From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC7202BD8 for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 15:52:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x38Dju09044194 for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 09:52:52 -0400 Received: from smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com (smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com [192.155.248.93]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2rr74esmdq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 08 Apr 2019 09:52:51 -0400 Received: from localhost by smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com with smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com ESMTP for from ; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:52:50 -0000 Received: from us1a3-smtp02.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com (10.106.154.159) by smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com (10.106.227.39) with smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com ESMTP; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:51:28 -0000 Received: from us1a3-mail93.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com ([10.146.21.248]) by us1a3-smtp02.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com with ESMTP id 2019040813512702-575394 ; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:51:27 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@dpdk.org From: "Vivian Kong" Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 09:51:14 -0400 X-KeepSent: 56B51D50:79E62A14-852583D6:004B92AD; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: IBM Notes Release 9.0.1EXT SHF993 September 20, 2018 X-LLNOutbound: False X-Disclaimed: 62167 X-TNEFEvaluated: 1 x-cbid: 19040813-1799-0000-0000-00000B1B764B X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: BY=0; FL=0; FP=0; FZ=0; HX=0; KW=0; PH=0; SC=0.423878; ST=0; TS=0; UL=0; ISC=; MB=0.003148 X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00010889; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000284; SDB=6.01186127; UDB=6.00621196; IPR=6.00966884; BA=6.00006276; NDR=6.00000001; ZLA=6.00000005; ZF=6.00000009; ZB=6.00000000; ZP=6.00000000; ZH=6.00000000; ZU=6.00000002; MB=3.00026343; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-04-08 13:52:50 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unsuspicious REMOTE=unsuspicious XFE=unused X-IBM-AV-VERSION: SAVI=2019-04-08 10:10:26 - 6.00009778 x-cbparentid: 19040813-1800-0000-0000-0000FEB49AE0 Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-04-08_05:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Reason: safe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] Function name collision on bpf_validate X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 13:52:53 -0000 Hi, Has anyone run into this issue with bpf=5Fvalidate? We have an application that links to both DPDK and libpcap and both define bpf=5Fvalidate. I couldn't find other complaints on this so I'm wondering what would be the best way to handle this? Thanks and I appreciate for your input. Regards, Vivian Kong Linux on IBM Z Open Source Ecosystem IBM Canada Toronto Lab From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC25BA0096 for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 15:52:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F312C24; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 15:52:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC7202BD8 for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 15:52:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x38Dju09044194 for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 09:52:52 -0400 Received: from smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com (smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com [192.155.248.93]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2rr74esmdq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 08 Apr 2019 09:52:51 -0400 Received: from localhost by smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com with smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com ESMTP for from ; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:52:50 -0000 Received: from us1a3-smtp02.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com (10.106.154.159) by smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com (10.106.227.39) with smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com ESMTP; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:51:28 -0000 Received: from us1a3-mail93.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com ([10.146.21.248]) by us1a3-smtp02.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com with ESMTP id 2019040813512702-575394 ; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:51:27 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@dpdk.org From: "Vivian Kong" Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 09:51:14 -0400 X-KeepSent: 56B51D50:79E62A14-852583D6:004B92AD; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: IBM Notes Release 9.0.1EXT SHF993 September 20, 2018 X-LLNOutbound: False X-Disclaimed: 62167 X-TNEFEvaluated: 1 x-cbid: 19040813-1799-0000-0000-00000B1B764B X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: BY=0; FL=0; FP=0; FZ=0; HX=0; KW=0; PH=0; SC=0.423878; ST=0; TS=0; UL=0; ISC=; MB=0.003148 X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00010889; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000284; SDB=6.01186127; UDB=6.00621196; IPR=6.00966884; BA=6.00006276; NDR=6.00000001; ZLA=6.00000005; ZF=6.00000009; ZB=6.00000000; ZP=6.00000000; ZH=6.00000000; ZU=6.00000002; MB=3.00026343; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-04-08 13:52:50 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unsuspicious REMOTE=unsuspicious XFE=unused X-IBM-AV-VERSION: SAVI=2019-04-08 10:10:26 - 6.00009778 x-cbparentid: 19040813-1800-0000-0000-0000FEB49AE0 Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-04-08_05:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Reason: safe Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] Function name collision on bpf_validate X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Message-ID: <20190408135114.nnY_RUOWeL7TlulypfufzH2LpwXyaL721JClA7bDzkw@z> Hi, Has anyone run into this issue with bpf=5Fvalidate? We have an application that links to both DPDK and libpcap and both define bpf=5Fvalidate. I couldn't find other complaints on this so I'm wondering what would be the best way to handle this? Thanks and I appreciate for your input. Regards, Vivian Kong Linux on IBM Z Open Source Ecosystem IBM Canada Toronto Lab