From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <mb@smartsharesystems.com>,
Ciara Power <ciara.power@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] telemetry: support boolean type
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 14:47:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1AABobg98qzGTgE@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221019073702.3948624-1-david.marchand@redhat.com>
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 09:37:02AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> Add the boolean type RTE_TEL_BOOL_VAL for values in arrays and dicts.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> ---
This patch looks pretty good to me. Some very small comments inline below.
One thing I notice is that we are not supporting booleans except as part of
an array or dictionary. Is it likely that we will ever want to have a
telemetry command that just returns true/false alone? Don't see that being
necessary just yet, so:
Reviewed-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> app/test/test_telemetry_data.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> lib/telemetry/rte_telemetry.h | 36 ++++++++++++++
> lib/telemetry/telemetry.c | 24 +++++++++-
> lib/telemetry/telemetry_data.c | 44 +++++++++++++++--
> lib/telemetry/telemetry_data.h | 5 ++
> lib/telemetry/telemetry_json.h | 34 +++++++++++++
> lib/telemetry/version.map | 5 ++
> 7 files changed, 228 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
<snip>
> diff --git a/lib/telemetry/rte_telemetry.h b/lib/telemetry/rte_telemetry.h
> index a0d21d6b7f..5d74212f17 100644
> --- a/lib/telemetry/rte_telemetry.h
> +++ b/lib/telemetry/rte_telemetry.h
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> * Copyright(c) 2018 Intel Corporation
> */
>
> +#include <stdbool.h>
> #include <stdint.h>
>
> #include <rte_compat.h>
> @@ -46,6 +47,7 @@ enum rte_tel_value_type {
> RTE_TEL_INT_VAL, /** a signed 32-bit int value */
> RTE_TEL_U64_VAL, /** an unsigned 64-bit int value */
> RTE_TEL_CONTAINER, /** a container struct */
> + RTE_TEL_BOOL_VAL, /** a boolean value */
> };
>
> /**
> @@ -155,6 +157,22 @@ int
> rte_tel_data_add_array_container(struct rte_tel_data *d,
> struct rte_tel_data *val, int keep);
>
> +/**
> + * Add a boolean to an array.
> + * The array must have been started by rte_tel_data_start_array() with
> + * RTE_TEL_BOOL_VAL as the type parameter.
> + *
> + * @param d
> + * The data structure passed to the callback
> + * @param x
> + * The number to be returned in the array
number -> boolean value
> + * @return
> + * 0 on success, negative errno on error
> + */
> +__rte_experimental
> +int
> +rte_tel_data_add_array_bool(struct rte_tel_data *d, bool x);
> +
> /**
> * Add a string value to a dictionary.
> * The dict must have been started by rte_tel_data_start_dict().
> @@ -233,6 +251,24 @@ int
> rte_tel_data_add_dict_container(struct rte_tel_data *d, const char *name,
> struct rte_tel_data *val, int keep);
>
> +/**
> + * Add a boolean value to a dictionary.
> + * The dict must have been started by rte_tel_data_start_dict().
> + *
> + * @param d
> + * The data structure passed to the callback
> + * @param name
> + * The name the value is to be stored under in the dict
> + * Must contain only alphanumeric characters or the symbols: '_' or '/'
> + * @param val
> + * The number to be stored in the dict
number -> boolean value
> + * @return
> + * 0 on success, negative errno on error, E2BIG on string truncation of name.
> + */
> +__rte_experimental
> +int
> +rte_tel_data_add_dict_bool(struct rte_tel_data *d, const char *name, bool val);
> +
> /**
> * This telemetry callback is used when registering a telemetry command.
