From: Mahipal Challa <mchalla@marvell.com>
To: "Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)" <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
"Narayana Prasad Raju Athreya" <pathreya@marvell.com>,
Subrahmanyam Nilla <snilla@marvell.com>,
Venkateshwarlu Nalla <venkatn@marvell.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 5/6] raw/octeontx2_ep: add dequeue operation
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 06:45:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MWHPR18MB13763FB1810E82E679BD3552BE520@MWHPR18MB1376.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR08MB5376FE045FD650CFBCCCAD368F570@VI1PR08MB5376.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Gavin,
Please see response inline.
________________________________
From: Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China) <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2019 9:48 PM
To: Mahipal Challa <mchalla@marvell.com>; dev@dpdk.org <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>; Narayana Prasad Raju Athreya <pathreya@marvell.com>; Subrahmanyam Nilla <snilla@marvell.com>; Venkateshwarlu Nalla <venkatn@marvell.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: [EXT] RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 5/6] raw/octeontx2_ep: add dequeue operation
External Email
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Mahipal,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Mahipal Challa
> Sent: Friday, December 6, 2019 2:39 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: jerinj@marvell.com; pathreya@marvell.com; snilla@marvell.com;
> venkatn@marvell.com
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 5/6] raw/octeontx2_ep: add dequeue
> operation
>
> Add rawdev dequeue operation for SDP VF devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mahipal Challa <mchalla@marvell.com>
> ---
> drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_enqdeq.c | 199
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_enqdeq.h | 2 +
> drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_rawdev.c | 1 +
> drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_rawdev.h | 18 ++-
> 4 files changed, 219 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_enqdeq.c
> b/drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_enqdeq.c
> index ebbacfb..451fcc0 100644
> --- a/drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_enqdeq.c
> +++ b/drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_enqdeq.c
> @@ -260,6 +260,7 @@
> rte_mempool_get(sdpvf->enqdeq_mpool, &buf);
> if (buf == NULL) {
> otx2_err("OQ buffer alloc failed");
> + droq->stats.rx_alloc_failure++;
> /* sdp_droq_destroy_ring_buffers(droq);*/
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> @@ -645,3 +646,201 @@
> return SDP_IQ_SEND_FAILED;
> }
>
> +static uint32_t
> +sdp_droq_refill(struct sdp_device *sdpvf, struct sdp_droq *droq)
> +{
> + struct sdp_droq_desc *desc_ring;
> + uint32_t desc_refilled = 0;
> + void *buf = NULL;
> +
> + desc_ring = droq->desc_ring;
> +
> + while (droq->refill_count && (desc_refilled < droq->nb_desc)) {
> + /* If a valid buffer exists (happens if there is no dispatch),
> + * reuse the buffer, else allocate.
> + */
> + if (droq->recv_buf_list[droq->refill_idx].buffer != NULL)
> + break;
> +
> + rte_mempool_get(sdpvf->enqdeq_mpool, &buf);
> + /* If a buffer could not be allocated, no point in
> + * continuing
> + */
> + if (buf == NULL) {
> + droq->stats.rx_alloc_failure++;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + droq->recv_buf_list[droq->refill_idx].buffer = buf;
> + desc_ring[droq->refill_idx].buffer_ptr =
> rte_mem_virt2iova(buf);
> +
> + /* Reset any previous values in the length field. */
> + droq->info_list[droq->refill_idx].length = 0;
> +
> + droq->refill_idx = sdp_incr_index(droq->refill_idx, 1,
> + droq->nb_desc);
> +
> + desc_refilled++;
> + droq->refill_count--;
> +
> + }
> +
> + return desc_refilled;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +sdp_droq_read_packet(struct sdp_device *sdpvf __rte_unused,
> + struct sdp_droq *droq,
> + struct sdp_droq_pkt *droq_pkt)
> +{
> + struct sdp_droq_info *info;
> + uint32_t total_len = 0;
> + uint32_t pkt_len = 0;
> +
> + info = &droq->info_list[droq->read_idx];
> + sdp_swap_8B_data((uint64_t *)&info->length, 1);
