DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kusztal, ArkadiuszX" <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>
To: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "anoobj@marvell.com" <anoobj@marvell.com>,
	Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>,
	Fan Zhang <fanzhang.oss@gmail.com>, "Ji, Kai" <kai.ji@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 1/3] cryptodev: add SM2 asymmetric crypto algorithm
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 20:01:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH0PR11MB5013FD002F0D5E881AD8C2519F52A@PH0PR11MB5013.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bbd8b9642bf20513448c3747f9e6f28eef0561.1685870993.git.gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>

Acked-by: Arek Kusztal <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>

Some things will need to be changed before the next release (few of them I described below), but I will ack it. Especially that other algorithms have similar issues.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
> Sent: Sunday, June 4, 2023 11:43 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: anoobj@marvell.com; Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>; Kusztal,
> ArkadiuszX <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>; Fan Zhang
> <fanzhang.oss@gmail.com>; Ji, Kai <kai.ji@intel.com>; Gowrishankar
> Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] cryptodev: add SM2 asymmetric crypto algorithm
> 
> ShangMi 2 (SM2) is set of public-key cryptography algorithms based on elliptic
> curves.
> 
> Added support for asymmetric SM2 in cryptodev along with prime field curve, as
> referenced in RFC:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-shen-sm2-ecdsa-02
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
> ---
>  doc/guides/cryptodevs/features/default.ini |  1 +
>  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_07.rst     |  5 ++
>  lib/cryptodev/rte_crypto_asym.h            | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c              |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 94 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/cryptodevs/features/default.ini
> b/doc/guides/cryptodevs/features/default.ini
> index 523da0cfa8..a69967bb9e 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/cryptodevs/features/default.ini
> +++ b/doc/guides/cryptodevs/features/default.ini
> @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ Diffie-hellman          =
>  ECDSA                   =
>  ECPM                    =
>  ECDH                    =
> +SM2                     =
> 
>  ;
>  ; Supported Operating systems of a default crypto driver.
> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_07.rst
> b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_07.rst
> index a9b1293689..8b8e69d619 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_07.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_07.rst
> @@ -55,6 +55,11 @@ New Features
>       Also, make sure to start the actual text at the margin.
>       =======================================================
> 
> +* **Added SM2 asymmetric algorithm in cryptodev.**
> +
> +  Added support for ShamMi 2 (SM2) asymmetric crypto algorithm  along
> + with prime field curve support.
> +
> 
>  Removed Items
>  -------------
> diff --git a/lib/cryptodev/rte_crypto_asym.h b/lib/cryptodev/rte_crypto_asym.h
> index 989f38323f..ab0b4abea7 100644
> --- a/lib/cryptodev/rte_crypto_asym.h
> +++ b/lib/cryptodev/rte_crypto_asym.h
> @@ -119,6 +119,11 @@ enum rte_crypto_asym_xform_type {
>  	/**< Elliptic Curve Point Multiplication */
>  	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_ECFPM,
>  	/**< Elliptic Curve Fixed Point Multiplication */
> +	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_SM2,
> +	/**< ShangMi 2
> +	 * Performs Encrypt, Decrypt, Sign and Verify.
> +	 * Refer to rte_crypto_asym_op_type.
> +	 */
>  	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_TYPE_LIST_END
>  	/**< End of list */
>  };
> @@ -382,6 +387,17 @@ struct rte_crypto_ec_xform {
>  	/**< Pre-defined ec groups */
>  };
> 
> +/**
> + * Asymmetric SM2 transform data
> + *
> + * Structure describing SM2 xform params
> + *
> + */
> +struct rte_crypto_sm2_xform {
> +	enum rte_crypto_auth_algorithm hash;
> +	/**< Hash algorithm used in SM2 op. */ };
> +
>  /**
>   * Operations params for modular operations:
>   * exponentiation and multiplicative inverse @@ -637,9 +653,79 @@ struct
> rte_crypto_asym_xform {
>  		/**< EC xform parameters, used by elliptic curve based
>  		 * operations.
>  		 */
> +
> +		struct rte_crypto_sm2_xform sm2;
> +		/**< SM2 xform parameters */
>  	};
>  };
> 
> +/**
> + * SM2 operation params
> + */
> +struct rte_crypto_sm2_op_param {
> +	enum rte_crypto_asym_op_type op_type;
> +	/**< Signature generation or verification */
> +
> +	rte_crypto_uint pkey;
> +	/**< Private key for encryption or sign generation */
> +
> +	struct rte_crypto_ec_point q;
> +	/**< Public key for decryption or verification */
> +
> +	rte_crypto_param message;
> +	/**<
> +	 * Pointer to input data
> +	 * - to be encrypted for SM2 public encrypt.
> +	 * - to be signed for SM2 sign generation.
> +	 * - to be authenticated for SM2 sign verification.
> +	 *

