DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
To: NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"stephen@networkplumber.org" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	"ferruh.yigit@intel.com" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	"olivier.matz@6wind.com" <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
	"jerinjacobk@gmail.com" <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>,
	"maxime.coquelin@redhat.com" <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
	"david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/9] ethdev: introduce Rx buffer split
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 17:11:37 +0000
Message-ID: <MWHPR12MB1360F43167FDC72F4C4D002BDF070@MWHPR12MB1360.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <228932926.FOKgLshO0b@thomas>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 20:03
> To: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; Andrew Rybchenko
> <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; stephen@networkplumber.org; ferruh.yigit@intel.com;
> olivier.matz@6wind.com; jerinjacobk@gmail.com;
> maxime.coquelin@redhat.com; david.marchand@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/9] ethdev: introduce Rx buffer split
> 
> 12/10/2020 18:38, Andrew Rybchenko:
> > On 10/12/20 7:19 PM, Viacheslav Ovsiienko wrote:
> > >  int
> > > +rte_eth_rxseg_queue_setup(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t rx_queue_id,
> > > +			  uint16_t nb_rx_desc, unsigned int socket_id,
> > > +			  const struct rte_eth_rxconf *rx_conf,
> > > +			  const struct rte_eth_rxseg *rx_seg, uint16_t n_seg) {
> > > +	int ret;
> > > +	uint16_t seg_idx;
> > > +	uint32_t mbp_buf_size;
> >
> > <start-of-dup>
> >
> > > +	struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
> > > +	struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info;
> > > +	struct rte_eth_rxconf local_conf;
> > > +	void **rxq;
> > > +
> > > +	RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -EINVAL);
> > > +
> > > +	dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
> > > +	if (rx_queue_id >= dev->data->nb_rx_queues) {
> > > +		RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR, "Invalid RX queue_id=%u\n",
> rx_queue_id);
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +	}
> >
> > <end-of-dup>
> >
> > > +
> > > +	if (rx_seg == NULL) {
> > > +		RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR, "Invalid null description pointer\n");
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	if (n_seg == 0) {
> > > +		RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR, "Invalid zero description
> number\n");
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->dev_ops->rxseg_queue_setup,
> > > +-ENOTSUP);
> > > +
> >
> > <start-of-dup>
> >
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * Check the size of the mbuf data buffer.
> > > +	 * This value must be provided in the private data of the memory
> pool.
> > > +	 * First check that the memory pool has a valid private data.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	ret = rte_eth_dev_info_get(port_id, &dev_info);
> > > +	if (ret != 0)
> > > +		return ret;
> >
> > <end-of-dup>
> >
> > > +
> > > +	for (seg_idx = 0; seg_idx < n_seg; seg_idx++) {
> > > +		struct rte_mempool *mp = rx_seg[seg_idx].mp;
> > > +
> > > +		if (mp->private_data_size <
> > > +				sizeof(struct rte_pktmbuf_pool_private)) {
> > > +			RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR, "%s private_data_size %d <
> %d\n",
> > > +				mp->name, (int)mp->private_data_size,
> > > +				(int)sizeof(struct
> rte_pktmbuf_pool_private));
> > > +			return -ENOSPC;
> > > +		}
> > > +
> > > +		mbp_buf_size = rte_pktmbuf_data_room_size(mp);
> > > +		if (mbp_buf_size < rx_seg[seg_idx].length +
> > > +				   rx_seg[seg_idx].offset +
> > > +				   (seg_idx ? 0 :
> > > +				    (uint32_t)RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM)) {
> > > +			RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR,
> > > +				"%s mbuf_data_room_size %d < %d"
> > > +				" (segment length=%d + segment
> offset=%d)\n",
> > > +				mp->name, (int)mbp_buf_size,
> > > +				(int)(rx_seg[seg_idx].length +
> > > +				      rx_seg[seg_idx].offset),
> > > +				(int)rx_seg[seg_idx].length,
