From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Cc: "Ferruh Yigit" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, "Keith Wiles" <keith.wiles@intel.com>,
"Hongzhi Guo" <guohongzhi1@huawei.com>,
"Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>,
"Thomas Monjalon" <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] net: introduce functions to verify L4 checksums
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 14:29:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YL9isf/qDvXZIDEF@platinum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1c377463-9d2d-88ac-ef63-f0452fe8bd13@oktetlabs.ru>
Hi Ferruh, Andrew,
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 01:23:33PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> On 4/30/21 6:42 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > On 4/27/2021 2:57 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> >> Since commit d5df2ae0428a ("net: fix unneeded replacement of TCP
> >> checksum 0"), the functions rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum() and
> >> rte_ipv6_udptcp_cksum() can return either 0x0000 or 0xffff when used to
> >> verify a packet containing a valid checksum.
> >>
> >> Since these functions should be used to calculate the checksum to set in
> >> a packet, introduce 2 new helpers for checksum verification. They return
> >> 0 if the checksum is valid in the packet.
> >>
> >> Use this new helper in net/tap driver.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 7 +-
> >> lib/net/rte_ip.h | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >> 2 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> >> index 71282e8065..b14d5a1d55 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> >> @@ -365,11 +365,12 @@ tap_verify_csum(struct rte_mbuf *mbuf)
> >> return;
> >> }
> >> }
> >> - cksum = rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum(l3_hdr, l4_hdr);
> >> + cksum_ok = !rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum_verify(l3_hdr,
> >> + l4_hdr);
> >> } else { /* l3 == RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV6, checked above */
> >> - cksum = rte_ipv6_udptcp_cksum(l3_hdr, l4_hdr);
> >> + cksum_ok = !rte_ipv6_udptcp_cksum_verify(l3_hdr,
> >> + l4_hdr);
> >> }
> >> - cksum_ok = (cksum == 0) || (cksum == 0xffff);
> >> mbuf->ol_flags |= cksum_ok ?
> >> PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD : PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD;
> >> }
> >> diff --git a/lib/net/rte_ip.h b/lib/net/rte_ip.h
> >> index 8c189009b0..ef84bcc5bf 100644
> >> --- a/lib/net/rte_ip.h
> >> +++ b/lib/net/rte_ip.h
> >> @@ -344,20 +344,10 @@ rte_ipv4_phdr_cksum(const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr, uint64_t ol_flags)
> >> }
> >>
> >> /**
> >> - * Process the IPv4 UDP or TCP checksum.
> >> - *
> >> - * The IP and layer 4 checksum must be set to 0 in the packet by
> >> - * the caller.
> >> - *
> >> - * @param ipv4_hdr
> >> - * The pointer to the contiguous IPv4 header.
> >> - * @param l4_hdr
> >> - * The pointer to the beginning of the L4 header.
> >> - * @return
> >> - * The complemented checksum to set in the IP packet.
> >> + * @internal Calculate the non-complemented IPv4 L4 checksum
> >> */
> >> static inline uint16_t
> >> -rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum(const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr, const void *l4_hdr)
> >> +__rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum(const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr, const void *l4_hdr)
> >> {
> >> uint32_t cksum;
> >> uint32_t l3_len, l4_len;
> >> @@ -374,16 +364,62 @@ rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum(const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr, const void *l4_hdr)
> >> cksum += rte_ipv4_phdr_cksum(ipv4_hdr, 0);
> >>
> >> cksum = ((cksum & 0xffff0000) >> 16) + (cksum & 0xffff);
> >> - cksum = (~cksum) & 0xffff;
> >> +
> >> + return (uint16_t)cksum;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/**
> >> + * Process the IPv4 UDP or TCP checksum.
> >> + *
> >> + * The IP and layer 4 checksum must be set to 0 in the packet by
> >> + * the caller.
> >> + *
> >> + * @param ipv4_hdr
> >> + * The pointer to the contiguous IPv4 header.
> >> + * @param l4_hdr
> >> + * The pointer to the beginning of the L4 header.
> >> + * @return
> >> + * The complemented checksum to set in the IP packet.
> >> + */
> >> +static inline uint16_t
> >> +rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum(const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr, const void *l4_hdr)
> >> +{
> >> + uint16_t cksum = __rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum(ipv4_hdr, l4_hdr);
> >> +
> >> + cksum = ~cksum;
> >> +
> >> /*
> >> - * Per RFC 768:If the computed checksum is zero for UDP,
> >> + * Per RFC 768: If the computed checksum is zero for UDP,
> >> * it is transmitted as all ones
> >> * (the equivalent in one's complement arithmetic).
