DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Varghese, Vipin" <Vipin.Varghese@amd.com>
To: Khadem Ullah <14pwcse1224@uetpeshawar.edu.pk>,
	"stephen@networkplumber.org" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"Yigit, Ferruh" <Ferruh.Yigit@amd.com>,
	"andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru" <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7] app/testpmd: monitor state of primary process when using secondary
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 10:30:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH7PR12MB8596259B1F736357A7E9A3EB8228A@PH7PR12MB8596.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250808114909.1606758-1-14pwcse1224@uetpeshawar.edu.pk>

[AMD Official Use Only - AMD Internal Distribution Only]

Thank you for sharing the details in this thread,


Snipped
>
>
> The crashes are on 22.11, 23.03, 24.11, it is on all dpdk stable versions and 25.07
> as well.
> Please first close primary testpmd before secondary testpmd application and try to
> close secondary or execute any of the following commands,

Here is my problem, these were working at start of 2023. So something has definitely changed.

>
> "show device info all
> show port stats all
> show port xstats all
> set fwd rxonly
> set fwd txonly
> start
> etc"

Have you started the rx-tx of the device in primary or secondary applications?

>
> We are all agree that these crashes exists. First we were tried to prevent the
> crashes at PMD level, but it was not possible to add checks in each PMD. Then we
> tried to add safety checks in ethdev layer, and it was not suitable as with primary
> closing all reference to device information (pointers) would lead crashes.
>
> Then we agreed on secondary process monitoring for primary process exiting.
> and it is now resolved on application level, i.e. on testpmd.

This is where I am not clear. You have attempted the fix in `testpmd`.
Please help in understanding the cause and impact

1. is it only occurring in testpmd?
2. does other applications (Example) also faces this issue?

I still remember, where solutions were designed for network customers where primary allocates and manages memory.
While secondary does rx and tx burst. We ended up in creating service thread in secondary to check aliveness of primary.

>
> Now, this solution is working perfectly. We can add eal_cleanup for gracefull exit.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-11 10:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-22 11:54 [PATCH] lib/ethdev: fix segfault in secondary process by validating dev_private pointer Khadem Ullah
2025-07-22 13:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-22 14:30   ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-22 15:42     ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-22 16:01       ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-22 16:13         ` Bruce Richardson
2025-07-22 17:04           ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-22 17:38             ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-22 17:53               ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-22 18:21                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-22 19:03                   ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-22 19:05                   ` Ivan Malov
2025-07-22 22:28                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-23  4:29 ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-23  4:50 ` [PATCH v2] " Khadem Ullah
2025-07-23 12:19   ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-23 13:13     ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-23 13:24       ` Ivan Malov
2025-07-23 13:26         ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-23 13:31           ` Ivan Malov
2025-07-23 13:10   ` [PATCH] [PATCH v3] " Khadem Ullah
2025-07-23 13:19     ` Ivan Malov
2025-07-23 13:34       ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-23 14:22         ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-24  5:49           ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-25 13:00           ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-25 12:55     ` [PATCH] [PATCH v4] " Khadem Ullah
2025-07-28 21:45       ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-29  5:42         ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-29 21:34           ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-30  5:07             ` Khadem Ullah
2025-08-08  3:49               ` Varghese, Vipin
2025-08-08 15:32                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-08-11 10:19                   ` Varghese, Vipin
2025-08-11 10:28                     ` Khadem Ullah
2025-08-11 10:39                       ` Varghese, Vipin
2025-07-29  6:39       ` [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix segfault in secondary process by monitoring primary Khadem Ullah
2025-07-29  6:39         ` [PATCH] [PATCH v4] lib/ethdev: fix segfault in secondary process by validating dev_private pointer Khadem Ullah
2025-07-29  6:39         ` [PATCH] [PATCH v5] app/testpmd: fix segfault in secondary process by monitoring primary Khadem Ullah
2025-07-29 14:48           ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-29 21:48           ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-30  5:24             ` Khadem Ullah
2025-08-08  3:44               ` Varghese, Vipin
2025-08-08 16:17                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-08-11 10:23                   ` Varghese, Vipin
2025-08-11 10:27                     ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-30  5:56           ` [PATCH] app/testpmd: monitor state of primary process when using secondary Khadem Ullah
2025-07-30  6:08           ` [PATCH v6] " Khadem Ullah
2025-08-01 22:50             ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-08-04  7:54           ` [PATCH v7] " Khadem Ullah
2025-08-04 11:33           ` Khadem Ullah
2025-08-04 15:44             ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-08-05  0:50             ` fengchengwen
2025-08-08  3:23             ` Varghese, Vipin
2025-08-08  5:44               ` Khadem Ullah
2025-08-08 10:59                 ` Varghese, Vipin
2025-08-08 11:49                   ` Khadem Ullah
2025-08-08 16:49                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-08-08 17:01                       ` Khadem Ullah
2025-08-11 10:37                       ` Varghese, Vipin
2025-08-11 11:14                         ` Khadem Ullah
2025-08-11 11:34                           ` Varghese, Vipin
2025-08-11 11:55                             ` Khadem Ullah
2025-08-11 14:44                               ` Varghese, Vipin
2025-08-11 17:11                                 ` Khadem Ullah
2025-08-11 10:30                     ` Varghese, Vipin [this message]
2025-08-11 10:51                       ` Khadem Ullah
2025-08-11 11:07                         ` Varghese, Vipin
2025-08-08 15:28                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-08-08 15:50                   ` Khadem Ullah
2025-08-08 16:10               ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-23 14:21   ` [PATCH v2] lib/ethdev: fix segfault in secondary process by validating dev_private pointer Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=PH7PR12MB8596259B1F736357A7E9A3EB8228A@PH7PR12MB8596.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=vipin.varghese@amd.com \
    --cc=14pwcse1224@uetpeshawar.edu.pk \
    --cc=Ferruh.Yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).