From: "Takeshi T Yoshimura" <TYOS@jp.ibm.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: "David Christensen" <drc@ibm.com>,
"Pradeep Satyanarayana" <pradeep@us.ibm.com>,
aconole@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vfio: fix expanding DMA area in ppc64le
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 02:30:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <OF55F2F264.56A29995-ON00258418.000DA3C8-00258418.000DCE27@notes.na.collabserv.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190613022239.6946-1-tyos@jp.ibm.com>
>宛先: dev@dpdk.org
>送信元: Takeshi Yoshimura <tyos@jp.ibm.com>
>日付: 2019/06/13 11:22AM
>Cc: drc@ibm.com, pradeep@us.ibm.com, Takeshi Yoshimura
><tyos@jp.ibm.com>
>件名: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] vfio: fix expanding DMA area in ppc64le
>
>In ppc64le, expanding DMA areas always fail because we cannot remove
>a DMA window. As a result, we cannot allocate more than one memseg in
>ppc64le. This is because vfio_spapr_dma_mem_map() doesn't unmap all
>the mapped DMA before removing the window. This patch fixes this
>incorrect behavior.
>
>I added a global variable to track current window size since we do
>not have better ways to get exact size of it than doing so. sPAPR
>IOMMU seems not to provide any ways to get window size with ioctl
>interfaces. rte_memseg_walk*() is currently used to calculate window
>size, but it walks memsegs that are marked as used, not mapped. So,
>we need to determine if a given memseg is mapped or not, otherwise
>the ioctl reports errors due to attempting to unregister memory
>addresses that are not registered. The global variable is excluded
>in non-ppc64le binaries.
>
>Similar problems happen in user maps. We need to avoid attempting to
>unmap the address that is given as the function's parameter. The
>compaction of user maps prevents us from passing correct length for
>unmapping DMA at the window recreation. So, I removed it in ppc64le.
>
>I also fixed the order of ioctl for unregister and unmap. The ioctl
>for unregister sometimes report device busy errors due to the
>existence of mapped area.
>
>Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yoshimura <tyos@jp.ibm.com>
>---
> lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal_vfio.c | 154
>+++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 103 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal_vfio.c
>b/lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal_vfio.c
>index f16c5c3c0..c1b275b56 100644
>--- a/lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal_vfio.c
>+++ b/lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal_vfio.c
>@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ is_null_map(const struct user_mem_map *map)
> return map->addr == 0 && map->iova == 0 && map->len == 0;
> }
>
>+#ifndef RTE_ARCH_PPC_64
> /* we may need to merge user mem maps together in case of user
>mapping/unmapping
> * chunks of memory, so we'll need a comparator function to sort
>segments.
> */
>@@ -126,6 +127,7 @@ user_mem_map_cmp(const void *a, const void *b)
>
> return 0;
> }
>+#endif
>
> /* adjust user map entry. this may result in shortening of existing
>map, or in
> * splitting existing map in two pieces.
>@@ -162,6 +164,7 @@ adjust_map(struct user_mem_map *src, struct
>user_mem_map *end,
> }
> }
>
>+#ifndef RTE_ARCH_PPC_64
> /* try merging two maps into one, return 1 if succeeded */
> static int
> merge_map(struct user_mem_map *left, struct user_mem_map *right)
>@@ -177,6 +180,7 @@ merge_map(struct user_mem_map *left, struct
>user_mem_map *right)
>
> return 1;
> }
>+#endif
>
> static struct user_mem_map *
> find_user_mem_map(struct user_mem_maps *user_mem_maps, uint64_t
>addr,
>@@ -211,6 +215,16 @@ find_user_mem_map(struct user_mem_maps
>*user_mem_maps, uint64_t addr,
> return NULL;
> }
>
>+#ifdef RTE_ARCH_PPC_64
>+/* Recreation of DMA window requires unregistering DMA memory.
>+ * Compaction confuses the logic and causes false reports in the
>recreation.
>+ * For now, we do not compact user maps in ppc64le.
