DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gujjar, Abhinandan S" <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>
To: "Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>,
	Shijith Thotton <sthotton@marvell.com>,
	Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>,
	Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
	Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@nxp.com>
Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5] app/eventdev: add crypto producer mode
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 16:33:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH0PR11MB4824E9B62F3C716AE6ECA7AEE83C9@PH0PR11MB4824.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN0PR11MB5712E32BAE49D041B2E1238BD73C9@BN0PR11MB5712.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Van Haaren, Harry <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 3:43 PM
> To: Shijith Thotton <sthotton@marvell.com>; Gujjar, Abhinandan S
> <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>; Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>;
> Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>; Nipun Gupta
> <nipun.gupta@nxp.com>
> Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v5] app/eventdev: add crypto producer mode
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Shijith Thotton <sthotton@marvell.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 10:02 AM
> > To: Gujjar, Abhinandan S <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>; Van Haaren,
> > Harry <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>; Jerin Jacob
> > <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>; Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>;
> > Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@nxp.com>
> > Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v5] app/eventdev: add crypto producer mode
> >
> >
> >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Gujjar, Abhinandan S <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>
> > >Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 2:32 PM
> > >To: Shijith Thotton <sthotton@marvell.com>; Van Haaren, Harry
> > ><harry.van.haaren@intel.com>; Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>;
> > >Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>; Nipun Gupta
> > ><nipun.gupta@nxp.com>
> > >Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> > >Subject: [EXT] RE: [PATCH v5] app/eventdev: add crypto producer mode
> > >
> > >External Email
> > >
> > >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >-
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Shijith Thotton <sthotton@marvell.com>
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 12:34 PM
> > >> To: Van Haaren, Harry <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>; Gujjar,
> > >> Abhinandan S <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>; Jerin Jacob
> > >> <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>; Hemant Agrawal
> <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>;
> > >> Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@nxp.com>
> > >> Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> > >> Subject: RE: [PATCH v5] app/eventdev: add crypto producer mode
> > >>
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > + @Van Haaren, Harry
> > >> >
> > >> >Hi All,
> > >> >
> > >> >I have been away on vacation for the last week - hence the delay
> > >> >in reply on this thread.
> > >> >
> > >> ><snip discussion>
> > >> >
> > >> >> > > [1]
> > >> >> > > Steps to reproduce:
> > >> >> > > * Clone https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-
> > >> >3A__dpdk.org_git_next_dpdk-2Dnext-
> > >>
> >2Deventdev&d=DwIGaQ&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=G9w4KsPaQLAC
> > >> BfGCL
> > >> >35PtiRH996yqJDxAZwrWegU2qQ&m=-yaLm_cvg5cKTbBy3OoUs719W-
> > >>
> >E3ARETajJQmUvoE4aSAPjcEn1kulkRNxTn841D&s=lZjsn2zecck8IBBQRA7fId7
> > >> BXSYKk
> > >> >U8Tjj10gNQLB6U&e=
> > >> >> > > * Apply [v5] app/eventdev: add crypto producer mode
> > >> >> > >   git-pw --server
> > >> >> > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> > >>
> >3A__patches.dpdk.org_api_1.2_&d=DwIGaQ&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtf
> > >> Q&r=G
> > >> >9w4KsPaQLACBfGCL35PtiRH996yqJDxAZwrWegU2qQ&m=-
> > >> >yaLm_cvg5cKTbBy3OoUs719W-
> > >>
> >E3ARETajJQmUvoE4aSAPjcEn1kulkRNxTn841D&s=VBQtpQ8vwHt9BnMrPLz
> > >> SneOm
> > >> >zhLdP5bfyLuY42fCnak&e=  --project dpdk
> > >> >> > > patch apply 107645
> > >> >> > > * Apply [RFC] app/eventdev: add software crypto adapter
> support
> > >> >> > >   git-pw --server
> > >> >> > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> > >>
> >3A__patches.dpdk.org_api_1.2_&d=DwIGaQ&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtf
> > >> Q&r=G
> > >> >9w4KsPaQLACBfGCL35PtiRH996yqJDxAZwrWegU2qQ&m=-
> > >> >yaLm_cvg5cKTbBy3OoUs719W-
> > >>
> >E3ARETajJQmUvoE4aSAPjcEn1kulkRNxTn841D&s=VBQtpQ8vwHt9BnMrPLz
> > >> SneOm
> > >> >zhLdP5bfyLuY42fCnak&e=  --project dpdk
> > >> >> > > patch apply 107029
> > >> >> > > * meson x86_build_debug  -Dc_args='-g -O0' -
> > >> Ddisable_drivers="*/cnxk"
> > >> >> > > * ninja -C x86_build_debug
> > >> >> > > * Command to reproduce crash
> > >> >> > >   sudo ./x86_build_debug/app/dpdk-test-eventdev -l 0-8 -s
> > >> >> > > 0xf0
> > >> >> > > --vdev=event_sw0  --vdev="crypto_null" --
> > >> >> > > --prod_type_cryptodev --crypto_adptr_mode 0
> > >> >> > > --test=perf_queue --stlist=a --wlcores 1 --plcores 2
> > >> >
> > >> >Can confirm that these steps indeed cause segfault as reported.
> > >> >
> > >> >In debugging, it seems like there are *zero* NEW events, and large
> > >> >numbers of RELEASE events are enqueued... if so, this is not
> > >> >compliant to
> > >> the Eventdev API.
> > >> >Can somebody confirm that?
> > >> >
> > >> >The SW PMD is being told there are events to release, but there aren't
> any.
> > >> >Eventually, this leads to a mismatch in credit allocations, which
> > >> >then causes the IQ-chunks datastructure to corrupt.
> > >> >
> > >> >All in all, I'm not convinced this is a SW PMD issue yet - initial
> > >> >testing points to incorrect event OP NEW/FWD/RELEASE usage. Can we
> > >> >verify that the OPs being sent are correct?
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> Looks like an issue in crypto adapter service. The service is
> > >> starting with OP_FORWARD, if
> RTE_EVENT_DEV_CAP_IMPLICIT_RELEASE_DISABLE is set.
> > >> Abhinandan can confirm.
> > >
> > >The service is started with what application is requesting for from the
> adapter.
> > >The app can request either OP_NEW or FWD mode. Adapter while
> creating
> > >a
> > new
> > >instance
> > >requests for evendev caps & based on that adapter enqueues events
> > >back to evdev in FWD or NEW mode. All events are triggered by
> > >application and adapter is transparent here. Could you please explain
> > >me how this creating an issue?
> > >
> >
> > In lib/eventdev/rte_event_crypto_adapter.c:
> > ...
> > eca_ops_enqueue_burst(struct event_crypto_adapter *adapter, ...
> >                 rte_memcpy(ev, &m_data->response_info, sizeof(*ev));
> >                 ev->event_ptr = ops[i];
> >                 ev->event_type = RTE_EVENT_TYPE_CRYPTODEV;
> >                 if (adapter->implicit_release_disabled)
> >                         ev->op = RTE_EVENT_OP_FORWARD;
> >                 else
> >                         ev->op = RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW;  ...
> >
> > op and event_type is set in the service. Changing FORWARD to NEW will
> > fix the crash.
> 
> Yes, I think that is true, but lets ensure we're all understanding the reason.
> 
> The crash reported occurs when events with FORWARD are sent into the SW
> PMD, and later those are RELEASED. Notice, the event was never *NEW*.
> 
> Eventdev demands that when adding "new" things (e.g. events not
> previously seen by the PMD) into the Eventdev instance, the type of the
> event must be NEW. The NEW op type consumes "credits" in the SW PMD,
> and causes tracking for the NEW events.
> 
> I think that here the events *starts* with FORWARD events (should be NEW),
> and hence the crash occurs, because the NEW type was never enqueued
> first.
> 
> Shijith suggests changing FORWARD to NEW to fix the crash, I believe that
> may *fix* the crash here, but doing so without consideration for "implicit-
> release" mode may break things elsewhere.
> 
> Is the better fix to ensure that any events being enqueued into Eventdev for
> the first time are of a NEW type, and once circulated, either FORWARD or
> NEW can be used in a valid way?
> 
> 
> > I think, we should update the spec with what all values are used in
> response info.
> > I will remove setting op/event_type field of response info in the
> application.
> > PMD/service can take care of it.
> 
> I'm not familiar with how the adapter/pmd/service interact - no input from
> me.

