RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] eventdev: introduce event pre-scheduling

[Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>]

> On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 13:29:56 +0530
> <pbhagavatula@marvell.com> wrote:
> 
> > +static int
> > +preschedule_test(enum rte_event_dev_preschedule_type
> preschedule_type, const char *preschedule_name)
> > +{
> > +#define NB_EVENTS     1024
> > +	uint64_t start, total;
> > +	struct rte_event ev;
> > +	int rc, cnt;
> > +
> > +	ev.event_type = RTE_EVENT_TYPE_CPU;
> > +	ev.queue_id = 0;
> > +	ev.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW;
> > +	ev.u64 = 0xBADF00D0;
> > +
> > +	for (cnt = 0; cnt < NB_EVENTS; cnt++) {
> > +		ev.flow_id = cnt;
> > +		rc = rte_event_enqueue_burst(TEST_DEV_ID, 0, &ev, 1);
> > +		TEST_ASSERT(rc == 1, "Failed to enqueue event");
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	RTE_SET_USED(preschedule_type);
> 
> If you respin this patch. My preference is to use the __rte_unused attribute in
> the function
> declaration rather RTE_SET_USED(), mainly because it makes it more obvious
> in the start of the function.

Hi Stephen, 
I am respinning the series but the RTE_SET_USED is removed in the 2/6.

-       RTE_SET_USED(preschedule_type);
+       if (modify) {
+               rc = rte_event_port_preschedule_modify(TEST_DEV_ID, 0, preschedule_type);
+               TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(rc, "Failed to modify preschedule type");
+       }
+

Thanks,
Pavan.