[RFC 00/10] unit test bugs

[RFC 00/10] unit test bugs

[Stephen Hemminger]

Recent blog post from PVS studio referenced lots bugs found by
their analyzer against DPDK. This set addresses the ones in
the test suite.

Stephen Hemminger (10):
  app/test: do not duplicate loop variable
  app/test: fix typo in mac address compare
  app/test: fix paren typo
  app/test: avoid duplicate initialization
  app/test: fix TLS zero length record
  test/eal: fix core check in c flag test
  app/test-pmd: remove redundant condition
  app/test-pmd: avoid potential outside of array reference
  app/test-dma-perf: fix parsing of dma address
  app/test: fix operator precedence bug

 app/test-dma-perf/main.c                      |  9 +++---
 app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c                   |  2 +-
 app/test-pmd/config.c                         |  3 +-
 app/test/test_common.c                        | 31 ++++++++++---------
 app/test/test_cryptodev.c                     |  5 +--
 app/test/test_eal_flags.c                     |  4 +--
 app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c          | 24 ++++++--------
 app/test/test_link_bonding.c                  |  9 ++----
 app/test/test_security_inline_proto_vectors.h |  8 +++--
 9 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

-- 
2.45.2

[RFC 01/10] app/test: do not duplicate loop variable

[Stephen Hemminger]

Do not use same variable for outer and inner loop in bonding test.
Since the loop is just freeing the resulting burst use bulk free.

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: 92073ef961ee ("bond: unit tests")
Cc: declan.doherty@intel.com

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
 app/test/test_link_bonding.c | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_link_bonding.c b/app/test/test_link_bonding.c
index 4d54706c21..805613d7dd 100644
--- a/app/test/test_link_bonding.c
+++ b/app/test/test_link_bonding.c
@@ -2288,12 +2288,7 @@ test_activebackup_rx_burst(void)
 		}
 
 		/* free mbufs */
-		for (i = 0; i < MAX_PKT_BURST; i++) {
-			if (rx_pkt_burst[i] != NULL) {
-				rte_pktmbuf_free(rx_pkt_burst[i]);
-				rx_pkt_burst[i] = NULL;
-			}
-		}
+		rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(rx_pkt_burst, burst_size);
 
 		/* reset bonding device stats */
 		rte_eth_stats_reset(test_params->bonding_port_id);
-- 
2.45.2

[RFC 02/10] app/test: fix typo in mac address compare

[Stephen Hemminger]

The first argument of 'memcmp' function was equal to the second argument.
Therefore ASSERT would always be true.

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: 92073ef961ee ("bond: unit tests")
Cc: declan.doherty@intel.com

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
 app/test/test_link_bonding.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_link_bonding.c b/app/test/test_link_bonding.c
index 805613d7dd..b752a5ecbf 100644
--- a/app/test/test_link_bonding.c
+++ b/app/test/test_link_bonding.c
@@ -792,7 +792,7 @@ test_set_primary_member(void)
 				&read_mac_addr),
 				"Failed to get mac address (port %d)",
 				test_params->bonding_port_id);
-		TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(memcmp(&read_mac_addr, &read_mac_addr,
+		TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(memcmp(expected_mac_addr, &read_mac_addr,
 				sizeof(read_mac_addr)),
 				"bonding port mac address not set to that of primary port\n");
 
-- 
2.45.2

[RFC 03/10] app/test: fix paren typo

[Stephen Hemminger]

The parenthesis were in the wrong place so that comparison
took precedence over assignment in handling IPv6 extension
headers.  Break up the loop condition to avoid the problem.

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: 15ccc647526e ("test/security: test inline reassembly with multi-segment")
Cc: ndabilpuram@marvell.com

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
 app/test/test_security_inline_proto_vectors.h | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_security_inline_proto_vectors.h b/app/test/test_security_inline_proto_vectors.h
index b3d724bac6..86dfa54777 100644
--- a/app/test/test_security_inline_proto_vectors.h
+++ b/app/test/test_security_inline_proto_vectors.h
@@ -519,10 +519,12 @@ test_vector_payload_populate(struct ip_reassembly_test_packet *pkt,
 			if (extra_data_sum) {
 				proto = hdr->proto;
 				p += sizeof(struct rte_ipv6_hdr);
-				while (proto != IPPROTO_FRAGMENT &&
-				       (proto = rte_ipv6_get_next_ext(p, proto, &ext_len) >= 0))
+				while (proto != IPPROTO_FRAGMENT) {
+					proto = rte_ipv6_get_next_ext(p, proto, &ext_len);
+					if (proto < 0)
+						break;
 					p += ext_len;
-
+				}
 				/* Found fragment header, update the frag offset */
 				if (proto == IPPROTO_FRAGMENT) {
 					frag_ext = (struct rte_ipv6_fragment_ext *)p;
-- 
2.45.2

[RFC 04/10] app/test: avoid duplicate initialization

[Stephen Hemminger]

The event_dev_config initialization had duplicate assignments
to the same element. Change to use structure initialization
so that compiler will catch this type of bug.

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: f8f9d233ea0e ("test/eventdev: add unit tests")
Cc: jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
 app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c b/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
index 9d38a66bfa..ab24e30a97 100644
--- a/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
+++ b/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
@@ -1154,21 +1154,17 @@ configure_cryptodev(void)
 
 static inline void
 evdev_set_conf_values(struct rte_event_dev_config *dev_conf,
-			struct rte_event_dev_info *info)
+		      const struct rte_event_dev_info *info)
 {
-	memset(dev_conf, 0, sizeof(struct rte_event_dev_config));
-	dev_conf->dequeue_timeout_ns = info->min_dequeue_timeout_ns;
-	dev_conf->nb_event_ports = NB_TEST_PORTS;
-	dev_conf->nb_event_queues = NB_TEST_QUEUES;
-	dev_conf->nb_event_queue_flows = info->max_event_queue_flows;
-	dev_conf->nb_event_port_dequeue_depth =
-			info->max_event_port_dequeue_depth;
-	dev_conf->nb_event_port_enqueue_depth =
-			info->max_event_port_enqueue_depth;
-	dev_conf->nb_event_port_enqueue_depth =
-			info->max_event_port_enqueue_depth;
-	dev_conf->nb_events_limit =
-			info->max_num_events;
+	*dev_conf = (struct rte_event_dev_config) {
+		.dequeue_timeout_ns = info->min_dequeue_timeout_ns,
+		.nb_event_ports = NB_TEST_PORTS,
+		.nb_event_queues = NB_TEST_QUEUES,
+		.nb_event_queue_flows = info->max_event_queue_flows,
+		.nb_event_port_dequeue_depth = info->max_event_port_dequeue_depth,
+		.nb_event_port_enqueue_depth = info->max_event_port_enqueue_depth,
+		.nb_events_limit = info->max_num_events,
+	};
 }
 
 static int
-- 
2.45.2

[RFC 05/10] app/test: fix TLS zero length record

[Stephen Hemminger]

The code was duplicating the same condition three times?
Reading the commit message, the intention was:

    Add unit tests to verify the zero len TLS records. Zero len packets are
    allowed when content type is app data while zero packet length with
    other content type (such as handshake) would result in an error.

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: 79a58624369a ("test/security: verify zero length TLS records")
Cc: vvelumuri@marvell.com
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
 app/test/test_cryptodev.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
index c647baeee1..a33ef574cc 100644
--- a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
+++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
@@ -12253,10 +12253,7 @@ test_tls_record_proto_all(const struct tls_record_test_flags *flags)
 		if (flags->skip_sess_destroy && sec_session_outb == NULL)
 			sec_session_outb = ut_params->sec_session;
 
-		if (flags->zero_len &&
-		    ((flags->content_type == TLS_RECORD_TEST_CONTENT_TYPE_HANDSHAKE) ||
-		    (flags->content_type == TLS_RECORD_TEST_CONTENT_TYPE_HANDSHAKE) ||
-		    (flags->content_type == TLS_RECORD_TEST_CONTENT_TYPE_HANDSHAKE))) {
+		if (flags->zero_len && flags->content_type != TLS_RECORD_TEST_CONTENT_TYPE_APP) {
 			if (ret == TEST_SUCCESS)
 				return TEST_FAILED;
 			goto skip_decrypt;
-- 
2.45.2

[RFC 06/10] test/eal: fix core check in c flag test

[Stephen Hemminger]

The expression for checking which lcore is enabled for 0-7
was wrong (missing case for 6).