Harry and Shijith, Thanks for all the observations.

After debugging, I think the changes are required in both adapter and application:
1. Application/Adapter in FWD mode case: The app is forming FWD events as an event originator (it is supposed to form NEW events) which is causing the crash!
App fix:
root@dev:/home/intel/abhi/dpdk-next-eventdev#
In crypto_adapter_enq_op_fwd() -> change as below: 
-       ev.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_FORWARD;
+       ev.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW;
        ev.queue_id = p->queue_id;
        ev.sched_type = RTE_SCHED_TYPE_ATOMIC; 

2. Adapter in NEW mode case: The app is calls rte_cryptodev_enqueue_burst() and directly enqueue crypto ops. Adapter had no clue crypto ops were derived from events or they were directly enqueued by application.
So, below is the fix for that:
root@dev:/home/intel/abhi/dpdk-next-eventdev# git diff lib/eventdev/rte_event_crypto_adapter.c
diff --git a/lib/eventdev/rte_event_crypto_adapter.c b/lib/eventdev/rte_event_crypto_adapter.c
index 0b484f3695..a6328b853d 100644
--- a/lib/eventdev/rte_event_crypto_adapter.c
+++ b/lib/eventdev/rte_event_crypto_adapter.c
@@ -658,7 +658,9 @@ eca_ops_enqueue_burst(struct event_crypto_adapter *adapter,
                rte_memcpy(ev, &m_data->response_info, sizeof(*ev));
                ev->event_ptr = ops[i];
                ev->event_type = RTE_EVENT_TYPE_CRYPTODEV;
-               if (adapter->implicit_release_disabled)
+               if (adapter->mode == RTE_EVENT_CRYPTO_ADAPTER_OP_NEW)
+                       ev->op = RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW;
+               else if (adapter->implicit_release_disabled)
                        ev->op = RTE_EVENT_OP_FORWARD;
                else
                        ev->op = RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW;


With the above fix, I can run the test for both NEW and FWD mode:

root@xdp-dev:/home/intel/abhi/dpdk-next-eventdev/abhi# ./app/dpdk-test-eventdev -l 0-8 -s 0xf0 --vdev=event_sw0  --vdev="crypto_null" -- --prod_type_cryptodev --crypto_adptr_mode 0 --test=perf_queue --stlist=a --wlcores 1 --plcores 2
EAL: Detected CPU lcores: 96
EAL: Detected NUMA nodes: 2
EAL: Detected static linkage of DPDK
EAL: Multi-process socket /var/run/dpdk/rte/mp_socket
EAL: Selected IOVA mode 'PA'
EAL: VFIO support initialized
CRYPTODEV: Creating cryptodev crypto_null

CRYPTODEV: Initialisation parameters - name: crypto_null,socket id: 0, max queue pairs: 8
TELEMETRY: No legacy callbacks, legacy socket not created
        driver               : event_sw
        test                 : perf_queue
        dev                  : 0
        verbose_level        : 1
        socket_id            : -1
        pool_sz              : 16384
        main lcore           : 0
        nb_pkts              : 67108864
        nb_timers            : 100000000
        available lcores     : {0 1 2 3 8}
        nb_flows             : 1024
        worker deq depth     : 16
        fwd_latency          : false
        nb_prod_lcores       : 1
        producer lcores      : {2}
        nb_worker_lcores     : 1
        worker lcores        : {1}
        nb_stages            : 1
        nb_evdev_ports       : 2
        nb_evdev_queues      : 1
        queue_priority       : false
        sched_type_list      : {A}
        crypto adapter mode  : OP_NEW
        nb_cryptodev         : 1
        prod_type            : Event crypto adapter producers
        prod_enq_burst_sz    : 1
CRYPTODEV: elt_size 0 is expanded to 208