>+ */
>+static void
>+compact_user_maps(__rte_unused struct user_mem_maps *user_mem_maps)
>+{
>+}
>+#else
> /* this will sort all user maps, and merge/compact any adjacent maps
>*/
> static void
> compact_user_maps(struct user_mem_maps *user_mem_maps)
>@@ -256,6 +270,7 @@ compact_user_maps(struct user_mem_maps
>*user_mem_maps)
> user_mem_maps->n_maps = cur_idx;
> }
> }
>+#endif
>
> static int
> vfio_open_group_fd(int iommu_group_num)
>@@ -1306,6 +1321,7 @@ vfio_type1_dma_map(int vfio_container_fd)
> return rte_memseg_walk(type1_map, &vfio_container_fd);
> }
>
>+#ifdef RTE_ARCH_PPC_64
> static int
> vfio_spapr_dma_do_map(int vfio_container_fd, uint64_t vaddr,
>uint64_t iova,
> uint64_t len, int do_map)
>@@ -1357,14 +1373,6 @@ vfio_spapr_dma_do_map(int vfio_container_fd,
>uint64_t vaddr, uint64_t iova,
> }
>
> } else {
>- ret = ioctl(vfio_container_fd,
>- VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_UNREGISTER_MEMORY, ®);
>- if (ret) {
>- RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, " cannot unregister vaddr for IOMMU, error %i
>(%s)\n",
>- errno, strerror(errno));
>- return -1;
>- }
>-
> memset(&dma_unmap, 0, sizeof(dma_unmap));
> dma_unmap.argsz = sizeof(struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap);
> dma_unmap.size = len;
>@@ -1377,24 +1385,50 @@ vfio_spapr_dma_do_map(int vfio_container_fd,
>uint64_t vaddr, uint64_t iova,
> errno, strerror(errno));
> return -1;
> }
>+
>+ ret = ioctl(vfio_container_fd,
>+ VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_UNREGISTER_MEMORY, ®);
>+ if (ret) {
>+ RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, " cannot unregister vaddr for IOMMU, error %i
>(%s)\n",
>+ errno, strerror(errno));
>+ return -1;
>+ }
> }
>
> return 0;
> }
>
>+struct spapr_remap_walk_param {
>+ int vfio_container_fd;
>+ uint64_t window_size;
>+};
>+
> static int
> vfio_spapr_map_walk(const struct rte_memseg_list *msl,
> const struct rte_memseg *ms, void *arg)
> {
>- int *vfio_container_fd = arg;
>+ struct spapr_remap_walk_param *p = arg;
>
>- if (msl->external)
>+ if (msl->external || ms->iova >= p->window_size)
> return 0;
>
>- return vfio_spapr_dma_do_map(*vfio_container_fd, ms->addr_64,
>ms->iova,
>+ return vfio_spapr_dma_do_map(p->vfio_container_fd, ms->addr_64,
>ms->iova,
> ms->len, 1);
> }
>
>+static int
>+vfio_spapr_unmap_walk(const struct rte_memseg_list *msl,
>+ const struct rte_memseg *ms, void *arg)
>+{
>+ struct spapr_remap_walk_param *p = arg;
>+
>+ if (msl->external || ms->iova >= p->window_size)
>+ return 0;
>+
>+ return vfio_spapr_dma_do_map(p->vfio_container_fd, ms->addr_64,
>ms->iova,
>+ ms->len, 0);
>+}
>+
> struct spapr_walk_param {
> uint64_t window_size;
> uint64_t hugepage_sz;
>@@ -1481,14 +1515,13 @@ vfio_spapr_create_new_dma_window(int
>vfio_container_fd,
> return 0;
> }
>
>+static struct vfio_iommu_spapr_tce_create prev_create;
>+
> static int
> vfio_spapr_dma_mem_map(int vfio_container_fd, uint64_t vaddr,
>uint64_t iova,
> uint64_t len, int do_map)
> {
>- struct spapr_walk_param param;
>- struct vfio_iommu_spapr_tce_create create = {
>- .argsz = sizeof(create),
>- };
>+ struct vfio_iommu_spapr_tce_create create;
> struct vfio_config *vfio_cfg;
> struct user_mem_maps *user_mem_maps;
> int i, ret = 0;
>@@ -1502,43 +1535,59 @@ vfio_spapr_dma_mem_map(int vfio_container_fd,
>uint64_t vaddr, uint64_t iova,
> user_mem_maps = &vfio_cfg->mem_maps;
> rte_spinlock_recursive_lock(&user_mem_maps->lock);
>
>- /* check if window size needs to be adjusted */
>- memset(¶m, 0, sizeof(param));
>-
>- /* we're inside a callback so use thread-unsafe version */
>- if (rte_memseg_walk_thread_unsafe(vfio_spapr_window_size_walk,
>- ¶m) < 0) {
>- RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Could not get window size\n");
>- ret = -1;
>- goto out;
>- }
>+ memcpy(&create, &prev_create, sizeof(create));
>
> /* also check user maps */
> for (i = 0; i < user_mem_maps->n_maps; i++) {
>- uint64_t max = user_mem_maps->maps[i].iova +
>- user_mem_maps->maps[i].len;
>- create.window_size = RTE_MAX(create.window_size, max);
>+ struct user_mem_map *map = &user_mem_maps->maps[i];
>+
>+ if (vaddr == map->addr && len == map->len)
>+ continue;
>+ create.window_size = RTE_MAX(create.window_size, map->iova +
>map->len);
> }
>
> /* sPAPR requires window size to be a power of 2 */
>- create.window_size = rte_align64pow2(param.window_size);
>- create.page_shift = __builtin_ctzll(param.hugepage_sz);
>- create.levels = 1;
>+ create.window_size = rte_align64pow2(create.window_size);
>
> if (do_map) {
>- void *addr;
> /* re-create window and remap the entire memory */
>- if (iova > create.window_size) {
>+ if (iova + len > create.window_size) {
>+ struct spapr_remap_walk_param param = {