This repeats problems known to dsa/ecdsa. What will work on OpenSSL PMD will not work on the HW. Ironically, test will pass for both...
We can extend this before the next release.

> +	 * Pointer to output data
> +	 * - for SM2 private decrypt.
> +	 * In this case the underlying array should have been
> +	 * allocated with enough memory to hold plaintext output
> +	 * (at least encrypted text length). The message.length field
> +	 * will be overwritten by the PMD with the decrypted length.
> +	 */
> +
> +	rte_crypto_param cipher;
> +	/**<
> +	 * Pointer to input data
> +	 * - to be decrypted for SM2 private decrypt.
> +	 *
> +	 * Pointer to output data
> +	 * - for SM2 public encrypt.
> +	 * In this case the underlying array should have been allocated
> +	 * with enough memory to hold ciphertext output (at least X bytes
> +	 * for prime field curve of N bytes and for message M bytes,
> +	 * where X = (C1 + C2 + C3) and computed based on SM2 RFC as
> +	 * C1 (1 + N + N), C2 = M, C3 = N. The cipher.length field will
> +	 * be overwritten by the PMD with the encrypted length.
> +	 */
I thought it was concatenation, not addition.
> +
> +	rte_crypto_uint id;
> +	/**< The SM2 id used by signer and verifier and is in interval (1,
> +n-1). */
Where does the (1,n-1) limitation comes from? As it is a hashed prefix, should it have any mathematical interpretation at all?
> +
> +	rte_crypto_uint k;
> +	/**< The SM2 per-message secret number, which is an integer
> +	 * in the interval (1, n-1).
> +	 * If the random number is generated by the PMD,
> +	 * the 'rte_crypto_param.data' parameter should be set to NULL.
> +	 */
> +
> +	rte_crypto_uint r;
> +	/**< r component of elliptic curve signature
> +	 *     output : for signature generation (of at least N bytes
> +	 *              where prime field length is N bytes)
> +	 *     input  : for signature verification
> +	 */
> +	rte_crypto_uint s;
> +	/**< s component of elliptic curve signature
> +	 *     output : for signature generation (of at least N bytes
> +	 *              where prime field length is N bytes)
> +	 *     input  : for signature verification
> +	 */
> +};
> +
>  /**
>   * Asymmetric Cryptographic Operation.
>   *
> @@ -665,6 +751,7 @@ struct rte_crypto_asym_op {
>  		struct rte_crypto_dsa_op_param dsa;
>  		struct rte_crypto_ecdsa_op_param ecdsa;
>  		struct rte_crypto_ecpm_op_param ecpm;
> +		struct rte_crypto_sm2_op_param sm2;
>  	};
>  	uint16_t flags;
>  	/**<
> diff --git a/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c b/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c index
> a96114b2da..21cabc3ffd 100644
> --- a/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> +++ b/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> @@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ crypto_asym_xform_strings[] = {
>  	[RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_DSA]	= "dsa",
>  	[RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_ECDSA]	= "ecdsa",
>  	[RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_ECPM]	= "ecpm",
> +	[RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_SM2]	= "sm2",
>  };
> 
>  /**
> --
> 2.25.1


  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-06 20:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-04  9:42 [PATCH v3 0/3] SM2 crypto algorithm support Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-06-04  9:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] cryptodev: add SM2 asymmetric crypto algorithm Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-06-06 20:01   ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX [this message]
2023-06-07  3:39     ` Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-06-04  9:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] test/crypto: add asymmetric SM2 test cases Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-06-04  9:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] crypto/openssl: add SM2 asymmetric crypto support Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=PH0PR11MB5013FD002F0D5E881AD8C2519F52A@PH0PR11MB5013.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com \
    --cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=fanzhang.oss@gmail.com \
    --cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=gmuthukrishn@marvell.com \
    --cc=kai.ji@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).