From: "Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)" <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>,
"hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
"bruce.richardson@intel.com" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
nd <nd@arm.com>,
"olivier.matz@6wind.com" <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
"Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)" <Joyce.Kong@arm.com>,
nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] test/ring: ring perf test case enhancement
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 02:40:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <VI1PR08MB3167D095F98588EBD50D60118F8D0@VI1PR08MB3167.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8800966.1N6bVxlZCo@xps>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2019 8:49 PM
> To: Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China) <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; jerinj@marvell.com; hemant.agrawal@nxp.com;
> bruce.richardson@intel.com; chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com; Honnappa
> Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>;
> olivier.matz@6wind.com; Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)
> <Joyce.Kong@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] test/ring: ring perf test case enhancement
>
> > Suggested-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Dharmik Thakkar <Dharmik.Thakkar@arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Ola Liljedahl <Ola.Liljedahl@arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
>
> Small comment about the email addresses,
> Please do not use uppercase so we can match/grep more easily.
>
Thanks for reminding, already fixed this in v5.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-03 2:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-02 0:55 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] add rte ring reset api and use it to flush a ring by hash Gavin Hu
2019-01-02 0:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] test/ring: ring perf test case enhancement Gavin Hu
2019-01-02 12:49 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-01-03 2:40 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China) [this message]
2019-01-02 0:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] ring: add reset api to flush the ring when not in use Gavin Hu
2019-01-02 0:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] hash: flush the rings instead of dequeuing one by one Gavin Hu
2019-01-02 12:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] add rte ring reset api and use it to flush a ring by hash Thomas Monjalon
2019-01-02 18:40 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-01-03 2:43 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-01-03 2:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] ring test enhancement and new ring reset api and use it " gavin hu
2019-01-03 2:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] test/ring: ring perf test case enhancement gavin hu
2019-01-03 7:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-01-03 8:22 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-01-09 11:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/3] ring test enhancement and new ring reset api and use it by hash gavin hu
2019-01-09 11:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/3] test/ring: ring perf test case enhancement gavin hu
2019-09-09 5:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] " Joyce Kong
2019-10-08 8:07 ` Olivier Matz
2019-10-24 7:56 ` David Marchand
2019-01-09 11:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] ring: add reset API to flush the ring when not in use gavin hu
2019-01-09 11:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/3] hash: flush the rings instead of dequeuing one by one gavin hu
2019-01-09 18:53 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2019-01-03 2:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] ring: add reset API to flush the ring when not in use gavin hu
2019-01-03 2:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] hash: flush the rings instead of dequeuing one by one gavin hu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=VI1PR08MB3167D095F98588EBD50D60118F8D0@VI1PR08MB3167.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
--to=gavin.hu@arm.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=Joyce.Kong@arm.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).