DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phil Yang <Phil.Yang@arm.com>
To: "Carrillo, Erik G" <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>,
	Dharmik Thakkar <Dharmik.Thakkar@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] eventdev: use c11 atomics for lcore timer armed flag
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 16:12:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <VE1PR08MB4640E0F2398B623338872335E9910@VE1PR08MB4640.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR1101MB211889A1A063F4F6E33F3635B9940@CY4PR1101MB2118.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Erik,

Sorry, I was on vacation.
Thanks for your feedback. I will update it in the next version.

Thanks,
Phil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carrillo, Erik G <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2020 5:02 AM
> To: Phil Yang <Phil.Yang@arm.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; Ruifeng Wang
> <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>; Dharmik Thakkar <Dharmik.Thakkar@arm.com>;
> nd <nd@arm.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/3] eventdev: use c11 atomics for lcore timer armed
> flag
> 
> Hi Phil,
> 
> Comment in-line:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>
> > Sent: Friday, June 12, 2020 6:20 AM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org; Carrillo, Erik G <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>
> > Cc: drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com; honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com;
> > ruifeng.wang@arm.com; dharmik.thakkar@arm.com; nd@arm.com
> > Subject: [PATCH 2/3] eventdev: use c11 atomics for lcore timer armed flag
> >
> > The in_use flag is a per core variable which is not shared between lcores in
> > the normal case and the access of this variable should be ordered on the
> > same core. However, if non-EAL thread pick the highest lcore to insert
> timers
> > into, there is the possibility of conflicts on this flag between threads. Then
> > the atomic CAS operation is needed.
> >
> > Use the c11 atomic CAS instead of the generic rte_atomic operations to
> avoid
> > the unnecessary barrier on aarch64.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.c
> > b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.c
> > index 6a0e283..6947efb 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.c
> > @@ -554,7 +554,7 @@ struct swtim {
> >  	uint32_t timer_data_id;
> >  	/* Track which cores have actually armed a timer */
> >  	struct {
> > -		rte_atomic16_t v;
> > +		int16_t v;
> >  	} __rte_cache_aligned in_use[RTE_MAX_LCORE];
> >  	/* Track which cores' timer lists should be polled */
> >  	unsigned int poll_lcores[RTE_MAX_LCORE]; @@ -606,7 +606,8 @@
> > swtim_callback(struct rte_timer *tim)
> >  				      "with immediate expiry value");
> >  		}
> >
> > -		if (unlikely(rte_atomic16_test_and_set(&sw-
> > >in_use[lcore].v))) {
> > +		if (unlikely(sw->in_use[lcore].v == 0)) {
> > +			sw->in_use[lcore].v = 1;
> >  			n_lcores = __atomic_fetch_add(&sw->n_poll_lcores,
> > 1,
> >  						__ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> >  			__atomic_store_n(&sw->poll_lcores[n_lcores],
> > lcore, @@ -834,7 +835,7 @@ swtim_init(struct rte_event_timer_adapter
> > *adapter)
> >
> >  	/* Initialize the variables that track in-use timer lists */
> >  	for (i = 0; i < RTE_MAX_LCORE; i++)
> > -		rte_atomic16_init(&sw->in_use[i].v);
> > +		sw->in_use[i].v = 0;
> >
> >  	/* Initialize the timer subsystem and allocate timer data instance */
> >  	ret = rte_timer_subsystem_init();
> > @@ -1017,6 +1018,8 @@ __swtim_arm_burst(const struct
> > rte_event_timer_adapter *adapter,
> >  	struct rte_timer *tim, *tims[nb_evtims];
> >  	uint64_t cycles;
> >  	int n_lcores;
> > +	/* Timer is not armed state */
> 
> A more accurate comment would be something like "Timer list for this lcore is
> not in use".
> 
> With that change, it looks good to me:
> Acked-by: Erik Gabriel Carrillo <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>
> 
> > +	int16_t exp_state = 0;
> >
> >  #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_EVENTDEV_DEBUG
> >  	/* Check that the service is running. */ @@ -1035,8 +1038,12 @@
> > __swtim_arm_burst(const struct rte_event_timer_adapter *adapter,
> >  	/* If this is the first time we're arming an event timer on this lcore,
> >  	 * mark this lcore as "in use"; this will cause the service
> >  	 * function to process the timer list that corresponds to this lcore.
> > +	 * The atomic CAS operation can prevent the race condition on
> > in_use
> > +	 * flag between multiple non-EAL threads.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (unlikely(rte_atomic16_test_and_set(&sw->in_use[lcore_id].v))) {
> > +	if (unlikely(__atomic_compare_exchange_n(&sw-
> > >in_use[lcore_id].v,
> > +			&exp_state, 1, 0,
> > +			__ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED))) {
> >  		EVTIM_LOG_DBG("Adding lcore id = %u to list of lcores to
> > poll",
> >  			      lcore_id);
> >  		n_lcores = __atomic_fetch_add(&sw->n_poll_lcores, 1,
> > --
> > 2.7.4


