DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Trahe, Fiona" <fiona.trahe@intel.com>
To: "Dybkowski, AdamX" <adamx.dybkowski@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"akhil.goyal@nxp.com" <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
Cc: "Trahe, Fiona" <fiona.trahe@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/3] Refactor crypto unit tests.
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 14:56:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MWHPR11MB1807A7C08B92CEC669E56489E4310@MWHPR11MB1807.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200117144651.26804-1-adamx.dybkowski@intel.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dybkowski, AdamX <adamx.dybkowski@intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2020 2:47 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; Trahe, Fiona <fiona.trahe@intel.com>; akhil.goyal@nxp.com
> Cc: Dybkowski, AdamX <adamx.dybkowski@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v6 0/3] Refactor crypto unit tests.
> 
> This patch set is a first step to refactor the overly complex symmetric
> crypto unit tests. It merges many separate arrays of the tests
> for these PMDs: null, aesni_mb, aesni_gcm, openssl, qat, sw_snow3g,
> sw_kasumi, sw_zuc into one big array that's then used when running
> unit tests on these PMDs.
> 
> Individual test functions check the capabilities and execute the rest
> of the test or skip (return -ENOTSUP) based on the particular test
> requirements - e.g. test if PMD supports ZUC algo or even a particular
> key length in few cases. Few edge cases required to check the PMD
> itself (e.g. run on QAT only, or skip on AES NI / AES GCM).
> 
> It's the first step of bigger refactoring. Maintainers of other PMDs
> are encouraged to add their PMD unit tests also into this big central
> array and remove individual test macro arrays.
> 
> This patch doesn't address next refactoring steps to be done in the
> future: geting rid of many small (usually 1-2 line) test functions,
> created separately for every test case; and simplifying many bigger
> functions that currently do similar things but work on different
> test vector structures.
> 
> A simple script to check if symmetric crypto unit tests work properly
> on multiple PMDs at once, update the PMDs list to your needs:
> 
> for PMD in null aesni_mb aesni_gcm openssl qat scheduler sw_snow3g sw_kasumi sw_zuc
> do
>     echo +++++ $PMD +++++
>     echo cryptodev_${PMD}_autotest | build/app/test -c7 -n1 --log-level=7 | grep ' Tests
> [Failed|Passed]'
> done
> 
> ---
> v2:
> * Update the cover letter, regenerate the patch file.
> v3:
> * Break very large commit into four smaller commits, easier to review.
> * Show in the cover letter how to run unit tests on multiple PMDs at once.
> v4:
> * Rebase.
> v5:
> * Fix a test failing on SW ZUC PMD.
> v6:
> * Rebase again, squash first two commits to allow building individual patches.
> 
> Adam Dybkowski (3):
>   test/crypto: refactor unit tests
>   test/crypto: add capability checks
>   test/crypto: refactor unit tests into one combined array
> 
>  app/test/test_cryptodev.c                  | 15975 +++++++++----------
>  app/test/test_cryptodev_blockcipher.c      |     2 +-
>  app/test/test_cryptodev_des_test_vectors.h |     6 +-
>  3 files changed, 7335 insertions(+), 8648 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> 2.17.1
Series-acked-by: Fiona Trahe <fiona.trahe@intel.com>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-17 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-11 16:10 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/1] " Adam Dybkowski
2019-12-11 16:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] test/crypto: refactor unit tests into one combined array Adam Dybkowski
2019-12-12 14:09   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/1] Refactor crypto unit tests Adam Dybkowski
2019-12-12 14:09     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] test/crypto: refactor unit tests into one combined array Adam Dybkowski
2019-12-13 15:22     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] Refactor crypto unit tests Adam Dybkowski
2019-12-13 15:22       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] test/crypto: refactor " Adam Dybkowski
2019-12-13 15:22       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] test/crypto: refactor unit tests - continuation Adam Dybkowski
2020-01-15 18:06         ` Trahe, Fiona
2019-12-13 15:22       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] test/crypto: add capability checks Adam Dybkowski
2019-12-13 15:22       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] test/crypto: refactor unit tests into one combined array Adam Dybkowski
2020-01-16 10:40       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] Refactor crypto unit tests Adam Dybkowski
2020-01-16 10:40         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] test/crypto: refactor " Adam Dybkowski
2020-01-16 10:40         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] test/crypto: refactor unit tests - continuation Adam Dybkowski
2020-01-16 10:40         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] test/crypto: add capability checks Adam Dybkowski
2020-01-16 10:40         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] test/crypto: refactor unit tests into one combined array Adam Dybkowski
2020-01-16 12:42         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] Refactor crypto unit tests Adam Dybkowski
2020-01-16 12:42           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/4] test/crypto: refactor " Adam Dybkowski
2020-01-16 12:42           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/4] test/crypto: refactor unit tests - continuation Adam Dybkowski
2020-01-16 12:42           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/4] test/crypto: add capability checks Adam Dybkowski
2020-01-16 12:42           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/4] test/crypto: refactor unit tests into one combined array Adam Dybkowski
2020-01-17  9:53           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] Refactor crypto unit tests Dybkowski, AdamX
2020-01-17 14:46           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/3] " Adam Dybkowski
2020-01-17 14:46             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/3] test/crypto: refactor " Adam Dybkowski
2020-01-17 14:46             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] test/crypto: add capability checks Adam Dybkowski
2020-01-17 14:46             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/3] test/crypto: refactor unit tests into one combined array Adam Dybkowski
2020-01-17 14:56             ` Trahe, Fiona [this message]
2020-01-20 10:02             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/3] Refactor crypto unit tests Akhil Goyal
2020-01-20 13:11             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 " Adam Dybkowski
2020-01-20 13:11               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/3] test/crypto: refactor " Adam Dybkowski
2020-01-20 13:11               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/3] test/crypto: add capability checks Adam Dybkowski
2020-01-20 13:11               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/3] test/crypto: refactor unit tests into one combined array Adam Dybkowski
2020-01-20 13:30               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/3] Refactor crypto unit tests Akhil Goyal
2020-01-21 10:26                 ` Akhil Goyal
2019-12-12 11:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/1] " Akhil Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MWHPR11MB1807A7C08B92CEC669E56489E4310@MWHPR11MB1807.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=fiona.trahe@intel.com \
    --cc=adamx.dybkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).