From: Shijith Thotton <sthotton@marvell.com>
To: "Naga Harish K, S V" <s.v.naga.harish.k@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>,
"Pathak, Pravin" <pravin.pathak@intel.com>,
Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
Sachin Saxena <sachin.saxena@nxp.com>,
Mattias R_nnblom <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>,
Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>, Liang Ma <liangma@liangbit.com>,
"Mccarthy, Peter" <peter.mccarthy@intel.com>,
"Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>,
"Carrillo, Erik G" <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>,
"Gujjar, Abhinandan S" <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>,
Amit Prakash Shukla <amitprakashs@marvell.com>,
"Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH] eventdev: adapter API to configure multiple Rx queues
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 13:42:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH0PR18MB442573F6CCB0FCB357F9F360D9E12@PH0PR18MB4425.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN7PR11MB70449343834D079E93AD1FF3A1E12@SN7PR11MB7044.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
>> >> >> >>> This RFC introduces a new API,
>> >> >> >>> rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queues_add(),
>> >> >> >>> designed to enhance the flexibility of configuring multiple Rx
>> >> >> >>> queues in eventdev Rx adapter.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> The existing rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_add() API supports
>> >> >> >>> adding multiple queues by specifying rx_queue_id = -1, but it
>> >> >> >>> lacks the ability to
>> >> >> >apply
>> >> >> >>> specific configurations to each of the added queues.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>The application can still use the existing
>> >> >> >>rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_add() API in a loop with
>> >> >> >>different configurations for different queues.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>The proposed API is not enabling new features that cannot be
>> >> >> >>achieved with the existing API.
>> >> >> >>Adding new APIs without much usefulness causes unnecessary
>> >> >> >>complexity/confusion for users.
>> >> >> >>
>>
>> The eth_rx_adapter_queue_add eventdev PMD operation can be updated to
>> support burst mode. Internally, both the new and existing APIs can utilize this
>> updated operation. This enables applications to use either API and achieve
>the
>> same results while adding a single queue. For adding multiple RX queues to
>the
>> adapter, the new API can be used as it is not supported by the old API.
>>
>
>Not all platforms implement the eventdev PMD operation for
>eth_rx_adapter_queue_add, so this does not apply to all platforms.
>
Yes, but there are hardware PMDs that implement eth_rx_adapter_queue_add op,
and I am looking for a solution that works for both cases.
The idea is to use the new eventdev PMD operation (eth_rx_adapter_queues_add)
within the rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_add() API. The parameters of this
API can be easily mapped to and supported by the new PMD operation.
typedef int (*eventdev_eth_rx_adapter_queues_add_t)(
const struct rte_eventdev *dev,
const struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev,
int32_t rx_queue_id[],
const struct rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_conf queue_conf[],
uint16_t nb_rx_queues);
With this, the old PMD op (eth_rx_adapter_queue_add) can be removed.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >The new API was introduced because the existing API does not
>> >> >> >support adding multiple queues with specific configurations. It
>> >> >> >serves as a burst variant of the existing API, like many other APIs in
>> DPDK.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >The other burst APIs may be there for dataplane functionalities, but
>> >> >may not be for the control plane functionalities.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> rte_acl_add_rules() is an example of burst API in control path.
>> >>
>> >
>> >I mean, In general, burst APIs are for data-plane functions.
>> >This may be one of the rare cases where a burst API is in the control path.
>> >
>> >> >> >For better clarity, the API can be renamed to
>> >> >> >rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_add_burst() if needed.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >In hardware, adding each queue individually incurs significant
>> >> >> >overheads, such as mailbox operations. A burst API helps to
>> >> >> >amortize this overhead. Since real- world applications often call
>> >> >> >the API with specific queue_ids, the burst API can provide considerable
>> benefits.
>> >> >> >Testing shows a 75% reduction in time when adding multiple queues
>> >> >> >to the RX adapter using the burst API on our platform.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > As batching helps for a particular hardware device, this may not be
>> >> >applicable for all platforms/cases.
>> >> > Since queue_add is a control plane operation, latency may not be a
>> >> >concern.
>> >>
>> >> In certain use cases, these APIs can be considered semi-fast path.
>> >> For
>> >instance,
>> >> in an application that hotplugs a port on demand, configuring all
>> >> available queues simultaneously can significantly reduce latency.
>> >>
>> >
>> >As said earlier, this latency reduction (when trying to add multiple RX
>> >queues to the Event Ethernet Rx adapter) may not apply to all
>> platforms/cases.
>> >This API is not for configuring queues but for adding the queues to the
>> >RX adapter.
>> >
>> >> >How to specify a particular set(specific queue_ids) of rx_queues
>> >> >that has a non- zero start index with the new proposed API?
>> >>
>> >> In the proposed API,
>> >> int rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queues_add(
>> >> uint8_t id, uint16_t eth_dev_id, int32_t rx_queue_id[],
>> >> const struct rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_conf conf[],
>> >> uint16_t nb_rx_queues); rx_queues_id is an
>> >> array containing the receive queues ids, which can start from a
>> >> non-zero value. The array index is used solely to locate the
>> >> corresponding queue_conf. For example, rx_queues_id[i] will use conf[i].