> + if (!info->length) {
> + otx2_err("OQ info_list->length[%ld]", (long)info->length);
> + goto oq_read_fail;
> + }
> +
> + /* Deduce the actual data size */
> + info->length -= SDP_RH_SIZE;
> + total_len += (uint32_t)info->length;
> +
> + otx2_sdp_dbg("OQ: pkt_len[%ld], buffer_size %d",
> + (long)info->length, droq->buffer_size);
> + if (info->length > droq->buffer_size) {
> + otx2_err("This mode is not supported: pkt_len > buffer_size");
> + goto oq_read_fail;
> + }
> +
> + if (info->length <= droq->buffer_size) {
> + pkt_len = (uint32_t)info->length;
> + droq_pkt->data = droq->recv_buf_list[droq->read_idx].buffer;
> + droq_pkt->len = pkt_len;
> +
> + droq->recv_buf_list[droq->read_idx].buffer = NULL;
> + droq->read_idx = sdp_incr_index(droq->read_idx, 1,/*
> count */
> + droq->nb_desc /* max rd idx
> */);
> + droq->refill_count++;
> +
> + }
> +
> + info->length = 0;
> +
> + return SDP_OQ_RECV_SUCCESS;
> +
> +oq_read_fail:
> + return SDP_OQ_RECV_FAILED;
> +}
> +
> +static inline uint32_t
> +sdp_check_droq_pkts(struct sdp_droq *droq, uint32_t burst_size)
> +{
> + uint32_t min_pkts = 0;
> + uint32_t new_pkts;
> + uint32_t pkt_count;
> +
> + /* Latest available OQ packets */
> + pkt_count = rte_read32(droq->pkts_sent_reg);
> +
> + /* Newly arrived packets */
> + new_pkts = pkt_count - droq->last_pkt_count;
> + otx2_sdp_dbg("Recvd [%d] new OQ pkts", new_pkts);
> +
> + min_pkts = (new_pkts > burst_size) ? burst_size : new_pkts;
> + if (min_pkts) {
> + rte_atomic64_add(&droq->pkts_pending, min_pkts);
> + /* Back up the aggregated packet count so far */
> + droq->last_pkt_count += min_pkts;
> + }
> +
> + return min_pkts;
> +}
> +
> +/* Check for response arrival from OCTEON TX2
> + * returns number of requests completed
> + */
> +int
> +sdp_rawdev_dequeue(struct rte_rawdev *rawdev,
> + struct rte_rawdev_buf **buffers, unsigned int count,
> + rte_rawdev_obj_t context __rte_unused)
> +{
> + struct sdp_droq_pkt *oq_pkt;
> + struct sdp_device *sdpvf;
> + struct sdp_droq *droq;
> +
> + uint32_t q_no = 0, pkts;
> + uint32_t new_pkts;
> + uint32_t ret;
> +
> + sdpvf = (struct sdp_device *)rawdev->dev_private;
> +
> + droq = sdpvf->droq[q_no];
> + if (!droq) {
> + otx2_err("Invalid droq[%d]", q_no);
> + goto deq_fail;
> + }
> +
> + /* Grab the lock */
> + rte_spinlock_lock(&droq->lock);
> +
> + new_pkts = sdp_check_droq_pkts(droq, count);
> + if (!new_pkts) {
> + otx2_sdp_dbg("Zero new_pkts:%d", new_pkts);
> + goto deq_fail; /* No pkts at this moment */
> + }
> +
> + otx2_sdp_dbg("Received new_pkts = %d", new_pkts);
> +
> + for (pkts = 0; pkts < new_pkts; pkts++) {
> +
> + /* Push the received pkt to application */
> + oq_pkt = (struct sdp_droq_pkt *)buffers[pkts];
> +
> + ret = sdp_droq_read_packet(sdpvf, droq, oq_pkt);
> + if (ret) {
> + otx2_err("DROQ read pakt failed.");
> + goto deq_fail;
> + }
> +
> + /* Stats */
> + droq->stats.pkts_received++;
> + droq->stats.bytes_received += oq_pkt->len;
> + }
> +
> + /* Ack the h/w with no# of pkts read by Host */
> + rte_wmb();
The following rte_write32 call has a built-in rte_io_wmb, which is sufficient for IO device.
The above barrier can be saved.
[Mahipal]: Agreed, will remove it.
> + rte_write32(pkts, droq->pkts_sent_reg);
> + rte_wmb();
Rte_cio_wmb is sufficient to keep order between coherent memory domain between lcore and I/O device.
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__code.dpdk.org_dpdk_latest_source_lib_librte-5Feal_common_include_generic_rte-5Fatomic.h-23L137&d=DwIFAg&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=-s3WtB2eBJ7B88AJuqlVnFqXScHMHYESWbIBMvf7lwI&m=XF-4neNZaxQUEDvG1kq1bRFnn4v3X44D4se5yqm58Js&s=DWWym_IWt8oB3S86IKjl70drjid0ZHFyCtVfKVwMrsI&e=
[Mahipal]: Okay, will replace it with rte_cio_wmb() API.
> +
> + droq->last_pkt_count -= pkts;
> +
> + otx2_sdp_dbg("DROQ pkts[%d] pushed to application", pkts);
> +
> + /* Refill DROQ buffers */
> + if (droq->refill_count >= 2 /* droq->refill_threshold */) {
> + int desc_refilled = sdp_droq_refill(sdpvf, droq);
> +
> + /* Flush the droq descriptor data to memory to be sure
> + * that when we update the credits the data in memory is
> + * accurate.
> + */
> + rte_wmb();
Rte_cio_wmb should be the correct one, but the stronger rte_io_wmb within rte_write32 API suffice.
[Mahipal]: Agreed, will remove it.
