Hi!

The patch series looks good.
Only one thought from my side is about consistency between prefixes for global symbols for variables and functions.

For functions, we use the prefix "nthw_*"; however, the patch series uses the prefix "ntnic_" for global variables.
Will it be better to keep the same prefix for functions and variables?
If there is no strict rule, we may keep "ntnic_".

On 26.09.2025, 19:25, "Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:

The ntnic driver in next-net is not consitent in prefixing
all global symbols.

Stephen Hemminger (3):
  net/ntnic: rename nt_log_ types
  net/ntnic: rename hwlock
  net/ntnic: make flow_lock local

 drivers/net/ntnic/include/create_elements.h   |  2 --
 .../ntnic/include/stream_binary_flow_api.h    |  2 +-
 drivers/net/ntnic/ntlog/ntlog.h               | 16 +++++++-------
 drivers/net/ntnic/ntnic_ethdev.c              | 22 +++++++++----------
 drivers/net/ntnic/ntnic_filter/ntnic_filter.c | 10 ++++-----
 5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

--
2.47.3