0.000 mpps avg 0.000 mppsEventDev todo-fix-name: ports 3, qids 1
        rx   6080
        drop 0
        tx   2040
        sched calls: 9064463
        sched cq/qid call: 9069025
        sched no IQ enq: 9063156
        sched no CQ enq: 9063759
        inflight 4096, credits: 0
  Port 0
        rx   0  drop 0  tx   2024       inflight 0
        Max New: 4096   Avg cycles PP: 745      Credits: 40
        Receive burst distribution:
                0:100% 1-4:0.00% 5-8:0.00% 9-12:0.00% 13-16:0.00%
        rx ring used:    0      free: 4096
        cq ring used:    0      free:   16
  Port 1
        rx   0  drop 0  tx   0  inflight 0
        Max New: 4096   Avg cycles PP: 0        Credits: 0
        Receive burst distribution:
                0:-nan%
        rx ring used:    0      free: 4096
        cq ring used:    0      free:   16
  Port 2
        rx   6080       drop 0  tx   16 inflight 16
        Max New: 4096   Avg cycles PP: 0        Credits: 0
        Receive burst distribution:
                0:-nan%
        rx ring used:    0      free: 4096
        cq ring used:   16      free:    0
  Queue 0 (Atomic)
        rx   6080       drop 0  tx   2040
        Per Port Stats:
          Port 0: Pkts: 2024    Flows: 0
          Port 1: Pkts: 0       Flows: 0
          Port 2: Pkts: 16      Flows: 22
        iq 1: Used 4040
error: perf_launch_lcores() No schedules for seconds, deadlock

Packet distribution across worker cores :
Worker 0 packets: 7e8 percentage: 100.00
Result: Failed


root@xdp-dev:/home/intel/abhi/dpdk-next-eventdev/abhi# ./app/dpdk-test-eventdev -l 0-8 -s 0xf0 --vdev=event_sw0  --vdev="crypto_null" -- --prod_type_cryptodev --crypto_adptr_mode 1 --test=perf_queue --stlist=a --wlcores 1 --plcores 2
EAL: Detected CPU lcores: 96
EAL: Detected NUMA nodes: 2
EAL: Detected static linkage of DPDK
EAL: Multi-process socket /var/run/dpdk/rte/mp_socket
EAL: Selected IOVA mode 'PA'
EAL: VFIO support initialized
CRYPTODEV: Creating cryptodev crypto_null

CRYPTODEV: Initialisation parameters - name: crypto_null,socket id: 0, max queue pairs: 8
TELEMETRY: No legacy callbacks, legacy socket not created
        driver               : event_sw
        test                 : perf_queue
        dev                  : 0
        verbose_level        : 1
        socket_id            : -1
        pool_sz              : 16384
        main lcore           : 0
        nb_pkts              : 67108864
        nb_timers            : 100000000
        available lcores     : {0 1 2 3 8}
        nb_flows             : 1024
        worker deq depth     : 16
        fwd_latency          : false
        nb_prod_lcores       : 1
        producer lcores      : {2}
        nb_worker_lcores     : 1
        worker lcores        : {1}
        nb_stages            : 1
        nb_evdev_ports       : 2
        nb_evdev_queues      : 1
        queue_priority       : false
        sched_type_list      : {A}
        crypto adapter mode  : OP_FORWARD
        nb_cryptodev         : 1
        prod_type            : Event crypto adapter producers
        prod_enq_burst_sz    : 1
CRYPTODEV: elt_size 0 is expanded to 208

