From: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
To: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>,
"Doherty, Declan" <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
"ravi1.kumar@amd.com" <ravi1.kumar@amd.com>,
"anoobj@marvell.com" <anoobj@marvell.com>,
"Zhang, Roy Fan" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>,
"Trahe, Fiona" <fiona.trahe@intel.com>,
"tdu@semihalf.com" <tdu@semihalf.com>,
"rnagadheeraj@marvell.com" <rnagadheeraj@marvell.com>,
"adwivedi@marvell.com" <adwivedi@marvell.com>,
"g.singh@nxp.com" <g.singh@nxp.com>,
"hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
"jianjay.zhou@huawei.com" <jianjay.zhou@huawei.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Akhil.goyal@nxp.com" <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Crypto test refactoring (second phase)
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:28:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <SN6PR11MB3101BB08F5751D65A4C1A70184D80@SN6PR11MB3101.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0801MB2025B0C8C2671328F6AEFE009ED80@HE1PR0801MB2025.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Ruifeng,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2020 9:29 AM
> To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; Doherty, Declan
> <declan.doherty@intel.com>; ravi1.kumar@amd.com; anoobj@marvell.com;
> Zhang, Roy Fan <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>; Trahe, Fiona
> <fiona.trahe@intel.com>; tdu@semihalf.com; rnagadheeraj@marvell.com;
> adwivedi@marvell.com; g.singh@nxp.com; hemant.agrawal@nxp.com;
> jianjay.zhou@huawei.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Akhil.goyal@nxp.com; nd <nd@arm.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/3] Crypto test refactoring (second phase)
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 2:04 AM
> > To: declan.doherty@intel.com; ravi1.kumar@amd.com; Ruifeng Wang
> > <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>; anoobj@marvell.com; roy.fan.zhang@intel.com;
> > fiona.trahe@intel.com; tdu@semihalf.com; rnagadheeraj@marvell.com;
> > adwivedi@marvell.com; g.singh@nxp.com; hemant.agrawal@nxp.com;
> > jianjay.zhou@huawei.com
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Akhil.goyal@nxp.com; Pablo de Lara
> > <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Crypto test refactoring (second phase)
> >
> > This patchset is the phase two of the crypto test refactoring effort.
> > It mainly focuses on removing the PMD bitmask used to select which
> > PMDs are used to run the tests against.
> > Instead, now all PMDs will run all test cases and the capability
> > checking will determine which ones are supported and therefore, are not
> skipped.
> >
> > Since there are tests cases that require sessionless support, a new
> > feature flag has been added, which reflects this support per PMD.
> >
> > I am CC'ing all PMD maintainers, asking for their collaboration to
> > test this patchset, as this might impact the testing of each PMD.
> >
> >
> > This patchset depends on:
> > (1) http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/68433/ (crypto/openssl: fix
> > out-of-place
> > encryption)
> > (2) http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/68434/ (cryptodev: add missing
> > feature
> > name)
> > (3) http://patches.dpdk.org/cover/68435/ (Crypto test refactoring
> > (first
> > phase))
> >
> > Pablo de Lara (3):
> > cryptodev: add sessionless support feature flag
> > test/crypto: check if device supports sessionless
> > test/crypto: do not check for PMD in tests
> >
> There is one test case failure with crypto_armv8 after applying these patches.
> I will try to locate it.
>
> 33) TestCase AES-128-CBC HMAC-SHA1 Decryption Digest Verify Sessionless
> PASS
> 34) TestCase NULL-CIPHER-NULL-AUTH encrypt & gen x8byte PASS
> 35) TestCase NULL-AUTH-NULL-CIPHER verify & decrypt x8byte PASS
> 36) TestCase NULL-CIPHER-NULL-AUTH encrypt & gen x8byte - OOP PASS
> 37) TestCase NULL-AUTH-NULL-CIPHER verify & decrypt x8byte - OOP PASS
> 38) TestCase NULL-CIPHER-NULL-AUTH encrypt & gen x4byte PASS
> 39) TestCase NULL-AUTH-NULL-CIPHER verify & decrypt x4byte PASS
> 40) TestCase NULL-CIPHER-NULL-AUTH encrypt & gen x4byte - OOP PASS
> 41) TestCase NULL-AUTH-NULL-CIPHER verify & decrypt x4byte - OOP PASS
> 42) TestCase NULL-CIPHER-NULL-AUTH encrypt & gen x1byte PASS
> 43) TestCase NULL-AUTH-NULL-CIPHER verify & decrypt x1byte PASS
> 44) TestCase NULL-CIPHER-NULL-AUTH encrypt & gen x1byte - OOP PASS
> 45) TestCase NULL-AUTH-NULL-CIPHER verify & decrypt x1byte - OOP PASS +
These test cases shouldn't be run, as your PMD doesn't support NULL cipher/auth.
Have you merged the first phase of this refactoring work?
I just pushed new versions for both phases, as there were a few problems in the first ones:
http://patches.dpdk.org/cover/68677/
http://patches.dpdk.org/cover/68681/
Could you tried the new versions? (remember to also apply http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/68433/
and http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/68434/)
Thanks,
Pablo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-16 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-14 18:04 Pablo de Lara
2020-04-14 18:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] cryptodev: add sessionless support feature flag Pablo de Lara
2020-04-15 10:38 ` Dybkowski, AdamX
2020-04-14 18:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] test/crypto: check if device supports sessionless Pablo de Lara
2020-04-15 10:38 ` Dybkowski, AdamX
2020-04-14 18:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] test/crypto: do not check for PMD in tests Pablo de Lara
2020-04-15 10:38 ` Dybkowski, AdamX
2020-04-16 8:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Crypto test refactoring (second phase) Ruifeng Wang
2020-04-16 13:28 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo [this message]
2020-04-16 15:23 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-04-16 9:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] " Pablo de Lara
2020-04-16 9:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] cryptodev: add sessionless support feature flag Pablo de Lara
2020-04-16 15:27 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-04-16 9:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] test/crypto: check if device supports sessionless Pablo de Lara
2020-04-16 15:27 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-04-16 9:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] test/crypto: check if device supports out-of-place ops Pablo de Lara
2020-04-16 13:41 ` Dybkowski, AdamX
2020-04-16 15:28 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-04-16 9:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] test/crypto: do not check for PMD in tests Pablo de Lara
2020-04-16 15:28 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-04-16 16:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] Crypto test refactoring (second phase) Trahe, Fiona
2020-04-19 21:13 ` Akhil Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=SN6PR11MB3101BB08F5751D65A4C1A70184D80@SN6PR11MB3101.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
--cc=adwivedi@marvell.com \
--cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fiona.trahe@intel.com \
--cc=g.singh@nxp.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=jianjay.zhou@huawei.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=ravi1.kumar@amd.com \
--cc=rnagadheeraj@marvell.com \
--cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=tdu@semihalf.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).