> >> */
> >> if (cksum == 0 && ipv4_hdr->next_proto_id == IPPROTO_UDP)
> >> cksum = 0xffff;
> >>
> >> - return (uint16_t)cksum;
> >> + return cksum;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/**
> >> + * Validate the IPv4 UDP or TCP checksum.
> >> + *
> >> + * @param ipv4_hdr
> >> + * The pointer to the contiguous IPv4 header.
> >> + * @param l4_hdr
> >> + * The pointer to the beginning of the L4 header.
> >> + * @return
> >> + * Return 0 if the checksum is correct, else -1.
> >> + */
> >> +__rte_experimental
> >> +static inline int
> >> +rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum_verify(const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr,
> >> + const void *l4_hdr)
> >> +{
> >> + uint16_t cksum = __rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum(ipv4_hdr, l4_hdr);
> >> +
> >> + if (cksum != 0xffff)
> >> + return -1;
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >
> > There is behavior change in tap verify, I am asking just to verify if expected,
> >
> > Previously for UDP, if calculated checksum is '0', the 'rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum()'
> > returns 0xFFFF.
> > And 0xFFFF is taken as good checksum by tap PMD.
rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum() cannot return 0xFFFF: this is only possible if
all data is 0. Before verifying a udp packet, the user must check that
it is not 0 (which means no checksum). In tcp, "Data offset" is never
0. Moreover, port=0 is a reserved value for both udp and tcp.
> > With new 'rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum_verify()', if calculated checksum is '0' it will
> > be taken as bad checksum.
> >
> > I don't know if calculated checksum with valid checksum in place can return 0.
> >
> >
> > Also for TCP, 'rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum_verify()' doesn't have inversion (cksum =
> > ~cksum;) seems changing pass/fail status of the checksum, unless I am not
> > missing anything here.
>
> Yes, it looks suspicious to me as well.
>
> Olivier, could you clarify, please.
Before commit d5df2ae0428a ("net: fix unneeded replacement of TCP checksum 0"),
the behavior was:
// rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum() is 0xffff if checksum is valid
// so cksum is 0 if checksum is valid
cksum = ~rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum(l3_hdr, l4_hdr);
// ol_flags is set to PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD if checksum is valid
mbuf->ol_flags |= cksum ? PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD : PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD;
After commit d5df2ae0428a ("net: fix unneeded replacement of TCP checksum 0"),
it is broken:
// rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum() is 0 (tcp) or 0xffff (udp) if checksum is valid
// so cksum is 0xffff (tcp) or 0 (udp) if checksum is valid
cksum = ~rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum(l3_hdr, l4_hdr);
// ol_flags is set to BAD (tcp) or GOOD (udp) if checksum is valid
mbuf->ol_flags |= cksum ? PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD : PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD;
After patch 2/4 ("net/tap: fix Rx cksum flags on TCP packets"), the
correct behavior is restored:
// cksum is 0 (tcp) or 0xffff (udp) if checksum is valid
// note: 0xffff for tcp cannot happen (there is at least 1 bit set in the header)
// note: 0 for udp cannot happen (it is replaced by in rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum())
cksum = rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum(l3_hdr, l4_hdr);
// cksum_ok is 1 if checksum is valid
cksum_ok = (cksum == 0) || (cksum == 0xffff);
// ol_flags is set to GOOD if checksum is valid
mbuf->ol_flags |= cksum_ok ? PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD : PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD;
After this patch [3/4] ("net: introduce functions to verify L4 checksums"),
it is simplified by using rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum_verify():
// cksum_ok is 1 if checksum is valid
cksum_ok = !rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum_verify(l3_hdr, l4_hdr);
// ol_flags is set to GOOD if checksum is valid
mbuf->ol_flags |= cksum_ok ? PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD : PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD;
Olivier
>
> >> }
> >>
> >> /**
> >> @@ -448,6 +484,25 @@ rte_ipv6_phdr_cksum(const struct rte_ipv6_hdr *ipv6_hdr, uint64_t ol_flags)
> >> return __rte_raw_cksum_reduce(sum);
> >> }
> >>
> >> +/**
> >> + * @internal Calculate the non-complemented IPv4 L4 checksum
> >> + */
> >> +static inline uint16_t
> >> +__rte_ipv6_udptcp_cksum(const struct rte_ipv6_hdr *ipv6_hdr, const void *l4_hdr)
> >> +{
> >> + uint32_t cksum;
> >> + uint32_t l4_len;
> >> +
> >> + l4_len = rte_be_to_cpu_16(ipv6_hdr->payload_len);
> >> +
> >> + cksum = rte_raw_cksum(l4_hdr, l4_len);
> >> + cksum += rte_ipv6_phdr_cksum(ipv6_hdr, 0);
> >> +
> >> + cksum = ((cksum & 0xffff0000) >> 16) + (cksum & 0xffff);
> >> +
> >> + return (uint16_t)cksum;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> /**
> >> * Process the IPv6 UDP or TCP checksum.
