From: Shijith Thotton <sthotton@marvell.com>
To: "Naga Harish K, S V" <s.v.naga.harish.k@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>,
"Pathak, Pravin" <pravin.pathak@intel.com>,
Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
Sachin Saxena <sachin.saxena@nxp.com>,
Mattias R_nnblom <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>,
Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>, Liang Ma <liangma@liangbit.com>,
"Mccarthy, Peter" <peter.mccarthy@intel.com>,
"Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>,
"Carrillo, Erik G" <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>,
"Gujjar, Abhinandan S" <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>,
Amit Prakash Shukla <amitprakashs@marvell.com>,
"Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH] eventdev: adapter API to configure multiple Rx queues
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 06:27:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH0PR18MB4425814723E192FC21969FA9D91A2@PH0PR18MB4425.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN7PR11MB70442D9156537BA7C5D918A7A1192@SN7PR11MB7044.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
>> >>> This RFC introduces a new API,
>> >>> rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queues_add(),
>> >>> designed to enhance the flexibility of configuring multiple Rx
>> >>> queues in eventdev Rx adapter.
>> >>>
>> >>> The existing rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_add() API supports
>> >>> adding multiple queues by specifying rx_queue_id = -1, but it lacks
>> >>> the ability to
>> >apply
>> >>> specific configurations to each of the added queues.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>The application can still use the existing
>> >>rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_add() API in a loop with different
>> >>configurations for different queues.
>> >>
>> >>The proposed API is not enabling new features that cannot be achieved
>> >>with the existing API.
>> >>Adding new APIs without much usefulness causes unnecessary
>> >>complexity/confusion for users.
>> >>
>> >
>> >The new API was introduced because the existing API does not support
>> >adding multiple queues with specific configurations. It serves as a
>> >burst variant of the existing API, like many other APIs in DPDK.
>> >
>
>The other burst APIs may be there for dataplane functionalities, but may not be
>for the control plane functionalities.
>
rte_acl_add_rules() is an example of burst API in control path.
>> >For better clarity, the API can be renamed to
>> >rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_add_burst() if needed.
>> >
>> >In hardware, adding each queue individually incurs significant
>> >overheads, such as mailbox operations. A burst API helps to amortize
>> >this overhead. Since real- world applications often call the API with
>> >specific queue_ids, the burst API can provide considerable benefits.
>> >Testing shows a 75% reduction in time when adding multiple queues to
>> >the RX adapter using the burst API on our platform.
>> >
>
> As batching helps for a particular hardware device, this may not be applicable
>for all platforms/cases.
> Since queue_add is a control plane operation, latency may not be a
>concern.
In certain use cases, these APIs can be considered semi-fast path. For instance,
in an application that hotplugs a port on demand, configuring all available
queues simultaneously can significantly reduce latency.
>How to specify a particular set(specific queue_ids) of rx_queues that has a non-
>zero start index with the new proposed API?
In the proposed API,
int rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queues_add(
uint8_t id, uint16_t eth_dev_id, int32_t rx_queue_id[],
const struct rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_conf conf[],
uint16_t nb_rx_queues);
rx_queues_id is an array containing the receive queues ids, which can start
from a non-zero value. The array index is used solely to locate the
corresponding queue_conf. For example, rx_queues_id[i] will use conf[i].
> Since this is still not possible with the proposed API, the existing
>queue_add API needs to be used with specific queue_ids and their
>configurations.
>
>> >I can modify the old API implementation to act as a wrapper around the
>> >burst API, with number of queues equal to 1. If concerns remain, we can
>> >explore deprecation as an alternative.
>> >
>>
>> Please let me know if you have any suggestions/feedback on what I said
>> above.
>
>Still feel the new proposed API can be avoided as it looks like a different
>combination of existing API instead of adding some new features.
>
>> If not, I can go ahead and send v1.
