From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23225A3160 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 14:40:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A99981EA8D; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 14:40:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from EUR04-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr70083.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.7.83]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734E61EA8A for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 14:40:21 +0200 (CEST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=aW/oLqAI1UwCKNXtCWsZypPXsTl11KIZ1f+ey31WMIutAd71A+4ptBXofYYZp1+E7FG8o9xEUF/zfWnsRmpJDKuVl0iA2sI+lUbtzprPW6OVnH+OPluKeSp0kIKPVhhLB1JWbT/tpR4rJTFFmZroDiPh4Rzg/zWm+tI6osJPbDtRIWShhidA92/2uSayar9TyqkOygbOZIH0+rj3krwIIisY39KyN4piTiimHL7wQfkKStx+s3KAhm2xtJTRri1600haZP2gO8+ftdq+HsFt1qKF0UQUZxVdyK2l79xNz6jRRUJXFW8RhALHLbnPT1A2cO4ckE09ULBD0KTZWtQ/WQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=CR2S+0yI94QpuQDAxmk1VXew3VdJhOjaPPhcs17KM0k=; b=dGr9qSBG5BWCU5oWK/6NtcQ7P7jDyQ0aPlHne7RD3v8c96vHHI+FLNRjk6dLsKYjnCWyWKyseM0pmGapgVQW35/WtNj/hEiXu7t5kzQb0otDZizVXF9t4RipH4GKOo5KQADdDiZfkC4xJyvf2fMKmVAUyUOOGc0BiBvK6df8cIwCl19M8fgmMQmJC9dwi4MVpDOUTiGiWxtSByiXY2IsIf9P4DeBfL2Muc4pS6UJp5ZMm9epFI/DgJcuGsGKHyMMvPSJddGCuakPIip99mQzXPx5YCgCVQCGw2WqT+iBfO6AxgUKU0XdemOOIa0a/eE0rjbu7NSK0FZCfZoQMiK7wA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nxp.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nxp.com; dkim=pass header.d=nxp.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nxp.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=CR2S+0yI94QpuQDAxmk1VXew3VdJhOjaPPhcs17KM0k=; b=fGkPXpdEHk7KKveeEkIODs1A/2rvImsolgW/PN/hciZAUmzsOkzQz8e4LAg9ZhZ4gO94mtGYlO/1TmaoX2y+vZbUWukfvl3Tt4c1lx7eVOv/xIzVijPUClyNhd91Lhe8UE3q+oDR+P8A7ptPtUhwfP6muDXBIjDJUksXURtc0aE= Received: from VE1PR04MB6639.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.255.118.11) by VE1PR04MB6416.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.255.118.91) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2347.21; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 12:40:20 +0000 Received: from VE1PR04MB6639.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c045:5df2:ba1f:c3ee]) by VE1PR04MB6639.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c045:5df2:ba1f:c3ee%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2347.021; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 12:40:20 +0000 From: Akhil Goyal To: Bernard Iremonger , "dev@dpdk.org" , "konstantin.ananyev@intel.com" , "anoobj@marvell.com" , "jerinj@marvell.com" , 'Thomas Monjalon' Thread-Topic: [PATCH v2 0/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: set default Thread-Index: AQHVeGtwa0h85gmQX0WS5PacJv4Ia6dVb/tg Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 12:40:19 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1567069173-10505-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> <1569943080-20228-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1569943080-20228-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-IN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=akhil.goyal@nxp.com; x-originating-ip: [92.120.1.65] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1777e700-eb51-4aaa-447a-08d74e482d49 x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VE1PR04MB6416: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508; x-forefront-prvs: 0187F3EA14 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(39860400002)(396003)(376002)(366004)(136003)(346002)(53754006)(13464003)(189003)(199004)(81156014)(66476007)(8936002)(55016002)(9686003)(6436002)(44832011)(8676002)(11346002)(25786009)(446003)(476003)(486006)(6116002)(66066001)(2201001)(6246003)(7736002)(86362001)(26005)(256004)(66946007)(14454004)(186003)(3846002)(71190400001)(71200400001)(81166006)(66446008)(14444005)(76116006)(5660300002)(102836004)(64756008)(66556008)(74316002)(110136005)(2501003)(53546011)(2906002)(6506007)(52536014)(99286004)(229853002)(305945005)(478600001)(33656002)(76176011)(316002)(7696005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:VE1PR04MB6416; H:VE1PR04MB6639.