From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE153A0032; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 17:41:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700964118A; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 17:41:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D434067A; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 17:41:09 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10124"; a="223570341" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,339,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="223570341" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Oct 2021 08:41:08 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,339,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="565073725" Received: from bricha3-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.252.10.40]) by fmsmga002-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 01 Oct 2021 08:41:06 -0700 Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 16:41:02 +0100 From: Bruce Richardson To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, bluca@debian.org Message-ID: References: <20210915173633.59057-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <2209110.ZU905HFkbt@thomas> <1645178.3i6yeRJgWt@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1645178.3i6yeRJgWt@thomas> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] doc/examples: fix build on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 05:36:51PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 01/10/2021 17:15, Bruce Richardson: > > On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 05:03:11PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > 15/09/2021 19:36, Bruce Richardson: > > > > On FreeBSD, "find" does not support the "printf" flag, so we need to > > > > use "gfind" from the "findutils" package. > > > > > > It is one more dependency. > > > Shouldn't we avoid it by rewritting the shell commands with loops? > > > > > Probably in the longer term, yes. If I get the chance, I'll try and rewrite > > this script, but let's keep this patch in the queue in case I don't get to > > in the 21.11 timeframe. > > OK > I can help with the shell tricks if needed. > Well, I was actually considering a rewrite in python for two reasons: * easy FS scans using the "walk()" function * portability across OS's [which is the main reason for the work after all] /Bruce