>> >>
>> >
>> >Ok
>> >
>> >> > Since this is still not possible with the proposed API, the
>> >> >existing queue_add API needs to be used with specific queue_ids and
>> >> >their configurations.
>> >> >
>> >> >> >I can modify the old API implementation to act as a wrapper
>> >> >> >around the burst API, with number of queues equal to 1. If
>> >> >> >concerns remain, we can explore deprecation as an alternative.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Please let me know if you have any suggestions/feedback on what I
>> >> >> said above.
>> >> >
>> >> >Still feel the new proposed API can be avoided as it looks like a
>> >> >different combination of existing API instead of adding some new
>features.
>> >> >
>> >> >> If not, I can go ahead and send v1.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> The proposed API, rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queues_add,
>> >> >> >>> addresses this limitation by:
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> - Enabling users to specify an array of rx_queue_id values alongside
>> >> >> >>> individual configurations for each queue.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> - Supporting a nb_rx_queues argument to define the number of
>> >> >> >>> queues
>> >> >to
>> >> >> >>> configure. When set to 0, the API applies a common configuration
>> to
>> >> >> >>> all queues, similar to the existing rx_queue_id = -1 behavior.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> This enhancement allows for more granular control when
>> >> >> >>> configuring
>> >> >> >multiple
>> >> >> >>> Rx queues. Additionally, the API can act as a replacement for
>> >> >> >>> the older API, offering both flexibility and improved functionality.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Signed-off-by: Shijith Thotton <sthotton@marvell.com>
>> >> >> >>> ---
>> >> >> >>> lib/eventdev/eventdev_pmd.h | 34
>> >> >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> >> >>> lib/eventdev/rte_event_eth_rx_adapter.h | 34
>> >> >> >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> >> >>> 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+)
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> diff --git a/lib/eventdev/eventdev_pmd.h
>> >> >> >>> b/lib/eventdev/eventdev_pmd.h index 36148f8d86..2e458a9779
>> >> >> 100644
>> >> >> >>> --- a/lib/eventdev/eventdev_pmd.h
>> >> >> >>> +++ b/lib/eventdev/eventdev_pmd.h
>> >> >> >>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>> >> >> >>> #include <rte_mbuf_dyn.h>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> #include "event_timer_adapter_pmd.h"
>> >> >> >>> +#include "rte_event_eth_rx_adapter.h"
>> >> >> >>> #include "rte_eventdev.h"
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> #ifdef __cplusplus
>> >> >> >>> @@ -708,6 +709,37 @@ typedef int
>> >> >> >>> (*eventdev_eth_rx_adapter_queue_add_t)(
>> >> >> >>> int32_t rx_queue_id,
>> >> >> >>> const struct rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_conf
>> >> >> >>> *queue_conf);
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> +/**
>> >> >> >>> + * Add ethernet Rx queues to event device. This callback is
>> >> >> >>> +invoked if
>> >> >> >>> + * the caps returned from
>> >> >> >>> +rte_eventdev_eth_rx_adapter_caps_get(,
>> >> >> >>> +eth_port_id)
>> >> >> >>> + * has RTE_EVENT_ETH_RX_ADAPTER_CAP_INTERNAL_PORT set.
>> >> >> >>> + *
>> >> >> >>> + * @param dev
>> >> >> >>> + * Event device pointer
>> >> >> >>> + *
>> >> >> >>> + * @param eth_dev
>> >> >> >>> + * Ethernet device pointer
>> >> >> >>> + *
>> >> >> >>> + * @param rx_queue_id
>> >> >> >>> + * Ethernet device receive queue index array
>> >> >> >>> + *
>> >> >> >>> + * @param queue_conf
>> >> >> >>> + * Additional configuration structure array
>> >> >> >>> + *
>> >> >> >>> + * @param nb_rx_queues
>> >> >> >>> + * Number of ethernet device receive queues
>> >> >> >>> + *
>> >> >> >>> + * @return
>> >> >> >>> + * - 0: Success, ethernet receive queues added successfully.
>> >> >> >>> + * - <0: Error code returned by the driver function.
