From: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
To: "Doherty, Declan" <declan.doherty@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"akhil.goyal@nxp.com" <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] test/crypto: add capability check
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 11:15:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <SN6PR11MB31013400502C273DB979EC4184D80@SN6PR11MB3101.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1586886056-221547-2-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 6:41 PM
> To: Doherty, Declan <declan.doherty@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; akhil.goyal@nxp.com; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] test/crypto: add capability check
>
> Check if test case is supported by the crypto device, including algorithm and
> some of its parameter, such as key length, IV length, etc, using the capabilities
> API.
> If it is not supported, test case is skipped.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
> ---
> app/test/test_cryptodev_blockcipher.c | 49
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev_blockcipher.c
> b/app/test/test_cryptodev_blockcipher.c
> index 2ff7fc9..3fb1274 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_cryptodev_blockcipher.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev_blockcipher.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,47 @@
> #include "test_cryptodev_hash_test_vectors.h"
>
> static int
> +verify_algo_support(const struct blockcipher_test_case *t,
> + const uint8_t dev_id, const uint32_t digest_len) {
> + int ret;
> + const struct blockcipher_test_data *tdata = t->test_data;
> + struct rte_cryptodev_sym_capability_idx cap_idx;
> + const struct rte_cryptodev_symmetric_capability *capability;
> +
> + if (t->op_mask & BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_OP_CIPHER) {
> + cap_idx.type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_CIPHER;
> + cap_idx.algo.cipher = tdata->crypto_algo;
> + capability = rte_cryptodev_sym_capability_get(dev_id,
> &cap_idx);
> + if (capability == NULL)
> + return -1;
> +
> + ret = rte_cryptodev_sym_capability_check_cipher(capability,
> + tdata->cipher_key.len,
> + tdata->iv.len);
> + if (ret != 0)
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + if (t->op_mask & BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_OP_AUTH) {
> + cap_idx.type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AUTH;
> + cap_idx.algo.auth = tdata->auth_algo;
> + capability = rte_cryptodev_sym_capability_get(dev_id,
> &cap_idx);
> + if (capability == NULL)
> + return -1;
> +
> + ret = rte_cryptodev_sym_capability_check_auth(capability,
> + tdata->auth_key.len,
> + digest_len,
> + 0);
> + if (ret != 0)
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> test_blockcipher_one_case(const struct blockcipher_test_case *t,
> struct rte_mempool *mbuf_pool,
> struct rte_mempool *op_mpool,
> @@ -144,6 +185,14 @@ test_blockcipher_one_case(const struct
> blockcipher_test_case *t,
> goto error_exit;
> }
>
> + /* Check if PMD is capable of performing that test */
> + if (verify_algo_support(t, dev_id, digest_len) < 0) {
> + RTE_LOG(DEBUG, USER1,
> + "Device does not support this algorithm."
> + "Test Skipped.\n");
> + return 0;
I forgot to set the "test_msg" here, so I'll send another patchset.
Thanks,
Pablo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-16 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-14 10:22 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH " Pablo de Lara
2020-04-14 10:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] test/crypto: do not check for IMB_VERSION_NUM Pablo de Lara
2020-04-14 10:34 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-14 17:22 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2020-04-14 17:48 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-22 9:16 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-22 9:43 ` Akhil Goyal
2020-04-22 10:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-15 10:28 ` Dybkowski, AdamX
2020-04-14 10:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] test/crypto: add capability check Pablo de Lara
2020-04-14 10:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] test/crypto: do not check for IMB_VERSION_NUM Pablo de Lara
2020-04-15 10:30 ` Dybkowski, AdamX
2020-04-14 17:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] Crypto test refactoring (first phase) Pablo de Lara
2020-04-14 17:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] test/crypto: add capability check Pablo de Lara
2020-04-15 10:31 ` Dybkowski, AdamX
2020-04-16 11:15 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo [this message]
2020-04-14 17:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] test/crypto: do not check for internal PMD information Pablo de Lara
2020-04-15 10:30 ` Dybkowski, AdamX
2020-04-16 9:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] Crypto test refactoring (first phase) Pablo de Lara
2020-04-16 9:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] test/crypto: add capability check Pablo de Lara
2020-04-16 15:35 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-04-16 16:26 ` Trahe, Fiona
2020-04-16 16:44 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2020-04-16 9:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] test/crypto: do not check for internal PMD information Pablo de Lara
2020-04-16 15:35 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-04-16 17:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] Crypto test refactoring (first phase) Pablo de Lara
2020-04-16 17:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] test/crypto: add capability check Pablo de Lara
2020-04-16 17:53 ` Trahe, Fiona
2020-04-16 17:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] test/crypto: do not check for internal PMD information Pablo de Lara
2020-04-16 17:53 ` Trahe, Fiona
2020-04-19 21:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] Crypto test refactoring (first phase) Akhil Goyal
2020-04-15 10:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] test/crypto: add capability check Dybkowski, AdamX
2020-04-15 9:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH " Dybkowski, AdamX
2020-04-15 9:23 ` Dybkowski, AdamX
2020-04-15 10:29 ` Dybkowski, AdamX
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=SN6PR11MB31013400502C273DB979EC4184D80@SN6PR11MB3101.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).