> > > +				(int)rx_seg[seg_idx].offset);
> > > +			return -EINVAL;
> > > +		}
> > > +	}
> > > +
> >
> > <start-of-huge-dup>
> >
> > > +	/* Use default specified by driver, if nb_rx_desc is zero */
> > > +	if (nb_rx_desc == 0) {
> > > +		nb_rx_desc = dev_info.default_rxportconf.ring_size;
> > > +		/* If driver default is also zero, fall back on EAL default */
> > > +		if (nb_rx_desc == 0)
> > > +			nb_rx_desc =
> RTE_ETH_DEV_FALLBACK_RX_RINGSIZE;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	if (nb_rx_desc > dev_info.rx_desc_lim.nb_max ||
> > > +			nb_rx_desc < dev_info.rx_desc_lim.nb_min ||
> > > +			nb_rx_desc % dev_info.rx_desc_lim.nb_align != 0) {
> > > +
> > > +		RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR,
> > > +			"Invalid value for nb_rx_desc(=%hu), should be: "
> > > +			"<= %hu, >= %hu, and a product of %hu\n",
> > > +			nb_rx_desc, dev_info.rx_desc_lim.nb_max,
> > > +			dev_info.rx_desc_lim.nb_min,
> > > +			dev_info.rx_desc_lim.nb_align);
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	if (dev->data->dev_started &&
> > > +		!(dev_info.dev_capa &
> > > +			RTE_ETH_DEV_CAPA_RUNTIME_RX_QUEUE_SETUP))
> > > +		return -EBUSY;
> > > +
> > > +	if (dev->data->dev_started &&
> > > +		(dev->data->rx_queue_state[rx_queue_id] !=
> > > +			RTE_ETH_QUEUE_STATE_STOPPED))
> > > +		return -EBUSY;
> > > +
> > > +	rxq = dev->data->rx_queues;
> > > +	if (rxq[rx_queue_id]) {
> > > +		RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->dev_ops-
> >rx_queue_release,
> > > +					-ENOTSUP);
> > > +		(*dev->dev_ops->rx_queue_release)(rxq[rx_queue_id]);
> > > +		rxq[rx_queue_id] = NULL;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	if (rx_conf == NULL)
> > > +		rx_conf = &dev_info.default_rxconf;
> > > +
> > > +	local_conf = *rx_conf;
> > > +
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * If an offloading has already been enabled in
> > > +	 * rte_eth_dev_configure(), it has been enabled on all queues,
> > > +	 * so there is no need to enable it in this queue again.
> > > +	 * The local_conf.offloads input to underlying PMD only carries
> > > +	 * those offloadings which are only enabled on this queue and
> > > +	 * not enabled on all queues.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	local_conf.offloads &= ~dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads;
> > > +
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * New added offloadings for this queue are those not enabled in
> > > +	 * rte_eth_dev_configure() and they must be per-queue type.
> > > +	 * A pure per-port offloading can't be enabled on a queue while
> > > +	 * disabled on another queue. A pure per-port offloading can't
> > > +	 * be enabled for any queue as new added one if it hasn't been
> > > +	 * enabled in rte_eth_dev_configure().
> > > +	 */
> > > +	if ((local_conf.offloads & dev_info.rx_queue_offload_capa) !=
> > > +	     local_conf.offloads) {
> > > +		RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR,
> > > +			"Ethdev port_id=%d rx_queue_id=%d, new added
> offloads"
> > > +			" 0x%"PRIx64" must be within per-queue offload"
> > > +			" capabilities 0x%"PRIx64" in %s()\n",
> > > +			port_id, rx_queue_id, local_conf.offloads,
> > > +			dev_info.rx_queue_offload_capa,
> > > +			__func__);
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * If LRO is enabled, check that the maximum aggregated packet
> > > +	 * size is supported by the configured device.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	if (local_conf.offloads & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_LRO) {
> > > +		if (dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.max_lro_pkt_size == 0)
> > > +			dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.max_lro_pkt_size =
> > > +				dev->data-
> >dev_conf.rxmode.max_rx_pkt_len;
> > > +		int ret = check_lro_pkt_size(port_id,
> > > +				dev->data-
> >dev_conf.rxmode.max_lro_pkt_size,
> > > +				dev->data-
> >dev_conf.rxmode.max_rx_pkt_len,
> > > +				dev_info.max_lro_pkt_size);
> > > +		if (ret != 0)
> > > +			return ret;
> > > +	}
> >
> > <end-of-huge-dup>
> >
> > IMO It is not acceptable to duplication so much code.
> > It is simply unmaintainable.
> >
> > NACK
> 
> Can it be solved by making rte_eth_rx_queue_setup() a wrapper on top of
> this new rte_eth_rxseg_queue_setup() ?