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: b0209034f2bb ("test/eal: check number of cores before running subtests")
Cc: msantana@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
 app/test/test_eal_flags.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
index d37d6b8627..e32f83d3c8 100644
--- a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
+++ b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
@@ -677,8 +677,8 @@ test_missing_c_flag(void)
 
 	if (rte_lcore_is_enabled(0) && rte_lcore_is_enabled(1) &&
 	    rte_lcore_is_enabled(2) && rte_lcore_is_enabled(3) &&
-	    rte_lcore_is_enabled(3) && rte_lcore_is_enabled(5) &&
-	    rte_lcore_is_enabled(4) && rte_lcore_is_enabled(7) &&
+	    rte_lcore_is_enabled(4) && rte_lcore_is_enabled(5) &&
+	    rte_lcore_is_enabled(6) && rte_lcore_is_enabled(7) &&
 	    launch_proc(argv29) != 0) {
 		printf("Error - "
 		       "process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n");
-- 
2.45.2

[RFC 07/10] app/test-pmd: remove redundant condition

[Stephen Hemminger]

The loop over policy actions will always exit when it sees
the flow end action, so the next check is redundant.

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: f29fa2c59b85 ("app/testpmd: support policy actions per color")
Cc: haifeil@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
 app/test-pmd/config.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-pmd/config.c
index 88770b4dfc..32c4e86c84 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
@@ -2288,7 +2288,7 @@ port_meter_policy_add(portid_t port_id, uint32_t policy_id,
 		for (act_n = 0, start = act;
 			act->type != RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END; act++)
 			act_n++;
-		if (act_n && act->type == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END)
+		if (act_n > 0)
 			policy.actions[i] = start;
 		else
 			policy.actions[i] = NULL;
@@ -7316,4 +7316,3 @@ show_mcast_macs(portid_t port_id)
 		printf("  %s\n", buf);
 	}
 }
-
-- 
2.45.2

[RFC 08/10] app/test-pmd: avoid potential outside of array reference

[Stephen Hemminger]

The order of comparison is wrong, and potentially allows
referencing past the array.

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: 3e3edab530a1 ("ethdev: add flow quota")
Cc: getelson@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
 app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
index 1e4f2ebc55..9e4fc2d95d 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
@@ -12892,7 +12892,7 @@ comp_names_to_index(struct context *ctx, const struct token *token,
 	RTE_SET_USED(token);
 	if (!buf)
 		return names_size;
-	if (names[ent] && ent < names_size)
+	if (ent < names_size && names[ent] != NULL)
 		return rte_strscpy(buf, names[ent], size);
 	return -1;
 
-- 
2.45.2

[RFC 09/10] app/test-dma-perf: fix parsing of dma address

[Stephen Hemminger]

There was useless loop when looking at the DMA address.
It looks like it was meant to skip whitespace before
calling strtok.

Good time to replace strtok with strtok_r as well.

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: 623dc9364dc6 ("app/dma-perf: introduce DMA performance test")
Cc: cheng1.jiang@intel.com

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
 app/test-dma-perf/main.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test-dma-perf/main.c b/app/test-dma-perf/main.c
index 18219918cc..dabf4e02e6 100644
--- a/app/test-dma-perf/main.c
+++ b/app/test-dma-perf/main.c
@@ -217,19 +217,18 @@ parse_lcore_dma(struct test_configure *test_case, const char *value)
 	struct lcore_dma_map_t *lcore_dma_map;
 	char *input, *addrs;
 	char *ptrs[2];
-	char *start, *end, *substr;
+	char *start, *end, *substr, *saveptr;
 	uint16_t lcore_id;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (test_case == NULL || value == NULL)
 		return -1;
 
-	input = strndup(value, strlen(value) + 1);
+	input = strdup(value);
 	if (input == NULL)
 		return -1;
 	addrs = input;
-
-	while (*addrs == '\0')
+	while (*addrs == '\0' && isspace(*addrs))
 		addrs++;
 	if (*addrs == '\0') {
 		fprintf(stderr, "No input DMA addresses\n");
@@ -237,7 +236,7 @@ parse_lcore_dma(struct test_configure *test_case, const char *value)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	substr = strtok(addrs, ",");
+	substr = strtok_r(addrs, ",", &saveptr);
 	if (substr == NULL) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "No input DMA address\n");
 		ret = -1;
-- 
2.45.2

RE: [RFC 09/10] app/test-dma-perf: fix parsing of dma address

[Morten Brørup]

> +	while (*addrs == '\0' && isspace(*addrs))
>  		addrs++;

This is never going to happen. Did you mean ||?

Re: [RFC 09/10] app/test-dma-perf: fix parsing of dma address

[Stephen Hemminger]

On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 08:00:52 +0100
Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com> wrote:

> > +	while (*addrs == '\0' && isspace(*addrs))
> >  		addrs++;  
> 
> This is never going to happen. Did you mean ||?

Good catch.

Re: [RFC 09/10] app/test-dma-perf: fix parsing of dma address

[fengchengwen]

On 2024/11/14 8:12, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> There was useless loop when looking at the DMA address.
> It looks like it was meant to skip whitespace before
> calling strtok.
> 
> Good time to replace strtok with strtok_r as well.

Incomplete modification for strtok, I suggest the strtok adopt HaiJie's patchset [1],
This commit just modify non-strtok logic.

[1] https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/20241108110404.18317-6-haijie1@huawei.com/

> 
> Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/
> 
> Fixes: 623dc9364dc6 ("app/dma-perf: introduce DMA performance test")
> Cc: cheng1.jiang@intel.com
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> ---
>  app/test-dma-perf/main.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test-dma-perf/main.c b/app/test-dma-perf/main.c
> index 18219918cc..dabf4e02e6 100644
> --- a/app/test-dma-perf/main.c
> +++ b/app/test-dma-perf/main.c
> @@ -217,19 +217,18 @@ parse_lcore_dma(struct test_configure *test_case, const char *value)
>  	struct lcore_dma_map_t *lcore_dma_map;
>  	char *input, *addrs;
>  	char *ptrs[2];
> -	char *start, *end, *substr;
> +	char *start, *end, *substr, *saveptr;
>  	uint16_t lcore_id;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	if (test_case == NULL || value == NULL)
>  		return -1;
>  
> -	input = strndup(value, strlen(value) + 1);
> +	input = strdup(value);
>  	if (input == NULL)
>  		return -1;
>  	addrs = input;
> -
> -	while (*addrs == '\0')
> +	while (*addrs == '\0' && isspace(*addrs))
>  		addrs++;
>  	if (*addrs == '\0') {
>  		fprintf(stderr, "No input DMA addresses\n");
> @@ -237,7 +236,7 @@ parse_lcore_dma(struct test_configure *test_case, const char *value)
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> -	substr = strtok(addrs, ",");
> +	substr = strtok_r(addrs, ",", &saveptr);
>  	if (substr == NULL) {
>  		fprintf(stderr, "No input DMA address\n");
>  		ret = -1;

[RFC 10/10] app/test: fix operator precedence bug

[Stephen Hemminger]

The test loop was much shorter than desired because when
MAX_NUM is defined with out paren's the divide operator /
takes precedence over shift.

But when MAX_NUM is fixed, some tests take too long
and have to modified to avoid running over full N^2
space of 1<<20.

Note: this is a very old bug, goes back to 2013.

