From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0143.outbound.protection.outlook.com [157.56.111.143]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51F0592A for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 02:47:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from SN1PR08MB1376.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.162.1.146) by SN1PR08MB1373.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.162.1.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.219.17; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:47:10 +0000 Received: from SN1PR08MB1376.namprd08.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.1.146]) by SN1PR08MB1376.namprd08.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.1.146]) with mapi id 15.01.0219.018; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:47:10 +0000 From: "Jeff Venable, Sr." To: "Zhang, Helin" , lhffjzh , "'Thomas Monjalon'" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by i40e NIC Thread-Index: AQHQUwUptdnjFbxdFU2dC7iwa2kdKJ0FeWOAgACnogCA4vqxMA== Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:47:10 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1416936405-25333-1-git-send-email-ssujith@cisco.com> <03fb01d05269$fe8d2110$fba76330$@com> <1566601.Xkl8jJDb44@xps13> <046801d052f8$9090a530$b1b1ef90$@com> <049801d0530f$b866bce0$293436a0$@com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: intel.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; x-originating-ip: [12.226.156.82] x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SN1PR08MB1373; 5:1ZjP4a1mtUqvCrdcemL9wCO3PqPd92qY5NQug0n+qYoB7IZtjdIL60AaOVr+G0ALJzGvph33+Dn+8Gsg8GREZlSrfT1J3DCKlQ5AiB7xj44DrJdubRNmPewwOWkn7J3fkUqZFClhpR+LsCZGGyGuvQ==; 24:mJegXic+ZGbAb3l03kB66YHnvrkgFnsB+7x3t2Fj8ZQnU28e6vvoW2M8SnBrWOd2CfAPf89mw1W4sbOUfDnZbVlCnKpD8W8yF9Yq1crLzqU=; 20:WzsVAeWa4+8mXz5vSZFnxVsi7qeb7KTkanpOMYIbwx3MMTNrFjz5geicD/BGo3gpCSSuEmZqL9pCcKJu9sq5SA== x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SN1PR08MB1373; sn1pr08mb1373: X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RulesExecuted x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:SN1PR08MB1373; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SN1PR08MB1373; x-forefront-prvs: 06469BCC91 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(53754006)(377424004)(164054003)(13464003)(122556002)(5002640100001)(19580405001)(5001960100002)(102836002)(2950100001)(106116001)(46102003)(93886004)(77096005)(19580395003)(5001920100001)(77156002)(62966003)(87936001)(33656002)(5001770100001)(40100003)(2656002)(189998001)(92566002)(99286002)(76576001)(50986999)(76176999)(86362001)(54356999)(74316001)(5003600100002)(66066001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:SN1PR08MB1373; H:SN1PR08MB1376.namprd08.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: vectranetworks.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 23 Jul 2015 00:47:10.2546 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: a6cc66bc-f419-45c2-a9c2-8ff4ab685f2d X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN1PR08MB1373 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by i40e NIC X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:47:14 -0000 Is the I40E incapable of operating RSS with ETH_RSS_IP (i.e. hashing withou= t L4 ports)? Thanks, Jeff -----Original Message----- From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zhang, Helin Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 6:34 AM To: lhffjzh; 'Thomas Monjalon' Cc: dev@dpdk.org; maintainers@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by= i40e NIC Good to know that! > -----Original Message----- > From: lhffjzh [mailto:lhffjzh@126.com] > Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 12:34 PM > To: Zhang, Helin; 'Thomas Monjalon' > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; maintainers@dpdk.org > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network=20 > packet by i40e NIC >=20 > Hi Helin, >=20 > Thanks a lot for your great help, all of rx queue received network=20 > packet after I update rss_hf from "ETH_RSS_IP" to " ETH_RSS_PROTO_MASK ". >=20 > static struct rte_eth_conf port_conf =3D { > .rxmode =3D { > .mq_mode =3D ETH_MQ_RX_RSS, > .max_rx_pkt_len =3D ETHER_MAX_LEN, > .split_hdr_size =3D 0, > .header_split =3D 0, /**< Header Split disabled */ > .hw_ip_checksum =3D 1, /**< IP checksum offload enabled */ > .hw_vlan_filter =3D 0, /**< VLAN filtering disabled */ > .jumbo_frame =3D 0, /**< Jumbo Frame Support disabled */ > .hw_strip_crc =3D 0, /**< CRC stripped by hardware */ > }, > .rx_adv_conf =3D { > .rss_conf =3D { > .rss_key =3D NULL, > .rss_hf =3D ETH_RSS_PROTO_MASK, > }, > }, > .txmode =3D { > .mq_mode =3D ETH_MQ_TX_NONE, > }, > .fdir_conf.mode =3D RTE_FDIR_MODE_SIGNATURE, }; >=20 >=20 > Regards, > Haifeng >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Zhang, Helin [mailto:helin.zhang@intel.com] > Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 11:18 AM > To: lhffjzh; 'Thomas Monjalon' > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; maintainers@dpdk.org > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network=20 > packet by i40e NIC >=20 > Hi Haifeng >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of lhffjzh > > Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 9:48 AM > > To: 'Thomas Monjalon' > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; maintainers@dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network=20 > > packet > by > > i40e NIC > > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > Thanks very much for your reminder, you give me many help in this=20 > > mail > list. > > > > The issue with detailed information just as below. but I don't know=20 > > who is > the > > dpdk i40e maintainers? is maintainers@dpdk.org? > > > > Hardware list: > > 2 i40e 40G NICs > > Xeon E5-2670 v2(10 cores) > > 32G memory > > > > I loopback 2 i40e NICs by QSFP cable, one NIC send UDP network=20 > > packet by DPDK, and another for receiving. I bind 4 processor's=20 > > logical cores with 4 > rx > > queue "0,1,2,3" on receiving NIC, when I start to send packet, only=20 > > rx > queue > > "0" > > can receive > > the UDP packet, the others queue always receive nothing. but it is=20 > > work > well on > > ixgbe 10G NICs, I can receive network packet from all rx queues.=20 > > does > anyone > > kindly know why? > Could you help to list the DPDK version you are using now? > Two possible reasons: > 1. UDP rss is not enabled on your board correctly. > I40e has different rss flags from ixgbe, so I am wondering if you use=20 > it correctly. > In addition, this will be unified from 2.0. So I care about the DPDK ver= sion. > 2. The UDP stream is occasionally hit the hash key of queue 0. > You'd better to try to send your UDP stream with random 5-tuples, to=20 > get the > hash value hit different queues randomly. >=20 > Regards, > Helin >=20 > > > > > > Regards, > > Haifeng > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 6:55 PM > > To: lhffjzh > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by=20 > > i40e NIC > > > > 2015-02-27 16:47, lhffjzh: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > We use 4 cores loop 4 rx queues on one i40e port, but only rx queue "= 0" > > can > > > receive network packet, do anyone kindly know why? BTW, all of=20 > > > network packet has same destination ip address but has more than=20 > > > 200 different source ip address. > > > > It's possible that you don't have any answer for 2 reasons: > > - you replied in a thread dedicated to Cisco enic questions > > - you didn't describe your usage enough to understand your problem > > > > I suggest to use the button "new email" instead of "reply all" to=20 > > start a new question with enough details. > > > > Did you noticed you put some Cisco guys in CC instead of putting the=20 > > Intel responsible for i40e (see MAINTAINERS file)? > > >=20