DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
To: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>,
	Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Cc: Kanaka Durga Kotamarthy <kkotamarthy@marvell.com>,
	Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	Narayana Prasad Raju Athreya <pathreya@marvell.com>,
	Fiona Trahe <fiona.trahe@intel.com>,
	Shally Verma <shallyv@marvell.com>,
	Sunila Sahu <ssahu@marvell.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/8] crypto/octeontx: add RSA and modexp asym capabilities
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 08:03:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <VE1PR04MB6639042C5B9D049B65C287B5E69F0@VE1PR04MB6639.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR18MB28778927544FF2633ECEAB3BDF9C0@MN2PR18MB2877.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>

> >
> > Hi Anoob,
> >
> > >  const struct rte_cryptodev_capabilities *
> > > -otx_get_capabilities(void)
> > > +otx_get_capabilities(uint64_t flags)
> > >  {
> > > -	return otx_capabilities;
> > > +	if (flags & RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_ASYMMETRIC_CRYPTO)
> > > +		return otx_asym_capabilities;
> > > +	else
> > > +		return otx_sym_capabilities;
> > > +
> > >  }
> >
> > I believe this will give Asym capabilities always. As the feature flag
> > RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_ASYMMETRIC_CRYPTO will always be set, as the flags
> are
> > set in init.
> >
> > It will never go in else.
> 
> [Anoob] The flags is set based on the type of underlying device. The crypto
> module on OCTEONTX exposes two kinds of VFs. One which does only
> symmetric and one which does only asymmetric. Both are never supported
> together for a VF, and hence the if...else.

OK probably a comment should be added to avoid this confusion while calling infos_get.
And add this info in doc as well if not already there.

> 
> From the first patch, crypto/octeontx: add device type mailbox routine
> 
> 	switch (cptvf->vftype) {
> 	case OTX_CPT_VF_TYPE_AE:
> 		/* Set asymmetric cpt feature flags */
> 		c_dev->feature_flags =
> RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_ASYMMETRIC_CRYPTO |
> 				RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_HW_ACCELERATED;
> 		break;
> 	case OTX_CPT_VF_TYPE_SE:
> 		/* Set symmetric cpt feature flags */
> 		c_dev->feature_flags =
> RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_SYMMETRIC_CRYPTO |
> 				RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_HW_ACCELERATED |
> 
> 	RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_SYM_OPERATION_CHAINING |
> 				RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_IN_PLACE_SGL |
> 				RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_OOP_SGL_IN_LB_OUT |
> 				RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_OOP_SGL_IN_SGL_OUT;
> 		break;
> 
> Hope this clarifies.
> 
> >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/octeontx/otx_cryptodev_capabilities.h
> > > b/drivers/crypto/octeontx/otx_cryptodev_capabilities.h
> > > index fc62821..439b50e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/crypto/octeontx/otx_cryptodev_capabilities.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/crypto/octeontx/otx_cryptodev_capabilities.h
> > > @@ -8,10 +8,9 @@
> > >  #include <rte_cryptodev.h>
> > >
> > >  /*
> > > - * Get capabilities list for the device
> > > - *
> > > + * Get capabilities list for the device, based on device type
> > >   */
> > >  const struct rte_cryptodev_capabilities *
> > > -otx_get_capabilities(void);
> > > +otx_get_capabilities(uint64_t flags);
> > >
> > >  #endif /* _OTX_CRYPTODEV_CAPABILITIES_H_ */ diff --git
> > > a/drivers/crypto/octeontx/otx_cryptodev_ops.c
> > > b/drivers/crypto/octeontx/otx_cryptodev_ops.c
> > > index 88efed3..b59a001 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/crypto/octeontx/otx_cryptodev_ops.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/crypto/octeontx/otx_cryptodev_ops.c
> > > @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ otx_cpt_dev_info_get(struct rte_cryptodev *dev,
> > > struct rte_cryptodev_info *info)
> > >  	if (info != NULL) {
> > >  		info->max_nb_queue_pairs = CPT_NUM_QS_PER_VF;
> > >  		info->feature_flags = dev->feature_flags;
> > > -		info->capabilities = otx_get_capabilities();
> > > +		info->capabilities = otx_get_capabilities(info->feature_flags);
> > >  		info->sym.max_nb_sessions = 0;
> > >  		info->driver_id = otx_cryptodev_driver_id;
> > >  		info->min_mbuf_headroom_req =
> > > OTX_CPT_MIN_HEADROOM_REQ;
> > > @@ -635,7 +635,8 @@ otx_cpt_dev_create(struct rte_cryptodev *c_dev)
> > >  	case OTX_CPT_VF_TYPE_AE:
> > >  		/* Set asymmetric cpt feature flags */
> > >  		c_dev->feature_flags =
> > > RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_ASYMMETRIC_CRYPTO |
> > > -				RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_HW_ACCELERATED;
> > > +				RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_HW_ACCELERATED |
> > > +				RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_RSA_PRIV_OP_KEY_QT;
> > >  		break;
> > >  	case OTX_CPT_VF_TYPE_SE:
> > >  		/* Set symmetric cpt feature flags */
> > > --
> > > 2.7.4


