From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: "Xia, Chenbo" <chenbo.xia@intel.com>
Cc: "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"mdr@ashroe.eu" <mdr@ashroe.eu>,
"nhorman@tuxdriver.com" <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
"david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce removal of ABIs in PCI bus driver
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 09:44:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YP/Hb9tLKG7XLnOl@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB4063ED510043B7640EAC167C9CE89@MN2PR11MB4063.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 05:56:17AM +0000, Xia, Chenbo wrote:
> Hi, Ferruh
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> > Sent: Friday, July 23, 2021 8:47 PM
> > To: Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; thomas@monjalon.net
> > Cc: mdr@ashroe.eu; nhorman@tuxdriver.com; david.marchand@redhat.com
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce removal of ABIs in PCI bus
> > driver
> >
> > On 7/23/2021 8:39 AM, Xia, Chenbo wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > A gentle ping for comments..
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Chenbo Xia
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 4:42 PM
> > >> To: dev@dpdk.org; thomas@monjalon.net
> > >> Cc: mdr@ashroe.eu; nhorman@tuxdriver.com
> > >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce removal of ABIs in PCI bus
> > driver
> > >>
> > >> All ABIs in PCI bus driver, which are defined in rte_buc_pci.h,
> > >> will be removed and the header will be made internal.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Chenbo Xia <chenbo.xia@intel.com>
> > >> ---
> > >> doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 5 +++++
> > >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > >> b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > >> index 9584d6bfd7..b01f46c62e 100644
> > >> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > >> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > >> @@ -147,3 +147,8 @@ Deprecation Notices
> > >> * cmdline: ``cmdline`` structure will be made opaque to hide platform-
> > >> specific
> > >> content. On Linux and FreeBSD, supported prior to DPDK 20.11,
> > >> original structure will be kept until DPDK 21.11.
> > >> +
> > >> +* pci: To reduce unnecessary ABIs exposed by DPDK bus driver,
> > "rte_bus_pci.h"
> > >> + will be made internal in 21.11 and macros/data structures/functions
> > defined
> > >> + in the header will not be considered as ABI anymore. This change is
> > >> inspired
> > >> + by the RFC
> > https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=17176.
> > >
> > > I see there's some ABI improvement work on-going and I think it could be
> > part of
> > > the work. If it makes sense to you, I'd like some ACKs.
> > >
> >
> > Acked-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> >
> > I am for reducing the public ABI as much as possible. How big will the
> > change
> > be? Is the 'rte_bus_pci.h' used other than './drivers/bus/pci/'?
>
> I don't see big change here. And I am not sure if I understand your second
> question. The rte_bus_pci.h will still be used by drivers (maybe remove the
> rte prefix and change the file name).
>
The file itself will still be exported in some cases, where the end-user
has their own drivers which need to be compiled, so I'd recommend keeping
the rte_ prefix. However, I think making all bus APIs internal-only to DPDK
is a good idea.
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-27 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-01 8:41 Chenbo Xia
2021-07-23 7:39 ` Xia, Chenbo
2021-07-23 12:46 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-07-26 5:56 ` Xia, Chenbo
2021-07-27 8:44 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2021-07-28 15:32 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-31 20:44 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-08-03 1:52 ` Xia, Chenbo
2021-08-03 8:19 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-27 10:58 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YP/Hb9tLKG7XLnOl@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=chenbo.xia@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).