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nxp.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: AgfXP68k8SB0AN/4qv91IUFv2cZtqbhKD4sYFxZvMRG3EFAjuC5N/T9RqSys9JDjXXwFypEs6Rwg9svYV+CJ4GOerues7CdMahK9a2sEls0ArrZ6jUsHT1o0SupEQVC2u1slFxshMb5xjZ7hxS/XHRKQNMrcQM3cPf4aWbI/at0eUIcP2Qe+1k5iczTLrNNLbGJI2Fngq3Ix7AP3lPR4AelPtAaxfTrW9z+9qlrGnQjVeFWvj/l54eDH+SW49IhrJdHgwTn2nVVY5WTLb9T+VYGgNjKbbaskplAJdjhRLsDtyXWKefbspGg5GP8I1npfeVfZWxkv3U7bTCsJkjMu1GmFhl7M8oWZW0r/GdVRVBhP6bGh3RLcahBBhy5XE776cd93dl1Tm2i4kI9Qv2KjtfiOvkAFBQyuB3foYi4l6Lc= x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: nxp.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 1777e700-eb51-4aaa-447a-08d74e482d49 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 11 Oct 2019 12:40:19.6954 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 686ea1d3-bc2b-4c6f-a92c-d99c5c301635 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: DkLEl3g7xbd9A1qXMq91NP27RipG8VJkQpNzPx2IIZionV7kKO6cb7J1bEMHTUWq76Eyz7uMh0OxIMjhqZ8Xcg== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VE1PR04MB6416 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: set default X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi All, This patchset would need ack from more vendors as it will impact user exper= ience on a key example application which is normally demonstrated to customers. IPSec library is still evolving and there are new functionality added every= release. Atleast from NXP side we are not OK with this change. I would hold this patch till RC2 atleast. Regards, Akhil > -----Original Message----- > From: Bernard Iremonger > Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2019 8:48 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org; konstantin.ananyev@intel.com; Akhil Goyal > > Cc: Bernard Iremonger > Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: set default >=20 > This patch set, sets the default code path in the ipsec-secgw > application to use the librte_ipsec. > The *_old test scripts have been modified to use the legacy code > path. >=20 > Changes in v2: > ------------- > The error messages for the -l option have been updated. > The pktest.sh script has been updated to drop the -l option. >=20 > Bernard Iremonger (3): > examples/ipsec-secgw: set default to IPsec library mode > examples/ipsec-secgw: add -l 0 parameter to old scripts > examples/ipsec-secgw: update pktest.sh script >=20 > doc/guides/rel_notes/release_19_11.rst | 8 ++++ > doc/guides/sample_app_ug/ipsec_secgw.rst | 6 ++- > examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c | 46 ++++++++++++++--= ------ > examples/ipsec-secgw/test/pkttest.sh | 1 - > .../ipsec-secgw/test/trs_3descbc_sha1_old_defs.sh | 2 +- > .../ipsec-secgw/test/trs_aescbc_sha1_old_defs.sh | 2 +- > .../ipsec-secgw/test/trs_aesctr_sha1_old_defs.sh | 2 +- > .../test/trs_aesgcm_inline_crypto_old_defs.sh | 2 +- > examples/ipsec-secgw/test/trs_aesgcm_old_defs.sh | 2 +- > .../ipsec-secgw/test/tun_3descbc_sha1_old_defs.sh | 2 +- > .../ipsec-secgw/test/tun_aescbc_sha1_old_defs.sh | 2 +- > .../ipsec-secgw/test/tun_aesctr_sha1_old_defs.sh | 2 +- > .../test/tun_aesgcm_inline_crypto_old_defs.sh | 2 +- > examples/ipsec-secgw/test/tun_aesgcm_old_defs.sh | 2 +- > 14 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) >=20 > -- > 2.7.4