DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / Atom feed
From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: "Di, ChenxuX" <chenxux.di@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Yang, Qiming" <qiming.yang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/4] net/ixgbe: cleanup Tx buffers
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 12:46:35 +0000
Message-ID: <SN6PR11MB2558D436DDE73916424F53DD9A380@SN6PR11MB2558.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B926E44943CB04AA3A39AC16328CE39B95155@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>


Hi Chenxu,

> hi, Konstantin
> 
> thanks for your opinion, I have fixed almost in new version patch except one.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> > Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2020 10:02 PM
> > To: Di, ChenxuX <chenxux.di@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Yang, Qiming <qiming.yang@intel.com>; Di, ChenxuX
> > <chenxux.di@intel.com>
> > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/4] net/ixgbe: cleanup Tx buffers
> >
> >
> > Hi Chenxu,
> >
> > Good progress wih _full_version, but still some issues remains I think.
> > More comments inline.
> > Konstantin
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Chenxu Di <chenxux.di@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c |   4 +
> > >  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c   | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > >  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h   |  10 ++
> > >  3 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > > index 2c6fd0f13..668c36188 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > > @@ -601,6 +601,7 @@ static const struct eth_dev_ops ixgbe_eth_dev_ops
> > > = {  .udp_tunnel_port_add  = ixgbe_dev_udp_tunnel_port_add,
> > > .udp_tunnel_port_del  = ixgbe_dev_udp_tunnel_port_del,
> > >  .tm_ops_get           = ixgbe_tm_ops_get,
> > > +.tx_done_cleanup      = ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup,
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  /*
> > > @@ -649,6 +650,7 @@ static const struct eth_dev_ops ixgbevf_eth_dev_ops
> > = {
> > >  .reta_query           = ixgbe_dev_rss_reta_query,
> > >  .rss_hash_update      = ixgbe_dev_rss_hash_update,
> > >  .rss_hash_conf_get    = ixgbe_dev_rss_hash_conf_get,
> > > +.tx_done_cleanup      = ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup,
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  /* store statistics names and its offset in stats structure */ @@
> > > -1101,6 +1103,7 @@ eth_ixgbe_dev_init(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev,
> > > void *init_params __rte_unused)  eth_dev->rx_pkt_burst =
> > > &ixgbe_recv_pkts;  eth_dev->tx_pkt_burst = &ixgbe_xmit_pkts;
> > > eth_dev->tx_pkt_prepare = &ixgbe_prep_pkts;
> > > +ixgbe_set_tx_done_cleanup_func(ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_scalar);
> > >
> > >  /*
> > >   * For secondary processes, we don't initialise any further as
> > > primary @@ -1580,6 +1583,7 @@ eth_ixgbevf_dev_init(struct rte_eth_dev
> > > *eth_dev)  eth_dev->dev_ops = &ixgbevf_eth_dev_ops;
> > > eth_dev->rx_pkt_burst = &ixgbe_recv_pkts;  eth_dev->tx_pkt_burst =
> > > &ixgbe_xmit_pkts;
> > > +ixgbe_set_tx_done_cleanup_func(ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_scalar);
> > >
> > >  /* for secondary processes, we don't initialise any further as primary
> > >   * has already done this work. Only check we don't need a different
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c index fa572d184..122dae425 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > > @@ -92,6 +92,8 @@ uint16_t ixgbe_xmit_fixed_burst_vec(void *tx_queue,
> > struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
> > >      uint16_t nb_pkts);
> > >  #endif
> > >
> > > +static ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_t ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_op;
> >
> > You can't have just one static variable here.
> > There could be several ixgbe devices and they could be configured in a different
> > way.
> > I.E. txpkt_burst() is per device, so tx_done_cleanup() also has to be per device.
> > Probably the easiest way is to add new entry for tx_done_cleanup into struct
> > ixgbe_txq_ops, and set it properly in ixgbe_set_tx_function().