> 
It would be the code refactoring. The more simple solution - provide the subroutine to perform the common part of parameters check.

It seems there are no strong decision-making pro's and con's for these two approaches.
As I said - from my side the main concern of including segment descriptions into config structure
is introducing ambiguity of some kind. But, if we decide to switch to this approach - will handle.

With best regards, Slava




  parent reply index

Thread overview: 172+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-17 17:49 [dpdk-dev] [RFC] " Slava Ovsiienko
2020-09-17 16:55 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-10-01  8:54   ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-12  8:45     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-10-12  9:56       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 15:14         ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-12 15:28           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-10-12 15:34             ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 15:56               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-10-12 15:59                 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 16:52                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-12 16:03           ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-10-12 16:10             ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-13 21:59         ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-14  7:17           ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-14  7:37           ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-05  6:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-05  6:26   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-05  6:26   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/5] app/testpmd: add multiple pools per core creation Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-05  6:26   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/5] app/testpmd: add buffer split offload configuration Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-05  6:26   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] app/testpmd: add rxpkts commands and parameters Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-05  6:26   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/5] app/testpmd: add extended Rx queue setup Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-07 15:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/9] ethdev: introduce Rx buffer split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-07 15:06   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/9] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-11 22:17     ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-12  9:40       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 10:09         ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-07 15:06   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/9] app/testpmd: add multiple pools per core creation Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-07 15:06   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/9] app/testpmd: add buffer split offload configuration Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-07 15:06   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/9] app/testpmd: add rxpkts commands and parameters Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-07 15:06   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/9] app/testpmd: add extended Rx queue setup Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-07 15:06   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/9] net/mlx5: add extended Rx queue setup routine Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-07 15:06   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 7/9] net/mlx5: configure Rx queue to support split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-07 15:06   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 8/9] net/mlx5: register multiple pool for Rx queue Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-07 15:06   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 9/9] net/mlx5: update Rx datapath to support split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 16:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/9] ethdev: introduce Rx buffer split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 16:19   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/9] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 16:38     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-10-12 17:03       ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-12 17:11         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-10-12 20:22           ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 17:11         ` Slava Ovsiienko [this message]
2020-10-12 16:19   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/9] app/testpmd: add multiple pools per core creation Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 16:19   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/9] app/testpmd: add buffer split offload configuration Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 16:19   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/9] app/testpmd: add rxpkts commands and parameters Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 16:19   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/9] app/testpmd: add extended Rx queue setup Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 16:19   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/9] net/mlx5: add extended Rx queue setup routine Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 16:19   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 7/9] net/mlx5: configure Rx queue to support split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 16:19   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 8/9] net/mlx5: register multiple pool for Rx queue Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 16:19   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 9/9] net/mlx5: update Rx datapath to support split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/9] ethdev: introduce Rx buffer split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 20:09   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/9] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 20:09   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/9] app/testpmd: add multiple pools per core creation Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 20:09   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/9] app/testpmd: add buffer split offload configuration Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 20:09   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/9] app/testpmd: add rxpkts commands and parameters Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 20:09   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/9] app/testpmd: add extended Rx queue setup Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 20:09   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/9] net/mlx5: add extended Rx queue setup routine Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 20:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 7/9] net/mlx5: configure Rx queue to support split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 20:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 8/9] net/mlx5: register multiple pool for Rx queue Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 20:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 9/9] net/mlx5: update Rx datapath to support split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-13 19:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/6] ethdev: introduce Rx buffer split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-13 19:21   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/6] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-13 22:34     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-14 13:31       ` Olivier Matz
2020-10-14 14:42       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-13 19:21   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/6] app/testpmd: add multiple pools per core creation Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-13 19:21   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/6] app/testpmd: add buffer split offload configuration Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-13 19:21   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/6] app/testpmd: add rxpkts commands and parameters Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-13 19:21   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/6] app/testpmd: add rxoffs " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-13 19:21   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 6/6] app/testpmd: add extended Rx queue setup Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-14 18:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/6] ethdev: introduce Rx buffer split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-14 18:11   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/6] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-14 18:57     ` Jerin Jacob
2020-10-15  7:43       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-15  9:27         ` Jerin Jacob
2020-10-15 10:27           ` Jerin Jacob
2020-10-15 10:51             ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-15 11:26               ` Jerin Jacob
2020-10-15 11:36                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-15 11:49                   ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-15 12:49                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-15 13:07                       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-10-15 13:57                         ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-15 20:22                         ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-15  9:49         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-10-15 10:34           ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-15 11:09             ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-10-15 14:39               ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-14 22:13     ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-14 22:50     ` Ajit Khaparde
