From: "Varghese, Vipin" <vipin.varghese@intel.com>
To: "Hunt, David" <david.hunt@intel.com>,
Hideyuki Yamashita <yamashita.hideyuki@ntt-tx.co.jp>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] add apistats function
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2020 13:23:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MWHPR11MB15814F74D177EE49FB5BD16D90F00@MWHPR11MB1581.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2a9a170b-c351-e3f2-36b5-6db9d4c29da5@intel.com>
Sharing an alternate approach, if RX-TX callbacks are enabled in DPDK (which is by default). One can register a callback handler to update counters with the following information as `port-queue pair, lcoreid, total rx burst request, total empty rx burst, 1-8 pks, 9-16 pkts, 16-32 pkts`. Callback handlers can be selectively enabled or disabled too.
Can you please help me understand how `rte_apistats` would be different or pros of having it as library (that needs to be added to linking and running in case of using DPDK applications)?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of David Hunt
> Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 3:51 PM
> To: Hideyuki Yamashita <yamashita.hideyuki@ntt-tx.co.jp>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] add apistats function
>
>
> On 4/12/2020 7:51 AM, Hideyuki Yamashita wrote:
> > In general, DPDK application consumes CPU usage because it polls
> > incoming packets using rx_burst API in infinite loop.
> > This makes difficult to estimate how much CPU usage is really used to
> > send/receive packets by the DPDK application.
> >
> > For example, even if no incoming packets arriving, CPU usage looks
> > nearly 100% when observed by top command.
> >
> > It is beneficial if developers can observe real CPU usage of the DPDK
> > application.
> > Such information can be exported to monitoring application like
> > prometheus/graphana and shows CPU usage graphically.
> >
> > To achieve above, this patch set provides apistats functionality.
> > apistats provides the followiing two counters for each lcore.
> > - rx_burst_counts[RTE_MAX_LCORE]
> > - tx_burst_counts[RTE_MAX_LCORE]
> > Those accumulates rx_burst/tx_burst counts since the application starts.
> >
> > By using those values, developers can roughly estimate CPU usage.
> > Let us assume a DPDK application is simply forwarding packets.
> > It calls tx_burst only if it receive packets.
> > If rx_burst_counts=1000 and tx_burst_count=1000 during certain period
> > of time, one can assume CPU usage is 100%.
> > If rx_burst_counts=1000 and tx_burst_count=100 during certain period
> > of time, one can assume CPU usage is 10%.
> > Here we assumes that tx_burst_count equals counts which rx_burst
> > function really receives incoming packets.
> >
> >
> > This patch set provides the following.
> > - basic API counting functionality(apistats) into librte_ethdev
> > - add code to testpmd to accumulate counter information
> > - add code to proc-info to retrieve above mentioned counter
> > information
> > - add description in proc-info document about --apistats parameter
> > - modify MAINTAINERS file for apistats.c and apistats.h
> >
> > Hideyuki Yamashita (5):
> > maintainers: update maintainers file for apistats
> > app/proc-info: add to use apistats
> > app/test-pmd: add to use apistats
> > docs: add description of apistats parameter into proc-info
> > librte_ethdev: add to use apistats
> >
> > MAINTAINERS | 3 ++
> > app/proc-info/main.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 4 ++
> > doc/guides/tools/proc_info.rst | 10 ++++-
> > lib/librte_ethdev/meson.build | 6 ++-
> > lib/librte_ethdev/rte_apistats.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > lib/librte_ethdev/rte_apistats.h | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h | 7 ++++
> > lib/librte_ethdev/version.map | 5 +++
> > 9 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 lib/librte_ethdev/rte_apistats.c
> > create mode 100644 lib/librte_ethdev/rte_apistats.h
>
>
> Hi Hideyuki,
>
> I have a few questions on the patch set.
>
> How does this compare to the mechanism added to l3fwd-power which counts
> the number of empty, partial and full polls, and uses them to calculate
> busyness? We saw pretty good tracking of busyness using those metrics. I
> would be concerned that just looking at the numebr of rx_bursts and tx_bursts
> may be limited to only a few use-cases. The l3fwd-power example uses
> branchless increments to capture empty, non-empty, full, and non-full polls.
>
> Why not use the existing telemetry library to store the stats? It would be good
> if whatever metrics were counted were made available in a standard way, so
> that external entities such as collectd could pick them up, rather than having to
> parse the new struct. The l3fwd-power example registers the necessary new
> metrics, and exposes them through the telemetry library.
>
> And a comment on the patch set in general: The order of the patch set seems
> reversed. The earlier patch do not compile, because they depend on
> rte_apistats.h, which is introduced in the final patch. Each patch as it is applied
> needs to build successfully.
>
> Also, I would suggest a different name. rte_apistats seems very generic and
> could apply to anything. How about something like rte_ethdev_stats.h or
> rte_burst_stats.h?
>
> Rgds,
> Dave.
>
>
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-05 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-04 7:51 Hideyuki Yamashita
2020-12-04 7:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] maintainers: update maintainers file for apistats Hideyuki Yamashita
2020-12-05 13:27 ` Varghese, Vipin
2020-12-24 6:36 ` Hideyuki Yamashita
2020-12-04 7:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/5] app/proc-info: add to use apistats Hideyuki Yamashita
2020-12-05 13:15 ` Varghese, Vipin
2020-12-04 7:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/5] app/test-pmd: " Hideyuki Yamashita
2020-12-05 13:04 ` Varghese, Vipin
2020-12-04 7:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] docs: add description of apistats parameter into proc-info Hideyuki Yamashita
2020-12-05 13:02 ` Varghese, Vipin
2020-12-07 9:48 ` Pattan, Reshma
2020-12-04 7:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/5] librte_ethdev: add to use apistats Hideyuki Yamashita
2020-12-05 13:01 ` Varghese, Vipin
2020-12-06 17:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-12-24 6:33 ` Hideyuki Yamashita
2020-12-07 12:38 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-12-22 2:48 ` Hideyuki Yamashita
2020-12-22 2:50 ` Hideyuki Yamashita
2020-12-22 9:04 ` Morten Brørup
2020-12-22 13:05 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-12-04 9:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] add apistats function Ferruh Yigit
2020-12-04 10:20 ` David Hunt
2020-12-05 13:23 ` Varghese, Vipin [this message]
2020-12-24 6:43 ` Hideyuki Yamashita
2020-12-24 12:35 ` Varghese, Vipin
2020-12-22 2:16 ` Hideyuki Yamashita
2020-12-07 9:46 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-12-22 2:22 ` Hideyuki Yamashita
2021-02-22 15:10 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MWHPR11MB15814F74D177EE49FB5BD16D90F00@MWHPR11MB1581.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=vipin.varghese@intel.com \
--cc=david.hunt@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=yamashita.hideyuki@ntt-tx.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).