> >
> > > +
> > >
> > /****************************************************************
> > *****
> > >   *
> > >   *  TX functions
> > > @@ -2306,6 +2308,152 @@ ixgbe_tx_queue_release_mbufs(struct
> > > ixgbe_tx_queue *txq)  }  }
> > >
> > > +int
> > > +ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_scalar(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq, uint32_t
> > > +free_cnt)
> >
> > As a nit I would change _scalar to _full or so.
> >
> > > +{
> > > +uint32_t pkt_cnt;
> > > +uint16_t i;
> > > +uint16_t tx_last;
> > > +uint16_t tx_id;
> > > +uint16_t nb_tx_to_clean;
> > > +uint16_t nb_tx_free_last;
> > > +struct ixgbe_tx_entry *swr_ring = txq->sw_ring;
> > > +
> > > +/* Start free mbuf from the next of tx_tail */ tx_last =
> > > +txq->tx_tail; tx_id  = swr_ring[tx_last].next_id;
> > > +
> > > +if (txq->nb_tx_free == 0)
> > > +if (ixgbe_xmit_cleanup(txq))
> >
> >
> > As a nit it could be just if (ixgbe_set_tx_function && ixgbe_xmit_cleanup(txq))
> >
> > > +return 0;
> > > +
> > > +nb_tx_to_clean = txq->nb_tx_free;
> > > +nb_tx_free_last = txq->nb_tx_free;
> > > +if (!free_cnt)
> > > +free_cnt = txq->nb_tx_desc;
> > > +
> > > +/* Loop through swr_ring to count the amount of
> > > + * freeable mubfs and packets.
> > > + */
> > > +for (pkt_cnt = 0; pkt_cnt < free_cnt; ) { for (i = 0; i <
> > > +nb_tx_to_clean && pkt_cnt < free_cnt && tx_id != tx_last; i++) { if
> > > +(swr_ring[tx_id].mbuf != NULL) {
> > > +rte_pktmbuf_free_seg(swr_ring[tx_id].mbuf);
> > > +swr_ring[tx_id].mbuf = NULL;
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * last segment in the packet,
> > > + * increment packet count
> > > + */
> > > +pkt_cnt += (swr_ring[tx_id].last_id == tx_id); }
> > > +
> > > +tx_id = swr_ring[tx_id].next_id;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +if (tx_id == tx_last || txq->tx_rs_thresh
> > > +> txq->nb_tx_desc - txq->nb_tx_free)
> >
> > First condition (tx_id == tx_last) is porbably redundant here.
> >
> 
> I think it is necessary. The txq may transmit packets when the API called.

Nope it is not possible.
All ethdev RX/TX API is not thread safe.
It will be a race condition that most likely will cause either crash or memory corruption.

> So txq->nb_tx_free may be changed.
> 
> If (tx_id == tx_last) , it will break the loop above and the function should be done and return.
> However if more than  txq->tx_rs_thresh numbers packet send into txq while function doing.
> It will not return. And fall in endless loop
> 
> > > +break;
> > > +
> > > +if (pkt_cnt < free_cnt) {
> > > +if (ixgbe_xmit_cleanup(txq))
> > > +break;
> > > +
> > > +nb_tx_to_clean = txq->nb_tx_free - nb_tx_free_last; nb_tx_free_last =
> > > +txq->nb_tx_free; } }
> > > +
> > > +PMD_TX_FREE_LOG(DEBUG,
> > > +"Free %u Packets successfully "
> > > +"(port=%d queue=%d)",
> > > +pkt_cnt, txq->port_id, txq->queue_id);
> > > +
> > > +return (int)pkt_cnt;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int
> > > +ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_vec(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq __rte_unused,
> > > +uint32_t free_cnt __rte_unused) { return -ENOTSUP; }
> > > +
> > > +int
> > > +ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_simple(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq, uint32_t
> > > +free_cnt) { uint16_t i; uint16_t tx_first; uint16_t tx_id; uint32_t
> > > +pkt_cnt; struct ixgbe_tx_entry *swr_ring = txq->sw_ring;
> >
> >
> > Looks overcomplicated here.
