From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A31A0534; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 14:23:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A002BE9; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 14:23:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from EUR04-DB3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr60087.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.6.87]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08DF9262E for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 14:23:24 +0100 (CET) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=WIqhtTKHUAGF25xpQ8HV52HPLfhFrawKTTcIpBzNRdYpuB98frLoa8HlPO+3RRW+LZBMPuMgNP9uYvIu6wQZwHVSXZJjjL3rQl0oIC+Oi1ahd46LYLGo2S6VAF/23Dz4ktEuDZWcHAO8anoaGROCAGx3aPBVkabGhYwIFEOF/XITHEI6V4wCruSjkJHKCwh+PqgTfKSu9p+xlvEAMQTIp7KURvuzre3NBdvm4j1X/v2U8lyw04PKdqYui3aptbY4LUQFNUvfGh5G78fuo2lg3ImAeMt5IcGW3TDsfYweAGrTUQDSDJJrODeeb/52P3dy3p+EsrgE+f9BlcCn+rSNFg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=MBU+w+vdCCZ5jDrq3Adw9bXmqvQnLMrM9x5xzbJnvcc=; b=QVVRbxurGYMlMxMT2W0yclwHn8qjrssyFW/5g6rjBtd2W5by35ZlzKgTBYL83OTUleiZygIglSHcZ0GvC9Ltum8Q7BYq92xZN4jlixZFByEIdcSD3K3GNJgFkvcblXtF19PoPclIP9Xxd+7rQlcap2PUQZPPqk9xWfgDaJMaBASvSKCH9oHyMVQ79q0YFmDDAWMwZ1OyGyEtxpAMOOCGqDGikJpZ+2W5EEwn9LdvB3B1zIS8Kd7oHxz0O4Dfdqzetzy5Xxlinw7qZEKQjgXsB89tg7ehzpZHvSF06qjy//tDKikVp+SfVVmhT+rDQCiyZknR2dqsOFuzwlgaDDlxxQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nxp.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nxp.com; dkim=pass header.d=nxp.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nxp.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=MBU+w+vdCCZ5jDrq3Adw9bXmqvQnLMrM9x5xzbJnvcc=; b=kP/hRoGpkeh7zML2/NUo7dKikNezX0qtgfksCxEo2STv5x51xtIVNSLGET/llDDKjNlgqCJSBu6nzYOlup85ffUwPqZBU8mTaEiiKGtOlToc34TZxl8b5yj9qhIk4TaA6ZRQ14eo7IW9aK5QechEtPxIUFDNBYr7rIGdHRUEj/k= Received: from VE1PR04MB6639.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.255.118.11) by VE1PR04MB6702.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (20.179.234.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2729.22; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 13:23:23 +0000 Received: from VE1PR04MB6639.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::25b0:b1ac:aed0:63e1]) by VE1PR04MB6639.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::25b0:b1ac:aed0:63e1%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2729.021; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 13:23:23 +0000 From: Akhil Goyal To: Adam Dybkowski , "dev@dpdk.org" , "fiona.trahe@intel.com" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test/crypto: replace wireless algos test vectors Thread-Index: AQHV3OAeb424kmqSjkelDVWvOppYqagXlGMA Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 13:23:22 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20200206112447.31488-1-adamx.dybkowski@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20200206112447.31488-1-adamx.dybkowski@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-IN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=akhil.goyal@nxp.com; x-originating-ip: [92.120.1.72] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: e1711190-2f56-4061-2975-08d7afbebc12 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VE1PR04MB6702: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:1824; x-forefront-prvs: 0311124FA9 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(396003)(39860400002)(136003)(366004)(346002)(376002)(199004)(189003)(6506007)(5660300002)(478600001)(4744005)(71200400001)(9686003)(66946007)(316002)(44832011)(110136005)(66476007)(76116006)(66446008)(64756008)(52536014)(33656002)(26005)(55016002)(66556008)(86362001)(186003)(7696005)(8676002)(81156014)(8936002)(81166006)(2906002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:VE1PR04MB6702; H:VE1PR04MB6639.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nxp.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 3PkLIu+yk5PDjXJSpxnWl6++wWzWHvwWh+CvhYiZSYW3GRfmV1nY0/UnKVOFLRCYjFhTnt2NIqTxyDVrQ88BGZZkG65lXinjj4IzhYLQvBhDfiUHIpCdV6zXNeBwziDNn8y3yg6WROAw6X/7haKRkqfWrQVvkBywJIdRJYZ3lI+WPEdoe8pwQ23Qapxu5A40dvTSjgWr58nVHUcqKj54n5t2jC/oaagJ6X+A9MrEFylGmAve3dgEbTeV+zCunIRq562V54PY9U0bERGIwJyimpr05cd1gfAVNAKQymWpy0yTF/7Cnze4ruj8lZDaMKsTGvQQtWfUYeSNzzP7z3cWUrC2eFzM3Vw/JgFOqlcaIR7DNjKFEt7zrHv6E9HF3eusQGeKYhh7b2O0ISQOTQ53FPoWU8CsbIre5BVI0B+VzjSKkaRMYHRgq0S0TA89Nvu3 x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: VLJejfUAQ9iRZK9XYLBWdBF6gPiqbm2oVQ5Z8WtxwpV58YA3dFFVB7LYFKa7Q/j0bFnn0FWYUIpQuYc1x4iV7h54mOOVwENm4+TKmGoq3h0pyU70jJ9tR6HhAUpVq7UPWaB8Moqb6ZTmdQUPGCfCUA== x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: nxp.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: e1711190-2f56-4061-2975-08d7afbebc12 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 12 Feb 2020 13:23:22.8959 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 686ea1d3-bc2b-4c6f-a92c-d99c5c301635 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 2T6uBWsuDlDVROLQGNe4CE+qaJo0TLkJ48QAFMkb9dVcXAheyke411bw6DgvkgIdtRFG2lq3p7hlK6yyETCaXw== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VE1PR04MB6702 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test/crypto: replace wireless algos test vectors X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Adam/Fiona, >=20 > This patch replaces all KASUMI, SNOW3G, ZUC and all mixed > crypto unit test vectors with randomly generated input arrays. > All outputs were calculated and verified on both QAT PMD > and appropriate software-only PMDs wherever possible. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Adam Dybkowski > --- I have few doubts about this patch -> What is the reason for changing the test vectors? -> Are these based on some standard test vectors somewhere? -> Have you done any interoperability tests on these vectors? Regards, Akhil