>+ .vfio_container_fd = vfio_container_fd,
>+ .window_size = create.window_size,
>+ };
>+
>+ /* we're inside a callback, so use thread-unsafe version
>+ */
>+ rte_memseg_walk_thread_unsafe(vfio_spapr_unmap_walk,
>+ ¶m);
>+ /* destruct all user maps */
>+ for (i = 0; i < user_mem_maps->n_maps; i++) {
>+ struct user_mem_map *map =
>+ &user_mem_maps->maps[i];
>+ if (vaddr == map->addr && len == map->len)
>+ continue;
>+ if (vfio_spapr_dma_do_map(vfio_container_fd,
>+ map->addr, map->iova, map->len,
>+ 0)) {
>+ RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Could not destruct user DMA maps\n");
>+ ret = -1;
>+ goto out;
>+ }
>+ }
>+
>+ create.window_size = rte_align64pow2(iova + len);
> if (vfio_spapr_create_new_dma_window(vfio_container_fd,
> &create) < 0) {
> RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Could not create new DMA window\n");
> ret = -1;
> goto out;
> }
>+ memcpy(&prev_create, &create, sizeof(create));
> /* we're inside a callback, so use thread-unsafe version
> */
> if (rte_memseg_walk_thread_unsafe(vfio_spapr_map_walk,
>- &vfio_container_fd) < 0) {
>+ ¶m) < 0) {
> RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Could not recreate DMA maps\n");
> ret = -1;
> goto out;
>@@ -1547,6 +1596,8 @@ vfio_spapr_dma_mem_map(int vfio_container_fd,
>uint64_t vaddr, uint64_t iova,
> for (i = 0; i < user_mem_maps->n_maps; i++) {
> struct user_mem_map *map =
> &user_mem_maps->maps[i];
>+ if (vaddr == map->addr && len == map->len)
>+ continue;
> if (vfio_spapr_dma_do_map(vfio_container_fd,
> map->addr, map->iova, map->len,
> 1)) {
>@@ -1556,23 +1607,8 @@ vfio_spapr_dma_mem_map(int vfio_container_fd,
>uint64_t vaddr, uint64_t iova,
> }
> }
> }
>-
>- /* now that we've remapped all of the memory that was present
>- * before, map the segment that we were requested to map.
>- *
>- * however, if we were called by the callback, the memory we
>- * were called with was already in the memseg list, so previous
>- * mapping should've mapped that segment already.
>- *
>- * virt2memseg_list is a relatively cheap check, so use that. if
>- * memory is within any memseg list, it's a memseg, so it's
>- * already mapped.
>- */
>- addr = (void *)(uintptr_t)vaddr;
>- if (rte_mem_virt2memseg_list(addr) == NULL &&
>- vfio_spapr_dma_do_map(vfio_container_fd,
>- vaddr, iova, len, 1) < 0) {
>- RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Could not map segment\n");
>+ if (vfio_spapr_dma_do_map(vfio_container_fd, vaddr, iova, len, 1))
>{
>+ RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Failed to map DMA\n");
> ret = -1;
> goto out;
> }
>@@ -1613,6 +1649,7 @@ vfio_spapr_dma_map(int vfio_container_fd)
> RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Could not create new DMA window\n");
> return -1;
> }
>+ memcpy(&prev_create, &create, sizeof(create));
>
> /* map all DPDK segments for DMA. use 1:1 PA to IOVA mapping */
> if (rte_memseg_walk(vfio_spapr_map_walk, &vfio_container_fd) < 0)
>@@ -1620,6 +1657,21 @@ vfio_spapr_dma_map(int vfio_container_fd)
>
> return 0;
> }
>+#else
>+static int
>+vfio_spapr_dma_mem_map(int __rte_unused vfio_container_fd,
>+ uint64_t __rte_unused vaddr,
>+ uint64_t __rte_unused iova, uint64_t __rte_unused len,
>+ int __rte_unused do_map)
>+{
>+ return 0;
>+}
>+static int
>+vfio_spapr_dma_map(int __rte_unused vfio_container_fd)
>+{
>+ return 0;
>+}
>+#endif
>
> static int
> vfio_noiommu_dma_map(int __rte_unused vfio_container_fd)
>--
>2.17.1
>
>
Added CC: aconole@redhat.com
I updated the patch not to break builds in x86.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-13 2:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-12 6:33 Takeshi Yoshimura
2019-06-12 14:06 ` Aaron Conole
2019-06-13 2:22 ` Takeshi Yoshimura
2019-06-13 17:37 ` David Christensen
2019-06-14 7:34 ` David Marchand
2019-06-14 7:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Takeshi Yoshimura
2019-07-13 1:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Takeshi Yoshimura
2019-07-16 0:20 ` David Christensen
2019-07-16 10:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-06-18 2:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Mo, YufengX
2019-06-18 2:39 ` Mo, YufengX
2019-06-26 9:43 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-06-28 11:38 ` Takeshi T Yoshimura
2019-06-28 13:47 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-06-28 14:04 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-06-13 2:30 ` Takeshi T Yoshimura [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=OF55F2F264.56A29995-ON00258418.000DA3C8-00258418.000DCE27@notes.na.collabserv.com \
--to=tyos@jp.ibm.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=drc@ibm.com \
--cc=pradeep@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).