Hey Akhil,
I attempted to split the changes into multiple patches and added a depends-on the second patch. But automation does not seem to be picking up the patch as a dependency. Is there a process step I messed up:
Patch 1: compress/zlib: support for dictionary and PDCP checksum - Patchwork
Patch 2 with depends-n: app/compress-perf: support dictionary files - Patchwork
Thanks
Sameer Vaze
________________________________
From: Akhil Goyal
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 3:34 PM
To: Sameer Vaze ; Sunila Sahu ; Fan Zhang ; Ashish Gupta
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] app/compress-perf: support dictionary files
WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.
> compress/zlib: support PDCP checksum
>
> compress/zlib: support zlib dictionary
>
> compressdev: add PDCP checksum
>
> compressdev: support zlib dictionary
>
> Adds support to provide predefined dictionaries to zlib. Handles setting
> and getting of dictionaries using zlib apis. Also includes support to
> read dictionary files
>
> Adds support for passing in and validationg 3GPP PDCP spec defined
> checksums as defined under the Uplink Data Compression(UDC) feature.
> Changes also include functions that do inflate or deflate specific
> checksum operations.
>
> Introduces new members to compression api structures to allow setting
> predefined dictionaries
>
> Signed-off-by: Sameer Vaze
Seems like multiple patches are squashed into a single patch
I see that this patch has ABI breaks.
We need to defer this patch for next ABI break release.
Please split the patch appropriately.
First patch should define the library changes.
And subsequently logically broken PMD patches
Followed by application patches.
Ensure each patch is compilable.
Since this patch is breaking ABI/API,
Please send a deprecation notice to be merged in this release and
Implementation for next release.
Also avoid unnecessary and irrelevant code changes.