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: 1fb8b07ee511 ("app: add some tests")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
 app/test/test_common.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_common.c b/app/test/test_common.c
index 21eb2285e1..6dbd7fc9a9 100644
--- a/app/test/test_common.c
+++ b/app/test/test_common.c
@@ -9,11 +9,12 @@
 #include <rte_common.h>
 #include <rte_bitops.h>
 #include <rte_hexdump.h>
+#include <rte_random.h>
 #include <rte_pause.h>
 
 #include "test.h"
 
-#define MAX_NUM 1 << 20
+#define MAX_NUM (1 << 20)
 
 #define FAIL(x)\
 	{printf(x "() test failed!\n");\
@@ -218,19 +219,21 @@ test_align(void)
 		}
 	}
 
-	for (p = 1; p <= MAX_NUM / 2; p++) {
-		for (i = 1; i <= MAX_NUM / 2; i++) {
-			val = RTE_ALIGN_MUL_CEIL(i, p);
-			if (val % p != 0 || val < i)
-				FAIL_ALIGN("RTE_ALIGN_MUL_CEIL", i, p);
-			val = RTE_ALIGN_MUL_FLOOR(i, p);
-			if (val % p != 0 || val > i)
-				FAIL_ALIGN("RTE_ALIGN_MUL_FLOOR", i, p);
-			val = RTE_ALIGN_MUL_NEAR(i, p);
-			if (val % p != 0 || ((val != RTE_ALIGN_MUL_CEIL(i, p))
-				& (val != RTE_ALIGN_MUL_FLOOR(i, p))))
-				FAIL_ALIGN("RTE_ALIGN_MUL_NEAR", i, p);
-		}
+	/* testing the whole space of 2^20^2 takes too long. */
+	for (j = 1; j <= MAX_NUM ; j++) {
+		i = rte_rand_max(MAX_NUM - 1) + 1;
+		p = rte_rand_max(MAX_NUM - 1) + 1;
+
+		val = RTE_ALIGN_MUL_CEIL(i, p);
+		if (val % p != 0 || val < i)
+			FAIL_ALIGN("RTE_ALIGN_MUL_CEIL", i, p);
+		val = RTE_ALIGN_MUL_FLOOR(i, p);
+		if (val % p != 0 || val > i)
+			FAIL_ALIGN("RTE_ALIGN_MUL_FLOOR", i, p);
+		val = RTE_ALIGN_MUL_NEAR(i, p);
+		if (val % p != 0 || ((val != RTE_ALIGN_MUL_CEIL(i, p))
+				     & (val != RTE_ALIGN_MUL_FLOOR(i, p))))
+			FAIL_ALIGN("RTE_ALIGN_MUL_NEAR", i, p);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.45.2

[PATCH v2 00/10] Bug fixes for unit tests

[Stephen Hemminger]

Recent blog post from PVS studio referenced lots bugs found by
their analyzer against DPDK. This set addresses the ones in
the test suite.

v2 - fix dma address parsing
   - add stable where needed

Stephen Hemminger (10):
  app/test: do not duplicated loop variable
  app/test: fix typo in address compare
  app/test: fix paren typo
  app/test: avoid duplicate initialization
  app/test: fix TLS zero length record
  app/test: fix operator precedence bug
  test/eal: fix core check in c flag test
  app/test-pmd: remove redundant condition
  app/test-pmd: avoid potential outside of array reference
  app/test-dma-perf: fix parsing of DMA address

 app/test-dma-perf/main.c                      | 12 +++----
 app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c                   |  2 +-
 app/test-pmd/config.c                         |  3 +-
 app/test/test_common.c                        | 31 ++++++++++---------
 app/test/test_cryptodev.c                     |  5 +--
 app/test/test_eal_flags.c                     |  4 +--
 app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c          | 24 ++++++--------
 app/test/test_link_bonding.c                  |  9 ++----
 app/test/test_security_inline_proto_vectors.h |  8 +++--
 9 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)

-- 
2.45.2

[PATCH v2 01/10] app/test: do not duplicated loop variable

[Stephen Hemminger]

Do not use same variable for outer and inner loop in bonding test.
Since the loop is just freeing the resulting burst use bulk free.

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: 92073ef961ee ("bond: unit tests")
Cc: declan.doherty@intel.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
 app/test/test_link_bonding.c | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_link_bonding.c b/app/test/test_link_bonding.c
index 4d54706c21..805613d7dd 100644
--- a/app/test/test_link_bonding.c
+++ b/app/test/test_link_bonding.c
@@ -2288,12 +2288,7 @@ test_activebackup_rx_burst(void)
 		}
 
 		/* free mbufs */
-		for (i = 0; i < MAX_PKT_BURST; i++) {
-			if (rx_pkt_burst[i] != NULL) {
-				rte_pktmbuf_free(rx_pkt_burst[i]);
-				rx_pkt_burst[i] = NULL;
-			}
-		}
+		rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(rx_pkt_burst, burst_size);
 
 		/* reset bonding device stats */
 		rte_eth_stats_reset(test_params->bonding_port_id);
-- 
2.45.2

Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] app/test: do not duplicated loop variable

[Bruce Richardson]

On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 11:24:59AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Do not use same variable for outer and inner loop in bonding test.
> Since the loop is just freeing the resulting burst use bulk free.
> 
> Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/
> 
> Fixes: 92073ef961ee ("bond: unit tests")
> Cc: declan.doherty@intel.com
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

[PATCH v2 02/10] app/test: fix typo in address compare

[Stephen Hemminger]

The first argument of 'memcmp' function was equal to the second argument.
Therefore ASSERT would always be true.

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: 92073ef961ee ("bond: unit tests")
Cc: declan.doherty@intel.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
 app/test/test_link_bonding.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_link_bonding.c b/app/test/test_link_bonding.c
index 805613d7dd..b752a5ecbf 100644
--- a/app/test/test_link_bonding.c
+++ b/app/test/test_link_bonding.c
@@ -792,7 +792,7 @@ test_set_primary_member(void)
 				&read_mac_addr),
 				"Failed to get mac address (port %d)",
 				test_params->bonding_port_id);
-		TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(memcmp(&read_mac_addr, &read_mac_addr,
+		TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(memcmp(expected_mac_addr, &read_mac_addr,
 				sizeof(read_mac_addr)),
 				"bonding port mac address not set to that of primary port\n");
 
-- 
2.45.2

[PATCH v2 03/10] app/test: fix paren typo

[Stephen Hemminger]

The parenthesis were in the wrong place so that comparison
took precedence over assignment in handling IPv6 extension
headers.  Break up the loop condition to avoid the problem.

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: 15ccc647526e ("test/security: test inline reassembly with multi-segment")
Cc: ndabilpuram@marvell.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
 app/test/test_security_inline_proto_vectors.h | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_security_inline_proto_vectors.h b/app/test/test_security_inline_proto_vectors.h
index b3d724bac6..86dfa54777 100644
--- a/app/test/test_security_inline_proto_vectors.h
+++ b/app/test/test_security_inline_proto_vectors.h
@@ -519,10 +519,12 @@ test_vector_payload_populate(struct ip_reassembly_test_packet *pkt,
 			if (extra_data_sum) {
 				proto = hdr->proto;
 				p += sizeof(struct rte_ipv6_hdr);
-				while (proto != IPPROTO_FRAGMENT &&
-				       (proto = rte_ipv6_get_next_ext(p, proto, &ext_len) >= 0))
+				while (proto != IPPROTO_FRAGMENT) {
+					proto = rte_ipv6_get_next_ext(p, proto, &ext_len);
+					if (proto < 0)
+						break;
 					p += ext_len;
-
+				}
 				/* Found fragment header, update the frag offset */
 				if (proto == IPPROTO_FRAGMENT) {
 					frag_ext = (struct rte_ipv6_fragment_ext *)p;
-- 
2.45.2

Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] app/test: fix paren typo

[Bruce Richardson]

On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 11:25:01AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> The parenthesis were in the wrong place so that comparison
> took precedence over assignment in handling IPv6 extension
> headers.  Break up the loop condition to avoid the problem.
> 
> Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/
> 
> Fixes: 15ccc647526e ("test/security: test inline reassembly with multi-segment")
> Cc: ndabilpuram@marvell.com
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

[PATCH v2 04/10] app/test: avoid duplicate initialization

[Stephen Hemminger]

The event_dev_config initialization had duplicate assignments
to the same element. Change to use structure initialization
so that compiler will catch this type of bug.