  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-28 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-12 11:19 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] eventdev: fix race condition on timer list counter Phil Yang
2020-06-12 11:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] eventdev: use c11 atomics for lcore timer armed flag Phil Yang
2020-06-23 21:01   ` Carrillo, Erik G
2020-06-28 16:12     ` Phil Yang [this message]
2020-06-23 21:20   ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-06-23 21:31     ` Carrillo, Erik G
2020-06-28 16:32       ` Phil Yang
2020-06-12 11:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] eventdev: relax smp barriers with c11 atomics Phil Yang
2020-06-22 10:12   ` Phil Yang
2020-06-23 19:38     ` Carrillo, Erik G
2020-06-28 17:33       ` Phil Yang
2020-06-29 18:07         ` Carrillo, Erik G
2020-06-18 15:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] eventdev: fix race condition on timer list counter Carrillo, Erik G
2020-06-18 18:25   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-06-22  9:48     ` Phil Yang
2020-07-01 11:22       ` Jerin Jacob
2020-07-02  3:28         ` Phil Yang
2020-07-02  3:26     ` Phil Yang
2020-07-02  3:56       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-02 21:15         ` Carrillo, Erik G
2020-07-02 21:30           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-06-22  9:09   ` Phil Yang
2020-07-02  5:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] " Phil Yang
2020-07-02  5:26   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] eventdev: use c11 atomics for lcore timer armed flag Phil Yang
2020-07-02 20:21     ` Carrillo, Erik G
2020-07-02  5:26   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] eventdev: remove redundant code Phil Yang
2020-07-03  3:35     ` Dharmik Thakkar
2020-07-02  5:26   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] eventdev: relax smp barriers with c11 atomics Phil Yang
2020-07-02 20:30     ` Carrillo, Erik G
2020-07-03 10:50       ` Jerin Jacob
2020-07-06 10:04     ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-06 15:32       ` Phil Yang
2020-07-06 15:40         ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-07 11:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] eventdev: fix race condition on timer list counter Phil Yang
2020-07-07 11:13     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] eventdev: use C11 atomics for lcore timer armed flag Phil Yang
2020-07-07 11:13     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] eventdev: remove redundant code Phil Yang
2020-07-07 11:13     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] eventdev: relax smp barriers with C11 atomics Phil Yang
2020-07-07 14:29       ` Jerin Jacob
2020-07-07 15:56         ` Phil Yang
2020-07-07 15:54     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] eventdev: fix race condition on timer list counter Phil Yang
2020-07-07 15:54       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] eventdev: use C11 atomics for lcore timer armed flag Phil Yang
2020-07-07 15:54       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] eventdev: remove redundant code Phil Yang
2020-07-07 15:54       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] eventdev: relax smp barriers with C11 atomics Phil Yang
2020-07-08 13:30       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] eventdev: fix race condition on timer list counter Jerin Jacob
2020-07-08 15:01         ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=VE1PR08MB4640E0F2398B623338872335E9910@VE1PR08MB4640.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=phil.yang@arm.com \
    --cc=Dharmik.Thakkar@arm.com \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=erik.g.carrillo@intel.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).