From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 335CF45E1E;
	Tue,  3 Dec 2024 17:13:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D109740272;
	Tue,  3 Dec 2024 17:13:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from sender2-of-o51.zoho.eu (sender2-of-o51.zoho.eu [136.143.171.51])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B16E40264
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue,  3 Dec 2024 17:13:32 +0100 (CET)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1733242398; cv=none; d=zohomail.eu; s=zohoarc; 
 b=dSnfkDGi226mDi6lFFkVdbrHGobNlNptUWRqu9mMueuWwdcI1k1klLSw2M1yRqngrrsvh4hvS46l6iEr/xKjTdAxDVxOEDO7z3iXziF73HvHqVPqZ09brt3AjPGcP8aqWRrjAzBvCIYqa80rxUGBEUHec8nDjaVeV1O4FFzSplY=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.eu;
 s=zohoarc; t=1733242398;
 h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To;
 bh=MqUzjg7PVWPOzXnrq37+mJZC6WyO2J+6MBzurfT/uIQ=; 
 b=CgGtfDi9KI5QzFk9iWeKrv/CblxIy+3X7ayUQZzax1/GYPNQoLUSUQozSP8I0bAuujJQ2rCHsRKAvQ3JEp7vb/92geIosVtW5zeKnHd1STh7x2qvQ11kkF3ne+tK5Hz52IYzyu4fyf27sCJDFGQ6zjgHmDr5BxT7MgJd6Zm3i4w=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.eu;
 spf=pass  smtp.mailfrom=liangma@liangbit.com;
 dmarc=pass header.from=<liangma@liangbit.com>
Received: by mx.zoho.eu with SMTPS id 1733242395615560.8672660190116;
 Tue, 3 Dec 2024 17:13:15 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 16:13:13 +0000
From: Liang Ma <liangma@liangbit.com>
To: =?utf-8?B?546L6aKi?= <howard_wang@realsil.com.cn>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
 "ferruh.yigit@amd.com" <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
 "stephen@networkplumber.org" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
 "thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: About DPDK l3fwd
Message-ID: <Z08uGUEksLFyfsnb@CTQ0WR29WC>
References: <5ac7c2183b4b4cbebff6e36efee37b3e@realsil.com.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <5ac7c2183b4b4cbebff6e36efee37b3e@realsil.com.cn>
X-ZohoMailClient: External
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org

On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 09:45:58AM +0000, 王颢 wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> I have noticed that the performance reports on the official DPDK website predominantly use l3fwd, while we typically utilize pktgen. Out of curiosity, I attempted to replicate the experiments from the performance reports. However, I encountered some issues, as shown in the attached image.
> 
> I ran pktgen on PC1 and l3fwd on PC2. After establishing the connection, I entered the command str on pktgen. It appears that pktgen is able to send and receive packets normally, but there is no output from l3fwd. Based on my understanding, l3fwd should produce some output, correct?
> 
> Could you please share how you usually conduct these tests for your performance reports?
> 
> Thank you for your assistance.
> 
> Best regards,
> Howard Wang
> 
> [cid:image001.png@01DB3D05.9B91B530]
> 
> [cid:image002.png@01DB3D05.9B91B530]
Hi Howard, 
   You can check out the performance test report. In most cases, the report will include all setup details (including the command line).
Regards
Liang