>> >> >> >>> + */
>> >> >> >>> +typedef int (*eventdev_eth_rx_adapter_queues_add_t)(
>> >> >> >>> + const struct rte_eventdev *dev,
>> >> >> >>> + const struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev,
>> >> >> >>> + int32_t rx_queue_id[],
>> >> >> >>> + const struct rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_conf
>> >> >> >>> queue_conf[],
>> >> >> >>> + uint16_t nb_rx_queues);
>> >> >> >>> +
>> >> >> >>> /**
>> >> >> >>> * Delete ethernet Rx queues from event device. This callback
>> >> >> >>> is
>> >invoked
>> >> if
>> >> >> >>> * the caps returned from eventdev_eth_rx_adapter_caps_get(,
>> >> >> >eth_port_id)
>> >> >> >>> @@ -1578,6 +1610,8 @@ struct eventdev_ops {
>> >> >> >>> /**< Get ethernet Rx adapter capabilities */
>> >> >> >>> eventdev_eth_rx_adapter_queue_add_t
>> >eth_rx_adapter_queue_add;
>> >> >> >>> /**< Add Rx queues to ethernet Rx adapter */
>> >> >> >>> + eventdev_eth_rx_adapter_queues_add_t
>> >> >> >>> eth_rx_adapter_queues_add;
>> >> >> >>> + /**< Add Rx queues to ethernet Rx adapter */
>> >> >> >>> eventdev_eth_rx_adapter_queue_del_t
>> >eth_rx_adapter_queue_del;
>> >> >> >>> /**< Delete Rx queues from ethernet Rx adapter */
>> >> >> >>> eventdev_eth_rx_adapter_queue_conf_get_t
>> >> >> >>> eth_rx_adapter_queue_conf_get; diff --git
>> >> >> >>> a/lib/eventdev/rte_event_eth_rx_adapter.h
>> >> >> >>> b/lib/eventdev/rte_event_eth_rx_adapter.h
>> >> >> >>> index 9237e198a7..9a5c560b67 100644
>> >> >> >>> --- a/lib/eventdev/rte_event_eth_rx_adapter.h
>> >> >> >>> +++ b/lib/eventdev/rte_event_eth_rx_adapter.h
>> >> >> >>> @@ -553,6 +553,40 @@ int
>> >> >> rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_add(uint8_t
>> >> >> >>> id,
>> >> >> >>> int32_t rx_queue_id,
>> >> >> >>> const struct
>> >rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_conf
>> >> >> >>> *conf);
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> +/**
>> >> >> >>> + * Add multiple receive queues to an event adapter.
>> >> >> >>> + *
>> >> >> >>> + * @param id
>> >> >> >>> + * Adapter identifier.
>> >> >> >>> + *
>> >> >> >>> + * @param eth_dev_id
>> >> >> >>> + * Port identifier of Ethernet device.
>> >> >> >>> + *
>> >> >> >>> + * @param rx_queue_id
>> >> >> >>> + * Array of Ethernet device receive queue indices.
>> >> >> >>> + * If nb_rx_queues is 0, then rx_queue_id is ignored.
>> >> >> >>> + *
>> >> >> >>> + * @param conf
>> >> >> >>> + * Array of additional configuration structures of type
>> >> >> >>> + * *rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_conf*. conf[i] is used
>> >> >> >>> +for
>> >> >> >>> rx_queue_id[i].
>> >> >> >>> + * If nb_rx_queues is 0, then conf[0] is used for all Rx queues.
>> >> >> >>> + *
>> >> >> >>> + * @param nb_rx_queues
>> >> >> >>> + * Number of receive queues to add.
>> >> >> >>> + * If nb_rx_queues is 0, then all Rx queues configured for
>> >> >> >>> + * the device are added with the same configuration in conf[0].
>> >> >> >>> + * @see RTE_EVENT_ETH_RX_ADAPTER_CAP_MULTI_EVENTQ
>> >> >> >>> + *
>> >> >> >>> + * @return
>> >> >> >>> + * - 0: Success, Receive queues added correctly.
>> >> >> >>> + * - <0: Error code on failure.
>> >> >> >>> + */
>> >> >> >>> +__rte_experimental
>> >> >> >>> +int rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queues_add(
>> >> >> >>> + uint8_t id, uint16_t eth_dev_id, int32_t
>> >> >> >>> rx_queue_id[],
>> >> >> >>> + const struct
>> >> rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_conf
>> >> >> >>> conf[],
>> >> >> >>> + uint16_t nb_rx_queues);
>> >> >> >>> +
>> >> >> >>> /**
>> >> >> >>> * Delete receive queue from an event adapter.
>> >> >> >>> *
>> >> >> >>> --
>> >> >> >>> 2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-22 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-19 7:34 Shijith Thotton
2024-12-22 16:28 ` Naga Harish K, S V
2025-01-02 9:40 ` Shijith Thotton
2025-01-13 12:06 ` Shijith Thotton
2025-01-15 16:52 ` Naga Harish K, S V
2025-01-16 6:27 ` Shijith Thotton
2025-01-20 9:52 ` Naga Harish K, S V
2025-01-20 18:23 ` Shijith Thotton
2025-01-22 5:17 ` Naga Harish K, S V
2025-01-22 13:42 ` Shijith Thotton [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-12-19 7:31 Shijith Thotton
2024-12-19 7:40 ` Shijith Thotton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=PH0PR18MB442573F6CCB0FCB357F9F360D9E12@PH0PR18MB4425.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
--to=sthotton@marvell.com \
--cc=abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com \
--cc=amitprakashs@marvell.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=erik.g.carrillo@intel.com \
--cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=liangma@liangbit.com \
--cc=mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com \
--cc=pbhagavatula@marvell.com \
--cc=peter.mccarthy@intel.com \
--cc=pravin.pathak@intel.com \
--cc=s.v.naga.harish.k@intel.com \
--cc=sachin.saxena@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).