From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
To: "thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>,
Amit Gupta <agupta3@marvell.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
Michael Santana <maicolgabriel@hotmail.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>,
"david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
"yipeng1.wang@intel.com" <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>,
nd <nd@arm.com>,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ci: increase unit test timeout
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:44:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <VE1PR08MB51490DCBFBF89A5BD11C484898070@VE1PR08MB5149.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VE1PR08MB5149F1847469AFEDC7590E3198040@VE1PR08MB5149.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ci: increase unit test timeout
> >
> > 28/01/2020 21:53, Aaron Conole:
> > > Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> writes:
> > >
> > > > Timeout multiplier was 3, which gives 30 seconds for unit test but
> > > > still some unit test was timing out time to time and travis
> > > > reporting false positive failures.
> > > >
> > > > Increasing the multiplier to 10, which makes timeout duration
> > > > 100seconds.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > It's okay to me. I thought there was an effort to split out
> > > performance part of this test from the functional part, but that
> > > seems to not have gone anywhere.
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
> >
> > NACK
> > The fix should be to split perf tests out of fast-tests.
> >
> > The following patch is splitting hash_readwrite_autotest:
> > https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/58726/
Thomas/David, is it possible to merge this patch? It is acked already. It would be good to have these changes for LF functional tests.
> > But we are still waiting for a patch splitting hash_readwrite_lf_autotest.
> > Please consider working on unit tests as a HIGH PRIORITY (using uppercase ;).
> > We should not have to wait so long to see performance tests removed
> > from fast unit tests (while keeping the functional coverage).
> Apologies, it slipped from my radar. Will send out a patch soon.
>
> >
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-31 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-28 16:28 Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-28 18:39 ` Michael Santana
2020-01-28 20:53 ` Aaron Conole
2020-01-30 11:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-01-30 15:35 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-01-31 15:44 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli [this message]
2020-02-05 18:47 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=VE1PR08MB51490DCBFBF89A5BD11C484898070@VE1PR08MB5149.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
--to=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=agupta3@marvell.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=maicolgabriel@hotmail.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).