From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320602BA3 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 13:22:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w7UBJdfZ093509 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 07:22:55 -0400 Received: from smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com (smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com [192.155.248.91]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2m6fg0gf05-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 07:22:54 -0400 Received: from localhost by smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com with smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com ESMTP for from ; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 11:22:54 -0000 Received: from us1a3-smtp03.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com (10.106.154.98) by smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com (10.106.227.143) with smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com ESMTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 11:22:46 -0000 Received: from us1a3-mail73.a3.dal09.isc4sb.com ([10.142.3.120]) by us1a3-smtp03.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com with ESMTP id 2018083011224627-449302 ; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 11:22:46 +0000 In-Reply-To: <3195236.p3PdHVbfnl@xps> To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com, Luca Boccassi , Chao Zhu , Christian Ehrhardt , dev@dpdk.org, Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan , Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan , Kevin Reilly , pradeep@us.ibm.com From: "Alfredo Mendoza" Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 06:22:47 -0500 References: <20180829131605.GJ3695@6wind.com> <3195236.p3PdHVbfnl@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-KeepSent: 79A722CD:35D86236-002582F9:003E59A1; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: IBM Notes Release 9.0.1FP10 SHF68 March 06, 2018 X-LLNOutbound: False X-Disclaimed: 21667 X-TNEFEvaluated: 1 x-cbid: 18083011-9951-0000-0000-000009431525 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: BY=0.292179; FL=0; FP=0; FZ=0; HX=0; KW=0; PH=0; SC=0.440328; ST=0; TS=0; UL=0; ISC=; MB=0.328600 X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00009638; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000266; SDB=6.01080998; UDB=6.00557650; IPR=6.00860982; BA=6.00006087; NDR=6.00000001; ZLA=6.00000005; ZF=6.00000009; ZB=6.00000000; ZP=6.00000000; ZH=6.00000000; ZU=6.00000002; MB=3.00023013; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-08-30 11:22:52 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unsuspicious REMOTE=unsuspicious XFE=unused X-IBM-AV-VERSION: SAVI=2018-08-30 03:43:05 - 6.00008900 x-cbparentid: 18083011-9952-0000-0000-000071241555 Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-08-30_04:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Reason: safe X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 16:09:21 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.08 build error on ppc64el - bool as vector type X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 11:22:56 -0000 I think Pradeep would be the correct person to answer about support for=20 ppc64le Thanks, Freddie Mendoza IBM Systems and Technology Group=20 STG ISV Enablement - Telco/Mobile (720) 395-4767 From: Thomas Monjalon To: Christian Ehrhardt ,=20 Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan , Chao Zhu=20 , pradeep@us.ibm.com, Alfredo Mendoza=20 , Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan=20 , Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan=20 , Kevin Reilly Cc: dev@dpdk.org, adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com, Luca Boccassi=20 Date: 08/30/2018 03:36 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.08 build error on ppc64el - bool as=20 vector type 29/08/2018 16:37, Christian Ehrhardt: > Why is no-one of IBM/Power world replying at all? > There not even was a "oh yeah, " mail by > them. > Is in fact ppc64 support in DPDK dead or at least "unmaintained"? > This is something that mid term has to be sorted out - I tried to pull=20 some > strings to get attention "there" but so far I'm waiting for a reply. > I'd say 18.11 should not be released with a clear re-confirmation of=20 ppc64 > maintainance ppc64 by "someone". I tend to agree. Let's try again: Chao, are you still available for DPDK PPC maintenance? SHOULD WE DECLARE DPDK NOT SUPPORTED ON PPC64?