From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1956A0548; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 12:14:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300A9140EC2; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 12:14:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pg1-f169.google.com (mail-pg1-f169.google.com [209.85.215.169]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E923140E4B for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 12:14:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pg1-f169.google.com with SMTP id l76so1195462pga.6 for ; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 03:14:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=0xh4GeayL7GPtcx0z6SJdBiN0vR9TWaYzAL/XfZRpIw=; b=foV4LhX9B4NdTBjvekXf4zCRlopfpCCOlpuwNBIv8yiwPy0Rb91uoIWmKzskOu5jge FtbBh7z1BtUlYub9xixaz1i39X+UXXogrWw+UPBVCCY833UowEp8RygFRpxhAbCoxQjf dxliQePirOvNkXH36hnvkiApy5K9ECZiH14xwBbo6Ws5esPfSXZYaFJimOsNo7edVpv4 uid4Fp1r5xhVJTge5TiRmP8fnpTGF0u7JyYuQsccl9m25/0G7KaLT1tPJvj22JjMD/wc +3ntqhmXA8lxjvUyj4rq+Qm4vTnceubWkxU2TRU4rOXkwKbBMWpWldQ7F6V+s+tTNl4W eqVw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=0xh4GeayL7GPtcx0z6SJdBiN0vR9TWaYzAL/XfZRpIw=; b=OJvwimYxZn9/LHlPqhjxfVjhcz5ANYotO01xXGtpaT+ajvBHiNpwSn/MyIt/kWwhTC 4yG0EAMgFQxC/HcSQv6LNN4sjVllXTWASfP4kgPi/bCI6d569sH75a65Ku0mfonH8cW0 Oqsq1LQDe72+n9lnS4f76SoTHDlGH9jNKCcWSit6VRb/a7pvYUH52CiQSMT9KNkgKZ+r qP7wUKLwvJv3p9pntZ7JNpmFfJGR3R6aiKZQM6Z40fFNpleW3IAwX/gREfHPgZlpH9wV Gs0B373AcQ5H9VY6JqiddcOdcRdWIDw6MRixMDzDHeGMUBiB5sfeH2Z4MuTEHJPhMdmm P3lg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532B6ASF8Olbl6qSaDU9Pq9UeeieXjThGbluq3oI2buT6Ck4wK36 f5YiMJBrF21FLDOtBwiBj7Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzdLckvgcZNaDFYvYWL9wxJcB0ymtLgdv9YOW5uu75lDQeMYce6iTZMQv99FCJ4WAEdtuEslQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:5852:: with SMTP id i18mr6789818pgm.337.1617272077439; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 03:14:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com ([1.6.215.26]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x11sm11835492pjh.0.2021.04.01.03.14.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Apr 2021 03:14:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 15:44:11 +0530 From: Nithin Dabilpuram To: Honnappa Nagarahalli Cc: Jerin Jacob , dpdk-dev , Jan Viktorin , Ruifeng Wang , "jerinj@marvell.com" , Sunil Kumar Kori , Satha Koteswara Rao Kottidi , Pavan Nikhilesh , Kiran Kumar K , Satheesh Paul , Ashwin Sekhar Thalakalath Kottilveetil , nd , "thomas@monjalon.net" Message-ID: References: <20210331172320.29130-1-ndabilpuram@marvell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] config/arm: add support for Marvell CN10K X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 03:39:01PM +0530, Nithin Dabilpuram wrote: > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 01:20:44AM +0000, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote: > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] config/arm: add support for Marvell CN10K > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 10:53 PM Nithin Dabilpuram > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > From: Pavan Nikhilesh > > > > > > > > Add config support to cross compile for Marvell CN10K SoC. > > > > Marvell CN10K SoC is based on ARM Neoverse N2 cores. > > > > > > cores->core > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Nithin Dabilpuram > > > > Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh > > > > > > With the above change: > > > Acked-by: Jerin Jacob > > I prefer this patch to be based on top of [1]. > > > > [1] http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/1617186371-18699-2-git-send-email-juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech/ > > There is no conflicting change I believe for me to take care of. The change for > enable Sorry, for incomplete message. I think there is no conflicting change here. I hope my understanding is correct. Since there is no dependency b/w the above patch and this one, I leave it to the maintainers to decide the merge order. > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > config/arm/arm64_cn10k_linux_gcc | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) > > > > create mode 100644 config/arm/arm64_cn10k_linux_gcc > > > > > > > > diff --git a/config/arm/arm64_cn10k_linux_gcc > > > > b/config/arm/arm64_cn10k_linux_gcc > > > > new file mode 100644 > > > > index 0000000..4f8e7cb > > > > --- /dev/null > > > > +++ b/config/arm/arm64_cn10k_linux_gcc > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ > > > > +[binaries] > > > > +c = 'aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc' > > > > +cpp = 'aarch64-linux-gnu-cpp' > > > > +ar = 'aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc-ar' > > > > +strip = 'aarch64-linux-gnu-strip' > > > > +pkgconfig = 'aarch64-linux-gnu-pkg-config' > > > > +pcap-config = '' > > > > + > > > > +[host_machine] > > > > +system = 'linux' > > > > +cpu_family = 'aarch64' > > > > +cpu = 'armv8.6-a' > > > > +endian = 'little' > > > > + > > > > +[properties] > > > > +implementer_id = '0x41' > > > > +part_number = '0xd49' > > > > +max_lcores = 36 > > > > +max_numa_nodes = 1 > > > > +numa = false > > > > -- > > > > 2.8.4 > > > >