> >> *
> >> @@ -464,16 +519,10 @@ rte_ipv6_phdr_cksum(const struct rte_ipv6_hdr *ipv6_hdr, uint64_t ol_flags)
> >> static inline uint16_t
> >> rte_ipv6_udptcp_cksum(const struct rte_ipv6_hdr *ipv6_hdr, const void *l4_hdr)
> >> {
> >> - uint32_t cksum;
> >> - uint32_t l4_len;
> >> -
> >> - l4_len = rte_be_to_cpu_16(ipv6_hdr->payload_len);
> >> + uint16_t cksum = __rte_ipv6_udptcp_cksum(ipv6_hdr, l4_hdr);
> >>
> >> - cksum = rte_raw_cksum(l4_hdr, l4_len);
> >> - cksum += rte_ipv6_phdr_cksum(ipv6_hdr, 0);
> >> + cksum = ~cksum;
> >>
> >> - cksum = ((cksum & 0xffff0000) >> 16) + (cksum & 0xffff);
> >> - cksum = (~cksum) & 0xffff;
> >> /*
> >> * Per RFC 768: If the computed checksum is zero for UDP,
> >> * it is transmitted as all ones
> >> @@ -482,7 +531,34 @@ rte_ipv6_udptcp_cksum(const struct rte_ipv6_hdr *ipv6_hdr, const void *l4_hdr)
> >> if (cksum == 0 && ipv6_hdr->proto == IPPROTO_UDP)
> >> cksum = 0xffff;
> >>
> >> - return (uint16_t)cksum;
> >> + return cksum;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/**
> >> + * Validate the IPv6 UDP or TCP checksum.
> >> + *
> >> + * The function accepts a 0 checksum, since it can exceptionally happen. See 8.1
> >> + * (Upper-Layer Checksums) in RFC 8200.
> >> + *
> >> + * @param ipv6_hdr
> >> + * The pointer to the contiguous IPv6 header.
> >> + * @param l4_hdr
> >> + * The pointer to the beginning of the L4 header.
> >> + * @return
> >> + * Return 0 if the checksum is correct, else -1.
> >> + */
> >> +__rte_experimental
> >> +static inline int
> >> +rte_ipv6_udptcp_cksum_verify(const struct rte_ipv6_hdr *ipv6_hdr,
> >> + const void *l4_hdr)
> >> +{
> >> + uint16_t cksum;
> >> +
> >> + cksum = __rte_ipv6_udptcp_cksum(ipv6_hdr, l4_hdr);
> >> + if (cksum != 0xffff)
> >> + return -1;
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >> }
> >
> > Nitpicking but, 'rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum_verify()' is almost same with this
> > function ('rte_ipv6_udptcp_cksum_verify()') but they have different line
> > spacing, can be good to have similar syntax for both.
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-08 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-27 13:57 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] net/tap: fix Rx cksum Olivier Matz
2021-04-27 13:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] net/tap: fix Rx cksum flags on IP options packets Olivier Matz
2021-04-30 14:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2021-06-08 10:13 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-06-08 12:29 ` Olivier Matz
2021-06-08 12:34 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-06-08 12:49 ` Olivier Matz
2021-06-08 13:57 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-06-08 14:30 ` Olivier Matz
2021-04-27 13:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] net/tap: fix Rx cksum flags on TCP packets Olivier Matz
2021-06-08 10:18 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-04-27 13:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] net: introduce functions to verify L4 checksums Olivier Matz
2021-04-27 15:02 ` Morten Brørup
2021-04-27 15:07 ` Morten Brørup
2021-04-28 12:21 ` Olivier Matz
2021-04-28 12:42 ` Morten Brørup
2021-04-30 15:42 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-06-08 10:23 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-06-08 12:29 ` Olivier Matz [this message]
2021-06-08 12:39 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-06-25 15:38 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-27 13:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] test/cksum: new test for L3/L4 checksum API Olivier Matz
2021-06-30 13:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] net/tap: fix Rx cksum Olivier Matz
2021-06-30 13:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] net/tap: fix Rx cksum flags on IP options packets Olivier Matz
2021-06-30 13:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] net/tap: fix Rx cksum flags on TCP packets Olivier Matz
2021-06-30 13:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] net: introduce functions to verify L4 checksums Olivier Matz
2021-06-30 13:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] test/cksum: new test for L3/L4 checksum API Olivier Matz
2021-07-01 9:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] net/tap: fix Rx cksum Andrew Rybchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YL9isf/qDvXZIDEF@platinum \
--to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=guohongzhi1@huawei.com \
--cc=keith.wiles@intel.com \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).