From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
Cc: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>,
"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Nipun.gupta@nxp.com" <nipun.gupta@nxp.com>,
"hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
"jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>,
Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] dmadev: introduce DMA device library
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 20:10:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YMpMi/3pwSJ1ZdZs@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DBAPR08MB58146623DCC760C5938262FF980F9@DBAPR08MB5814.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 04:48:59PM +0000, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> <snip>
>
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 02:14:54PM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 3:25 PM Chengwen Feng
> > <fengchengwen@huawei.com> wrote:
> > > > +
> > > > +#define RTE_DMADEV_NAME_MAX_LEN (64)
> > > > +/**< @internal Max length of name of DMA PMD */
> > > > +
> > > > +/** @internal
> > > > + * The data structure associated with each DMA device.
> > > > + */
> > > > +struct rte_dmadev {
> > > > + /**< Device ID for this instance */
> > > > + uint16_t dev_id;
> > > > + /**< Functions exported by PMD */
> > > > + const struct rte_dmadev_ops *dev_ops;
> > > > + /**< Device info. supplied during device initialization */
> > > > + struct rte_device *device;
> > > > + /**< Driver info. supplied by probing */
> > > > + const char *driver_name;
> > > > +
> > > > + /**< Device name */
> > > > + char name[RTE_DMADEV_NAME_MAX_LEN]; } __rte_cache_aligned;
> > > > +
> > >
> > > I see no queue/channel notion.
> > > How does a rte_dmadev object relate to a physical hw engine?
> > >
> > One queue, one device.
> > When looking to update the ioat driver for 20.11 release when I added the
> > idxd part, I considered adding a queue parameter to the API to look like one
> > device with multiple queues. However, since each queue acts completely
> > independently of each other, there was no benefit to doing so. It's just easier
> > to have a single id to identify a device queue.
> Does it mean, the queue is multi thread safe? Do we need queues per core to avoid locking?
The design is for each queue to be like the queue on a NIC, not
thread-safe. However, if the hardware supports thread-safe queues too, that
can be supported. But the API should be like other data-plane ones and be
lock free.
For the DMA devices that I am working on, the number of queues
is not very large, and in most cases each queue appears as a separate
entity, e.g. for ioat each queue/channel appears as a separate PCI ID, and
when using idxd kernel driver each queue is a separate dev node to mmap.
For other cases right now we just create one rawdev instance per queue in
software.
/Bruce
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-16 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-15 13:22 Chengwen Feng
2021-06-15 16:38 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-06-16 7:09 ` Morten Brørup
2021-06-16 10:17 ` fengchengwen
2021-06-16 12:09 ` Morten Brørup
2021-06-16 13:06 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-06-16 14:37 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-06-17 9:15 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-06-18 5:52 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-06-18 9:41 ` fengchengwen
2021-06-22 17:25 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-06-23 3:30 ` fengchengwen
2021-06-23 7:21 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-06-23 9:37 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-06-23 11:40 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-06-23 14:19 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-06-24 6:49 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-06-23 9:41 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-06-23 10:10 ` Morten Brørup
2021-06-23 11:46 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-06-23 14:22 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-06-18 9:55 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-06-22 17:31 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-06-22 19:17 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-06-23 7:00 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-06-16 9:41 ` fengchengwen
2021-06-16 17:31 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-06-16 18:08 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-06-16 19:13 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-06-17 7:42 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-06-17 8:00 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-06-18 5:16 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-06-18 10:03 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-06-22 17:36 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-06-17 9:48 ` fengchengwen
2021-06-17 11:02 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-06-17 14:18 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-06-18 8:52 ` fengchengwen
2021-06-18 9:30 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-06-22 17:51 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-06-23 3:50 ` fengchengwen
2021-06-23 11:00 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-06-23 14:56 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-06-24 12:19 ` fengchengwen
2021-06-26 3:59 ` [dpdk-dev] dmadev discussion summary fengchengwen
2021-06-28 10:00 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-06-28 11:14 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-06-28 12:53 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-07-02 13:31 ` fengchengwen
2021-07-01 15:01 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-07-01 16:33 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-07-02 7:39 ` Morten Brørup
2021-07-02 10:05 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-07-02 13:45 ` fengchengwen
2021-07-02 14:57 ` Morten Brørup
2021-07-03 0:32 ` fengchengwen
2021-07-03 8:53 ` Morten Brørup
2021-07-03 9:08 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-07-03 12:24 ` Morten Brørup
2021-07-04 7:43 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-07-05 10:28 ` Morten Brørup
2021-07-06 7:11 ` fengchengwen
2021-07-03 9:45 ` fengchengwen
2021-07-03 12:00 ` Morten Brørup
2021-07-04 7:34 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-07-02 7:07 ` Liang Ma
2021-07-02 13:59 ` fengchengwen
2021-06-24 7:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] dmadev: introduce DMA device library Jerin Jacob
2021-06-24 7:59 ` Morten Brørup
2021-06-24 8:05 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-06-23 5:34 ` Hu, Jiayu
2021-06-23 11:07 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-06-16 2:17 ` Wang, Haiyue
2021-06-16 8:04 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-06-16 8:16 ` Wang, Haiyue
2021-06-16 12:14 ` David Marchand
2021-06-16 13:11 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-06-16 16:48 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-06-16 19:10 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YMpMi/3pwSJ1ZdZs@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=nipun.gupta@nxp.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).