DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liron Himi <lironh@marvell.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Liron Himi <lironh@marvell.com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] |FAILURE| pw104631 [PATCH v2 5/5] regex/cn9k: use cnxk infrastructure
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 09:55:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH0PR18MB447327133A44809E2427E2EDC6669@PH0PR18MB4473.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5922270.lOV4Wx5bFT@thomas>

Hi Thomas,


-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> 
Sent: Sunday, 28 November 2021 22:37
To: Liron Himi <lironh@marvell.com>
Cc: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>; dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [EXT] |FAILURE| pw104631 [PATCH v2 5/5] regex/cn9k: use cnxk infrastructure

28/11/2021 21:17, Liron Himi:
> Hi,
> 
> I have fixed the error below but got additional errors which I need your advice if to ignore or update it is some way.
> This patch also replace the name of the 'regexdevs/octeontx2' folder to 'regexdevs/cn9k'
> Note that Jerin is going to remove the current 'octeontx2' references as the new cnxk is replacing it.
> 
> What should I do with those errors:
> dpdk-next-net-mrvl/doc/guides/platform/octeontx2.rst:158:unknown document: ../regexdevs/octeontx2

This one, you must fix to the next regex doc.
[L.H.] okay.

> dpdk-next-net-mrvl/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst:293:unknown document: ../regexdevs/octeontx2

This one, you must replace the link with a normal text.
For instance, this is what was done for another octeontx2 driver:

-  See the :doc:`../rawdevs/octeontx2_ep` for more details on this new PMD.
+  See ``rawdevs/octeontx2_ep`` for more details on this new PMD.
[L.H.] but this file represent the release notes of dpdk-20.11, right? so, in this release the driver is still 'regexdevs/octeontx2'.
only in the upcoming release the driver name will be changed to "regexdevs/cn9k".
I also think this is relevant for the example you provided. In dpdk-20.11 the driver was "rawdevs/octeontx2_ep"





  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-29  9:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-03  6:23 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] common/cnxk: add REE support lironh
2021-10-28  9:30 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-11-23 19:13 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] regex/cn9k: use cnxk infrastructure lironh
2021-11-23 19:13   ` [PATCH v2 1/5] common/cnxk: add REE HW definitions lironh
2021-11-23 19:13   ` [PATCH v2 2/5] common/cnxk: add REE mbox definitions lironh
2021-11-23 19:13   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] common/cnxk: add REE support lironh
2021-11-23 19:13   ` [PATCH v2 4/5] common/cnxk: link REE support to ROC files lironh
2021-11-23 19:13   ` [PATCH v2 5/5] regex/cn9k: use cnxk infrastructure lironh
     [not found]     ` <20211123193835.20601-1-robot@bytheb.org>
2021-11-28 20:17       ` [EXT] |FAILURE| pw104631 " Liron Himi
2021-11-28 20:37         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-29  9:55           ` Liron Himi [this message]
2021-11-29 10:10             ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-29 19:47   ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " lironh
2021-11-29 19:47     ` [PATCH v3 " lironh
2021-11-29 19:47     ` [PATCH v3 1/5] common/cnxk: add REE HW definitions lironh
2021-12-07 18:31       ` [PATCH v4 0/4] regex/cn9k: use cnxk infrastructure lironh
2021-12-07 18:31         ` [PATCH v4 1/4] common/cnxk: add REE HW definitions lironh
2021-12-07 18:31         ` [PATCH v4 2/4] common/cnxk: add REE mbox definitions lironh
2021-12-07 18:31         ` [PATCH v4 3/4] common/cnxk: add REE support lironh
2021-12-07 18:31         ` [PATCH v4 4/4] regex/cn9k: use cnxk infrastructure lironh
2021-12-08  9:14         ` [PATCH v4 0/4] " Jerin Jacob
2021-12-11  9:04         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/5] remove octeontx2 drivers jerinj
2021-12-11  9:04           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/5] common/cnxk: add REE HW definitions jerinj
2021-12-11  9:04           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/5] common/cnxk: add REE mbox definitions jerinj
2021-12-11  9:04           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/5] common/cnxk: add REE support jerinj
2021-12-11  9:04           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/5] regex/cn9k: use cnxk infrastructure jerinj
2021-12-11  9:04           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/5] drivers: remove octeontx2 drivers jerinj
2021-12-14  8:57             ` Ruifeng Wang
2022-01-12 14:37           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/5] " Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-29 19:47     ` [PATCH v3 2/5] common/cnxk: add REE mbox definitions lironh
2021-11-29 19:47     ` [PATCH v3 3/5] common/cnxk: add REE support lironh
2021-11-29 19:47     ` [PATCH v3 4/5] common/cnxk: link REE support to ROC files lironh
2021-11-29 19:47     ` [PATCH v3 5/5] regex/cn9k: use cnxk infrastructure lironh
2021-11-29 19:49   ` [PATCH v3 0/5] " lironh
2021-11-29 19:49     ` [PATCH v3 1/5] common/cnxk: add REE HW definitions lironh
2021-11-29 19:49     ` [PATCH v3 2/5] common/cnxk: add REE mbox definitions lironh
2021-11-29 19:49     ` [PATCH v3 3/5] common/cnxk: add REE support lironh
2021-11-29 19:49     ` [PATCH v3 4/5] common/cnxk: link REE support to ROC files lironh
2021-11-29 19:49     ` [PATCH v3 5/5] regex/cn9k: use cnxk infrastructure lironh
2021-11-29 19:59   ` [PATCH v3 0/5] " lironh
2021-11-29 19:59     ` [PATCH v3 1/5] common/cnxk: add REE HW definitions lironh
2021-11-29 19:59     ` [PATCH v3 2/5] common/cnxk: add REE mbox definitions lironh
2021-11-29 19:59     ` [PATCH v3 3/5] common/cnxk: add REE support lironh
2021-11-29 19:59     ` [PATCH v3 4/5] common/cnxk: link REE support to ROC files lironh
2021-12-06  5:07       ` Jerin Jacob
2021-12-06  6:54         ` [EXT] " Liron Himi
2021-12-06  8:08           ` Jerin Jacob
2021-11-29 19:59     ` [PATCH v3 5/5] regex/cn9k: use cnxk infrastructure lironh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=PH0PR18MB447327133A44809E2427E2EDC6669@PH0PR18MB4473.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=lironh@marvell.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).