DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
To: "Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>,
	Phil Yang <Phil.Yang@arm.com>,
	"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	"stephen@networkplumber.org" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	"maxime.coquelin@redhat.com" <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	"jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	"hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
	Gavin Hu <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>, Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>,
	Joyce Kong <Joyce.Kong@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 00/12] generic rte atomic APIs deprecate proposal
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 04:51:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <VE1PR08MB514975AC19F11A5F01CFCA8D98F50@VE1PR08MB5149.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR1101MB21570F1EDF906A7B3FBF37E1D7F70@MWHPR1101MB2157.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

<snip>

> > Subject: [PATCH v3 00/12] generic rte atomic APIs deprecate proposal
> >
> > DPDK provides generic rte_atomic APIs to do several atomic operations.
> > These APIs are using the deprecated __sync built-ins and enforce full
> > memory barriers on aarch64. However, full barriers are not necessary
> > in many use cases. In order to address such use cases, C language
> > offers
> > C11 atomic APIs. The C11 atomic APIs provide finer memory barrier
> > control by making use of the memory ordering parameter provided by the
> user.
> > Various patches submitted in the past [2] and the patches in this
> > series indicate significant performance gains on multiple aarch64 CPUs
> > and no performance loss on x86.
> >
> > But the existing rte_atomic API implementations cannot be changed as
> > the APIs do not take the memory ordering parameter. The only choice
> > available is replacing the usage of the rte_atomic APIs with C11
> > atomic APIs. In order to make this change, the following steps are proposed:
> >
> > [1] deprecate rte_atomic APIs so that future patches do not use
> > rte_atomic APIs (a script is added to flag the usages).
> > [2] refactor the code that uses rte_atomic APIs to use c11 atomic APIs.
> 
> On [1] above, I feel deprecating DPDKs atomic functions and failing checkpatch
> is a bit sudden. Perhaps noting that in a future release (20.11?) DPDK will
> move to a
> C11 based atomics model is a more gradual step to achieving the goal, and at
> that point add a checkpatch warning for additions of rte_atomic*?
We have been working on changing existing usages of rte_atomic APIs in DPDK to use C11 atomics. Usually, the x.11 releases have significant amount of changes (not sure how many would use rte_atomic APIs). I would prefer that in 20.11 no additional code is added using rte_atomics APIs. However, I am open to suggestions on the exact time frame.
Once we decide on the release, I think it makes sense to add a 'warning' in the checkpatch to indicate the deprecation timeline and add an 'error' after the release.

> 
> More on [2] in context below.
> 
> The above is my point-of-view, of course I'd like more people from the DPDK
> community to provide their input too.
> 
> 
> > This patchset contains:
> > 1) the checkpatch script changes to flag rte_atomic API usage in patches.
> > 2) changes to programmer guide describing writing efficient code for
> aarch64.
> > 3) changes to various libraries to make use of c11 atomic APIs.
> >
> > We are planning to replicate this idea across all the other libraries,
> > drivers, examples, test applications. In the next phase, we will add
> > changes to the mbuf, the EAL interrupts and the event timer adapter
> libraries.
> 
> About ~6/12 patches of this C11 set are targeting the Service Cores area of
> DPDK. I have some concerns over increased complexity of C11 implementation
> vs the (already complex) rte_atomic implementation today.
I agree that it C11 changes are complex, especially if one is starting out to understand what these APIs provide. From my experience, once few underlying concepts are understood, reviewing or making changes do not take too much time.

> I see other patchsets enabling C11 across other DPDK components, so maybe
> we should also discuss C11 enabling in a wider context that just service cores?
Yes, agree. We are in the process of making changes to other areas as well.

> 
> I don't think it fair to expect all developers to be well versed in C11 atomic
> semantics like understanding the complex interactions between the various
> C11 RELEASE, AQUIRE barriers requires.
C11 has been around from sometime now. To my surprise, OVS already uses C11 APIs extensively. VPP has been accepting C11 related changes from past couple of years. Having said that, I agree in general that not everyone is well versed.

> 
> As maintainer of Service Cores I'm hesitant to accept the large-scale refactor
Right now, the patches are split into multiple commits. If required I can host a call to go over simple C11 API usages (sufficient to cover the usage in service core) and the changes in this patch. If you find that particular areas need more understanding I can work on providing additional information such as memory order ladder diagrams. Please let me know what you think.