>>
>> >>> The proposed API, rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queues_add, addresses
>> >>> this limitation by:
>> >>>
>> >>> - Enabling users to specify an array of rx_queue_id values alongside
>> >>> individual configurations for each queue.
>> >>>
>> >>> - Supporting a nb_rx_queues argument to define the number of queues
>to
>> >>> configure. When set to 0, the API applies a common configuration to
>> >>> all queues, similar to the existing rx_queue_id = -1 behavior.
>> >>>
>> >>> This enhancement allows for more granular control when configuring
>> >multiple
>> >>> Rx queues. Additionally, the API can act as a replacement for the
>> >>> older API, offering both flexibility and improved functionality.
>> >>>
>> >>> Signed-off-by: Shijith Thotton <sthotton@marvell.com>
>> >>> ---
>> >>> lib/eventdev/eventdev_pmd.h | 34
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >>> lib/eventdev/rte_event_eth_rx_adapter.h | 34
>> >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >>> 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+)
>> >>>
>> >>> diff --git a/lib/eventdev/eventdev_pmd.h
>> >>> b/lib/eventdev/eventdev_pmd.h index 36148f8d86..2e458a9779
>> 100644
>> >>> --- a/lib/eventdev/eventdev_pmd.h
>> >>> +++ b/lib/eventdev/eventdev_pmd.h
>> >>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>> >>> #include <rte_mbuf_dyn.h>
>> >>>
>> >>> #include "event_timer_adapter_pmd.h"
>> >>> +#include "rte_event_eth_rx_adapter.h"
>> >>> #include "rte_eventdev.h"
>> >>>
>> >>> #ifdef __cplusplus
>> >>> @@ -708,6 +709,37 @@ typedef int
>> >>> (*eventdev_eth_rx_adapter_queue_add_t)(
>> >>> int32_t rx_queue_id,
>> >>> const struct rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_conf
>> >>> *queue_conf);
>> >>>
>> >>> +/**
>> >>> + * Add ethernet Rx queues to event device. This callback is invoked
>> >>> +if
>> >>> + * the caps returned from rte_eventdev_eth_rx_adapter_caps_get(,
>> >>> +eth_port_id)
>> >>> + * has RTE_EVENT_ETH_RX_ADAPTER_CAP_INTERNAL_PORT set.
>> >>> + *
>> >>> + * @param dev
>> >>> + * Event device pointer
>> >>> + *
>> >>> + * @param eth_dev
>> >>> + * Ethernet device pointer
>> >>> + *
>> >>> + * @param rx_queue_id
>> >>> + * Ethernet device receive queue index array
>> >>> + *
>> >>> + * @param queue_conf
>> >>> + * Additional configuration structure array
>> >>> + *
>> >>> + * @param nb_rx_queues
>> >>> + * Number of ethernet device receive queues
>> >>> + *
>> >>> + * @return
>> >>> + * - 0: Success, ethernet receive queues added successfully.
>> >>> + * - <0: Error code returned by the driver function.