> > TX simple (and vec) doesn't support mulsti-seg packets, So one TXD - one mbuf,
> > and one packet.
> > And ixgbe_tx_free_bufs() always retunrs/frees either 0 or tx_rs_thresh
> > mbufs/packets.
> > So it probably can be something like that:
> >
> > ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_simple(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq,  uint32_t free_cnt) {
> >    If (free_cnt == 0)
> >       free_cnt = txq->nb_desc;
> >
> >    cnt = free_cnt - free_cnt % txq->tx_rs_thesh;
> >     for (i = 0; i < cnt; i+= n) {
> >           n = ixgbe_tx_free_bufs(txq);
> >           if (n == 0)
> >              break;
> >     }
> >     return i;
> > }
> >
> > > +
> > > +/* Start free mbuf from tx_first */
> > > +tx_first = txq->tx_next_dd - (txq->tx_rs_thresh - 1); tx_id  =
> > > +tx_first;
> > > +
> > > +/* while free_cnt is 0,
> > > + * suppose one mbuf per packet,
> > > + * try to free packets as many as possible  */ if (free_cnt == 0)
> > > +free_cnt = txq->nb_tx_desc;
> > > +
> > > +/* Loop through swr_ring to count freeable packets */ for (pkt_cnt =
> > > +0; pkt_cnt < free_cnt; ) { if (txq->nb_tx_desc - txq->nb_tx_free <
> > > +txq->tx_rs_thresh) break;
> > > +
> > > +if (!ixgbe_tx_free_bufs(txq))
> > > +break;
> > > +
> > > +for (i = 0; i != txq->tx_rs_thresh && tx_id != tx_first; i++) {
> > > +/* last segment in the packet,
> > > + * increment packet count
> > > + */
> > > +pkt_cnt += (tx_id == swr_ring[tx_id].last_id); tx_id =
> > > +swr_ring[tx_id].next_id; }
> > > +
> > > +if (tx_id == tx_first)
> > > +break;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +PMD_TX_FREE_LOG(DEBUG,
> > > +"Free %u packets successfully "
> > > +"(port=%d queue=%d)",
> > > +pkt_cnt, txq->port_id, txq->queue_id);
> > > +
> > > +return (int)pkt_cnt;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int
> > > +ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup(void *txq, uint32_t free_cnt) {
> > > +ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_t func = ixgbe_get_tx_done_cleanup_func();
> > > +
> > > +if (!func)
> > > +return -ENOTSUP;
> > > +
> > > +return func(txq, free_cnt);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +void
> > > +ixgbe_set_tx_done_cleanup_func(ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_t fn) {
> > > +ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_op = fn; }
> > > +
> > > +ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_t
> > > +ixgbe_get_tx_done_cleanup_func(void)
> > > +{
> > > +return ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_op;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static void __attribute__((cold))
> > >  ixgbe_tx_free_swring(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq)  { @@ -2398,9
> > > +2546,14 @@ ixgbe_set_tx_function(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct
> > > ixgbe_tx_queue *txq)
> > >  ixgbe_txq_vec_setup(txq) == 0)) {
> > >  PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "Vector tx enabled.");  dev->tx_pkt_burst =
> > > ixgbe_xmit_pkts_vec; -} else
> > > +ixgbe_set_tx_done_cleanup_func(ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_vec);
> > > +} else {
> > >  #endif
> > >  dev->tx_pkt_burst = ixgbe_xmit_pkts_simple;
> > > +ixgbe_set_tx_done_cleanup_func(ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_simple);
> > > +#ifdef RTE_IXGBE_INC_VECTOR
> > > +}
> > > +#endif
> > >  } else {
> > >  PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "Using full-featured tx code path");
> > > PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, @@ -2412,6 +2565,7 @@
> > ixgbe_set_tx_function(struct
> > > rte_eth_dev *dev, struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq)  (unsigned
> > > long)RTE_PMD_IXGBE_TX_MAX_BURST);  dev->tx_pkt_burst =
> > > ixgbe_xmit_pkts;  dev->tx_pkt_prepare = ixgbe_prep_pkts;
> > > +ixgbe_set_tx_done_cleanup_func(ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_scalar);
> > >  }
> > >  }
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h
> > > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h index 505d344b9..a52597aa9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h
> > > @@ -253,6 +253,8 @@ struct ixgbe_txq_ops {
> > >   IXGBE_ADVTXD_DCMD_DEXT |\
> > >   IXGBE_ADVTXD_DCMD_EOP)
> > >
> > > +typedef int (*ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_t)(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq,
> > > +uint32_t free_cnt);
> > >
> > >  /* Takes an ethdev and a queue and sets up the tx function to be used based
> > on
> > >   * the queue parameters. Used in tx_queue_setup by primary process
> > > and then @@ -285,6 +287,14 @@ int
> > > ixgbe_rx_vec_dev_conf_condition_check(struct rte_eth_dev *dev);  int
> > > ixgbe_rxq_vec_setup(struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq);  void
> > > ixgbe_rx_queue_release_mbufs_vec(struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq);
> > >
> > > +void ixgbe_set_tx_done_cleanup_func(ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_t fn);
> > > +ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_t ixgbe_get_tx_done_cleanup_func(void);
> > > +
> > > +int ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup(void *txq, uint32_t free_cnt); int
> > > +ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_scalar(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq, uint32_t
> > > +free_cnt); int ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_vec(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq,
> > > +uint32_t free_cnt); int ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_simple(struct
> > > +ixgbe_tx_queue *txq, uint32_t free_cnt);
> > > +
> > >  extern const uint32_t ptype_table[IXGBE_PACKET_TYPE_MAX];
> > >  extern const uint32_t ptype_table_tn[IXGBE_PACKET_TYPE_TN_MAX];
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> >
