Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] lpm: extend IPv6 next hop field

[Vladyslav Buslov <Vladyslav.Buslov@harmonicinc.com>]

Hi Bruce,

Yes, v2 patch is same as v1 + indentation changes according to checkpatch warnings.

Regards,
Vlad

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 2:03 PM
> To: Vladyslav Buslov
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lpm: extend IPv6 next hop field
> 
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 04:46:39PM +0200, Vladyslav Buslov wrote:
> > This patch extend next_hop field from 8-bits to 21-bits in LPM library
> > for IPv6.
> >
> > Added versioning symbols to functions and updated library and
> > applications that have a dependency on LPM library.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vladyslav Buslov <vladyslav.buslov@harmonicinc.com>
> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> 
> Hi Vlad,
> 
> Thanks for the V2.
> I assume that this is just the V1 with the checkpatch issues fixed, right? For
> future use, please include just below the cut line "---" a short list of what has
> changed since the previous version, so that we know what to look for if we
> already have reviewed the previous version.
> For minor changes in code, like in this case, you can also keep the ack on the
> resubmission, putting it just below the signoff like above.
> 
> /Bruce