> of atomic-implementation, as it could lead to racey bugs that are likely
> extremely difficult to track down. (The recent race-on-exit has proven the
> difficulty in reproducing, and that's with an atomics model I'm quite familiar
> with).
> 
> Let me be very clear: I don't wish to block a C11 atomic implementation, but
> I'd like to discuss how we (DPDK community) can best port-to and maintain a
> complex multi-threaded service library with best-in-class performance for the
> workload.
> 
> To put some discussions/solutions on the table:
> - Shared Maintainership of a component?
>      Split in functionality and C11 atomics implementation
>      Obviously there would be collaboration required in such a case.
> - Maybe shared maintainership is too much?
>      A gentlemans/womans agreement of "helping out" with C11 atomics debug
> is enough?
I think shared maintainer ship could be too much as there are many changes. But, I and other engineers from Arm (I would include Arm ecosystem as well) can definitely help out on debug and reviews involving C11 APIs. (I see Thomas's reply on this topic).

> 
> 
> Hope my concerns are understandable, and of course input/feedback
> welcomed! -Harry
No worries at all. We are here to help and make this as easy as possible.

> 
> 
> PS: Apologies for the delay in reply - was OOO on Irish national holiday.
Same here, was on vacation for 3 days.

> 
> 
> > v3:
> > add libatomic dependency for 32-bit clang
> >
> > v2:
> > 1. fix Clang '-Wincompatible-pointer-types' WARNING.
> > 2. fix typos.
> >
> > Honnappa Nagarahalli (2):
> >   service: avoid race condition for MT unsafe service
> >   service: identify service running on another core correctly
> >
> > Phil Yang (10):
> >   doc: add generic atomic deprecation section
> >   devtools: prevent use of rte atomic APIs in future patches
> >   eal/build: add libatomic dependency for 32-bit clang
> >   build: remove redundant code
> >   vhost: optimize broadcast rarp sync with c11 atomic
> >   ipsec: optimize with c11 atomic for sa outbound sqn update
> >   service: remove rte prefix from static functions
> >   service: remove redundant code
> >   service: optimize with c11 one-way barrier
> >   service: relax barriers with C11 atomic operations
> >
> >  devtools/checkpatches.sh                         |   9 ++
> >  doc/guides/prog_guide/writing_efficient_code.rst |  60 +++++++-
> >  drivers/event/octeontx/meson.build               |   5 -
> >  drivers/event/octeontx2/meson.build              |   5 -
> >  drivers/event/opdl/meson.build                   |   5 -
> >  lib/librte_eal/common/rte_service.c              | 175 ++++++++++++----------
> > -
> >  lib/librte_eal/meson.build                       |   6 +
> >  lib/librte_ipsec/ipsec_sqn.h                     |   3 +-
> >  lib/librte_ipsec/sa.h                            |   2 +-
> >  lib/librte_rcu/meson.build                       |   5 -
> >  lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h                         |   2 +-
> >  lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c                    |   7 +-
> >  lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c                    |  16 ++-
> >  13 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 119 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.7.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-20  4:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 219+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-10 17:49 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/10] " Phil Yang
2020-03-10 17:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/10] doc: add generic atomic deprecation section Phil Yang
2020-03-10 17:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/10] devtools: prevent use of rte atomic APIs in future patches Phil Yang
2020-03-10 17:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/10] vhost: optimize broadcast rarp sync with c11 atomic Phil Yang
2020-03-10 17:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 04/10] ipsec: optimize with c11 atomic for sa outbound sqn update Phil Yang
2020-03-10 17:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 05/10] service: remove rte prefix from static functions Phil Yang
2020-03-10 17:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/10] service: remove redundant code Phil Yang
2020-03-10 17:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/10] service: avoid race condition for MT unsafe service Phil Yang
2020-03-10 17:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 08/10] service: identify service running on another core correctly Phil Yang
2020-03-10 17:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 09/10] service: optimize with c11 one-way barrier Phil Yang
2020-03-10 17:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 10/10] service: relax barriers with C11 atomic operations Phil Yang
2020-03-12  7:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/10] generic rte atomic APIs deprecate proposal Phil Yang
2020-03-12  7:44   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 01/10] doc: add generic atomic deprecation section Phil Yang
2020-03-12  7:44   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 02/10] devtools: prevent use of rte atomic APIs in future patches Phil Yang
2020-03-12  7:44   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 03/10] vhost: optimize broadcast rarp sync with c11 atomic Phil Yang
2020-03-12  7:44   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 04/10] ipsec: optimize with c11 atomic for sa outbound sqn update Phil Yang
2020-03-12  7:44   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 05/10] service: remove rte prefix from static functions Phil Yang
2020-03-12  7:44   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 06/10] service: remove redundant code Phil Yang
2020-03-12  7:44   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 07/10] service: avoid race condition for MT unsafe service Phil Yang
2020-03-12  7:44   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 08/10] service: identify service running on another core correctly Phil Yang
2020-03-12  7:44   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 09/10] service: optimize with c11 one-way barrier Phil Yang
2020-03-12  7:44   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 10/10] service: relax barriers with C11 atomic operations Phil Yang
2020-03-17  1:17   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 00/12] generic rte atomic APIs deprecate proposal Phil Yang