>> >>> + */
>> >>> +typedef int (*eventdev_eth_rx_adapter_queues_add_t)(
>> >>> + const struct rte_eventdev *dev,
>> >>> + const struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev,
>> >>> + int32_t rx_queue_id[],
>> >>> + const struct rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_conf
>> >>> queue_conf[],
>> >>> + uint16_t nb_rx_queues);
>> >>> +
>> >>> /**
>> >>> * Delete ethernet Rx queues from event device. This callback is invoked if
>> >>> * the caps returned from eventdev_eth_rx_adapter_caps_get(,
>> >eth_port_id)
>> >>> @@ -1578,6 +1610,8 @@ struct eventdev_ops {
>> >>> /**< Get ethernet Rx adapter capabilities */
>> >>> eventdev_eth_rx_adapter_queue_add_t eth_rx_adapter_queue_add;
>> >>> /**< Add Rx queues to ethernet Rx adapter */
>> >>> + eventdev_eth_rx_adapter_queues_add_t
>> >>> eth_rx_adapter_queues_add;
>> >>> + /**< Add Rx queues to ethernet Rx adapter */
>> >>> eventdev_eth_rx_adapter_queue_del_t eth_rx_adapter_queue_del;
>> >>> /**< Delete Rx queues from ethernet Rx adapter */
>> >>> eventdev_eth_rx_adapter_queue_conf_get_t
>> >>> eth_rx_adapter_queue_conf_get; diff --git
>> >>> a/lib/eventdev/rte_event_eth_rx_adapter.h
>> >>> b/lib/eventdev/rte_event_eth_rx_adapter.h
>> >>> index 9237e198a7..9a5c560b67 100644
>> >>> --- a/lib/eventdev/rte_event_eth_rx_adapter.h
>> >>> +++ b/lib/eventdev/rte_event_eth_rx_adapter.h
>> >>> @@ -553,6 +553,40 @@ int
>> rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_add(uint8_t
>> >>> id,
>> >>> int32_t rx_queue_id,
>> >>> const struct rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_conf
>> >>> *conf);
>> >>>
>> >>> +/**
>> >>> + * Add multiple receive queues to an event adapter.
>> >>> + *
>> >>> + * @param id
>> >>> + * Adapter identifier.
>> >>> + *
>> >>> + * @param eth_dev_id
>> >>> + * Port identifier of Ethernet device.
>> >>> + *
>> >>> + * @param rx_queue_id
>> >>> + * Array of Ethernet device receive queue indices.
>> >>> + * If nb_rx_queues is 0, then rx_queue_id is ignored.
>> >>> + *
>> >>> + * @param conf
>> >>> + * Array of additional configuration structures of type
>> >>> + * *rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_conf*. conf[i] is used for
>> >>> rx_queue_id[i].
>> >>> + * If nb_rx_queues is 0, then conf[0] is used for all Rx queues.
>> >>> + *
>> >>> + * @param nb_rx_queues
>> >>> + * Number of receive queues to add.
>> >>> + * If nb_rx_queues is 0, then all Rx queues configured for
>> >>> + * the device are added with the same configuration in conf[0].
>> >>> + * @see RTE_EVENT_ETH_RX_ADAPTER_CAP_MULTI_EVENTQ
>> >>> + *
>> >>> + * @return
>> >>> + * - 0: Success, Receive queues added correctly.
>> >>> + * - <0: Error code on failure.
>> >>> + */
>> >>> +__rte_experimental
>> >>> +int rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queues_add(
>> >>> + uint8_t id, uint16_t eth_dev_id, int32_t
>> >>> rx_queue_id[],
>> >>> + const struct rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_conf
>> >>> conf[],
>> >>> + uint16_t nb_rx_queues);
>> >>> +
>> >>> /**
>> >>> * Delete receive queue from an event adapter.
>> >>> *
>> >>> --
>> >>> 2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-16 6:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-19 7:34 Shijith Thotton
2024-12-22 16:28 ` Naga Harish K, S V
2025-01-02 9:40 ` Shijith Thotton
2025-01-13 12:06 ` Shijith Thotton
2025-01-15 16:52 ` Naga Harish K, S V
2025-01-16 6:27 ` Shijith Thotton [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-12-19 7:31 Shijith Thotton
2024-12-19 7:40 ` Shijith Thotton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=PH0PR18MB4425814723E192FC21969FA9D91A2@PH0PR18MB4425.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
--to=sthotton@marvell.com \
--cc=abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com \
--cc=amitprakashs@marvell.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=erik.g.carrillo@intel.com \
--cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=liangma@liangbit.com \
--cc=mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com \
--cc=pbhagavatula@marvell.com \
--cc=peter.mccarthy@intel.com \
--cc=pravin.pathak@intel.com \
--cc=s.v.naga.harish.k@intel.com \
--cc=sachin.saxena@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).