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: f8f9d233ea0e ("test/eventdev: add unit tests")
Cc: jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
 app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c b/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
index 9d38a66bfa..ab24e30a97 100644
--- a/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
+++ b/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
@@ -1154,21 +1154,17 @@ configure_cryptodev(void)
 
 static inline void
 evdev_set_conf_values(struct rte_event_dev_config *dev_conf,
-			struct rte_event_dev_info *info)
+		      const struct rte_event_dev_info *info)
 {
-	memset(dev_conf, 0, sizeof(struct rte_event_dev_config));
-	dev_conf->dequeue_timeout_ns = info->min_dequeue_timeout_ns;
-	dev_conf->nb_event_ports = NB_TEST_PORTS;
-	dev_conf->nb_event_queues = NB_TEST_QUEUES;
-	dev_conf->nb_event_queue_flows = info->max_event_queue_flows;
-	dev_conf->nb_event_port_dequeue_depth =
-			info->max_event_port_dequeue_depth;
-	dev_conf->nb_event_port_enqueue_depth =
-			info->max_event_port_enqueue_depth;
-	dev_conf->nb_event_port_enqueue_depth =
-			info->max_event_port_enqueue_depth;
-	dev_conf->nb_events_limit =
-			info->max_num_events;
+	*dev_conf = (struct rte_event_dev_config) {
+		.dequeue_timeout_ns = info->min_dequeue_timeout_ns,
+		.nb_event_ports = NB_TEST_PORTS,
+		.nb_event_queues = NB_TEST_QUEUES,
+		.nb_event_queue_flows = info->max_event_queue_flows,
+		.nb_event_port_dequeue_depth = info->max_event_port_dequeue_depth,
+		.nb_event_port_enqueue_depth = info->max_event_port_enqueue_depth,
+		.nb_events_limit = info->max_num_events,
+	};
 }
 
 static int
-- 
2.45.2

Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] app/test: avoid duplicate initialization

[Bruce Richardson]

On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 11:25:02AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> The event_dev_config initialization had duplicate assignments
> to the same element. Change to use structure initialization
> so that compiler will catch this type of bug.
> 
> Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/
> 
> Fixes: f8f9d233ea0e ("test/eventdev: add unit tests")
> Cc: jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

[PATCH v2 05/10] app/test: fix TLS zero length record

[Stephen Hemminger]

The code was duplicating the same condition three times?
Reading the commit message, the intention was:

    Add unit tests to verify the zero len TLS records. Zero len packets are
    allowed when content type is app data while zero packet length with
    other content type (such as handshake) would result in an error.

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: 79a58624369a ("test/security: verify zero length TLS records")
Cc: vvelumuri@marvell.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
 app/test/test_cryptodev.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
index c647baeee1..a33ef574cc 100644
--- a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
+++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
@@ -12253,10 +12253,7 @@ test_tls_record_proto_all(const struct tls_record_test_flags *flags)
 		if (flags->skip_sess_destroy && sec_session_outb == NULL)
 			sec_session_outb = ut_params->sec_session;
 
-		if (flags->zero_len &&
-		    ((flags->content_type == TLS_RECORD_TEST_CONTENT_TYPE_HANDSHAKE) ||
-		    (flags->content_type == TLS_RECORD_TEST_CONTENT_TYPE_HANDSHAKE) ||
-		    (flags->content_type == TLS_RECORD_TEST_CONTENT_TYPE_HANDSHAKE))) {
+		if (flags->zero_len && flags->content_type != TLS_RECORD_TEST_CONTENT_TYPE_APP) {
 			if (ret == TEST_SUCCESS)
 				return TEST_FAILED;
 			goto skip_decrypt;
-- 
2.45.2

[PATCH v2 06/10] app/test: fix operator precedence bug

[Stephen Hemminger]

The test loop was much shorter than desired because when
MAX_NUM is defined with out paren's the divide operator /
takes precedence over shift.

But when MAX_NUM is fixed, some tests take too long
and have to modified to avoid running over full N^2
space of 1<<20.

Note: this is a very old bug, goes back to 2013.

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: 1fb8b07ee511 ("app: add some tests")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
 app/test/test_common.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_common.c b/app/test/test_common.c
index 21eb2285e1..6dbd7fc9a9 100644
--- a/app/test/test_common.c
+++ b/app/test/test_common.c
@@ -9,11 +9,12 @@
 #include <rte_common.h>
 #include <rte_bitops.h>
 #include <rte_hexdump.h>
+#include <rte_random.h>
 #include <rte_pause.h>
 
 #include "test.h"
 
-#define MAX_NUM 1 << 20
+#define MAX_NUM (1 << 20)
 
 #define FAIL(x)\
 	{printf(x "() test failed!\n");\
@@ -218,19 +219,21 @@ test_align(void)
 		}
 	}
 
-	for (p = 1; p <= MAX_NUM / 2; p++) {
-		for (i = 1; i <= MAX_NUM / 2; i++) {
-			val = RTE_ALIGN_MUL_CEIL(i, p);
-			if (val % p != 0 || val < i)
-				FAIL_ALIGN("RTE_ALIGN_MUL_CEIL", i, p);
-			val = RTE_ALIGN_MUL_FLOOR(i, p);
-			if (val % p != 0 || val > i)
-				FAIL_ALIGN("RTE_ALIGN_MUL_FLOOR", i, p);
-			val = RTE_ALIGN_MUL_NEAR(i, p);
-			if (val % p != 0 || ((val != RTE_ALIGN_MUL_CEIL(i, p))
-				& (val != RTE_ALIGN_MUL_FLOOR(i, p))))
-				FAIL_ALIGN("RTE_ALIGN_MUL_NEAR", i, p);
-		}
+	/* testing the whole space of 2^20^2 takes too long. */
+	for (j = 1; j <= MAX_NUM ; j++) {
+		i = rte_rand_max(MAX_NUM - 1) + 1;
+		p = rte_rand_max(MAX_NUM - 1) + 1;
+
+		val = RTE_ALIGN_MUL_CEIL(i, p);
+		if (val % p != 0 || val < i)
+			FAIL_ALIGN("RTE_ALIGN_MUL_CEIL", i, p);
+		val = RTE_ALIGN_MUL_FLOOR(i, p);
+		if (val % p != 0 || val > i)
+			FAIL_ALIGN("RTE_ALIGN_MUL_FLOOR", i, p);
+		val = RTE_ALIGN_MUL_NEAR(i, p);
+		if (val % p != 0 || ((val != RTE_ALIGN_MUL_CEIL(i, p))
+				     & (val != RTE_ALIGN_MUL_FLOOR(i, p))))
+			FAIL_ALIGN("RTE_ALIGN_MUL_NEAR", i, p);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.45.2

Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] app/test: fix operator precedence bug

[Bruce Richardson]

On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 11:25:04AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> The test loop was much shorter than desired because when
> MAX_NUM is defined with out paren's the divide operator /
> takes precedence over shift.
> 
> But when MAX_NUM is fixed, some tests take too long
> and have to modified to avoid running over full N^2
> space of 1<<20.
> 
> Note: this is a very old bug, goes back to 2013.
> 
> Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/
> 
> Fixes: 1fb8b07ee511 ("app: add some tests")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

[PATCH v2 07/10] test/eal: fix core check in c flag test

[Stephen Hemminger]

The expression for checking which lcore is enabled for 0-7
was wrong (missing case for 6).