> * It handles getting and formatting information to be returned to telemetry
> diff --git a/lib/telemetry/telemetry.c b/lib/telemetry/telemetry.c
<snip>
> diff --git a/lib/telemetry/telemetry_data.c b/lib/telemetry/telemetry_data.c
> index 5b319c18fb..4f81f71e03 100644
> --- a/lib/telemetry/telemetry_data.c
> +++ b/lib/telemetry/telemetry_data.c
> @@ -16,10 +16,11 @@ int
> rte_tel_data_start_array(struct rte_tel_data *d, enum rte_tel_value_type type)
> {
> enum tel_container_types array_types[] = {
> - RTE_TEL_ARRAY_STRING, /* RTE_TEL_STRING_VAL = 0 */
> - RTE_TEL_ARRAY_INT, /* RTE_TEL_INT_VAL = 1 */
> - RTE_TEL_ARRAY_U64, /* RTE_TEL_u64_VAL = 2 */
> - RTE_TEL_ARRAY_CONTAINER, /* RTE_TEL_CONTAINER = 3 */
> + [RTE_TEL_STRING_VAL] = RTE_TEL_ARRAY_STRING,
> + [RTE_TEL_INT_VAL] = RTE_TEL_ARRAY_INT,
> + [RTE_TEL_U64_VAL] = RTE_TEL_ARRAY_U64,
> + [RTE_TEL_CONTAINER] = RTE_TEL_ARRAY_CONTAINER,
> + [RTE_TEL_BOOL_VAL] = RTE_TEL_ARRAY_BOOL,
> };
Really like this change!
> d->type = array_types[type];
> d->data_len = 0;
> @@ -80,6 +81,17 @@ rte_tel_data_add_array_u64(struct rte_tel_data *d, uint64_t x)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +int
> +rte_tel_data_add_array_bool(struct rte_tel_data *d, bool x)
> +{
> + if (d->type != RTE_TEL_ARRAY_BOOL)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (d->data_len >= RTE_TEL_MAX_ARRAY_ENTRIES)
> + return -ENOSPC;
> + d->data.array[d->data_len++].boolval = x;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> int
> rte_tel_data_add_array_container(struct rte_tel_data *d,
> struct rte_tel_data *val, int keep)
<snip>
> diff --git a/lib/telemetry/telemetry_json.h b/lib/telemetry/telemetry_json.h
> index e3fae7c30d..c97da97366 100644
> --- a/lib/telemetry/telemetry_json.h
> +++ b/lib/telemetry/telemetry_json.h
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>
> #include <inttypes.h>
> #include <stdarg.h>
> +#include <stdbool.h>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <rte_common.h>
> #include <rte_telemetry.h>
> @@ -159,6 +160,21 @@ rte_tel_json_add_array_u64(char *buf, const int len, const int used,
> return ret == 0 ? used : end + ret;
> }
>
> +/* Appends a boolean into the JSON array in the provided buffer. */
> +static inline int
> +rte_tel_json_add_array_bool(char *buf, const int len, const int used,
> + bool val)
> +{
> + int ret, end = used - 1; /* strip off final delimiter */
> + if (used <= 2) /* assume empty, since minimum is '[]' */
> + return __json_snprintf(buf, len, "[%s]",
> + val ? "true" : "false");
> +
> + ret = __json_snprintf(buf + end, len - end, ",%s]",
> + val ? "true" : "false");
Wonder if it's worthwhile doing a macro for this conditional, since the
same ternary-operator snippet appears 4 times in this code.
> + return ret == 0 ? used : end + ret;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Add a new element with raw JSON value to the JSON array stored in the
> * provided buffer.
> @@ -193,6 +209,24 @@ rte_tel_json_add_obj_u64(char *buf, const int len, const int used,
> return ret == 0 ? used : end + ret;
> }
>
<snip>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-19 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-19 7:37 David Marchand
2022-10-19 8:13 ` Morten Brørup
2022-10-19 13:47 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2022-10-19 14:18 ` Morten Brørup
2022-10-19 14:28 ` David Marchand
2022-10-19 16:47 ` Bruce Richardson
2022-10-19 18:08 ` Morten Brørup
2022-10-20 9:54 ` Power, Ciara
2022-10-20 11:48 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y1AABobg98qzGTgE@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=ciara.power@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).