From: "Zhao1, Wei" <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>, "Fu, Qi" <qi.fu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice/base: fix bm mask set and find switch recipe method
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 06:49:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MWHPR11MB1391DF568955CFA3802EA3D3B7AC0@MWHPR11MB1391.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200428062211.4216-1-wei.zhao1@intel.com>
Add fuqi
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 2:22 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] net/ice/base: fix bm mask set and find switch recipe method
>
> When we download a switch rule for ipv6 with esp payload "eth / ipv6 / esp spi
> is 1 / end actions queue index 2 / end"
>
> if we don't add bm bit set check for tun_type, then a packet of
> ipv4 with esp payload
>
> "sendp([Ether(dst="00:00:00:00:01:00")/IP(proto=50)/ESP(spi=1)/
> ("X"*480)], iface="ens5f0", count=10)"
>
> will also go to queue index 2. And also, we need to do tun_type check, or the
> second rule of following can not be download because of rejection from switch
> rule download function ice_aq_sw_rules().
>
> "eth / ipv4 / esp spi is 1 / end actions queue index 5 / end"
>
> "eth / ipv6 / esp spi is 1 / end actions queue index 2 / end"
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c
> b/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c
> index e64b03136..7d5d57938 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c
> @@ -5278,11 +5278,8 @@ static u16 ice_find_recp(struct ice_hw *hw, struct
> ice_prot_lkup_ext *lkup_exts,
> /* If for "i"th recipe the found was never set to false
> * then it means we found our match
> */
> - if (ice_is_prof_rule(tun_type) &&
> - tun_type == recp[i].tun_type && found)
> - return i; /* Return the recipe ID */
> - else if (!ice_is_prof_rule(tun_type) && found)
> - return i; /* Return the recipe ID */
> + if (tun_type == recp[i].tun_type && found)
> + return i;
> }
> }
> return ICE_MAX_NUM_RECIPES;
> @@ -5998,9 +5995,11 @@ ice_get_compat_fv_bitmap(struct ice_hw *hw,
> struct ice_adv_rule_info *rinfo,
> prof_type = ICE_PROF_TUN_PPPOE;
> break;
> case ICE_SW_TUN_PROFID_IPV6_ESP:
> + case ICE_SW_TUN_IPV6_ESP:
> ice_set_bit(ICE_PROFID_IPV6_ESP, bm);
> return;
> case ICE_SW_TUN_PROFID_IPV6_AH:
> + case ICE_SW_TUN_IPV6_AH:
> ice_set_bit(ICE_PROFID_IPV6_AH, bm);
> return;
> case ICE_SW_TUN_PROFID_MAC_IPV6_L2TPV3:
> @@ -6029,6 +6028,12 @@ ice_get_compat_fv_bitmap(struct ice_hw *hw,
> struct ice_adv_rule_info *rinfo,
> case ICE_SW_TUN_IPV4_L2TPV3:
> ice_set_bit(ICE_PROFID_MAC_IPV4_L2TPV3, bm);
> return;
> + case ICE_SW_TUN_IPV4_ESP:
> + ice_set_bit(ICE_PROFID_IPV4_ESP, bm);
> + return;
> + case ICE_SW_TUN_IPV4_AH:
> + ice_set_bit(ICE_PROFID_IPV4_AH, bm);
> + return;
> case ICE_SW_TUN_AND_NON_TUN:
> default:
> prof_type = ICE_PROF_ALL;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.h
> b/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.h
> index 09dc1f236..6bb742d2f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.h
> @@ -16,7 +16,9 @@
> #define ICE_FLTR_TX_RX (ICE_FLTR_RX | ICE_FLTR_TX)
>
> /* Switch Profile IDs for Profile related switch rules */
> +#define ICE_PROFID_IPV4_ESP 71
> #define ICE_PROFID_IPV6_ESP 72
> +#define ICE_PROFID_IPV4_AH 73
> #define ICE_PROFID_IPV6_AH 74
> #define ICE_PROFID_IPV4_NAT_T 75
> #define ICE_PROFID_IPV6_NAT_T 76
> --
> 2.19.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-28 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-28 6:22 Wei Zhao
2020-04-28 6:49 ` Zhao1, Wei [this message]
2020-04-29 10:16 ` Fu, Qi
2020-04-30 2:17 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2020-04-29 8:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Wei Zhao
2020-05-06 5:17 ` Ye Xiaolong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MWHPR11MB1391DF568955CFA3802EA3D3B7AC0@MWHPR11MB1391.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=wei.zhao1@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=qi.fu@intel.com \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).