa = 0; idx_sa < nb_sa_in; idx_sa++) {
> > +		sa = &sa_in[idx_sa];
> > +		if (sa->fdir_portid == portid)
> > +			return sa->fdir_flag;
> > +	}
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Initialise related rte_ipsec_sa object.
> >   */
> > --
> > 2.17.1


  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-13 10:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-11 14:55 Praveen Shetty
2020-03-12 11:00 ` Anoob Joseph
     [not found]   ` <BN7PR11MB25310A9A6B9C3BE91A411AA29DFD0@BN7PR11MB2531.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
     [not found]     ` <BN7PR11MB2531E92F9B078563A947615F9DFD0@BN7PR11MB2531.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
     [not found]       ` <BN7PR11MB2531ABDDAE26D1FD3B216E259DFD0@BN7PR11MB2531.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2020-03-13  7:05         ` Shetty, Praveen
2020-03-13 10:51           ` Anoob Joseph [this message]
2020-03-13 12:21             ` Shetty, Praveen
2020-03-19 16:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Praveen Shetty
2020-03-20  8:15   ` Anoob Joseph
2020-03-23 11:24     ` Shetty, Praveen
2020-03-31 13:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Praveen Shetty
2020-04-01 13:19     ` Akhil Goyal
2020-04-01 13:26       ` Anoob Joseph
2020-04-01 13:53         ` Akhil Goyal
2020-04-02 11:15           ` Shetty, Praveen
2020-04-02 13:39     ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Anoob Joseph
2020-04-02 17:56       ` Shetty, Praveen
2020-04-03  5:14         ` Anoob Joseph
2020-04-03  5:52           ` Akhil Goyal
2020-04-03 10:21             ` Shetty, Praveen
2020-04-03 10:28               ` Anoob Joseph
2020-04-08 14:13     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Praveen Shetty
2020-04-09 10:09       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Praveen Shetty
2020-04-14  7:33         ` Shetty, Praveen
2020-04-15 18:59         ` Akhil Goyal
2020-04-16 11:49           ` Shetty, Praveen
2020-04-16 16:47         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " Praveen Shetty
2020-04-17 20:58           ` Akhil Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MN2PR18MB2877DF3BBC751ADA33BFA69DDFFA0@MN2PR18MB2877.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=anoobj@marvell.com \
    --cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
    --cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=praveen.shetty@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).