DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhao1, Wei" <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
To: "Sun, GuinanX" <guinanx.sun@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
	"Guo, Jia" <jia.guo@intel.com>,
	"Sun, GuinanX" <guinanx.sun@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: enable port filter by switch filter
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 06:12:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MWHPR11MB1391B854A768B3C95AD0B07BB79C0@MWHPR11MB1391.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200611052416.14592-1-guinanx.sun@intel.com>

Hi, Guinan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Guinan Sun
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 1:24 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Guo, Jia <jia.guo@intel.com>; Sun,
> GuinanX <guinanx.sun@intel.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: enable port filter by switch filter
> 
> This patch enables the filter that supports to create following two rules for the
> same packet type:
> One is to select source port only as input set and the other is for destination
> port only.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guinan Sun <guinanx.sun@intel.com>
> ---
>  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_08.rst |   7 +
>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c         | 195 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h         |  17 ++
>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c           | 223
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 441 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_08.rst
> b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_08.rst
> index 7a67c960c..16870100d 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_08.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_08.rst
> @@ -68,6 +68,13 @@ New Features
> 
>    * Added new PMD devarg ``reclaim_mem_mode``.
> 
> +* **Updated Intel i40e driver.**
> +
> +  Updated i40e PMD with new features and improvements, including:
> +
> +  * Added a new type of cloud filter to support the coexistence of the
> +    following two rules. One selects L4 destination as input set and
> +    the other one selects L4 source port.
> 
>  Removed Items
>  -------------
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> index 970a31cb2..97e6e948a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> @@ -7956,6 +7956,13 @@ i40e_dev_tunnel_filter_set(struct i40e_pf *pf,
>  #define I40E_TR_GRE_KEY_MASK			0x400
>  #define I40E_TR_GRE_KEY_WITH_XSUM_MASK		0x800
>  #define I40E_TR_GRE_NO_KEY_MASK			0x8000

> +#define I40E_AQC_REPLACE_CLOUD_CMD_INPUT_PORT_TR_WORD0 0x49

A confused question, this 0x49 seems to be a field vector index? Filed vector table is 128 byte long, why does this can large than 64?


> #define
> +I40E_AQC_REPLACE_CLOUD_CMD_INPUT_DIRECTION_WORD0 0x41 #define
> +I40E_AQC_REPLACE_CLOUD_CMD_INPUT_INGRESS_WORD0 0x80
> +#define I40E_DIRECTION_INGRESS_KEY		0x8000
> +#define I40E_TR_L4_TYPE_TCP			0x2
> +#define I40E_TR_L4_TYPE_UDP			0x4
> +#define I40E_TR_L4_TYPE_SCTP			0x8
> 
>  static enum
>  i40e_status_code i40e_replace_mpls_l1_filter(struct i40e_pf *pf) @@
> -8254,6 +8261,131 @@ i40e_status_code
> i40e_replace_gtp_cloud_filter(struct i40e_pf *pf)
>  	return status;


  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-15  6:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-11  5:24 Guinan Sun
2020-06-15  6:12 ` Zhao1, Wei [this message]
2020-06-15  6:28   ` Sun, GuinanX
2020-06-21 12:28 ` Jeff Guo
2020-06-24  3:09   ` Sun, GuinanX
2020-06-30  4:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Guinan Sun
2020-06-30  6:15   ` Xing, Beilei
2020-07-07  6:11     ` Sun, GuinanX
2020-07-07  6:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/i40e: support cloud filter with L4 port Guinan Sun
2020-07-07  8:15   ` Xing, Beilei
2020-07-08  3:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Guinan Sun
2020-07-08  6:01   ` Xing, Beilei
2020-07-08  6:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Guinan Sun
2020-07-08  7:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " Guinan Sun
2020-07-08  8:20   ` Xing, Beilei
2020-07-08  8:52     ` Zhang, Qi Z

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MWHPR11MB1391B854A768B3C95AD0B07BB79C0@MWHPR11MB1391.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=wei.zhao1@intel.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=guinanx.sun@intel.com \
    --cc=jia.guo@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).