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: b0209034f2bb ("test/eal: check number of cores before running subtests")
Cc: msantana@redhat.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
 app/test/test_eal_flags.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
index d37d6b8627..e32f83d3c8 100644
--- a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
+++ b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
@@ -677,8 +677,8 @@ test_missing_c_flag(void)
 
 	if (rte_lcore_is_enabled(0) && rte_lcore_is_enabled(1) &&
 	    rte_lcore_is_enabled(2) && rte_lcore_is_enabled(3) &&
-	    rte_lcore_is_enabled(3) && rte_lcore_is_enabled(5) &&
-	    rte_lcore_is_enabled(4) && rte_lcore_is_enabled(7) &&
+	    rte_lcore_is_enabled(4) && rte_lcore_is_enabled(5) &&
+	    rte_lcore_is_enabled(6) && rte_lcore_is_enabled(7) &&
 	    launch_proc(argv29) != 0) {
 		printf("Error - "
 		       "process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n");
-- 
2.45.2

Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] test/eal: fix core check in c flag test

[Bruce Richardson]

On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 11:25:05AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> The expression for checking which lcore is enabled for 0-7
> was wrong (missing case for 6).
> 
> Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/
> 
> Fixes: b0209034f2bb ("test/eal: check number of cores before running subtests")
> Cc: msantana@redhat.com
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>

Just wondering would it not be better/safer to put in an actual loop check
here? 
However, I'm also ok with keeping the fix as-is, so:

Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>


> ---
>  app/test/test_eal_flags.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
> index d37d6b8627..e32f83d3c8 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
> @@ -677,8 +677,8 @@ test_missing_c_flag(void)
>  
>  	if (rte_lcore_is_enabled(0) && rte_lcore_is_enabled(1) &&
>  	    rte_lcore_is_enabled(2) && rte_lcore_is_enabled(3) &&
> -	    rte_lcore_is_enabled(3) && rte_lcore_is_enabled(5) &&
> -	    rte_lcore_is_enabled(4) && rte_lcore_is_enabled(7) &&
> +	    rte_lcore_is_enabled(4) && rte_lcore_is_enabled(5) &&
> +	    rte_lcore_is_enabled(6) && rte_lcore_is_enabled(7) &&
>  	    launch_proc(argv29) != 0) {
>  		printf("Error - "
>  		       "process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n");
> -- 
> 2.45.2
> 

Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] test/eal: fix core check in c flag test

[Stephen Hemminger]

On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 09:07:42 +0000
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 11:25:05AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > The expression for checking which lcore is enabled for 0-7
> > was wrong (missing case for 6).
> > 
> > Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/
> > 
> > Fixes: b0209034f2bb ("test/eal: check number of cores before running subtests")
> > Cc: msantana@redhat.com
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>  
> 
> Just wondering would it not be better/safer to put in an actual loop check
> here? 
> However, I'm also ok with keeping the fix as-is, so:
> 
> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

My goal was to do minimum changes for now, to avoid introducing new bugs.

[PATCH v2 08/10] app/test-pmd: remove redundant condition

[Stephen Hemminger]

The loop over policy actions will always exit when it sees
the flow end action, so the next check is redundant.

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: f29fa2c59b85 ("app/testpmd: support policy actions per color")
Cc: haifeil@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
 app/test-pmd/config.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-pmd/config.c
index 88770b4dfc..32c4e86c84 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
@@ -2288,7 +2288,7 @@ port_meter_policy_add(portid_t port_id, uint32_t policy_id,
 		for (act_n = 0, start = act;
 			act->type != RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END; act++)
 			act_n++;
-		if (act_n && act->type == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END)
+		if (act_n > 0)
 			policy.actions[i] = start;
 		else
 			policy.actions[i] = NULL;
@@ -7316,4 +7316,3 @@ show_mcast_macs(portid_t port_id)
 		printf("  %s\n", buf);
 	}
 }
-
-- 
2.45.2

Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] app/test-pmd: remove redundant condition

[Ajit Khaparde]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1377 bytes --]

On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 11:26 AM Stephen Hemminger
<stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>
> The loop over policy actions will always exit when it sees
> the flow end action, so the next check is redundant.
>
> Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/
>
> Fixes: f29fa2c59b85 ("app/testpmd: support policy actions per color")
> Cc: haifeil@nvidia.com
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Reviewed-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>

> ---
>  app/test-pmd/config.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-pmd/config.c
> index 88770b4dfc..32c4e86c84 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
> @@ -2288,7 +2288,7 @@ port_meter_policy_add(portid_t port_id, uint32_t policy_id,
>                 for (act_n = 0, start = act;
>                         act->type != RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END; act++)
>                         act_n++;
> -               if (act_n && act->type == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END)
> +               if (act_n > 0)
>                         policy.actions[i] = start;
>                 else
>                         policy.actions[i] = NULL;
> @@ -7316,4 +7316,3 @@ show_mcast_macs(portid_t port_id)
>                 printf("  %s\n", buf);
>         }
>  }
> -
> --
> 2.45.2
>

[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4218 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] app/test-pmd: remove redundant condition

[Bruce Richardson]

On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 11:25:06AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> The loop over policy actions will always exit when it sees
> the flow end action, so the next check is redundant.
> 
> Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/
> 
> Fixes: f29fa2c59b85 ("app/testpmd: support policy actions per color")
> Cc: haifeil@nvidia.com
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> ---
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

[PATCH v2 09/10] app/test-pmd: avoid potential outside of array reference

[Stephen Hemminger]

The order of comparison is wrong, and potentially allows
referencing past the array.

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: 3e3edab530a1 ("ethdev: add flow quota")
Cc: getelson@nvidia.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
 app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
index 1e4f2ebc55..9e4fc2d95d 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
@@ -12892,7 +12892,7 @@ comp_names_to_index(struct context *ctx, const struct token *token,
 	RTE_SET_USED(token);
 	if (!buf)
 		return names_size;
-	if (names[ent] && ent < names_size)
+	if (ent < names_size && names[ent] != NULL)
 		return rte_strscpy(buf, names[ent], size);
 	return -1;
 
-- 
2.45.2

Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] app/test-pmd: avoid potential outside of array reference

[Bruce Richardson]

On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 11:25:07AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> The order of comparison is wrong, and potentially allows
> referencing past the array.
> 
> Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/
> 
> Fixes: 3e3edab530a1 ("ethdev: add flow quota")
> Cc: getelson@nvidia.com
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>

Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

[PATCH v2 10/10] app/test-dma-perf: fix parsing of DMA address

[Stephen Hemminger]

There was useless loop when looking at the DMA address.
It looks like it was meant to skip whitespace before
calling strtok.

Good time to replace strtok with strtok_r as well.

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: 623dc9364dc6 ("app/dma-perf: introduce DMA performance test")
Cc: cheng1.jiang@intel.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
 app/test-dma-perf/main.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test-dma-perf/main.c b/app/test-dma-perf/main.c
index 18219918cc..dccb0a3541 100644
--- a/app/test-dma-perf/main.c
+++ b/app/test-dma-perf/main.c
@@ -217,27 +217,27 @@ parse_lcore_dma(struct test_configure *test_case, const char *value)
 	struct lcore_dma_map_t *lcore_dma_map;
 	char *input, *addrs;
 	char *ptrs[2];
-	char *start, *end, *substr;
+	char *start, *end, *substr, *saveptr;
 	uint16_t lcore_id;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (test_case == NULL || value == NULL)
 		return -1;
 
-	input = strndup(value, strlen(value) + 1);
+	input = strdup(value);
 	if (input == NULL)
 		return -1;
-	addrs = input;
 
-	while (*addrs == '\0')
-		addrs++;
+	addrs = input;
+	while (isspace(*addrs))
+		++addrs;
 	if (*addrs == '\0') {
 		fprintf(stderr, "No input DMA addresses\n");
 		ret = -1;
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	substr = strtok(addrs, ",");
+	substr = strtok_r(addrs, ",", &saveptr);
 	if (substr == NULL) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "No input DMA address\n");
 		ret = -1;
-- 
2.45.2

Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] app/test-dma-perf: fix parsing of DMA address

[Bruce Richardson]

On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 11:25:08AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> There was useless loop when looking at the DMA address.
> It looks like it was meant to skip whitespace before
> calling strtok.
> 
> Good time to replace strtok with strtok_r as well.
> 
> Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/
> 
> Fixes: 623dc9364dc6 ("app/dma-perf: introduce DMA performance test")
> Cc: cheng1.jiang@intel.com
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>

