DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ji, Kai" <kai.ji@intel.com>
To: "Power, Ciara" <ciara.power@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>,
	"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto/ipsec_mb: fix getting process ID per job
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 17:11:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <SN6PR11MB34085DC27F16A3E3501E94D181B9A@SN6PR11MB3408.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231123170701.901946-1-ciara.power@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 926 bytes --]

Acked-by: Kai Ji <kai.ji@intel.com>

________________________________
From: Power, Ciara <ciara.power@intel.com>
Sent: 23 November 2023 17:07
To: dev@dpdk.org <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: thomas@monjalon.net <thomas@monjalon.net>; Ji, Kai <kai.ji@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; Power, Ciara <ciara.power@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: [PATCH] crypto/ipsec_mb: fix getting process ID per job

Currently, when using IPsec-mb 1.4+, the process ID is obtained for each
job in a burst with a call to getpid().
This system call uses too many CPU cycles, and is unnecessary per job.

Instead, set the process ID value per lcore.
This is read when processing the burst, instead of per job.

Fixes: 9593d83e5d88 ("crypto/ipsec_mb: fix aesni_mb multi-process session ID")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Ciara Power <ciara.power@intel.com>
---

--
2.25.1


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1842 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-23 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-23 17:07 Ciara Power
2023-11-23 17:10 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2023-11-23 17:11 ` Ji, Kai [this message]
2023-11-23 17:15 ` [PATCH v2] " Ciara Power
2023-11-23 17:22   ` Ji, Kai
2023-11-23 17:26   ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2023-11-24  9:55     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=SN6PR11MB34085DC27F16A3E3501E94D181B9A@SN6PR11MB3408.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=kai.ji@intel.com \
    --cc=ciara.power@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).