0.000 mpps avg 0.000 mppsEventDev todo-fix-name: ports 3, qids 1
        rx   4480
        drop 0
        tx   447
        sched calls: 8438712
        sched cq/qid call: 8442432
        sched no IQ enq: 8438434
        sched no CQ enq: 8438494
        inflight 4096, credits: 0
  Port 0
        rx   0  drop 0  tx   431        inflight 0
        Max New: 4096   Avg cycles PP: 637      Credits: 47
        Receive burst distribution:
                0:100% 1-4:0.00% 5-8:0.00% 13-16:0.00%
        rx ring used:    0      free: 4096
        cq ring used:    0      free:   16
  Port 1
        rx   4480       drop 0  tx   0  inflight 0
        Max New: 4096   Avg cycles PP: 0        Credits: 0
        Receive burst distribution:
                0:-nan%
        rx ring used:    0      free: 4096
        cq ring used:    0      free:   16
  Port 2
        rx   0  drop 0  tx   16 inflight 16
        Max New: 4096   Avg cycles PP: 0        Credits: 0
        Receive burst distribution:
                0:-nan%
        rx ring used:    0      free: 4096
        cq ring used:   16      free:    0
  Queue 0 (Atomic)
        rx   4480       drop 0  tx   447
        Per Port Stats:
          Port 0: Pkts: 431     Flows: 0
          Port 1: Pkts: 0       Flows: 0
          Port 2: Pkts: 16      Flows: 1
        iq 0: Used 4033
error: perf_launch_lcores() No schedules for seconds, deadlock

Packet distribution across worker cores :
Worker 0 packets: 1af percentage: 100.00
Result: Failed

@Shijith Thotton, Any idea why the test is failing?
Meantime, I will get the rest of the app code reviewed.
I think, we can get both RFC and crypto producer patches in.

Regards
Abhinandan

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-23 16:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-20 19:53 [PATCH] " Shijith Thotton
2021-12-21  8:51 ` [PATCH v2] " Shijith Thotton
2021-12-30 11:56   ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2022-01-03  6:04     ` Shijith Thotton
2022-01-03  8:46       ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2022-01-03  9:14         ` Shijith Thotton
2022-01-04 15:28           ` Aaron Conole
2022-01-04 15:49             ` [EXT] " Shijith Thotton
2022-01-04 10:30   ` [PATCH v3] " Shijith Thotton
2022-01-21 12:25     ` Jerin Jacob
2022-01-23 16:56       ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2022-01-23 18:44     ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2022-01-24  6:09       ` Shijith Thotton
2022-01-24  6:59       ` Shijith Thotton
2022-01-25 14:15         ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2022-01-25 13:39       ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2022-02-08 17:00         ` Shijith Thotton
2022-02-14 15:26           ` Jerin Jacob
2022-02-14 15:31             ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2022-02-08 16:33     ` [PATCH v4] " Shijith Thotton
2022-02-15  6:03       ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2022-02-15 16:08         ` Shijith Thotton
2022-02-15 16:46           ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2022-02-15 16:56       ` [PATCH v5] " Shijith Thotton
2022-02-16  4:47         ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2022-02-16  7:08           ` Shijith Thotton
2022-02-16  7:49             ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2022-02-16  8:44               ` Jerin Jacob
2022-02-16  8:54                 ` Jerin Jacob
2022-02-17  5:33                   ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2022-02-21 13:10                     ` Van Haaren, Harry
2022-02-22  7:03                       ` Shijith Thotton
2022-02-23  9:02                         ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2022-02-23 10:02                           ` Shijith Thotton
2022-02-23 10:13                             ` Van Haaren, Harry
2022-02-23 16:33                               ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S [this message]
2022-02-23 17:02                                 ` Shijith Thotton
2022-02-17  6:56         ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-18 12:00           ` Shijith Thotton
2022-02-18 12:11         ` [PATCH v6] " Shijith Thotton
2022-02-24  4:46           ` [PATCH v7] " Shijith Thotton
2022-02-24  6:18             ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2022-02-24  7:58               ` Jerin Jacob

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=PH0PR11MB4824E9B62F3C716AE6ECA7AEE83C9@PH0PR11MB4824.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
    --cc=nipun.gupta@nxp.com \
    --cc=sthotton@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).