One comment inline below. With that fixed:

Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

> ---
>  app/test-dma-perf/main.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test-dma-perf/main.c b/app/test-dma-perf/main.c
> index 18219918cc..dccb0a3541 100644
> --- a/app/test-dma-perf/main.c
> +++ b/app/test-dma-perf/main.c
> @@ -217,27 +217,27 @@ parse_lcore_dma(struct test_configure *test_case, const char *value)
>  	struct lcore_dma_map_t *lcore_dma_map;
>  	char *input, *addrs;
>  	char *ptrs[2];
> -	char *start, *end, *substr;
> +	char *start, *end, *substr, *saveptr;
>  	uint16_t lcore_id;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	if (test_case == NULL || value == NULL)
>  		return -1;
>  
> -	input = strndup(value, strlen(value) + 1);
> +	input = strdup(value);
>  	if (input == NULL)
>  		return -1;
> -	addrs = input;
>  
> -	while (*addrs == '\0')
> -		addrs++;
> +	addrs = input;
> +	while (isspace(*addrs))
> +		++addrs;
>  	if (*addrs == '\0') {
>  		fprintf(stderr, "No input DMA addresses\n");
>  		ret = -1;
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> -	substr = strtok(addrs, ",");
> +	substr = strtok_r(addrs, ",", &saveptr);

Don't need to use strtok here at all. Just use strchr, and then no need for
a new temporary variable.

>  	if (substr == NULL) {
>  		fprintf(stderr, "No input DMA address\n");
>  		ret = -1;
> -- 
> 2.45.2
> 

Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] app/test-dma-perf: fix parsing of DMA address

[Stephen Hemminger]

On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 09:13:12 +0000
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 11:25:08AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > There was useless loop when looking at the DMA address.
> > It looks like it was meant to skip whitespace before
> > calling strtok.
> > 
> > Good time to replace strtok with strtok_r as well.
> > 
> > Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/
> > 
> > Fixes: 623dc9364dc6 ("app/dma-perf: introduce DMA performance test")
> > Cc: cheng1.jiang@intel.com
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>  
> 
> One comment inline below. With that fixed:
> 
> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> 
> > ---
> >  app/test-dma-perf/main.c | 12 ++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/app/test-dma-perf/main.c b/app/test-dma-perf/main.c
> > index 18219918cc..dccb0a3541 100644
> > --- a/app/test-dma-perf/main.c
> > +++ b/app/test-dma-perf/main.c
> > @@ -217,27 +217,27 @@ parse_lcore_dma(struct test_configure *test_case, const char *value)
> >  	struct lcore_dma_map_t *lcore_dma_map;
> >  	char *input, *addrs;
> >  	char *ptrs[2];
> > -	char *start, *end, *substr;
> > +	char *start, *end, *substr, *saveptr;
> >  	uint16_t lcore_id;
> >  	int ret = 0;
> >  
> >  	if (test_case == NULL || value == NULL)
> >  		return -1;
> >  
> > -	input = strndup(value, strlen(value) + 1);
> > +	input = strdup(value);
> >  	if (input == NULL)
> >  		return -1;
> > -	addrs = input;
> >  
> > -	while (*addrs == '\0')
> > -		addrs++;
> > +	addrs = input;
> > +	while (isspace(*addrs))
> > +		++addrs;
> >  	if (*addrs == '\0') {
> >  		fprintf(stderr, "No input DMA addresses\n");
> >  		ret = -1;
> >  		goto out;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	substr = strtok(addrs, ",");
> > +	substr = strtok_r(addrs, ",", &saveptr);  
> 
> Don't need to use strtok here at all. Just use strchr, and then no need for
> a new temporary variable.

The issue is that the test is passing each comma seperated section to rte_strsplit
and that needs the first part to be null terminated.
But using strtok_r in only one spot is wrong, will fix.

[PATCH v3 00/10] bug fixes for unit tests

[Stephen Hemminger]

Recent blog post from PVS studio referenced lots bugs found by
their analyzer against DPDK. This set addresses the ones in
the test suite.

v3 - minimize change to test-dma-perf

Stephen Hemminger (10):
  app/test: do not duplicate loop variable
  app/test: fix typo in address compare
  app/test: fix paren typo
  app/test: avoid duplicate initialization
  app/test: fix TLS zero length record
  app/test: fix operator precedence bug
  test/eal: fix core check in c flag test
  app/test-pmd: remove redundant condition
  app/test-pmd: avoid potential outside of array reference
  app/test-dma-perf: fix parsing of DMA address

 app/test-dma-perf/main.c                      |  4 +--
 app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c                   |  2 +-
 app/test-pmd/config.c                         |  3 +-
 app/test/test_common.c                        | 31 ++++++++++---------
 app/test/test_cryptodev.c                     |  5 +--
 app/test/test_eal_flags.c                     |  4 +--
 app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c          | 24 ++++++--------
 app/test/test_link_bonding.c                  |  9 ++----
 app/test/test_security_inline_proto_vectors.h |  8 +++--
 9 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)

-- 
2.45.2

[PATCH v3 01/10] app/test: do not duplicate loop variable

[Stephen Hemminger]

Do not use same variable for outer and inner loop in bonding test.
Since the loop is just freeing the resulting burst use bulk free.

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: 92073ef961ee ("bond: unit tests")
Cc: declan.doherty@intel.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
---
 app/test/test_link_bonding.c | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_link_bonding.c b/app/test/test_link_bonding.c
index 4d54706c21..805613d7dd 100644
--- a/app/test/test_link_bonding.c
+++ b/app/test/test_link_bonding.c
@@ -2288,12 +2288,7 @@ test_activebackup_rx_burst(void)
 		}
 
 		/* free mbufs */
-		for (i = 0; i < MAX_PKT_BURST; i++) {
-			if (rx_pkt_burst[i] != NULL) {
-				rte_pktmbuf_free(rx_pkt_burst[i]);
-				rx_pkt_burst[i] = NULL;
-			}
-		}
+		rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(rx_pkt_burst, burst_size);
 
 		/* reset bonding device stats */
 		rte_eth_stats_reset(test_params->bonding_port_id);
-- 
2.45.2

[PATCH v3 02/10] app/test: fix typo in address compare

[Stephen Hemminger]

The first argument of 'memcmp' function was equal to the second argument.
Therefore ASSERT would always be true.

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: 92073ef961ee ("bond: unit tests")
Cc: declan.doherty@intel.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
 app/test/test_link_bonding.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_link_bonding.c b/app/test/test_link_bonding.c
index 805613d7dd..b752a5ecbf 100644
--- a/app/test/test_link_bonding.c
+++ b/app/test/test_link_bonding.c
@@ -792,7 +792,7 @@ test_set_primary_member(void)
 				&read_mac_addr),
 				"Failed to get mac address (port %d)",
 				test_params->bonding_port_id);
-		TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(memcmp(&read_mac_addr, &read_mac_addr,
+		TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(memcmp(expected_mac_addr, &read_mac_addr,
 				sizeof(read_mac_addr)),
 				"bonding port mac address not set to that of primary port\n");
 
-- 
2.45.2

[PATCH v3 03/10] app/test: fix paren typo

[Stephen Hemminger]

The parenthesis were in the wrong place so that comparison
took precedence over assignment in handling IPv6 extension
headers.  Break up the loop condition to avoid the problem.

