From: bynes adam <adambynes@outlook.com>
To: Wei Dai <wei.dai@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix parsing of argument of option --lcores
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 20:44:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <SG2PR0201MB09987DA705665FCD8CF5DC85B6090@SG2PR0201MB0998.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1469081018-55300-1-git-send-email-wei.dai@intel.com>
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 02:03:38PM +0800, Wei Dai wrote:
Hi Wei,
> The '-' in lcores set overrides cpu set of following
> lcore set in the argument of EAL option --lcores.
>
> Fixes: 53e54bf81700 ("eal: new option --lcores for cpu assignment")
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Dai <wei.dai@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c
> index 0a594d7..96eb1a9 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c
> @@ -563,6 +563,7 @@ convert_to_cpuset(rte_cpuset_t *cpusetp,
> * lcores, cpus could be a single digit/range or a group.
> * '(' and ')' are necessary if it's a group.
> * If not supply '@cpus', the value of cpus uses the same as lcores.
> + * The 'a-b' in lcores not within '(' and ')' means a,a+1,...,b-1,b .
this description is not very clear, a-b and (a-b) are both the same meaning.
may be need a table for comparison
a-b@(c-d)
a-b@c-d
(a-b)@c-d
(a-b)@(c-d)
all the above I believe are the same
only the following two cases:
a-b,
(a-b),
so the key point here is the @ and (), not only @
> * e.g. '1,2@(5-7),(3-5)@(0,2),(0,6),7-8' means start 9 EAL thread as below
> * lcore 0 runs on cpuset 0x41 (cpu 0,6)
> * lcore 1 runs on cpuset 0x2 (cpu 1)
> @@ -571,6 +572,15 @@ convert_to_cpuset(rte_cpuset_t *cpusetp,
> * lcore 6 runs on cpuset 0x41 (cpu 0,6)
> * lcore 7 runs on cpuset 0x80 (cpu 7)
> * lcore 8 runs on cpuset 0x100 (cpu 8)
> + * e.g. '0-2,(3-5)@(3,4),6@(5,6),7@(5-7)'means start 8 EAL threads as below
> + * lcore 0 runs on cpuset 0x1 (cpu 0)
> + * lcore 1 runs on cpuset 0x2 (cpu 1)
> + * lcore 2 runs on cpuset ox4 (cpu 2)
> + * lcore 3,4,5 runs on cpuset 0x18 (cpu 3,4)
> + * lcore 6 runs on cpuset 0x60 (cpu 5,6)
> + * lcore 7 runs on cpuset 0xe0 (cpu 5,6,7)
> + * The second case is used to test bugfix for lflags not be cleared after use
you can put this sentance and description into the commit log
I don't think you should put bugfix description in comments here.
> + */
> */
> static int
> eal_parse_lcores(const char *lcores)
> @@ -679,6 +689,8 @@ eal_parse_lcores(const char *lcores)
> sizeof(rte_cpuset_t));
> }
>
> + lflags = 0;
> +
> lcores = end + 1;
> } while (*end != '\0');
>
> --
> 2.5.5
Adam Bynes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-21 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-21 6:03 Wei Dai
2016-07-21 14:21 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-21 20:44 ` bynes adam [this message]
2016-07-27 10:06 ` Dai, Wei
2016-07-26 9:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] eal: remove redundant codes to parse --lcores Wei Dai
2016-07-26 11:51 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-07-26 17:36 ` Adam Bynes
2016-07-27 9:15 ` Dai, Wei
2016-07-27 11:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] " Wei Dai
2016-07-28 15:18 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-27 11:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] eal: fix tail blank check in --lcores argument Wei Dai
2016-07-28 15:18 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-26 9:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] eal: fix parsing of eal option --lcores Wei Dai
2016-07-27 11:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] " Wei Dai
2016-07-28 15:18 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-27 11:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] eal: fix end character check in --lcores argument Wei Dai
2016-07-28 15:26 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-28 16:05 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-08-02 8:22 ` Dai, Wei
2016-08-02 10:45 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=SG2PR0201MB09987DA705665FCD8CF5DC85B6090@SG2PR0201MB0998.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com \
--to=adambynes@outlook.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=wei.dai@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).