2020-03-17  1:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 01/12] doc: add generic atomic deprecation section Phil Yang
2020-03-17  1:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 02/12] devtools: prevent use of rte atomic APIs in future patches Phil Yang
2020-03-17  1:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 03/12] eal/build: add libatomic dependency for 32-bit clang Phil Yang
2020-04-24  6:08       ` Phil Yang
2020-03-17  1:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 04/12] build: remove redundant code Phil Yang
2020-04-24  6:14       ` Phil Yang
2020-03-17  1:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 05/12] vhost: optimize broadcast rarp sync with c11 atomic Phil Yang
2020-04-23 16:54       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Phil Yang
2020-04-27  8:57         ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-04-28 16:06         ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-03-17  1:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 06/12] ipsec: optimize with c11 atomic for sa outbound sqn update Phil Yang
2020-03-23 18:48       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-03-23 19:07         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-03-23 19:18           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-03-23 20:20             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-03-24 13:10               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-03-24 13:21                 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-03-24 10:37             ` Phil Yang
2020-03-24 11:03               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-03-25  9:38                 ` Phil Yang
2020-04-23 17:16       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Phil Yang
2020-04-23 17:45         ` Jerin Jacob
2020-04-24  4:49           ` Phil Yang
2020-04-23 18:10         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-24  4:35           ` Phil Yang
2020-04-24  4:33         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Phil Yang
2020-04-24 11:17           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-05-09 21:51             ` Akhil Goyal
2020-03-17  1:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 07/12] service: remove rte prefix from static functions Phil Yang
2020-04-03 11:57       ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-04-08 10:14         ` Phil Yang
2020-04-08 10:36           ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-04-08 10:49             ` Phil Yang
2020-04-05 21:35       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-08 10:14         ` Phil Yang
2020-04-23 16:31       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] use c11 atomics for service core lib Phil Yang
2020-04-23 16:31         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/6] service: fix race condition for MT unsafe service Phil Yang
2020-04-29 16:51           ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-04-29 22:48             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-05-01 14:21               ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-05-01 14:56                 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-05-01 17:51                   ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-04-23 16:31         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/6] service: identify service running on another core correctly Phil Yang
2020-04-23 16:31         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/6] service: remove rte prefix from static functions Phil Yang
2020-04-23 16:31         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] service: remove redundant code Phil Yang
2020-04-23 16:31         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/6] service: optimize with c11 atomics Phil Yang
2020-04-23 16:31         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/6] service: relax barriers with C11 atomics Phil Yang
2020-05-02  0:02         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/6] use c11 atomics for service core lib Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-05-02  0:02           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/6] service: fix race condition for MT unsafe service Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-05-05 14:48             ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-05-02  0:02           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/6] service: identify service running on another core correctly Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-05-05 14:48             ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-05-02  0:02           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/6] service: remove rte prefix from static functions Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-05-05 14:48             ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-05-02  0:02           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/6] service: remove redundant code Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-05-05 14:48             ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-05-02  0:02           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/6] service: optimize with c11 atomics Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-05-05 14:48             ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-05-02  0:02           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/6] service: relax barriers with C11 atomics Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-05-05 14:48             ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-05-05 21:17         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/6] use c11 atomics for service core lib Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-05-05 21:17           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/6] service: fix race condition for MT unsafe service Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-05-05 21:17           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/6] service: fix identification of service running on other lcore Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-05-05 21:17           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/6] service: remove rte prefix from static functions Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-05-05 21:17           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/6] service: remove redundant code Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-05-05 21:17           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/6] service: optimize with c11 atomics Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-05-06 10:20             ` Phil Yang
2020-05-05 21:17           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/6] service: relax barriers with C11 atomics Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-05-06 10:24           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/6] use c11 atomics for service core lib Phil Yang
2020-05-06 10:24             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/6] service: fix race condition for MT unsafe service Phil Yang
2020-05-06 10:24             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/6] service: fix identification of service running on other lcore Phil Yang
2020-05-06 10:24             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/6] service: remove rte prefix from static functions Phil Yang
2020-05-06 10:24             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/6] service: remove redundant code Phil Yang
2020-05-06 10:24             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/6] service: optimize with c11 atomics Phil Yang
2020-05-06 10:24             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 6/6] service: relax barriers with C11 atomics Phil Yang
2020-05-06 15:27             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/6] use c11 atomics for service core lib Phil Yang
2020-05-06 15:27               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/6] service: fix race condition for MT unsafe service Phil Yang
2020-05-06 15:28               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/6] service: fix identification of service running on other lcore Phil Yang
2020-05-06 15:28               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/6] service: remove rte prefix from static functions Phil Yang
2020-05-06 15:28               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/6] service: remove redundant code Phil Yang
2020-05-06 15:28               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 5/6] service: optimize with c11 atomics Phil Yang
2020-05-06 15:28               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 6/6] service: relax barriers with C11 atomics Phil Yang
2020-05-11 11:21               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/6] use c11 atomics for service core lib David Marchand
2020-03-17  1:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 08/12] service: remove redundant code Phil Yang
2020-04-03 11:58       ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-04-05 18:35         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-08 10:15           ` Phil Yang
2020-03-17  1:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 09/12] service: avoid race condition for MT unsafe service Phil Yang
2020-04-03 11:58       ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-04-04 18:03         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-08 18:05           ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-04-09  1:31             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-09 16:46               ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-04-18  6:21                 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-21 17:43                   ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-03-17  1:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 10/12] service: identify service running on another core correctly Phil Yang
2020-04-03 11:58       ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-04-05  2:43         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-03-17  1:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 11/12] service: optimize with c11 one-way barrier Phil Yang
2020-04-03 11:58       ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-04-06  4:22         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-08 10:15         ` Phil Yang
2020-03-17  1:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 12/12] service: relax barriers with C11 atomic operations Phil Yang
2020-04-03 11:58       ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-04-06 17:06         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-08 19:42           ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-03-18 14:01     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 00/12] generic rte atomic APIs deprecate proposal Van Haaren, Harry
2020-03-18 15:13       ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-03-20  5:01         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-03-20 12:20           ` Jerin Jacob
2020-03-20  4:51       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli [this message]
2020-03-20 18:32         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-03-27 14:47           ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-04-03  7:23     ` Mattias Rönnblom
2020-05-12  8:03     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] " Phil Yang
2020-05-12  8:03       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] doc: add generic atomic deprecation section Phil Yang
2020-05-12  8:03       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] maintainers: claim maintainers of c11 atomics code Phil Yang
2020-05-24 23:11         ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-25  3:28           ` Phil Yang
2020-05-12  8:03       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] devtools: prevent use of rte atomic APIs in future patches Phil Yang
2020-05-12  8:03       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] eal/atomic: add wrapper for c11 atomics Phil Yang
2020-05-12 11:18         ` Morten Brørup
2020-05-13  9:40           ` Phil Yang
2020-05-13 15:32             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-05-12 18:20         ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-05-12 19:23           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-05-13  8:57             ` Morten Brørup
2020-05-13 15:30               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-05-13 19:04               ` Mattias Rönnblom
2020-05-13 19:40                 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-05-13 20:17                   ` Mattias Rönnblom
2020-05-14  8:34                     ` Morten Brørup
2020-05-14 20:16                       ` Mattias Rönnblom
2020-05-14 21:00                         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-05-13 11:53             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-05-13 15:06               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-05-13 19:25           ` Mattias Rönnblom
2020-05-12  8:18       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] generic rte atomic APIs deprecate proposal Phil Yang
2020-05-26  9:01       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 " Phil Yang
2020-05-26  9:01         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/4] doc: add generic atomic deprecation section Phil Yang
2020-05-26  9:01         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/4] maintainers: claim maintainers of c11 atomics code Phil Yang
2020-05-26  9:01         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/4] devtools: prevent use of rte atomic APIs in future patches Phil Yang
2020-06-29  4:38           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-06-29  5:38             ` Phil Yang
2020-05-26  9:01         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/4] eal/atomic: add wrapper for c11 atomic thread fence Phil Yang
2020-06-29  4:40           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-06-29 10:09             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-06-29 14:37               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-06-29 10:13           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-07-07  9:50         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/4] generic rte atomic APIs deprecate proposal Phil Yang
2020-07-07  9:50           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/4] doc: add generic atomic deprecation section Phil Yang
2020-07-10 16:55             ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-10 23:47               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-07  9:50           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/4] maintainers: claim maintainers of C11 atomics Phil Yang
2020-07-10 17:45             ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-10 23:41               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-13  6:26                 ` Phil Yang
2020-07-07  9:50           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/4] devtools: prevent use of rte atomic APIs in future patches Phil Yang
2020-07-07  9:50           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/4] eal/atomic: add wrapper for C11 atomic thread fence Phil Yang
2020-07-13  6:23           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/3] generic rte atomic APIs deprecate proposal Phil Yang
2020-07-13  6:23             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/3] doc: add generic atomic deprecation section Phil Yang
2020-07-14 18:36               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-15  2:58                 ` Phil Yang
2020-07-13  6:23             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/3] devtools: prevent use of rte atomic APIs in future patches Phil Yang
2020-07-13  6:23             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/3] eal/atomic: add wrapper for C11 atomic thread fence Phil Yang
2020-07-16  4:53             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3] generic rte atomic APIs deprecate proposal Phil Yang
2020-07-16  4:53               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/3] doc: add optimizations using C11 atomic built-ins Phil Yang
2020-07-16 10:35                 ` David Marchand
2020-07-16 18:22                 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-17  4:44                   ` Phil Yang
2020-07-16  4:53               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/3] devtools: prevent use of rte atomic APIs in future patches Phil Yang
2020-07-16 10:48                 ` David Marchand
2020-07-16 11:31                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-16 16:37                     ` Phil Yang
2020-07-16 16:42                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-16 16:59                         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-16 21:45                           ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-07-17 22:48                             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-18  2:18                               ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-07-17  4:48                           ` Phil Yang
2020-07-16 15:07                   ` Phil Yang
2020-07-16  4:53               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/3] eal/atomic: add wrapper for C11 atomic thread fence Phil Yang
2020-07-17  5:08               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/3] generic rte atomic APIs deprecate proposal Phil Yang
2020-07-17  5:08                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/3] doc: add optimizations using C11 atomic builtins Phil Yang
2020-07-17  5:08                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/3] devtools: prevent use of rte atomic APIs in future patches Phil Yang
2020-07-17  8:35                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-17  9:41                     ` Phil Yang
2020-07-17  5:08                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/3] eal/atomic: add wrapper for C11 atomic thread fence Phil Yang
2020-07-17  8:48                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-17  8:53                     ` Phil Yang
2020-07-17 10:14                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/3] generic rte atomic APIs deprecate proposal Phil Yang
2020-07-17 10:14                   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 1/3] doc: add optimizations using C11 atomic builtins Phil Yang
2020-07-17 10:14                   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 2/3] eal/atomic: add wrapper for C11 atomic thread fence Phil Yang
2020-07-17 10:14                   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 3/3] devtools: prevent use of rte atomic APIs in future patches Phil Yang
2020-07-17 13:58                   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/3] generic rte atomic APIs deprecate proposal David Marchand
2020-07-20  7:06                     ` Phil Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=VE1PR08MB514975AC19F11A5F01CFCA8D98F50@VE1PR08MB5149.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=Gavin.Hu@arm.com \
    --cc=Joyce.Kong@arm.com \
    --cc=Phil.Yang@arm.com \
    --cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).