From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Iremonger, Bernard" <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>,
"Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "Matan Azrad" <matan@nvidia.com>,
"Ori Kam" <orika@nvidia.com>,
"Raslan Darawsheh" <rasland@nvidia.com>,
"Asaf Penso" <asafp@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net: introduce IPv4 ihl and version fields
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 11:22:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YMHZ0q3lnNXXPjkv@platinum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR12MB483403988F87DF867B56D960A5359@BY5PR12MB4834.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Gregory,
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 04:10:25AM +0000, Gregory Etelson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There was no activity that patch for a long time.
> The patch is marked as failed, but we verified failed tests and concluded that the failures can be ignored.
> https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210527152858.13312-1-getelson@nvidia.com/
> How should I proceed with this case ?
> Please advise.
>
I like the idea of this patch: to me it is more convenient to access to
these fields with a bitfield. I don't see a problem about using
bitfields here, glibc or FreeBSD netinet/ip.h are doing the same.
However, as stated previously, this patch breaks the initialization API.
The DPDK ABI/API policy is described here:
http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/contributing/abi_policy.html#the-dpdk-abi-policy
From this document:
The API should only be changed for significant reasons, such as
performance enhancements. API breakages due to changes such as
reorganizing public structure fields for aesthetic or readability
purposes should be avoided.
So to follow the project policy, I think we should reject this path.
Regards,
Olivier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-10 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-27 15:28 Gregory Etelson
2021-05-27 15:56 ` Morten Brørup
2021-05-28 10:20 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-05-28 10:52 ` Morten Brørup
2021-05-28 14:18 ` Gregory Etelson
2021-05-31 9:58 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-05-31 11:10 ` Gregory Etelson
2021-06-02 9:51 ` Gregory Etelson
2021-06-10 4:10 ` Gregory Etelson
2021-06-10 9:22 ` Olivier Matz [this message]
2021-06-14 16:36 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-06-17 16:29 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-06-03 0:58 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-06-03 2:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-06-03 4:59 ` Gregory Etelson
2021-06-17 15:02 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-09-03 7:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " getelson
2021-10-04 7:49 ` Olivier Matz
2021-10-04 8:59 ` Gregory Etelson
2021-10-04 8:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Gregory Etelson
2021-10-04 12:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Gregory Etelson
2021-10-04 15:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-10-04 16:48 ` Olivier Matz
2021-10-12 12:36 ` Gregory Etelson
2021-10-12 12:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Gregory Etelson
2021-10-13 8:58 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-13 12:14 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-13 17:12 ` Gregory Etelson
2021-10-13 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/2] " Gregory Etelson
2021-10-13 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] net: fix IPv4 change announce Gregory Etelson
2021-10-14 8:37 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-14 11:03 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-14 12:21 ` Gregory Etelson
2021-10-14 12:32 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-14 13:34 ` Ori Kam
2021-10-14 12:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2021-10-13 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] net: introduce IPv4 ihl and version fields Gregory Etelson
2021-10-14 15:11 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-14 16:04 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-14 17:42 ` Gregory Etelson
2021-10-14 8:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/2] " Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-14 8:30 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-14 11:01 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-14 9:29 ` Gregory Etelson
2021-10-14 11:10 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-14 17:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 " Gregory Etelson
2021-10-14 17:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/2] net: fix IPv4 change announce Gregory Etelson
2021-10-14 20:00 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2021-10-21 22:00 ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-10-14 17:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/2] net: introduce IPv4 ihl and version fields Gregory Etelson
2021-10-14 18:16 ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-10-14 19:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/2] " Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YMHZ0q3lnNXXPjkv@platinum \
--to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=asafp@nvidia.com \
--cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=getelson@nvidia.com \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=orika@nvidia.com \
--cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).