> 


  reply index

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-03  5:51 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-03  5:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] net/fm10k: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-03  5:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-03  5:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-03  5:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] net/fm10k: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/5] net/fm10k: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/5] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/5] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/5] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-24  2:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/5] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-24  2:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/5] net/fm10k: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-24  2:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/5] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-26  8:24     ` Xing, Beilei
2019-12-24  2:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/5] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-24  2:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/5] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-24  2:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/5] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-30  9:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/4] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-30  9:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/4] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-30 13:01     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-12-30  9:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/4] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-30  9:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-30 12:53     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-03  9:01       ` Di, ChenxuX
2020-01-05 23:36         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-06  9:03           ` Di, ChenxuX
2020-01-06 13:26             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-07 10:46               ` Di, ChenxuX
2020-01-07 14:09                 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-08 10:15                   ` Di, ChenxuX
2020-01-08 15:12                     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-12-30  9:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/4] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-09 10:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/4] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-09 10:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/4] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-09 10:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/4] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-09 10:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-09 14:01     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-10 10:08       ` Di, ChenxuX
2020-01-10 12:46         ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2020-01-09 10:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/4] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-10  9:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/4] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-10  9:58   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/4] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-10  9:58   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/4] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-10  9:58   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-10 13:49     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-10  9:59   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 4/4] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-13  9:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/4] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-13  9:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/4] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-13 11:08     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-13  9:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/4] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-14  1:55     ` Yang, Qiming
2020-01-14 12:40     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-15 14:34       ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-16  1:40         ` Di, ChenxuX
2020-01-16  7:09           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice: cleanup for vec path check Xiaolong Ye
2020-01-16 10:19             ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-17  2:21             ` Yang, Qiming
2020-01-16  8:43     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/4] net/ice: cleanup Tx buffers Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-13  9:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-13 11:07     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-16  8:44     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-16 14:47     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-16 15:23       ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-13  9:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 4/4] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-13 11:08     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-14  2:49     ` Ye Xiaolong
2020-01-14  2:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] drivers/net: " Ye Xiaolong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=SN6PR11MB2558D436DDE73916424F53DD9A380@SN6PR11MB2558.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=chenxux.di@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox