DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [20.11, PATCH] bbdev: remove experimental tag from API
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 07:35:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <VI1PR04MB316812D97911222500823DF4E66F0@VI1PR04MB3168.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8zJnLrnrvdyO5goyhDdU0J2dDTMabgZDUE7YGtgDO0-gw@mail.gmail.com>


> 
> Hello Nicolas,
> 
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 1:14 AM Nicolas Chautru
> <nicolas.chautru@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Planning to move bbdev API to stable from 20.11 (ABI version 21)
> > and remove experimental tag.
> > Sending now to advertise and get any feedback.
> > Some manual rebase will be required later on notably as the
> > actual release note which is not there yet.
> 
> Cool that we want to stabilize this API.
> My concern is that we have drivers from a single vendor.
> I would hate to see a new vendor unable to submit a driver (or having
> to wait until the next ABI breakage window) because of the current
> API/ABI.
> 
> 

+1 from my side. I am not sure how much it is acceptable for all the vendors/customers.
It is not reviewed by most of the vendors who may support in future.
It is not good to remove experimental tag as we have a long 1 year cycle to break the API/ABI.

Regards,
Akhil

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-30  7:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-26 23:14 Nicolas Chautru
2020-06-26 23:14 ` Nicolas Chautru
2020-06-30  7:30 ` David Marchand
2020-06-30  7:35   ` Akhil Goyal [this message]
2020-07-02 17:54     ` Akhil Goyal
2020-07-02 18:02       ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-07-02 18:09         ` Akhil Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=VI1PR04MB316812D97911222500823DF4E66F0@VI1PR04MB3168.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).