From: "Dybkowski, AdamX" <adamx.dybkowski@intel.com>
To: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>,
"Griffin, John" <john.griffin@intel.com>,
"Trahe, Fiona" <fiona.trahe@intel.com>,
"Jain, Deepak K" <deepak.k.jain@intel.com>,
Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>,
Herbert Guan <herbert.guan@arm.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
"nd@arm.com" <nd@arm.com>, "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] crypto/qat: fix uninitilized compiler warning
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 13:16:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <SN6PR11MB2575E387B04CD78F50CD0314ED2B9@SN6PR11MB2575.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210517090709.4078-1-feifei.wang2@arm.com>
Hi.
I checked how it works on QAT hardware, and it does no harm. All unit tests still pass.
Verified on two QAT-enabled machines.
The question is: should this patch be simplified to just add a call to memset (to zero the digest variable while still keeping it on the stack) at the function begin? And that will be a faster solution in run-time (using the variable on the stack instead of calloc that uses the heap).
Adam
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Feifei Wang
> Sent: Monday, 17 May, 2021 11:07
> To: Griffin, John <john.griffin@intel.com>; Trahe, Fiona
> <fiona.trahe@intel.com>; Jain, Deepak K <deepak.k.jain@intel.com>; Jerin
> Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>; Herbert Guan
> <herbert.guan@arm.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; david.marchand@redhat.com; nd@arm.com; Feifei
> Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>; stable@dpdk.org; Ruifeng Wang
> <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] crypto/qat: fix uninitilized compiler warning
>
> In Arm platform, when "RTE_ARCH_ARM64_MEMCPY" is set as true,
> compiler will report variable uninitilized warning:
>
> ../drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym_session.c:
> In function ‘partial_hash_compute’:
> ../lib/eal/include/generic/rte_byteorder.h:241:24: warning:
> ‘<U35a0>’ may be used uninitialized in this function
> [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> 241 | #define rte_bswap32(x) __builtin_bswap32(x)
> ...
>
> This is because "digest" will be initialized by "rte_memcpy" function rather
> than "memcpy" if "RTE_ARCH_ARM64_MEMCPY" is set as true. However,
> compiler cannot know it is initialized by the function.
>
> To fix this, use "calloc" to initialize "digest".
>
> Fixes: cd7fc8a84b48 ("eal/arm64: optimize memcpy")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> ---
> v2: add check and free for memory dynamic allocation (David Marchand)
> v3: fix compiler error
>
> drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym_session.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym_session.c
> b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym_session.c
> index 231b1640da..105a10957a 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym_session.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym_session.c
> @@ -1190,8 +1190,7 @@ static int partial_hash_compute(enum
> icp_qat_hw_auth_algo hash_alg,
> uint8_t *data_out)
> {
> int digest_size;
> - uint8_t digest[qat_hash_get_digest_size(
> - ICP_QAT_HW_AUTH_ALGO_DELIMITER)];
> + uint8_t *digest;
> uint32_t *hash_state_out_be32;
> uint64_t *hash_state_out_be64;
> int i;
> @@ -1200,55 +1199,65 @@ static int partial_hash_compute(enum
> icp_qat_hw_auth_algo hash_alg,
> if (digest_size <= 0)
> return -EFAULT;
>
> + digest = calloc(qat_hash_get_digest_size(
> + ICP_QAT_HW_AUTH_ALGO_DELIMITER),
> sizeof(uint8_t));
> + if (!digest)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> hash_state_out_be32 = (uint32_t *)data_out;
> hash_state_out_be64 = (uint64_t *)data_out;
>
> switch (hash_alg) {
> case ICP_QAT_HW_AUTH_ALGO_SHA1:
> if (partial_hash_sha1(data_in, digest))
> - return -EFAULT;
> + goto fail;
> for (i = 0; i < digest_size >> 2; i++, hash_state_out_be32++)
> *hash_state_out_be32 =
> rte_bswap32(*(((uint32_t *)digest)+i));
> break;
> case ICP_QAT_HW_AUTH_ALGO_SHA224:
> if (partial_hash_sha224(data_in, digest))
> - return -EFAULT;
> + goto fail;
> for (i = 0; i < digest_size >> 2; i++, hash_state_out_be32++)
> *hash_state_out_be32 =
> rte_bswap32(*(((uint32_t *)digest)+i));
> break;
> case ICP_QAT_HW_AUTH_ALGO_SHA256:
> if (partial_hash_sha256(data_in, digest))
> - return -EFAULT;
> + goto fail;
> for (i = 0; i < digest_size >> 2; i++, hash_state_out_be32++)
> *hash_state_out_be32 =
> rte_bswap32(*(((uint32_t *)digest)+i));
> break;
> case ICP_QAT_HW_AUTH_ALGO_SHA384:
> if (partial_hash_sha384(data_in, digest))
> - return -EFAULT;
> + goto fail;
> for (i = 0; i < digest_size >> 3; i++, hash_state_out_be64++)
> *hash_state_out_be64 =
> rte_bswap64(*(((uint64_t *)digest)+i));
> break;
> case ICP_QAT_HW_AUTH_ALGO_SHA512:
> if (partial_hash_sha512(data_in, digest))
> - return -EFAULT;
> + goto fail;
> for (i = 0; i < digest_size >> 3; i++, hash_state_out_be64++)
> *hash_state_out_be64 =
> rte_bswap64(*(((uint64_t *)digest)+i));
> break;
> case ICP_QAT_HW_AUTH_ALGO_MD5:
> if (partial_hash_md5(data_in, data_out))
> - return -EFAULT;
> + goto fail;
> break;
> default:
> QAT_LOG(ERR, "invalid hash alg %u", hash_alg);
> - return -EFAULT;
> + goto fail;
> }
>
> + free(digest);
> return 0;
> +
> +fail:
> + free(digest);
> + return -EFAULT;
> }
> #define HMAC_IPAD_VALUE 0x36
> #define HMAC_OPAD_VALUE 0x5c
> --
> 2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-19 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-14 7:41 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Feifei Wang
2021-05-14 7:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " David Marchand
2021-05-14 8:01 ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2021-05-14 8:13 ` [dpdk-dev] " David Marchand
2021-05-14 8:30 ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2021-05-17 9:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Feifei Wang
2021-05-19 7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-19 8:11 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-20 5:44 ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2021-05-20 8:08 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-19 13:13 ` [dpdk-dev] " Dybkowski, AdamX
2021-05-19 13:16 ` Dybkowski, AdamX [this message]
2021-05-20 5:47 ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2021-05-20 8:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] crypto/qat: fix uninitilized gcc " Feifei Wang
2021-05-20 9:06 ` Dybkowski, AdamX
2021-05-21 2:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] crypto/qat: fix uninitialized " Feifei Wang
2021-06-29 20:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=SN6PR11MB2575E387B04CD78F50CD0314ED2B9@SN6PR11MB2575.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=adamx.dybkowski@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=deepak.k.jain@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=feifei.wang2@arm.com \
--cc=fiona.trahe@intel.com \
--cc=herbert.guan@arm.com \
--cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=john.griffin@intel.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).