DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kusztal, ArkadiuszX" <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>
To: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>, "Kinsella, Ray" <mdr@ashroe.eu>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	"hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
	Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>,
	"De Lara Guarch,  Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>,
	"Trahe, Fiona" <fiona.trahe@intel.com>,
	"Doherty, Declan" <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
	"matan@nvidia.com" <matan@nvidia.com>,
	"g.singh@nxp.com" <g.singh@nxp.com>,
	"Zhang, Roy Fan" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>,
	"jianjay.zhou@huawei.com" <jianjay.zhou@huawei.com>,
	"asomalap@amd.com" <asomalap@amd.com>,
	"ruifeng.wang@arm.com" <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>,
	David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	"Ji, Kai" <kai.ji@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] cryptodev: promote asym APIs to stable
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 18:05:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH0PR11MB5013E424525F90106CF78CA19FA29@PH0PR11MB5013.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CO6PR18MB4484E9309E32B5F98EF6FFE7D8D69@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2023 11:49 AM
> To: Kinsella, Ray <mdr@ashroe.eu>; Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
> <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: thomas@monjalon.net; david.marchand@redhat.com;
> hemant.agrawal@nxp.com; Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>; De Lara
> Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; Trahe, Fiona
> <fiona.trahe@intel.com>; Doherty, Declan <declan.doherty@intel.com>;
> matan@nvidia.com; g.singh@nxp.com; Zhang, Roy Fan
> <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>; jianjay.zhou@huawei.com; asomalap@amd.com;
> ruifeng.wang@arm.com; David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] cryptodev: promote asym APIs to
> stable
> 
>  Folks,
> 
> Can we promote the Asym APIs to stable now?

Yes, I think we cannot keep it as experimental forever. Although there is still much work to be done starting with capabilities and tests, I will describe it in separate threads.

> 
> Regards,
> Akhil
> 
> >
> > On 07/09/2021 12:45, Akhil Goyal wrote:
> > >>> Do you think all the asym APIs are not eligible for promoting it
> > >>> to stable
> > >> APIs?
> > >>> I haven't seen any changes for quite some time and we cannot have
> > >>> it experimental Forever.
> > >>> The APIs which you think are expected to change, we can leave them
> > >>> as experimental And mark the others as stable.
> > >> We could potentially make capability related functions stable but
> > >> for others there are still some many uncertainties, another example:
> > >> Ecdsa op expects 'k' in "in the interval (1, n-1)", openssl pmd
> > >> will not even have function that accepts 'k' (although optionally
> > >> inverse of k yes), what should user put then here?
> > >>
> > >> This API needs more attention I believe, I can send patches for it
> > >> after 21.11 release.
> > >> My opinion is that we should push all this by another year.
> > >>
> > > Ok will drop this patch for now.
> > >
> >
> > Look since everyone is in alignment here, I am going to ask the symbol
> > bot to ignore the asym crypto APIs for the next year. Thanks for the
> > diligence on this, and thanks to Fan for sending me an FYI.
> >
> > Ray K

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-14 18:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-31 18:13 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] cryptodev and security ABI improvements Akhil Goyal
2021-07-31 18:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] cryptodev: remove LIST_END enumerators Akhil Goyal
2021-07-31 18:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] cryptodev: promote asym APIs to stable Akhil Goyal
2021-08-30 15:49   ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2021-09-03 15:17     ` Akhil Goyal
2021-09-07 11:42       ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2021-09-07 11:45         ` Akhil Goyal
2021-09-08 12:37           ` Kinsella, Ray
2023-02-02 10:49             ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2023-02-02 11:02               ` Hemant Agrawal
2023-02-14 18:05               ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX [this message]
2021-07-31 18:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] security: hide internal API Akhil Goyal
2021-09-15 15:54   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-07-31 18:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] security: add reserved bitfields Akhil Goyal
2021-09-15 15:55   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-09-15 16:43   ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-07-31 18:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] cryptodev and security ABI improvements Akhil Goyal
2021-10-08 20:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] cryptodev: remove LIST_END enumerators Akhil Goyal
2021-10-08 20:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] security: hide internal API Akhil Goyal
2021-10-12  8:50     ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-08 20:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] security: add reserved bitfields Akhil Goyal
2021-10-11  8:31     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-11 16:58       ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2021-10-11 22:15         ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-10-12  8:31           ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-12  6:59         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-12  8:53           ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-12  8:50     ` [dpdk-dev] " Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-11 10:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] cryptodev: remove LIST_END enumerators Zhang, Roy Fan
2021-10-12  9:55   ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-12 10:19     ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2021-10-12 10:50       ` Anoob Joseph
2021-10-12 11:28         ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-12 11:34           ` Anoob Joseph
2021-10-12 11:52             ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-12 13:38               ` Anoob Joseph
2021-10-12 13:54                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-12 14:18                   ` Anoob Joseph
2021-10-12 14:47                     ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-12 15:06                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-13  5:36                         ` Anoob Joseph
2021-10-13  7:02                           ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-13  7:04                             ` Anoob Joseph
2021-10-13  8:39                               ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-18  5:22   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] security: hide internal API Akhil Goyal
2021-10-18  5:22     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] security: add reserved bitfields Akhil Goyal
2021-10-18 15:39       ` Akhil Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=PH0PR11MB5013E424525F90106CF78CA19FA29@PH0PR11MB5013.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com \
    --cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
    --cc=asomalap@amd.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=fiona.trahe@intel.com \
    --cc=g.singh@nxp.com \
    --cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=jianjay.zhou@huawei.com \
    --cc=kai.ji@intel.com \
    --cc=matan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
    --cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    --cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).