  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-03  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-09 13:27 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/8] add asym support in crypto_octeontx PMD Anoob Joseph
2019-09-09 13:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/8] crypto/octeontx: add device type mailbox routine Anoob Joseph
2019-09-09 13:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/8] crypto/octeontx: add RSA and modexp asym capabilities Anoob Joseph
2019-10-01 12:38   ` Akhil Goyal
2019-10-02 10:48     ` Anoob Joseph
2019-10-03  8:03       ` Akhil Goyal [this message]
2019-09-09 13:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/8] crypto/octeontx: add asymmetric session operations Anoob Joseph
2019-10-01 12:57   ` Akhil Goyal
2019-10-02 11:18     ` Anoob Joseph
2019-09-09 13:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/8] common/cpt: add helper functions for asymmetric crypto Anoob Joseph
2019-10-01 13:04   ` Akhil Goyal
2019-10-02 11:13     ` Anoob Joseph
2019-10-04  7:32       ` Anoob Joseph
2019-09-09 13:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/8] crypto/octeontx: add asymmetric op enqueue function Anoob Joseph
2019-09-09 13:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/8] crypto/octeontx: add asymmetric op dequeue function Anoob Joseph
2019-09-09 13:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/8] app/test: register octeontx PMD to asym testsuite Anoob Joseph
2019-09-09 13:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 8/8] doc: update octeontx asymmetric features Anoob Joseph
2019-10-01 13:27   ` Akhil Goyal
2019-10-02 11:04     ` Anoob Joseph
2019-10-03  8:01       ` Akhil Goyal
2019-09-09 15:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/8] add asym support in crypto_octeontx PMD Shally Verma
2019-10-11 13:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] " Anoob Joseph
2019-10-11 13:01   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] crypto/octeontx: add device type mailbox routine Anoob Joseph
2019-10-11 13:01   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] crypto/octeontx: add asymmetric session operations Anoob Joseph
2019-10-11 13:01   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] common/cpt: add helper functions for asymmetric crypto Anoob Joseph
2019-10-11 13:01   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] crypto/octeontx: add asymmetric enqueue/dequeue ops Anoob Joseph
2019-10-11 13:01   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] app/test: register octeontx PMD to asym testsuite Anoob Joseph
2019-10-15 12:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] add asym support in crypto_octeontx PMD Akhil Goyal
2019-10-15 13:31     ` Akhil Goyal
2019-10-16  4:57     ` Anoob Joseph
2019-10-16  5:57       ` Akhil Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=VE1PR04MB6639042C5B9D049B65C287B5E69F0@VE1PR04MB6639.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=fiona.trahe@intel.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=kkotamarthy@marvell.com \
    --cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    --cc=pathreya@marvell.com \
    --cc=shallyv@marvell.com \
    --cc=ssahu@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).