DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / Atom feed
From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 1/4] ring: future proof flag settings
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:12:22 +0000
Message-ID: <SN6PR11MB25586747BC9F9486BFFCEFAF9A1A0@SN6PR11MB2558.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200212230810.2837-2-stephen@networkplumber.org>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2020 11:08 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 1/4] ring: future proof flag settings
> 
> All API's should check that they support the flag values
> passed. If an application passes an invalid flag it could
> cause problems in later ABI.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> ---
>  lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.c b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.c
> index 77e5de099b81..6cd8831649ea 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.c
> @@ -100,6 +100,13 @@ rte_ring_init(struct rte_ring *r, const char *name, unsigned count,
>  	RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON((offsetof(struct rte_ring, prod) &
>  			  RTE_CACHE_LINE_MASK) != 0);
> 
> +	/* future proof flags, only allow supported values */
> +	if (flags & ~(RING_F_SP_ENQ | RING_F_SC_DEQ)) {
> +		RTE_LOG(ERR, RING,
> +			"Unsupported flags requested %d\n", flags);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +

Good idea, I think, but seems you forgot RING_F_EXACT_SZ.

>  	/* init the ring structure */
>  	memset(r, 0, sizeof(*r));
>  	ret = strlcpy(r->name, name, sizeof(r->name));
> --
> 2.20.1


  reply index

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-12 23:08 [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/4] Enforce flag checking in API's Stephen Hemminger
2020-02-12 23:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 1/4] ring: future proof flag settings Stephen Hemminger
2020-02-13 11:12   ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2020-02-12 23:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 2/4] hash: check flags on creation Stephen Hemminger
2020-02-12 23:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 3/4] stack: " Stephen Hemminger
2020-02-12 23:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 4/4] cfgfile: check flags value Stephen Hemminger
2020-04-24 17:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] enforce checking on flag values in API's Stephen Hemminger
2020-04-24 17:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] ring: future proof flag settings Stephen Hemminger
2020-04-24 18:07     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-24 19:02       ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-04-25  9:20         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-24 17:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] hash: check flags on creation Stephen Hemminger
2020-04-24 17:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] stack: " Stephen Hemminger
2020-04-24 17:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] cfgfile: check flags value Stephen Hemminger
2020-04-27 23:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] Enforce checking on flag values in API's Stephen Hemminger
2020-04-27 23:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] ring: future proof flag settings Stephen Hemminger
2020-04-28  4:12     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-27 23:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] hash: check flags on creation Stephen Hemminger
2020-04-29  1:08     ` Wang, Yipeng1
2020-04-27 23:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] stack: " Stephen Hemminger
2020-05-02  2:36     ` Eads, Gage
2020-04-27 23:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] cfgfile: check flags value Stephen Hemminger
2020-04-28 10:24     ` Bruce Richardson
2020-04-28 10:28   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] Enforce checking on flag values in API's Bruce Richardson
2020-06-16 15:47     ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-28 11:04   ` Ananyev, Konstantin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=SN6PR11MB25586747BC9F9486BFFCEFAF9A1A0@SN6PR11MB2558.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox