From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx5.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2630B10CCE for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 07:01:24 +0100 (CET) X-MAILFROM: X-RCPTTO: X-FROMIP: 10.30.3.20 X-SEG-Scaned: 1 X-Received: unknown,10.30.3.20,20161222135910 Received: from unknown (HELO mse01.zte.com.cn) (10.30.3.20) by localhost with (AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 22 Dec 2016 05:59:10 -0000 Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse01.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id uBM6112T028797; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 14:01:01 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from yao.chenghu@zte.com.cn) In-Reply-To: <4341B239C0EFF9468EE453F9E9F4604D3C5C6866@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1482289505-47591-1-git-send-email-yao.chenghu@zte.com.cn> <4341B239C0EFF9468EE453F9E9F4604D3C5C6866@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> To: "Chen, Jing D" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-KeepSent: CB2DF9D2:DE972E74-48258091:001FDF7A; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.3 September 15, 2011 Message-ID: From: yao.chenghu@zte.com.cn Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 14:01:13 +0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.3FP6|November 21, 2013) at 2016-12-22 14:01:01, Serialize complete at 2016-12-22 14:01:01 X-MAIL: mse01.zte.com.cn uBM6112T028797 X-HQIP: 127.0.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogUkU6IFtQQVRDSF0gbmV0L2ZtMTBrL2Jh?= =?gb2312?b?c2U6IGFkZCBhIGJyZWFrIHN0YXRlbWVudA==?= X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 06:01:26 -0000 > > Thanks for contributing code. But there are 2 problems here. > > 1. You are modifying base code under 'base' directory. It assumed > READ ONLY because > there is another Intel team are maintaining it. > 2. Without your change, the code won't have any negative effect. > Yes, I appreciate your > change to make it stronger. > > So, I'd to say 'NAC' for this patch. > Ok, thanks for your reply.