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: 15ccc647526e ("test/security: test inline reassembly with multi-segment")
Cc: ndabilpuram@marvell.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
---
 app/test/test_security_inline_proto_vectors.h | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_security_inline_proto_vectors.h b/app/test/test_security_inline_proto_vectors.h
index b3d724bac6..86dfa54777 100644
--- a/app/test/test_security_inline_proto_vectors.h
+++ b/app/test/test_security_inline_proto_vectors.h
@@ -519,10 +519,12 @@ test_vector_payload_populate(struct ip_reassembly_test_packet *pkt,
 			if (extra_data_sum) {
 				proto = hdr->proto;
 				p += sizeof(struct rte_ipv6_hdr);
-				while (proto != IPPROTO_FRAGMENT &&
-				       (proto = rte_ipv6_get_next_ext(p, proto, &ext_len) >= 0))
+				while (proto != IPPROTO_FRAGMENT) {
+					proto = rte_ipv6_get_next_ext(p, proto, &ext_len);
+					if (proto < 0)
+						break;
 					p += ext_len;
-
+				}
 				/* Found fragment header, update the frag offset */
 				if (proto == IPPROTO_FRAGMENT) {
 					frag_ext = (struct rte_ipv6_fragment_ext *)p;
-- 
2.45.2

[PATCH v3 04/10] app/test: avoid duplicate initialization

[Stephen Hemminger]

The event_dev_config initialization had duplicate assignments
to the same element. Change to use structure initialization
so that compiler will catch this type of bug.

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: f8f9d233ea0e ("test/eventdev: add unit tests")
Cc: jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
---
 app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c b/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
index 9d38a66bfa..ab24e30a97 100644
--- a/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
+++ b/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
@@ -1154,21 +1154,17 @@ configure_cryptodev(void)
 
 static inline void
 evdev_set_conf_values(struct rte_event_dev_config *dev_conf,
-			struct rte_event_dev_info *info)
+		      const struct rte_event_dev_info *info)
 {
-	memset(dev_conf, 0, sizeof(struct rte_event_dev_config));
-	dev_conf->dequeue_timeout_ns = info->min_dequeue_timeout_ns;
-	dev_conf->nb_event_ports = NB_TEST_PORTS;
-	dev_conf->nb_event_queues = NB_TEST_QUEUES;
-	dev_conf->nb_event_queue_flows = info->max_event_queue_flows;
-	dev_conf->nb_event_port_dequeue_depth =
-			info->max_event_port_dequeue_depth;
-	dev_conf->nb_event_port_enqueue_depth =
-			info->max_event_port_enqueue_depth;
-	dev_conf->nb_event_port_enqueue_depth =
-			info->max_event_port_enqueue_depth;
-	dev_conf->nb_events_limit =
-			info->max_num_events;
+	*dev_conf = (struct rte_event_dev_config) {
+		.dequeue_timeout_ns = info->min_dequeue_timeout_ns,
+		.nb_event_ports = NB_TEST_PORTS,
+		.nb_event_queues = NB_TEST_QUEUES,
+		.nb_event_queue_flows = info->max_event_queue_flows,
+		.nb_event_port_dequeue_depth = info->max_event_port_dequeue_depth,
+		.nb_event_port_enqueue_depth = info->max_event_port_enqueue_depth,
+		.nb_events_limit = info->max_num_events,
+	};
 }
 
 static int
-- 
2.45.2

RE: [PATCH v3 04/10] app/test: avoid duplicate initialization

[Gujjar, Abhinandan S]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2024 1:37 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>;
> jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com; Richardson, Bruce
> <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; Gujjar, Abhinandan S
> <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v3 04/10] app/test: avoid duplicate initialization
> 
> The event_dev_config initialization had duplicate assignments to the same
> element. Change to use structure initialization so that compiler will catch this
> type of bug.
> 
> Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/
> 
> Fixes: f8f9d233ea0e ("test/eventdev: add unit tests")
> Cc: jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Acked-by: Abhinandan Gujjar <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>


> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> ---
>  app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
> b/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
> index 9d38a66bfa..ab24e30a97 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
> @@ -1154,21 +1154,17 @@ configure_cryptodev(void)
> 
>  static inline void
>  evdev_set_conf_values(struct rte_event_dev_config *dev_conf,
> -			struct rte_event_dev_info *info)
> +		      const struct rte_event_dev_info *info)
>  {
> -	memset(dev_conf, 0, sizeof(struct rte_event_dev_config));
> -	dev_conf->dequeue_timeout_ns = info->min_dequeue_timeout_ns;
> -	dev_conf->nb_event_ports = NB_TEST_PORTS;
> -	dev_conf->nb_event_queues = NB_TEST_QUEUES;
> -	dev_conf->nb_event_queue_flows = info->max_event_queue_flows;
> -	dev_conf->nb_event_port_dequeue_depth =
> -			info->max_event_port_dequeue_depth;
> -	dev_conf->nb_event_port_enqueue_depth =
> -			info->max_event_port_enqueue_depth;
> -	dev_conf->nb_event_port_enqueue_depth =
> -			info->max_event_port_enqueue_depth;
> -	dev_conf->nb_events_limit =
> -			info->max_num_events;
> +	*dev_conf = (struct rte_event_dev_config) {
> +		.dequeue_timeout_ns = info->min_dequeue_timeout_ns,
> +		.nb_event_ports = NB_TEST_PORTS,
> +		.nb_event_queues = NB_TEST_QUEUES,
> +		.nb_event_queue_flows = info->max_event_queue_flows,
> +		.nb_event_port_dequeue_depth = info-
> >max_event_port_dequeue_depth,
> +		.nb_event_port_enqueue_depth = info-
> >max_event_port_enqueue_depth,
> +		.nb_events_limit = info->max_num_events,
> +	};
>  }
> 
>  static int
> --
> 2.45.2

[PATCH v3 05/10] app/test: fix TLS zero length record

[Stephen Hemminger]

The code was duplicating the same condition three times?
Reading the commit message, the intention was:

    Add unit tests to verify the zero len TLS records. Zero len packets are
    allowed when content type is app data while zero packet length with
    other content type (such as handshake) would result in an error.

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: 79a58624369a ("test/security: verify zero length TLS records")
Cc: vvelumuri@marvell.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
 app/test/test_cryptodev.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
index c647baeee1..a33ef574cc 100644
--- a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
+++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
@@ -12253,10 +12253,7 @@ test_tls_record_proto_all(const struct tls_record_test_flags *flags)
 		if (flags->skip_sess_destroy && sec_session_outb == NULL)
 			sec_session_outb = ut_params->sec_session;
 
-		if (flags->zero_len &&
-		    ((flags->content_type == TLS_RECORD_TEST_CONTENT_TYPE_HANDSHAKE) ||
-		    (flags->content_type == TLS_RECORD_TEST_CONTENT_TYPE_HANDSHAKE) ||
-		    (flags->content_type == TLS_RECORD_TEST_CONTENT_TYPE_HANDSHAKE))) {
+		if (flags->zero_len && flags->content_type != TLS_RECORD_TEST_CONTENT_TYPE_APP) {
 			if (ret == TEST_SUCCESS)
 				return TEST_FAILED;
 			goto skip_decrypt;
-- 
2.45.2

[PATCH v3 06/10] app/test: fix operator precedence bug

[Stephen Hemminger]

The test loop was much shorter than desired because when
MAX_NUM is defined with out paren's the divide operator /
takes precedence over shift.

But when MAX_NUM is fixed, some tests take too long
and have to be modified to avoid running over full N^2
space of 1<<20.

Note: this is a very old bug, goes back to 2013.

