DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Xu, HailinX" <hailinx.xu@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Kovacevic, Marko" <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>,
	"Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
	"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com>,
	"Puttaswamy, Rajesh T" <rajesh.t.puttaswamy@intel.com>,
	"Cui, KaixinX" <kaixinx.cui@intel.com>
Subject: Test report for 24.03-rc2
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 08:46:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MW4PR11MB591233B92D036DDA5421DF3C9F282@MW4PR11MB5912.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3061 bytes --]

Update the test status for Intel part. dpdk24.03-rc2 all test is done. found five new issues.

New issues:
1. loopback_virtio_user_server_mode: Failed to add vdev when launch dpdk-pdump -> has fix patch
2. DMA devices stats not reset after API testsuite -> has fix patch
3. https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1398 ptpclient causes NIC I225/I226 port RX missed -> has fix patch
4. meson_test/test_fasts: eal_flags_file_prefix_autotest and eal_flags_b_opt_autotest failed -> has fix patch
5. mdd_failure_diagnose/test_malicious_packet_segment_size: Failed to check size of mbuf segment on PF -> Intel dev is under investigating

# Basic Intel(R) NIC testing
* Build or compile:
 *Build: cover the build test combination with latest GCC/Clang version and the popular OS revision such as Ubuntu23.10, Ubuntu22.04.3, Fedora39, RHEL8.9/9.2, Centos7.9, FreeBSD14.0, SUSE15, OpenAnolis8.8, CBL-Mariner2.0 etc.
              - All test passed.
*Compile: cover the CFLAGES(O0/O1/O2/O3) with popular OS such as Ubuntu22.04.3 and RHEL9.2.
              - All test passed with latest dpdk.
* PF/VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including PF/VF-RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc.
              - All test case is done. found the fourth issue.
* PF/VF(igc): test scenarios including PF/VF-RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc.
              - All test case is done. found the third issue.
* PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible Descriptor, etc.
              - Execution rate is done. found the fourth and fifth issue.
* Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including PF/VF single core performance test, RFC2544 Zero packet loss performance test, etc.
              - Execution rate is done. No new issue is found.
* Power; IPsec; DLB; DSA dmadev:
 * Power: test scenarios including bi-direction/Telemetry/Empty Poll Lib/Priority Base Frequency, etc.
              - Execution rate is done. No new issue is found.
* IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic test - QAT&SW/FIB library, etc.
              - Execution rate is done. No new issue is found.
* DLB: test scenarios including DLB2/DLB2.5
              - Execution rate is done. No new issue is found.
* DSA dmadev:  - Execution rate is done. found the second issue.
# Basic cryptodev and virtio testing
* Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf testing/VMAWARE ESXI 8.0U1, etc.
              - Execution rate is done. found the first issue.
* Cryptodev:
 *Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API testing/CompressDev ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc.
              - Execution rate is done. No new issue is found.
 *Performance test: test scenarios including Throughput Performance /Cryptodev Latency, etc.
              - Execution rate is done. No performance drop.


Regards,
Xu, Hailin


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7432 bytes --]

                 reply	other threads:[~2024-03-15  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MW4PR11MB591233B92D036DDA5421DF3C9F282@MW4PR11MB5912.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=hailinx.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=kaixinx.cui@intel.com \
    --cc=marko.kovacevic@intel.com \
    --cc=rajesh.t.puttaswamy@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).