> + rte_write32(desc_refilled, droq->pkts_credit_reg);
> +
> + /* Ensure mmio write completes */
> + rte_wmb();
If the target to ensure the completeness of the above writes, this is ok, otherwise it is overkill.
[Mahipal]: Yes, the target is to ensure the completion of all the writes, so it is required.
> + otx2_sdp_dbg("Refilled count = %d", desc_refilled);
> + }
> +
> + /* Release the spin lock */
> + rte_spinlock_unlock(&droq->lock);
> +
> + return pkts;
> +
> +deq_fail:
> + rte_spinlock_unlock(&droq->lock);
> + return SDP_OQ_RECV_FAILED;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_enqdeq.h
> b/drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_enqdeq.h
> index b9b7c0b..172fdc5 100644
> --- a/drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_enqdeq.h
> +++ b/drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_enqdeq.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
> #define SDP_IQ_SEND_FAILED (-1)
> #define SDP_IQ_SEND_SUCCESS (0)
>
> +#define SDP_OQ_RECV_FAILED (-1)
> +#define SDP_OQ_RECV_SUCCESS (0)
>
> static inline uint64_t
> sdp_endian_swap_8B(uint64_t _d)
> diff --git a/drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_rawdev.c
> b/drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_rawdev.c
> index 4ba8473..ddb208d 100644
> --- a/drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_rawdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_rawdev.c
> @@ -252,6 +252,7 @@
> .dev_stop = sdp_rawdev_stop,
> .dev_close = sdp_rawdev_close,
> .enqueue_bufs = sdp_rawdev_enqueue,
> + .dequeue_bufs = sdp_rawdev_dequeue,
> };
>
> static int
> diff --git a/drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_rawdev.h
> b/drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_rawdev.h
> index 8fd06fb..a77cbab 100644
> --- a/drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_rawdev.h
> +++ b/drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_rawdev.h
> @@ -279,6 +279,18 @@ struct sdp_recv_buffer {
> };
> #define SDP_DROQ_RECVBUF_SIZE (sizeof(struct sdp_recv_buffer))
>
> +/* DROQ statistics. Each output queue has four stats fields. */
> +struct sdp_droq_stats {
> + /* Number of packets received in this queue. */
> + uint64_t pkts_received;
> +
> + /* Bytes received by this queue. */
> + uint64_t bytes_received;
> +
> + /* Num of failures of rte_pktmbuf_alloc() */
> + uint64_t rx_alloc_failure;
> +};
> +
> /* Structure to define the configuration attributes for each Output queue. */
> struct sdp_oq_config {
> /* Max number of OQs available */
> @@ -345,6 +357,9 @@ struct sdp_droq {
> */
> void *pkts_sent_reg;
>
> + /* Statistics for this DROQ. */
> + struct sdp_droq_stats stats;
> +
> /* DMA mapped address of the DROQ descriptor ring. */
> size_t desc_ring_dma;
>
> @@ -476,6 +491,7 @@ struct sdp_device {
>
> int sdp_rawdev_enqueue(struct rte_rawdev *dev, struct rte_rawdev_buf
> **buffers,
> unsigned int count, rte_rawdev_obj_t context);
> -
> +int sdp_rawdev_dequeue(struct rte_rawdev *dev, struct rte_rawdev_buf
> **buffers,
> + unsigned int count, rte_rawdev_obj_t context);
>
> #endif /* _OTX2_EP_RAWDEV_H_ */
> --
> 1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-19 6:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-06 6:39 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/6] OCTEON TX2 End Point Driver Mahipal Challa
2019-12-06 6:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/6] raw/octeontx2_ep: add build infra and device probe Mahipal Challa
2019-12-06 6:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/6] raw/octeontx2_ep: add device configuration Mahipal Challa
2019-12-14 16:04 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-12-19 6:41 ` Mahipal Challa
2019-12-06 6:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/6] raw/octeontx2_ep: add device uninitialization Mahipal Challa
2019-12-06 6:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 4/6] raw/octeontx2_ep: add enqueue operation Mahipal Challa
2019-12-14 16:24 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-12-19 6:48 ` Mahipal Challa
2019-12-06 6:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 5/6] raw/octeontx2_ep: add dequeue operation Mahipal Challa
2019-12-14 16:18 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-12-19 6:45 ` Mahipal Challa [this message]
2019-12-06 6:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 6/6] raw/octeontx2_ep: add driver self test Mahipal Challa
2019-12-08 15:35 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/6] OCTEON TX2 End Point Driver Mahipal Challa
2019-12-08 15:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 5/6] raw/octeontx2_ep: add dequeue operation Mahipal Challa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MWHPR18MB13763FB1810E82E679BD3552BE520@MWHPR18MB1376.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
--to=mchalla@marvell.com \
--cc=Gavin.Hu@arm.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=pathreya@marvell.com \
--cc=snilla@marvell.com \
--cc=venkatn@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).