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: 1fb8b07ee511 ("app: add some tests")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
---
 app/test/test_common.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_common.c b/app/test/test_common.c
index 21eb2285e1..6dbd7fc9a9 100644
--- a/app/test/test_common.c
+++ b/app/test/test_common.c
@@ -9,11 +9,12 @@
 #include <rte_common.h>
 #include <rte_bitops.h>
 #include <rte_hexdump.h>
+#include <rte_random.h>
 #include <rte_pause.h>
 
 #include "test.h"
 
-#define MAX_NUM 1 << 20
+#define MAX_NUM (1 << 20)
 
 #define FAIL(x)\
 	{printf(x "() test failed!\n");\
@@ -218,19 +219,21 @@ test_align(void)
 		}
 	}
 
-	for (p = 1; p <= MAX_NUM / 2; p++) {
-		for (i = 1; i <= MAX_NUM / 2; i++) {
-			val = RTE_ALIGN_MUL_CEIL(i, p);
-			if (val % p != 0 || val < i)
-				FAIL_ALIGN("RTE_ALIGN_MUL_CEIL", i, p);
-			val = RTE_ALIGN_MUL_FLOOR(i, p);
-			if (val % p != 0 || val > i)
-				FAIL_ALIGN("RTE_ALIGN_MUL_FLOOR", i, p);
-			val = RTE_ALIGN_MUL_NEAR(i, p);
-			if (val % p != 0 || ((val != RTE_ALIGN_MUL_CEIL(i, p))
-				& (val != RTE_ALIGN_MUL_FLOOR(i, p))))
-				FAIL_ALIGN("RTE_ALIGN_MUL_NEAR", i, p);
-		}
+	/* testing the whole space of 2^20^2 takes too long. */
+	for (j = 1; j <= MAX_NUM ; j++) {
+		i = rte_rand_max(MAX_NUM - 1) + 1;
+		p = rte_rand_max(MAX_NUM - 1) + 1;
+
+		val = RTE_ALIGN_MUL_CEIL(i, p);
+		if (val % p != 0 || val < i)
+			FAIL_ALIGN("RTE_ALIGN_MUL_CEIL", i, p);
+		val = RTE_ALIGN_MUL_FLOOR(i, p);
+		if (val % p != 0 || val > i)
+			FAIL_ALIGN("RTE_ALIGN_MUL_FLOOR", i, p);
+		val = RTE_ALIGN_MUL_NEAR(i, p);
+		if (val % p != 0 || ((val != RTE_ALIGN_MUL_CEIL(i, p))
+				     & (val != RTE_ALIGN_MUL_FLOOR(i, p))))
+			FAIL_ALIGN("RTE_ALIGN_MUL_NEAR", i, p);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.45.2

[PATCH v3 07/10] test/eal: fix core check in c flag test

[Stephen Hemminger]

The expression for checking which lcore is enabled for 0-7
was wrong (missing case for 6).

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: b0209034f2bb ("test/eal: check number of cores before running subtests")
Cc: msantana@redhat.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
---
 app/test/test_eal_flags.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
index d37d6b8627..e32f83d3c8 100644
--- a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
+++ b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
@@ -677,8 +677,8 @@ test_missing_c_flag(void)
 
 	if (rte_lcore_is_enabled(0) && rte_lcore_is_enabled(1) &&
 	    rte_lcore_is_enabled(2) && rte_lcore_is_enabled(3) &&
-	    rte_lcore_is_enabled(3) && rte_lcore_is_enabled(5) &&
-	    rte_lcore_is_enabled(4) && rte_lcore_is_enabled(7) &&
+	    rte_lcore_is_enabled(4) && rte_lcore_is_enabled(5) &&
+	    rte_lcore_is_enabled(6) && rte_lcore_is_enabled(7) &&
 	    launch_proc(argv29) != 0) {
 		printf("Error - "
 		       "process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n");
-- 
2.45.2

[PATCH v3 08/10] app/test-pmd: remove redundant condition

[Stephen Hemminger]

The loop over policy actions will always exit when it sees
the flow end action, so the next check is redundant.

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: f29fa2c59b85 ("app/testpmd: support policy actions per color")
Cc: haifeil@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
---
 app/test-pmd/config.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-pmd/config.c
index 88770b4dfc..32c4e86c84 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
@@ -2288,7 +2288,7 @@ port_meter_policy_add(portid_t port_id, uint32_t policy_id,
 		for (act_n = 0, start = act;
 			act->type != RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END; act++)
 			act_n++;
-		if (act_n && act->type == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END)
+		if (act_n > 0)
 			policy.actions[i] = start;
 		else
 			policy.actions[i] = NULL;
@@ -7316,4 +7316,3 @@ show_mcast_macs(portid_t port_id)
 		printf("  %s\n", buf);
 	}
 }
-
-- 
2.45.2

Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] app/test-pmd: remove redundant condition

[Ajit Khaparde]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1433 bytes --]

On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 12:08 PM Stephen Hemminger
<stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>
> The loop over policy actions will always exit when it sees
> the flow end action, so the next check is redundant.
>
> Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/
>
> Fixes: f29fa2c59b85 ("app/testpmd: support policy actions per color")
> Cc: haifeil@nvidia.com
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>

> ---
>  app/test-pmd/config.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-pmd/config.c
> index 88770b4dfc..32c4e86c84 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
> @@ -2288,7 +2288,7 @@ port_meter_policy_add(portid_t port_id, uint32_t policy_id,
>                 for (act_n = 0, start = act;
>                         act->type != RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END; act++)
>                         act_n++;
> -               if (act_n && act->type == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END)
> +               if (act_n > 0)
>                         policy.actions[i] = start;
>                 else
>                         policy.actions[i] = NULL;
> @@ -7316,4 +7316,3 @@ show_mcast_macs(portid_t port_id)
>                 printf("  %s\n", buf);
>         }
>  }
> -
> --
> 2.45.2
>

[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4218 bytes --]

[PATCH v3 09/10] app/test-pmd: avoid potential outside of array reference

[Stephen Hemminger]

The order of comparison is wrong, and potentially allows
referencing past the array.

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: 3e3edab530a1 ("ethdev: add flow quota")
Cc: getelson@nvidia.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
---
 app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
index 1e4f2ebc55..9e4fc2d95d 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
@@ -12892,7 +12892,7 @@ comp_names_to_index(struct context *ctx, const struct token *token,
 	RTE_SET_USED(token);
 	if (!buf)
 		return names_size;
-	if (names[ent] && ent < names_size)
+	if (ent < names_size && names[ent] != NULL)
 		return rte_strscpy(buf, names[ent], size);
 	return -1;
 
-- 
2.45.2

[PATCH v3 10/10] app/test-dma-perf: fix parsing of DMA address

[Stephen Hemminger]

There was useless loop when looking at the DMA address.
It looks like it was meant to skip whitespace before
calling strtok.

Good time to replace strtok with strtok_r as well.

Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/

Fixes: 623dc9364dc6 ("app/dma-perf: introduce DMA performance test")
Cc: cheng1.jiang@intel.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
---
 app/test-dma-perf/main.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test-dma-perf/main.c b/app/test-dma-perf/main.c
index 18219918cc..8d46b1258b 100644
--- a/app/test-dma-perf/main.c
+++ b/app/test-dma-perf/main.c
@@ -229,8 +229,8 @@ parse_lcore_dma(struct test_configure *test_case, const char *value)
 		return -1;
 	addrs = input;
 
-	while (*addrs == '\0')
-		addrs++;
+	while (isspace(*addrs))
+		++addrs;
 	if (*addrs == '\0') {
 		fprintf(stderr, "No input DMA addresses\n");
 		ret = -1;
-- 
2.45.2

Re: [PATCH v3 10/10] app/test-dma-perf: fix parsing of DMA address

[fengchengwen]

On 2024/11/16 4:06, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> There was useless loop when looking at the DMA address.
> It looks like it was meant to skip whitespace before
> calling strtok.
> 
> Good time to replace strtok with strtok_r as well.

Please delete this line, with this fixed:
Acked-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>

> 
> Link: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1179/
> 
> Fixes: 623dc9364dc6 ("app/dma-perf: introduce DMA performance test")
> Cc: cheng1.jiang@intel.com
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> ---
>  app/test-dma-perf/main.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test-dma-perf/main.c b/app/test-dma-perf/main.c
> index 18219918cc..8d46b1258b 100644
> --- a/app/test-dma-perf/main.c
> +++ b/app/test-dma-perf/main.c
> @@ -229,8 +229,8 @@ parse_lcore_dma(struct test_configure *test_case, const char *value)
>  		return -1;
>  	addrs = input;
>  
> -	while (*addrs == '\0')
> -		addrs++;
> +	while (isspace(*addrs))
> +		++addrs;
>  	if (*addrs == '\0') {
>  		fprintf(stderr, "No input DMA addresses\n");
>  		ret = -1;