2020-10-15 10:11     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-10-15 10:19       ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-14 18:11   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/6] app/testpmd: add multiple pools per core creation Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-14 18:11   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/6] app/testpmd: add buffer split offload configuration Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-14 18:12   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/6] app/testpmd: add rxpkts commands and parameters Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-14 18:12   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 5/6] app/testpmd: add rxoffs " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-14 18:12   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 6/6] app/testpmd: add extended Rx queue setup Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-15  0:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal/rte_malloc: add alloc_size() attribute to allocation functions Stephen Hemminger
2020-10-19 14:13   ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-19 14:22     ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-15 20:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/6] ethdev: introduce Rx buffer split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-15 20:17   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/6] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-15 20:30     ` Jerin Jacob
2020-10-15 20:33     ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-15 22:01       ` Ajit Khaparde
2020-10-15 20:17   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/6] app/testpmd: add multiple pools per core creation Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-15 20:17   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/6] app/testpmd: add buffer split offload configuration Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-15 20:17   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/6] app/testpmd: add rxpkts commands and parameters Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-15 20:17   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 5/6] app/testpmd: add rxoffs " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-15 20:17   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 6/6] app/testpmd: add extended Rx queue setup Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16  7:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/6] ethdev: introduce Rx buffer split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16  7:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/6] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16  8:51     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-10-16  8:58       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-10-16  9:15       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-16  9:27         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-10-16  9:34           ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-16  9:37         ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-16  9:38           ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-16  9:19     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-16  9:21       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-10-16  9:22       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-16  7:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/6] app/testpmd: add multiple pools per core creation Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16  7:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/6] app/testpmd: add buffer split offload configuration Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16  7:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 4/6] app/testpmd: add rxpkts commands and parameters Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16  7:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 5/6] app/testpmd: add rxoffs " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16  7:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 6/6] app/testpmd: add extended Rx queue setup Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 10:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/6] ethdev: introduce Rx buffer split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 10:22   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/6] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 11:21     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-16 13:08       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 10:22   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/6] app/testpmd: add multiple pools per core creation Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 10:22   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/6] app/testpmd: add buffer split offload configuration Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 10:22   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 4/6] app/testpmd: add rxpkts commands and parameters Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 10:22   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 5/6] app/testpmd: add rxoffs " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 10:22   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 6/6] app/testpmd: add extended Rx queue setup Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 12:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/6] ethdev: introduce Rx buffer split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 12:41   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 1/6] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 12:41   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 2/6] app/testpmd: add multiple pools per core creation Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 12:41   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 3/6] app/testpmd: add buffer split offload configuration Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 12:41   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 4/6] app/testpmd: add rxpkts commands and parameters Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 12:41   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 5/6] app/testpmd: add rxoffs " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 12:41   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 6/6] app/testpmd: add extended Rx queue setup Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 13:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 0/6] ethdev: introduce Rx buffer split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 13:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 1/6] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 15:14     ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-16 16:18       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 15:47     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-16 16:05       ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-16 16:06         ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-16 13:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 2/6] app/testpmd: add multiple pools per core creation Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 15:05     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-16 15:38       ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-16 15:48         ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 15:52           ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-16 15:55             ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 15:57               ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-16 13:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 3/6] app/testpmd: add buffer split offload configuration Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 13:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 4/6] app/testpmd: add rxpkts commands and parameters Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 13:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 5/6] app/testpmd: add rxoffs " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 13:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 6/6] app/testpmd: add extended Rx queue setup Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 16:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 0/6] ethdev: introduce Rx buffer split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 16:44   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 1/6] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 19:22     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-16 21:36       ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-16 16:44   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 2/6] app/testpmd: add multiple pools per core creation Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 16:44   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 3/6] app/testpmd: add buffer split offload configuration Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 16:44   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 4/6] app/testpmd: add rxpkts commands and parameters Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 16:44   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 5/6] app/testpmd: add rxoffs " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 16:44   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 6/6] app/testpmd: add extended Rx queue setup Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 17:05   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 0/6] ethdev: introduce Rx buffer split Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-16 17:07     ` Slava Ovsiienko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MWHPR12MB1360F43167FDC72F4C4D002BDF070@MWHPR12MB1360.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox